<<@JosephBeno-y1z
says :
Experiments were a waste of time and money.
>>
<<@TinyLordCthulhu
says :
Got second-hand shame watching this. Myth busted (by being inaccurate)
>>
<<@johnaweiss
says :
Dumbest episode. Who cares if you hit a target? Let's see some explosions!
>>
<<@christopherbentley6647
says :
Weakest video. Put a rocket on it
>>
<<@JohnSmith-vz8pc
says :
Put a 50m bungee cord on the lower end of the rod, and then anchor it to a point in the middle of the building!!! š
>>
<<@JohnSmith-vz8pc
says :
The raSSkis also have great difficulty hitting anything with an "Oreshnik" IRBM, which they claim comes in at Mach 10. š
>>
<<@samixine9470
says :
The guy who makes a 5 minute worth content for 25 minutes.
>>
<<@bashkillszombies
says :
Veritasium showing us he's a bit of an idiot and more into doing things for views than educating.
>>
<<@ErLe-u6s
says :
Stupidly inaccurate test
>>
<<@SackofDooDoo
says :
8:14 for Adam Savage hello-goodbye. You're welcome.
>>
<<@zaitcev0
says :
Reminder: this was filmed before Oreshnik was deployed and employed in combat. Ted Postol presented some interesting graphs in that regard, showing that an Oreshnik rod expends more than 90% of its energy in the atmosphere. The remaining 10% is what does the devastating damage.
>>
<<@gilgermesch
says :
Missed opportunity to call these "hot rods"
>>
<<@blackriveroutfitters7185
says :
With AI, targeting computers and possibly thruster adjustments by built in thrusters it could be done.
>>
<<@robin_freedom
says :
Worst planning. This could have been way more fun. Veritaseum should reboot this experiment from a stable platform, such as a high-rise building, a tower, the world's tallest cranes, the world's highest bridges, or steep mountains. Using a projectile with fins. No wobbly helicopters for drops.
>>
<<@SteveBlues
says :
they should have shortened the cable in order to reduce the weight swinging under the chopper
>>
<<@ssbb9972
says :
If the rod swings you had a higher likelihood of landing on the targets if your arenāt directly over it. Positions the helicopter not over but behind the target , swing the rod lightly and forward and then drop when it has forward momentum. Find where it lands and adjust the position or swing after words
>>
<<@codyleonard699
says :
I feel like the deployment system was the problem in this experiment. Tying a weight with essentially a rope, swinging free in the wind at hundreds of meters in the air, is never gonna hit where you want it to, even if your positioning is perfect. The swinging gives it lateral momentum before you even drop it, so itās gonna follow an arc to the ground, instead of falling straight down. You need a rigid deployment system, like a tube that holds the rod still until itās released.
>>
<<@luecam8704
says :
so drones didnt exist 3 years ago?
>>
<<@Sjsjsj-t3e
says :
Moab mentioned
>>
<<@raulpfilms
says :
nice video :)
>>
<<@AJ_ghdhejsien
says :
While this was fun to do, not the usual science I expect from this channel. With modern GPS and fins the rods from god could surely work.. the B2 flies after all. What is the point of this test.. weights and sand is not 10x speed of sound tungsten telephone poles against citys. Again fun but completely irrelevant
>>
<<@AtkinWhat
says :
I think with a shorter rope and a cheap laser pointer you could have improved accuracy.
>>
<<@dragonturtle2703
says :
Easy solution though (to most space engineering impracticalities): build it in space with asteroid mining. Not as simple as it sounds, but what is, and it would solve so many problems back on Earth.
>>
<<@atticusrussell1225
says :
Needs a CCAS and gos guidance kit on it (like JDAM) for this test
>>
<<@luiscifuentes5245
says :
G.I. Joe Retaliation plot
>>
<<@iamhugry
says :
āThey are not bombsā sounds so menacing for no reason
>>
<<@DominicAbeita-y8g
says :
Is your producer married??
>>
<<@genmasaotome3503
says :
Couldn't you guys tried it with multiple ones on one heli ride? and adjust after each one? Oooh.. it is pretty heavy...
>>
<<@its_meeeeeeeeee2603
says :
No glide fins , thats why...
>>
<<@bazoo513
says :
5:10 - _Professional sandcastle builders_ ?!? What's next, professional ice cream eaters? 3:30 - A piece of trivia: "brilliant pebbles" were an evolution os "smart rocks". 1:15 - _That_ Jerry Pournelle?
>>
<<@Vegai7
says :
I think rods from god are about to be true, specially after STARSHIP attains re-usability. 200 tons to orbit and easily do atleast 50 projectiles weighing a Ton each. With some heat shields and light guidance additions, a 6 meter rod would reach ground at mach 4~ with 500 to 600 kg of TNT as explosive power.
>>
<<@Nastyasscan
says :
Thor has absolutely nothing to do with Lightning, he is the God of Thunder. Zeus, and only Zeus shoots lightning bolts down from the heavens. There two totally different mythologies, ones Norse and ones Greek.
>>
<<@TaiSatterfield-m5s
says :
14:48 the pool is still square 15:08 the pool is smashed up. Why you doing stupid stuff man , you must think your viewers are idiots?
>>
<<@Rangerness
says :
No guide fins? No wonder yours didn't work.
>>
<<@AldrichCarrasco
says :
Everyone should hit the "dislike" button; this clown knows absolutely nothing about weapons. This year, the kinetic weapon has been successfully used in Venezuela and Iran.
>>
<<@aarondanaher9426
says :
Someone's gotta make an edit of this vid where they cut out all of the military context and just make it look like they got that whole setup just to smash a sandcastle city.
>>
<<@piffman711
says :
Iām assuming the government has the technology to actually guide them and not just shove them out the back of a rocket trunk and hope for some good wind. Literally everything he said is possibleā¦.. even the budget.
>>
<<@TheScondComming
says :
Thor did not throw lightning from the sky thatās Zeus from Greek or Roman mythology. Thor would strike the heaven, enemy or something with his hammer for what ever reason. The sparks from the hammer hitting an anvil would create lightning. I do not think it was controlled at all, more as an after effect.
>>
<<@baradam1153
says :
The first assumption was the accuracy of the commercial GPS, not so much; this is, at best, 10-20 feet. If you had considered a commercial-grade device, youāre within inches or surveying-type equipment within a gnat, which requires land-based references. End of story, the accuracy between two devices can be 40ā at the worst. So, throwing in the tail of the strap and the inertia of the swinging object with a little edge from the GPS, you were right on. Great fun and loved the demo, worth every second.
>>
<<@auntoneyofuntease6704
says :
So, Reagan and Bush considered this goofy idea. Go figure.ššš
>>
<<@daltonskates
says :
The shot from the heli @15:00 was awesome, there was a rainbow for a second.
>>
<<@monvalleytruth5111
says :
Definitely should have went up higher in the sky
>>
<<@Freddabeast-lx6bd
says :
This is the thing from cod ghosts
>>
<<@AverageLoserMan
says :
this has to be one of the worst tests ive ever seen
>>
<<@FXtrtzor
says :
And here we go: ORESHNIC
>>
<<@danielmicheni6769
says :
This is. A very complex way of trying to control ppl
>>
<<@brandonwagner9525
says :
Tungsten rods from lower orbit sounds devastating. Getting them into orbit sounds rather difficult.
>>
<<@curiousbear7
says :
Should have had a collab with @markrober
>>
<<@Birdmam2021
says :
The experiment may have been considered a failure, but this is the second time Iāve watched all the way through, and isnāt that the real success?
>>
<<@xaosnox
says :
I love the accent! He says, "Rah-id of Gah-id". Every vowel is a dipthong. "They" is "theh-ee" etc. So cool. Where is that from? And how did you find this huge project?! It's EXTREMELY impressive. I would have been MILES away after I saw that first one swinging like that. Who in their right mind puts themselves underneath that helicopter looking up, waiting to be squished like a cockroach. RUN!
>>
NEXT VIDEO
>>