<<@CrossExamined
says :
Listen to full podcast herešš±https://apple.co/3neSAND
>>
<<@gamecrusher2024
says :
Believing that something is true, doesn't make it true.
>>
<<@Exposure_Ministries
says :
Amen šš»šš»
>>
<<@Karson747
says :
So if itās not x itās y??? Bro thatās like saying if 2 + 2 is not 3 then it must be 2
>>
<<@janmeister1271
says :
Its a belief
>>
<<@rogerbee697
says :
Cool. Now who, where, what caused your god to come into existence? (Cue the logic fallacy of special pleadingā¦. And go) God always existed. And you know this.. how? Itās written in a book. How do you know the book is true? The book says the book is true. š¤¦āāļø FFS.
>>
<<@NullHypatheist
says :
Find me ONE astrophysicist or cosmologist who says "space+time+matter had a beginning out of nothing." "It's mind-boggling how finely tuned the universe appears to be." -- When you only have one universe in your sample size, you can't draw this conclusion (honestly anyway). We don't even know if it's possible for the constants/parameters to be anything else, nor do we know the boundaries of "life-permitting".
>>
<<@robertrenfrow8621
says :
Hallelujah Hallelujah Hallelujah!!!
>>
<<@spades9115
says :
It seems that every single atheist has found this video and commented their beliefs
>>
<<@Frognoot
says :
Okay, can just as much say the cause was unconscious force of nature. There, makes as much sense as God. Except with God you're starting with a thing a trillion times more complex and fully functioning as the starting point from nothing.
>>
<<@abbasbeig-LoverOfJesus
says :
So he is still has doubts about God existence?
>>
<<@timothymendez4465
says :
I thank the LORD for you brother glory to His Holy name that he chose to rise you up for such a time as this. Jesus name
>>
<<@voodoochild5440
says :
So something has to have caused 'god' šš
>>
<<@gi169
says :
Thank you CE
>>
<<@bentrider
says :
Nobody knows anything about God. It is all simply hearsay. It is all simply assumption. It is all simply belief.
>>
<<@rm18068
says :
Law of causality only shows the phenomenon in the observable universe have cause-effect relationships. From this simple principle, inferring an specific theistic god involves infinitely complicated mental gymnastics and verbal diarrhoea.š
>>
<<@stephencheung6614
says :
The answer is āI donāt knowā. Not a hairy tooth fairy.
>>
<<@histreeonics7770
says :
For years people have been correctly Turek about the Big Bang theory and for years he keeps on presenting a version of it that is NOT what most scientists describe. That is intentionally repeating a falsehood, that is lying. It is only HIS group that says that the universe began from nothing, and his group does not explain a single thing about the universe's formation, they just claim "God did whatever got done". That is not an explanation.
>>
<<@allofchristforalloflife8437
says :
Why can't we say Roman 1 or Acts 17. God exists because He exists and has made Himself known to everyone who lives.
>>
<<@miguel.ledesmaledesma1790
says :
I have patience for atheism. It is the dumbest belief system in world š. That said,I must,and try (though not enough though)to have patience with atheist themselves independent of their moronic belief as we are all ignorant in one way or another. Albeit most of us are not atheist,and thus not ignorant in this area,and thus donāt have such a monumental blind spot such as atheist do. The height of willful ignorance indeed.
>>
<<@IGotsToKnow2
says :
Why does God have to be contained in His creation to be believed but a painter does not have to be contained in the painting? What created creation if God doesn't exist and how would you know?
>>
<<@IGotsToKnow2
says :
God exists because creation exists. Nothing can't create something. Atheists believe in non-God because creation exists, non-God of the gaps.
>>
<<@samnehme437
says :
Your answer should be because Jesus Christ was sent for our sins from God.
>>
<<@karlhowe5181
says :
I'm a Chirstain but from a logic perspective I think there is a problem with that idea .I agree the more intricate, complex and coherent something is the more systematical the less likely it produced itself BUT if there is a God ( and I say this for argument sake only) then there exist nothing possessing those characteristics as much as him. Cause and effect I think undoubtedly irrefutable so then WHO MADE GOD? PS Please don't respond with the obvious answer he always existed ( though personally I do believe that),cause and effect remember? If that's the answer the same could be said about the universe. So that's not much an answer unless maybe if you can explain it in detail .
>>
<<@LordNinja109
says :
He really did just throw a bunch of crap at the wall to see what sticks. And none of it is new, just rehashed and thrown out with zero changes.
>>
<<@LiamOliver0297
says :
Atheists are people who live comfortably at the peak of the dunning-kruger curve, believing that bigotry towards religion qualifies them as Biblical scholars. Here's an extremely simple challenge which no atheist has ever answered because they simply do not comprehend philosophy and logic: Can you provide a definition, description, or criteria for an existential proof? No atheist has ever been able to answer this question because they literally do not understand it; they have never studied philosophy in their lives. The question can be explained for those who don't understand it, but of course even after that atheists will still not comprehend it. If you are going to demand a proof for the existence of something, for example a historical person, an object in space, or even a god, then it is you who must be able to define the criteria of the proof you require. If you cannot define the criteria of the proof you demand then your demand is entirely specious, unscientific, or intellectually dishonest. Yet even after that direct and clear explanation of the question atheists still dont comprehend because bigots have no use for philosophy. Thus, atheists are the perfect example of the "playing chess with a pigeon" metaphor; they don't understand the rules of logic and philosophy and will drop intellectual nonsense like pigeon poop all over the debate then walk away thinking they won. In other words, it is impossible to win a debate with an atheist for the same reason it's impossible to win a debate with an animal; the intellectual prerequisites simply are not present.
>>
<<@matthewalbury6799
says :
Ok champ Where did U get the hat I want one
>>
<<@Swectorious
says :
Genesis proposes creation from chaos, not nothing. There is no punctuation after genesis one.
>>
<<@jayarenneilson6049
says :
not a shred of evidence your god, if it exists, is the cause.
>>
<<@sherpacool9931
says :
so if you believe in the law of cause and effect, what is the cause of your god?.... science doesnt say something from nothing, your creation story does though. god made it all from what? so nothing right?....anyway the earth was not created in the begining, it wasnt created for 9 billion years after the begining, that we can see.....your story says light came after earth. thats a lie......do yourselves a favor and google a pic of the big bang while we can still see it.
>>
<<@rosemarietolentino3218
says :
Godās children know His voice. Mika 6. The rocks and trees cry out!
>>
<<@educatednumpty71
says :
If you believe in cause and effect, then God must of had a beginning, so who created God?.
>>
<<@colinjava8447
says :
Isn't god also an effect, so needs a cause? It's mind boggling to think how fine-tuned god is as well. So should we just make up another god, that can have created the god we apparently have now? He's just solving a problem by creating a harder problem.
>>
<<@sanjose6018
says :
The conception of God is more philosophically and scientifically SOUND than any other theory that excludes God.
>>
<<@robertjimenez5984
says :
Wait, didnāt this god pup everything from nothing and came from nothing?
>>
<<@binyamincrisostomo9555
says :
Sir , Jesus died in wooden stake,, not a cross, catholic invent that Christ died on a cross, so why do you wear a hat with a cross
>>
<<@skybussey6147
says :
Wait so god must have a god before him? And another before that one? Infinite regress Why not just STOP with what we all KNOW to be true? No need to put god as a first cause definitely not Your god considering a possibility of a god like being you need to prove its YOUR god as well. Could be the Hindu Trimerty could be Greek Panthion Shinto Panthion or Babalonian Panthion as YOUR GOD is very much based on Babylonian gods and Myths such as the lady of the rib the apple of immortality or death, the Glood has some pretty amazing parallels. And that one in the Babylonian actually has Scientific evidence of having happened, back then it was thier whole world16 cubits even has the parallel. Oh but Gilgamesh is in the Bible as being real and Angelic Hero of old So that proves if Yahweh exists the Babylonian gods by extension do as well and they are Older by admission with the whole Hero of Old thing.
>>
<<@marvenlunn6086
says :
Everyone knows the invisible pink unicorn created everything but God men created God because they didn't know of the invisible pink unicorn
>>
<<@monkkeygawd
says :
The Christian god 100% does not exist and there is 0% evidence for him... however, in truth, reality IS GOD. Reality is nondual, so all is in the Mind of God.
>>
<<@seanpittaway5341
says :
So because you don't know, God! That's not how you find the truth! The evidence that you always refer to isn't evidence. Stop lying to people and stop threatening kids it's abuse!
>>
<<@cadenschweer2040
says :
The cosmological argument is such an awful argument for God, firstly it relies on an outdated understanding of causation and additionally commits the fallacy of special pleading, as it still exempts God from the rule that everything in the universe must have a cause. I wonāt get into the flaws of the fine tuning argument.
>>
<<@theneutral1164
says :
So what you are saying is, if something cannot be proved, or have a scientific explanation, we should believe blindly in something that doesnāt make any sense whatsoever and is flawed to endth degree, and yet believing this we need to ignore everything scientifically and biologically that points to your belief being a total fallacy. Great logic š¤”
>>
<<@ziii2098
says :
It's amazing how wrong you are.
>>
<<@cinyarko
says :
Your argument has one fatal flaw - it only works if you completely disregard all the other religions. Because it can be used to justify belief for any god(s). So let me rephrase your question - how can you be sure YOUR version of God exists?
>>
<<@paulcollier968
says :
You were no one to speak for scientists. That's very apparent.
>>
<<@JangersTheDog
says :
YOU HAVE BLIND FAITH and it's okay.
>>
<<@michealcobia7869
says :
He lies and manipulates. No one ever said the universe was made out of nothing. Thereās no such thing as nothing. By definition, nothing becomes some thing when there is light. This is manās definition not sciences. Believe what you want, but you have no more proof than somebody who doesnāt believe.
>>
<<@janbuyck1
says :
Dzjeez, the (not so very ) fine-tuning argument and cosmological argument that has been debunked over and over again...
>>
<<@dennisevans6544
says :
Religion, particularly Christianity is on the decline in intelligent western societies. Itās only poor morons like this guy who are trying to hold the fort which is built on the nonsense of religious superstition.
>>
<<@Xplzit
says :
THIS IS HOW I GOT BACK TO MY FAITH, I loved science and realized I just loved his creationš but now instead of looking at his creation I can't keep my eyes off him
>>
NEXT VIDEO
>>