Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@CrossExamined says : FREE Download of sermon I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist!: 👉📱https://cutt.ly/cInI1eo>> <<@chuckscott4661 says : This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. 🙄>> <<@UGOEBENAJA says : Which strong evidence did you present that was denied? Assumption is not evidence too.>> <<@nelson_rebel3907 says : This was the most evasive side step of a question I've ever seen. And after that you resort to logically fallacy and name calling. Then after that you're relying on testimony from people who probably also claim to have anal probes from aliens and swear they've seen bigfoot and met the leprechaun at the end of the rainbow with a pot of gold. Extraordinary evidence is not fanciful belief of "trust me bro I saw it" If you can show or ask god to make it evident it would be comically easy to do so.>> <<@BestBackingTracks says : Embarrassing.>> <<@DeconvertedMan says : Please cite 1 pier reviewed paper that has an NDE person explain what is above them on a shelf, writen down on a paper above them, or other such test that has been done like that. Let me know when you have that.>> <<@darrylelam256 says : I have a cat as a pet - Its a very common thing have a cat as cats are a very common type of pet. It doesn't take much in the way of evidence to show that I do indeed have a cat. I have a rare breed of cat as a pet - While not common to have a rare breed of cat we know its something that happens often enough to not be very odd. It would require a little more evidence to show I have a rare breed of cat but not by much. I have a rare white tiger as a pet - That's a pretty out there claim as while white tigers exist having a tiger of any kind is very uncommon. I mean it does happen now and then by people who clearly aren't thinking right. But we know it is possible although the amount of evidence you would need to show the truth of your claim is not much higher. I have an invisible fire breathing white tiger as a pet - That's a pretty extraordinary claim as to our knowledge tigers aren't invisible or fire breathing. This would require some extraordinary to support such a wild claim that doesn't match what we know about tigers.>> <<@rachelhayhurst-mason7846 says : Once someone says "I don't believe other people's stories about God, I'll only believe in God if I experience Him myself" they are transparent as air. The next logical step to that argument is "If what I experienced is something I can't explain by logic I have to admit that my experience is still unexplainable, so I can't trust my own interpretation of it." If someone doesn't want to believe in God simply because they don't like Him, no amount of evidence will change their mind. It's the heart that is the real issue. Only surrendering to God with your heart will solve that problem.>> <<@majm4606 says : Doesn't this seem really dishonest to people? The claim "god(s) exist" is a huge claim -- it's a lot like the claim gravity exists, or that the big bang happened. It needs strong evidence. Well with those scientific topics (gravity, big bang) we have _mountains_ of evidence: actual observations of reality indicating both are real. With gods, nothing is presented here except vague mockery and the implication that there's as much evidence of god as for those other things. Well there just isn't. Imagine you have a friend Tim: * Tim believes in the Anti-Deity Donut which prevented all gods. * You ask Tim to prove it exists. * Tim gestures around vaguely, saying _everything_ proves the Donut. * What has Tim done here? He's made an implied claim that "the Donut caused everything". * Can Tim support that claim with evidence? He can't. * Well to me that means Tim can't logically treat "everything" as proving the Donut, right? Well one of the more common responses I get when I ask people for evidence of god is they gesture around to things like "everything" and call it evidence, but at no point have I seen a theist prove a god (A) exists and (B) caused everything. Yet they'd need _both_ A and B in order for "everything" to actually be evidence of a god.>> <<@Nekulturny says : How typically dishonest of both of you. I wish I could say I was surprised. Tell me more about how you know about how I think better than I do Gary. Seriously, when I first heard Frank, I thought he was the most insufferably smug apologist I'd ever heard (compared to WLC, thats saying something), but Gary has him beat clearly. You're the new champ, bud.>> <<@bruhmoment341 says : I would if you had extraordinary evidence, for instance if you say you won the lottery, that is a extraordinary claim right? Then show me that lottery ticket, it’s as easy as that,>> <<@timeshark8727 says : Hahaha. Gotta love it when people pretend to know what others think and believe better than they do. There is very little that demonstrates the utter weakness and pathetic quality of someone's argument better than watching that person spend more time playing pretend, putting up smokescreens and making excuses for why their arguments fail then presenting their actual arguments/evidence.>> <<@marekkedzierski8237 says : If NDEs are such great evidence do they also prove Hinduism or Islam? People raised in muslim countries tend to have Islam related NDEs and people in India tend to have Hindu themed NDEs.>> <<@nagranoth_ says : So... rather than providing evidence he spends his time lying about atheists and throwing insults, then wastes your time with NDE's something that actually has been studied... by someone who wanted them to point to supernatural stuff, and they failed even after dropping proper methodology and changing the way they worked halfway through the study. And this utter failure is his best so-called evidence... no wonder he has to lie about atheists. Anyone with any care about what is true is automatically his enemy...>> <<@VenusDescending says : “In order to accept your claim. I require extraordinary evidence. Which is evidence I will deny no matter how strong it is.” This is a logically incoherent statement. Habermass’ cultural chauvinism never fails to surprise me. That one person could be so deeply in a bubble… reflects poorly on humanity.>> <<@EhvulAtheist says : And exactly why would the argument of a hateful member of a death cult hold any merrit?>> <<@crishl19 says : I have a doubt. I recently saw a man talking about how crazy is to think God will speak on your head , that if you hear a voice telling you kill your son , you must be crazy . he referenced the Abraham story story? dont remember wich person God told him to kill his son. Plus he also mentioned that if there is God so good , why he killed so many people during the flood . if they were imperfect people why in first place killed eva and adam back then and evoid all the issues that came after . Plus if he is love why after dead if you were not good then you gonna carry on suffering in hell. for me as a believer in God I alway think about why he wants us to keep supperfing in hell. life is hard , we are alreay corrupt and imprefect and if you feel to get to the point of going to heaven due to your imprefection why keep this soul in enternal suffering ! I dont undertand God in this aspect.>> <<@Gek1177 says : It's pretty simple. People mean that really unlikely things require really strong evidence. Like if a bank gets robbed in the night and someone tell you that they read that it was the bank manager then you can probably just believe them. But if in the same scenario someone tells you that they read online that free masons used a secret wormhole into the bank you should probably not just take their word for it. That's why Hitchens rejected the many Christian claims, they are mostly fantastic but are supported by very little evidence.>> <<@Matthew_Holton says : Frank, If someone came to you and said they had a friend who was raised from the dead, could perform miracles and was the son of the Egyptian god Ra, how much evidence would they need to provide to convince you they spoke the truth? ..Now you know what extraordinary means.>> <<@martinlag1 says : I think Habermas was unfair in this answer. He claims NDE is wonderful evidence and if you dare to disagree, you are being emotional. I think Habermas is rather condescending of doubters and dismissive of the question.>> <<@555orestes says : *Any* claim requires proof, forget about extraordinary. I used to be an emotional atheist because I was lied to for 20 years. But I’ve outgrown that. I have nothing against believing in God. I just don’t believe in the Christian God. I don’t believe Jesus Christ was a human being. Not one iota of proof. This delusion has been the root of war, pain, genocide and more all over the world for 2,000 years.>> <<@chosenone8408 says : The atheist claim “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” is a set up. The atheist is setting up the Christian, so that the Christian can’t possibly provide the ridiculous amount of evidence the atheist is demanding. They know this. This way, they can act all high and mighty when the Christian says, “I can’t provide that much evidence.” The atheist walks away pretending they’ve given a knockout blow. This is why I use the same tactics on them. Just apply their claim to itself. When they demand unrealistic evidence, demand they in turn provide unrealistic evidence for their beliefs.>> <<@adlanier2 says : I only want to apply the same research and study to the claims of the Bible as I do to every other piece of information. That doesn’t feel too extraordinary but religious people seem to think so>> <<@harryfaber says : Question for all the Christians that read this, especially if they are priests or ministers. Is it ever acceptable to say to an atheist 'you are just a dick'?>> <<@ozowen5961 says : This is nonsense. When people ask for extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims they are not necessarily being emotional nor are they going to deny by default. This is not an honest approach to the subject. I am a Christian and I find this whole approach of pretending to know the other person's attitude and beliefs and state of mind offensive. I work in caring professions and if I took this person's attitude to my clients I would necessarily be causing havoc and pain in their lives and would correctly lose my job for that behaviour. If a claim is extraordinary and the person asking for evidence is someone who needs evidence, then it might be wise to accept that the evidence for things like the Resurrection are less than strong. I personally would not go anywhere NDEs as an evidence base. I think they add nothing to the discussion.>> <<@RangerRyke says : Hahaha he had one job, answer the question.>> <<@TheContrarian32 says : Leave it to apologist to twist and turn to avoid the obvious.>> <<@frankcardano4142 says : @0:52 “And let me tell you the reason you’re not going to believe” The words of someone who has constructed a false world different from reality.>> <<@roman_kofyno says : Problem is people many times don´t know real meaning of word "evidence" and are confusing it with something, what evidence isn´t and where REAL evidence is, think there is not evidence... interpretation isn´t facts, and facts aren´t interpretation.>> <<@steveprofiler says : If christians claim to know truth they should obligate themselves to have quality assurance by praying they want to go to the hell they say they believe in if they are wrong. Right?>> <<@mediaphile says : Regardless of the quality of the answer, what a smug response.>> <<@000FireRainHavoc000 says : There is evidence for the spirit world. Watch T.A.P.S. or Ghost Adventures.>> <<@Theo_Skeptomai says : YES! But let's forgo that for now. How about any one of you Christians present ONE DEMONSTRABLE FACT that suggests the god of your devotion is a _reality._ Start THERE.>> <<@flynnrider2871 says : What happened in the claim is the evidence. If Jesus was indeed dead and he did in fact rise from the dead…what more proof do you need. If I died and was in the ground for days and came back with all injuries gone what more proof would one need>> <<@Scorpion-my3dv says : A perfect example of 'you can take the horse to water but you can't make him drink'>> <<@nothingbutthetruth613 says : So forget extraordinary evidence. How about ANY evidence? To try and excuse yourself from giving evidence with the excuse that I won't listen anyway is ridiculous. There is no evidence and I've listened to this guy multiple times. He never says anything. Why is he talking about NDE's? What does that have to do with the resurrection of Jesus?>> <<@newcreationinchrist1423 says : Great points guys. Amen 🙂✝️🙏>> <<@sandrajackson709 says : Theists constantly offer the same fallacious reasoning and so called evidence that proves nothing and is speculative at best. Consistently that is the case which has nothing to do with incredulity on our part. Christians know exactly what is extraordinary evidence but just in case any Christian does not. It means do not talk about a god that parted a sea, healed the blind, and raised the dead while coming to me with a damn theory and this "Look around you " bs while expecting me to take that as evidence. If theists are confused as to what constitutes good evidence it's the same standard of evidence theist damand of science Accusing atheist of being incredulous will never cover for the fact that you don' have any evidence to present regardless of whether will would believe it not.>> <<@SK-bw2cv says : Unfortunately most will refuse to believe. That's the reality of the situation.>> <<@zerosteel0123 says : 00:40 exactly 💯>> <<@rockzalt says : I did hear Neil deGrasse Tyson talk of a study done in a hospital that investigated NDE. They would place a sign next to patients with high risk surgeries without informing them. Of those who reported NDE looking down on themselves, none of them saw the sign. With studies like that, NDE are not the slam dunk evidence of an afterlife they are made out to be.>> <<@LawlessNate says : Logical people follow the evidence wherever it leads. Emotional people reject the evidence because of where it leads, hence the fallacious notion of subjectively decided to be "extraordinary" claims now requiring subjectively "extraordinary" evidence.>> <<@aaronmonroe7932 says : If you have faith and evidence, which do you lead with? I'm glad I left faith in the same box I jumped out of. It was my Exodus. And now I see and respect the humanity of others.>> <<@ashwilliams5843 says : they rule out miracles and God from the get-go . . . . We don't even have great evidence for evolution .... they are not sitting on a mountain of evidence .>> <<@thomasharp3246 says : Let's talk about extraordinary claims. Evolution from nothing. A big bang from nothing. Somehow a bang took place with nothing to go bang. Then everything evolved from that. We use logic. God created a universe and fully developed animals and humans with adult intelligence to be able to procreate and survive. That makes sense.>> <<@gorillaz_jbi says : Can you describe how extraordinary claims require more evidence? Shouldn’t mediocre claims require more evidence?>> <<@BerishaFatian says : You cannot convince an atheist whose mindset is that God cannot exist. Anything is possible, but not God.>> <<@Generatorman59 says : NDEs, really? Most Hindus will see Vishnu and get a glimpse of their future life. Most Catholics will see Mary. And most other Christians will see Jesus. Maybe Vishnu, Jesus, and Mary all have an agreement on who they will visit when someone's brain is being deprived of oxygen.>> <<@larzman651 says : That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the LORD JESUS and shalt believe in thy heart that GOD raised him from the dead thou shalt be Saved 🙌 for GOD so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whomsoever believe in him should not perish but have everlasting life 🙌>> <<@Generatorman59 says : I have no idea what evidence it would take to convince me. But if God were real, he would know what it would take. Still waiting.>>