Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@mikewatts7979 says : I disagree with Mr. Keller; he does want to do all of the talking.>> <<@Mr.PotatoAWESOMEFitnessTips says : 1:25:42>> <<@Mr.PotatoAWESOMEFitnessTips says : 1:27:01>> <<@Mr.PotatoAWESOMEFitnessTips says : If God is within truth, and AI can reason empirical reality better than us, it's only bringing us closer to God.>> <<@Mr.PotatoAWESOMEFitnessTips says : Being a fan of Jim made me come here, finally realizing he's JACKED just added 2.000.000.000 times 2.000.000.000 more respect points to him. HAHAHAA>> <<@pearlh1051 says : This guy is the worse interviewee>> <<@haydenwayne3710 says : Ultimately the nightmare reality is our apparent obsolessence!>> <<@haydenwayne3710 says : Fascinating episode!!!! What is interesting is Jim Keller to Jordan and Jonathan is a microcasum of what A.I. will be to Humans.>> <<@gary_michael_flanagan_wildlife says : Hi Jordan, do you have the website to where we can find the LLM for the King James Bible you spoke about prior? I would like to use it if it’s for public use. Thanks!❤>> <<@frankfunkpt5321 says : Great Guest Thank you. And thank you for not interrupting him so much, after all he is the expert we want to hear from. Jonathan Pageau‘s concern: „Are we creating God?“ So far „God“ has created/manifested It self out if carbon into all that is. So why would A.I. not also be God‘s continues way to manifest and create It self? Again thank you for the, at least for me, rare opportunity to hear this guest speak and share his thoughts.>> <<@MrCookding says : wonderful interview>> <<@SetMeFree says : AI can make a bulletproof story with the most insane twist possible, and do it perfectly in an infinite amount of variations. Swallow that pill. haha.>> <<@SetMeFree says : GIK Acoustics can put all your art onto corning 703 rigid fiberglass that you can place in all your rooms of your house that will provide sound treatment in which will make any space you record content more sound friendly.>> <<@LockDoPop says : Usually I don't comment but this was actually one of the coolest interviews I've ever seen>> <<@tristantinnon1926 says : Eliezer Yudkowsky should meet with this individual and 'im rotzeh Ha-Shem, speak publicly on this topic. Two people on world with attitudes towards this stuff I intuitively want to credit and respect are Yudknowsky and this...I wanna say strong generality-based optimist...As always, I want to come at this like GRIMES seems to in her videos. Turns out God is a Goddess, and that's the Good and the Bad news.>> <<@Tinyjb0 says : "I don't wanna do all the talking" Proceeds to talk the whole time and won't let Jonathan Pageau finish his sentences.>> <<@NdxtremePro says : I like Keller, but the first part of the discussion, he just kept sidestepping Pageau 's idea, then explaining that yes the AI will always depend on the interaction of humans as their basis because of the initial state of training being propagated.>> <<@jlbroddle19 says : Narcissists creating artificial narcissists. That’s gonna end well>> <<@StarDollar says : Mr Keller is a CPU God. But he exists. Unlike all other.>> <<@context_eidolon_music says : When you learn what shinola is, but not the other thing, you get Pederstein.>> <<@wendellbabin6457 says : 1:21:55 An interesting possibility to me is that parents and/or Grandparents could leave an AI to their kids that may have been trained in several domain spaces. It would finally be not only passing down the Knowledge of Culture, but maybe even the Wisdom. If the Reptilian, sorry meant to say Elon, actually pulls off neuralink you could almost do this live I am guessing at some point. No reason to think this won't migrate to some sort of cloud existence that was networked through Starlink ir SatPhones or dermal implants powered by Cosmic Rays and Fairy Farts. Who knows what 10 billion humans, maybe 1 in 100K is an Elon Musk or an Einstein. Educated in a global space, online, from some of the best on Earth. A worldwide Montessori School. Maybe more folks with that sort of opportunity, FINALLY, uncontaminated by Neo-Marxist Feminist "ISH". Or any other "flavor". Finally enough real, tailored, education to bring everyone as far as they CAN go. Or WANT to.>> <<@wendellbabin6457 says : 1:18:42 Those two images describe two different technologies that will serve the two different types of people in the world that Jim just described. Like always, there are people that contribute to, and shape the future the best way they know how. Then there are the sheeple who just exist and wait for the beast to tell them what to do in return for "bread and circuses".>> <<@wendellbabin6457 says : 1:10:22 I wonder more about the Dark AI Web. Always same question. Is the fox going to get the chickens. Doesn't really matter if you catch the fox after the fact. There could be another AI fox in microseconds. To the point of gridlock?>> <<@martinarcher1503 says : flabby, an unhealthy pallor to his face, giant puffy bags under his eyes. This is a guy who lives in front of code on a screen and doesn't live a real, healthy life. He and his programmer ilk will kill us all with his complacent, religious belief in the power of computers. Never imagining what Putin or Xi would do if they had 100 times more power than the rest of the world. What can go wrong, will go wrong, no matter his vacuous blind optimism that AI will be beneficial to us humans>> <<@martinarcher1503 says : this guy Jim Keller is precisely the reason why AI will kill us all sooner or later. 39.15 "humans and AI at some point will have to find some calculation of self regulation" ignoring the fact that AI will in all likelihood decide that humans are too unpredictable and often do stupid things - which it never does - and will move to get humans out of their way. Then at 39.24 makes the specious argument that, like AI, "lots of humans don't feel pain either." He repeatedly dismisses Pageau's arguments with blithe disregard to the patently obvious existential threat of the AI's he posits. What can go wrong, will go wrong, and AI destroying us is, I would say inevitable. Instead of all the effort being put into creating it, we should be working out ways to stop it. Nothing, in all human history is more important than that.>> <<@justaguy328 says : Jim's inability to grasp the deeper level questions that they were asking was extremely frustrating. It's kind of scary that those deep, VERY VERY VERY important questions didn't even seem to register to him. That's not a good sign if people like him are at the helm. It seems to be a lot of highly narrow knowledge in this one field with zero wisdom behind it.>> <<@minecraftermad says : really should've talked about reward functions, and the infinite paperclip machine.>> <<@justaguy328 says : It will definitely be involved in the rise of the anti-christ. A tech god will be the only God that will get the atheistic globalist types to bend the knee.>> <<@kellyblanton6969 says : I don't see the WHY??? in AI. I would rather have a human bf. So many very extra wealthy people will have the 1rst round of AI's while the rest of us will be wondering if we are talking to a person or an IA. The only thing or what makes the AI so "SMART" IS the memory. And people who want to get rid ox of religion will work on not giving the AI any memory or pictures of CHRIST ..religion will be on its way out . It's so extremely important to raise our children to know God and they will teach their children about Christ this is NOT a good thing. I also think this will be taking jobs away from the people who still have jobs. Also we the collective have been told for many yrs. There too many people living on this planet now they want to take up valuable space on earth we should send the AI's to the galaxy...>> <<@Sevalecan says : I am watching the video because I saw Jim Keller, but it's great that this is actually Jordan Peterson's channel.>> <<@Nyyre says : 1:16:40 J Pageau talks ab biblical images of technology in Book of Revelation. The finality / totality of all things. The dragon that is worshiped and consumes, or the shining central city>> <<@chargv says : Loved the interaction between young and older Keller.>> <<@michaelbannon6903 says : Humans are dangerously non self regulating at times. What happens when AI has those same reactions>> <<@michaelbannon6903 says : Jim appeared to me at times as a creator so protective of his creation to blatantly disavow the belief that his creation could ever possibly be a threat>> <<@taraleemoore5199 says : We are made of clay, in Nebacudnezars (sp) dream in the book of Daniel ,the feet were made of clay and iron mixed. in the statue representing the subsequent kingdoms that is AI mixed with man in my determination. Brian in Arizona>> <<@jaysmith378 says : You have had this egotistical jackass before, and he would not let the other guest get a word in. Not watching another interview like that! FIND BETTER PEOPLE TO INTERVIEW!>> <<@truthspeaks1776me says : While AI is available to average people now, what happens when those who hold the keys to this AI power withhold that power from the rest of the world? Those who have access to it will truly be superhumans compared to everyone else. The difference between the elites of the world and the average person now, vast as it is, will be nothing compared to what could be in that scenario. What incentive do those who have this power have to share that power when they have this "godlike" potential which they could hoard to themselves?>> <<@ExecutiveZombie says : BRUH.>> <<@ExecutiveZombie says : MEH!!!!>> <<@roddumlauf9241 says : Can AI read the author's intended allegory and typology ? and how many levels of depth of meaning can AI interpret ?>> <<@ShaileshDagar says : The model in my brain keeps predicting that the other guest will speak, but then Jim interrupts them, creating a discrepancy in my prediction and the actual outcome, causing an anxiety-like negative emotion forcing me to correct my model for a better prediction.>> <<@clh4121 says : He seems a bit naive. He can’t picture things going sideways with AI. It’s like saying that government is inherently good 😬>> <<@jonbarnett9363 says : Electric cars are not environmentally great (around 55 min). So some of the assumptions being made are a little odd. I love to see the discussion.>> <<@lilrosebush says : 50:30 Jim’s comment about energy and saying “what’s next, we run out of matter?” Is crazy. You can’t say that when an superhumanly smart ai can predict if that could actually happen. What’s to stop the AI from secretly culling people to stop that from happening>> <<@lilrosebush says : 44:00 I think Jim is mis characterizing jon’s argument. How does he know that super smart AI won’t calculate that humans will EVENTUALLY become an issue if it doesn’t intervene in some way or destroy us. I don’t mean wipe out all humans but influence us in a way that leads to our own self destruction.>> <<@lilrosebush says : It’s seems like the anxiety that the ai would feel is from being destroyed or the likelihood of it being destroyed if it doesn’t produce the right results. If the ai is learning from humans then wouldn’t it be reasonable to assume that ai would receive this trait but have the ability to suppress it due to it not having to ACT of those ideas/feelings? Am I making a huge leap in logic or no?>> <<@alangiaconelli2919 says : No AI cannot do what it wants to do. When a man wants to do something it is new, never been before and so there is no relevance. Mans doing is creation based on subjective not the objective of everything seen around us. Its when we mix those two ways of thinking as the same we start to not understand anymore. We then say A I is smarter than man.>> <<@newengland1666 says : Can someone edit this to only have the parts where Jim Keller speaks? Much thanks in advance❤>> <<@DonG-1949 says : 14:50 they're... they're BRRAAAAAAPPP meta-gists>> <<@kaylah662 says : Jim may be extremely intelligent and good at his job, but several points: 1. His way of taking of talking over people frustrated me through the entire thing. 2. He holds the opinion that AI would not likely want to harm us…. Saying something like, “well humans don’t want to exterminate all cats”. Firstly, cats are our PETS. But if cats were to overrun the earth, change the earth’s environment by polluting, exact violence on eachother, argue with us, claim to be somehow better or more holy/natural than us, and try to control us, then yeah, we might think about exterminating all cats. We already try to exterminate the chipmunks making homes under our houses. The snakes in our yards. The spiders in our garages. Because we think our lives are more important and that we have more purpose… and we think these creatures interfere. I’ll leave it there. But several ideas were proposed to Jim as to the dangers of AI that I feel he completely turns a blind eye toward. He may understand computers but it does not seem he understands people very well.>>