Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@CrossExamined says : Download FREE Cheat Sheet “The 4-Point Case For Christianity” 👉📱https://cutt.ly/ZYMC4nl>> <<@Aguijon1982 says : If it's ok to have a creator without a creator then it's also ok to have a universe without a creator.>> <<@gi169 says : Thanks CE>> <<@gjr1962 says : God is love. He exist...my only proof is that I feel His presence. This is meaningless. Believe what you want; feel what you feel. Pray for understanding. Or don't.>> <<@theparodychannel7842 says : The universe appears the designed! The picture appears to move! The earth appears flat the stars appear to b small n the moon appears to b closer to me than Australia! All cus im literally basing things on appearance!>> <<@copernicus99 says : No cosmic mind is needed to explain DNA. Random molecular combinations are thrown against the wall. And whatever sticks (led to self-replicating entities) is what we observe. We don't observe what didn't stick. Or if we do, those are the fossils of variants that went extinct.>> <<@lisaedgett8714 says : Those Ai robots... all chance... they came from fish. Little ridiculous when i suggest that no?>> <<@HookaSmokingCaterpillar says : I love nonsense!!!>> <<@GODISALIVE.. says : What about how Gods name is in our DNA>> <<@curiouscurious6558 says : what is his def of intelligent being.>> <<@DRchachaaaaa says : I think it’s fair to assume that chaos can’t create order by chance and replicate a certain creation consistently accidentally.>> <<@1laforees9 says : DNA is made up>> <<@trepinne6840 says : Yes thats because we already know that humans writes things in the sand. What is specified complexity?>> <<@electric_thunder says : without proof i wont believe any of this nonsense. if we cant detect it, therefore it doesnt exist. microbes didnt exist until we invented microscopes.>> <<@creazian23 says : Busted!! Telescopes!! That's definitely what he meant to say...>> <<@jeffdavis7543 says : Frank thanks for being smart and defending Godly things.>> <<@marioserafin3177 says : I once observed the wind blowing leaves off of an acorn tree, the leaves spelt "the cat sat on the mat" amazed i looked away an when i looked back it was gone. I wonder how many trillions of years of chance made this happen and at the time that i was looking in that direction?. Such is it with life on this planet everything to support it in the universe is just perfect. We also see that life evolved suddenly during the cambrian period, then nothing. I wonder why?>> <<@TheWowster says : I mean isn’t it common sense that complex beings such as ourselves can exchange messages in a way no other living beings can 🤷🏾‍♂️.. written words are just one of our most common ways of communicating. so it would make sense that if our DNA was WRITTEN ON then it had to come from the creator.>> <<@chiayang5889 says : Simply, “The wisdom of men is foolishness to God.” Where is this verse in the New Testament? I take it as men of best minds take what is already existed and mixed them up and say, “Behold I make something new”. The truth is take water as an example. Water has three atoms, 2 hydrogen and 1 oxygen. Men learn how to split them into use resources and make hydrogen into a bomb. The point is these elements were not created by men but have already existed before them. God Almighty created water and how our body DNA will use them. It all correlates by laws and action.>> <<@SupremeSquiggly says : I am not surprised Turek would resort to a form of the watch maker analogy which has been shown to be a terrible argument. Low bar, but it was one of Frank’s best arguments so far. 😂>> <<@Leonhart_93 says : The argument doesn't hold, because even if you assume some extraterrestrial created us, then by the same token someone had to have created them. At some point, one of them will be the originals, without any creators.>> <<@Cocytus127 says : The Watchmaker's Fallacy is so readily deployed by these charlatans.>> <<@levongevorgyan6789 says : DNA isn't a message. It's an arrangement of biochemicals. An arrangement that can be altered throug mutation and selected for through natural and sexual selection.>> <<@armyguy4124 says : I like this man of God because he is wise and he helps person's like myself who have a lesser intellect understand complicated issues>> <<@robertwelsh4094 says : Courtroom evidence showed "Intelligent design" is just a direct substitute for creationism. Religious believers incorrectly using some of the terms of science is always amusing. This guy is low end even among televangelists.>> <<@michaelwells1783 says : I am astounded at how many people Don’t Read The Most Sold Book In The World . The King James Bible. Adams rib was the best language that could be used back then RIB IS THE HEALEX CURVE = DNA . EZE 1 . UFOs . Answering All questions The Bible . Study to show thyself rightly Approved .>> <<@xxxcarpfishing1657 says : Thats disingenuous the code is not like your saying 🙄>> <<@kathyrogers2065 says : And this is why Darwins Theory was dismissed by Darwin before his death. It is DNA, not primordial slime. There is a Creator and his name is Yahweh.>> <<@leonardshevlin7260 says : The "design" of the human body proves evolution and disproves intelligent design. Our eyes have blind spots. Our enormous brains mean we are born prematurely or hurt/harm/kill our mothers during childbirth. Ectopic pregnancy reveals a design flaw, as do hernias, scurvy, hemorrhoids, urinary tract infections, choking on food, etc.>> <<@ThatGuy-nt4jv says : Please don't listen to Dr Turek on anything remotely scientific, he is incredibly dishonest and projects his bias in a breath taking way. His only position is to assert something and provide zero evidence or sensible reasoning for it>> <<@gerrydescoteaux4721 says : Talk about idiotic understanding of DNA and science.>> <<@blackmullet6237 says : No, we go **fingersnap** mutations over billions of years. This is just a huge baseless assumption that DNA wasn't mutated naturally just like every element was created, by accidents over time.>> <<@blackmullet6237 says : Well that would be true if we could change the laws of physics as if we write in sand. It is possible for a human to write in sand, that's why we assume a human did it. But it is impossible to change the laws of physics. It's really a thoughless argument that stems from nothing but his hope of noone being able to pinpoint these differences. Unfortunately for him, this is recorded.>> <<@BigShannon says : SETI is a money scam>> <<@bendrew6356 says : Trash>> <<@jacobcollins2861 says : We haven't come close to creating anything remotely as complex in information storage density as DNA. Even if we did create a super quantum flash drive, all we would prove is it takes intelligence to create life. Fools will have you believe that books write themselves over millions of years with no evidence. Fools will ignore the obvious. Fools will ignore the assumptions in their argument (which is scientific faith). Don't be a fool, search for God with all your heart and He will reveal Himself to you. You were created with purpose and wonderfully designed. You are not a random accident and if you believe that all you are is chemicals bouncing off each other affected by temperature and pressure, then you are a fool. Your belief system requires more faith than mine.>> <<@crocheting-around-the-planet says : Yes>> <<@Cantatio411 says : Time is a funny thing, most people don't have the comprehension or the notion to think on the scale required for something to emerge. Practical experiment: Watch a 1 minute hour glass, then a 5m, 15m, 1H. When did you give up? Now imagine sitting and watching a 1 week, or 1 month hour glass. No one would, because the human mind doesn't operate on that level. That doesn't mean that other things can. Think about your own life, think about the last year, how many memories can you recall? What about the last 2? 5? 10? Do you remember the whole year of when you where 13? TL:DR The human mind is limited, most of those limits are imposed by ourselves. Think bigger.>> <<@stayahnwoke says : Evolution is retarded>> <<@dragonhearthx8369 says : Evolution is believing that if you shake a box of rocks long enough you will get a functional pocket watch.>> <<@jasoncarto says : The biggest argument against intelligent design is, ironically, artificial intelligence. Because actual artificial intelligence is not designed. It is created through what is called machine learning, which is essentially an evolutionarily process.>> <<@Mark-in1im says : Mankind is so evil that the more we know about the infinite complexity of living cells, DNA, the universe, etc., the more likely people are to pretend that God doesn't exist.>> <<@lorenzeberle987 says : You don't know it comes from a mind. You assume. Not more not less.>> <<@pinealglandeyestgaming245 says : The old teological argument. If our dna is intelligent design, how is myself born half deaf, intelligent design?>> <<@stonemaze9925 says : Humans always look for a pattern....>> <<@hannotn says : I cooked a complicated recipe once. Ergo, God exists.>> <<@BUCKS1987 says : We have evidence of all the other desighn>> <<@peteraschaffenburg1 says : Oh Frank! Even if the earth and life on it didn’t come up the way science thinks, you still haven’t proven your “creator” or god. Especially not the one from the Bible. One of many gods created by man. What your actually saying is; I don’t know how it happened so I’m going to assume it was god. It’s a silly and false argument. If you don’t accept knowledge, at least say you don’t know.>> <<@Manuka_888 says : Lol. Dude actually thinks DNA are letters.>> <<@Go8997 says : Argument of ignorance>>