Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@CrossExamined says : Listen to full podcast here👉📱https://apple.co/3nDRWtq>> <<@TTHubble says : Poor Frank>> <<@SageGreenandCinnamon says : 🤦‍♂️ what a ridiculous video.>> <<@Exposure_Ministries says : Amen>> <<@philb4462 says : Just because testimony is all you can have for the Resurrection, it doesn't mean that the testimony you have is sufficient to justify believing it really happened.>> <<@BlackHat-v4j says : I saw a magical unicorn yesterday and you can say I didn’t because I just said I did in testimony reliable like what apparently the skies never heard of the ability to lie>> <<@timmiller7338 says : Well, all the people that saw him resurrected never denied him again, even until death, and that was about 12 people. Previously Peter and others close to him had doubt. A.D. 2024 A.D. for A.I. ! Praise chant Gregorian chants. There's so much more.. Amen.>> <<@axellludvic3490 says : What if the testimony is flawed?>> <<@mikaeljohansson7921 says : Science don't say that>> <<@Jscott97 says : If you want the most overwhelming evidence of the resurrection outside of the new testament. Research the shroud of turin. Do your due dilegence.>> <<@christianlaraque2234 says : If you are a Christian and could travel back in time.. would you interject and try to stop the crucifixion. Or would you cheer it on, believing sadly that’s it’s an atonement for your “sins”?>> <<@hugostiglitz6914 says : Thars not correct to say you get all your truth from science, you get truth from evidence! Theres no evidence that leads back to jesus first hand. Most of what is written was written long after his death. It would be like there was no documents or anything written about WW1 and you started writing now. How accurate do you think it would be??>> <<@Demonoicgamer666 says : I’m sorry but if someone came up to me and said they witnessed a physical impossibility happen I would not believe them>> <<@emtiedvessel says : Most atheists today apeal to science because they believe it is the only true explanation of our reality. This is the presupposition they approach theism with. The main reason the bible is fiction to them is because of the mircals recorded in it. To most atheist, miracles are automatically ruled out because they defy the laws of nature and therefore are hard to believe. This is their world view. However, there are things that can't be measured by science. There is a plethora of documented supernatural phenomenon that suggest that science is indeed not the only true explanation of our reality.>> <<@nevadataylor says : You would think that someone would have received a noble prize for discovering the resurrection of a zombie.>> <<@gi169 says : Thank you CE>> <<@lackles27 says : All the bodies of the holy people who were raised to life in matthew didnt happen ig>> <<@MacGamer10 says : I think the stories of Peter and Thomas in the Gospels when the risen Christ appeared to them are very real. The stories are definitely reliable and dosen't look like it was made up. I am specifically referring to Thomas doubting Jesus and Jesus asking Peter "Do you love me" three times. It seems real because Peter denied Jesus three times before the crucifixion and was broken. Obviously, it's not the best explanation. But it can be explained in more detail.>> <<@bryanlosen3262 says : The answer is, no there is no scientific evidence of the resurrection. only faith.>> <<@thebobster2824 says : Jesus is my favourite fictional character after Harry Potter>> <<@ta3p-theannex3project84 says : Nice nonsense, he is a clone of dr Craig the nonsense machine.>> <<@stephencheung6614 says : Turek making excuses once again. That’s this guy’s wheelhouse it seems.>> <<@xtopher960 says : You don't have any evidence . Stop wasting your time>> <<@xxBlackpspxx says : This video misses the definition of the term "science">> <<@Angelraaga says : Jesus is truly resurrected and asended into heaven>> <<@chrisfjansson4661 says : BATTLING HYDROCHLORIC PHARMA. AND SULFURIC. CARTELS...CHILDREN ARE THE RESURRECTION...EVERY SSINGLE 1..NOW WHAT?>> <<@Yamyatos says : Im not even sure what the point of this video is. He talked so much but said nothing. The special effects were also super annoying.>> <<@gango23 says : Lower your own bar for evidence mate, leave the rest of us to negotiate reality the best way we see fit.>> <<@danielrivera1833 says : You said a whole lot of nothing>> <<@dallas1891 says : So no>> <<@GeistView says : You don't seem to know what "repeatable" means in the scientific method. You're saying the science of Volcanology requires that a real volcano and all its plumbing must be "repeated" in a lab. By your logic, no YEC "geologist" scientists can claim to have done any science because they haven't made a full Earth on the lab table. Your logic...>> <<@nickwardmusic says : So we are to believe ALL resurrection claims throughout history? Dionysus, Heracles, Caesar…..all true huh?>> <<@RobertSmith-gx3mi says : So many incorrect claims made by frank in such a short video. Typical for this liar though.>> <<@blackswan7568 says : Just remember: as per the scientific method, science cannot PROVE anything; it can only make hypotheses and predictions based on evidence.>> <<@itscomplicatedbeingawizard2892 says : You do have to rely on testimony. From a tribe in the desert over 2,000 years ago. Now that’s a whooooole lotta faith you’re gonna have to have to believe hearsay from a book like that buddy. Lemme tell ya>> <<@sherriethames6503 says : bunk>> <<@AlanXEverfrost says : This man does not understand science. He does not understand the scientific method. The whole "can't repeat history in a lab" thing is practically complete nonsense. While I can't repeat Marie Currie first discovering radiation, I can repeat the experiment that PROVES radiation. I can repeat many different experiments and variations of those experiments that discover the boundaries, limitations and effects of said radiation. With repeatedly getting the same results. I cannot repeat the exact apple falling that inspired Newton, but I can repeat the experiments he did to define gravity, I can test the math he invented to figure things out and test their accuracy. We cannot repeat, but we can replicate. If a historical account is discovered that claims something happened, we can check for evidence, for other accounts that corroborate the event possibly taking place, and we can test if the event is uberhaupt possible. Several different records describing a change in the economic system of Rome, with seperate ledgers noting the different prices and sales, and ledgers from merchants in different countries noting the profits made in trade WITH Rome during that time, leaves science and history pretty convinced an Emperor had a good idea or listened to their advisors. A copy of a copy of a book that said they heard a person say forty years ago there was a giant being cruel to people who lived for centuries before being killed, when there is no skeleton of such a being, no other accounts of people saying they suffered under said giant, no buildings suited for such a being...then science is doubtful of the claim. The man saying he invented the car was believed because he had a car to show for it. The man who claims a god came down to crown him king of the earth is not believed because he has no evidence to support this unlikely claim.>> <<@ParadoxDev_ says : History doesn't necessarily look for an objective truth, it looks for what is absolutely most likely. Anything supernatural is immediately one of the least likely events, so it can't be used historically. If you want to believe supernatural events are more likely than natural, start believing in Allah, Brahma, Vishnu, Krishna, Quetzalcoatl...the list goes on. Then why not also believe those miracles, like moon splitting in half, they all seem very credible if you think anything supernatural is likely.>> <<@nicholasemond1388 says : Testimony is one way to know about the past, but it isn’t the only way nor is it enough to know that seemingly supernatural events happened.>> <<@stephenkaake7016 says : Frank, I love you but Jesus did not exist, I am God now, I can't think of any way to get through, other than Command you to Believe me>> <<@HarryNicNicholas says : frank making stuff up again. the very first words out of his mouth are drivel. and, you certainly don't get any truth from religion, has he not noticed the state of the planet hasn't changed despite this _omnipotent god_ he's constantly ratting on about?>> <<@Kramer-tt32 says : Is there any evidence that isn't testimony? I dont believe bigfoot exist, because its all testimony. Why would i treat a religious belief differently?>> <<@rafaelrivera364 says : In other words, there isn’t. 🤷🏽‍♂️>> <<@seanpittaway5341 says : Nice dancing! 🤣>> <<@fidelbarcena4495 says : We have a material proof of the resurrection and it is the Holy Shroud. The carbon 14 test is badly dated since the test was taken from the edge that was repaired after a fire. If the Holy Shroud is a forgery from the 11th century, why are we unable to reproduce it with the technical advances of the 21st century?>> <<@jimmyhalperin7792 says : COME ON ALREADY JESUS WAS RESURRECTED FROM DEATH IT'S BEYOND DENIABLIYY I'LL DEBATE THE TOPIC IF YOU LIKE. MOVING ON, HIS WORDS ARE LIFE. THAT'S ALL>> <<@jayboyee452 says : I like how he argues the made up claim's of other's.>> <<@mattmatty4670 says : Ok stop your BS. Research a Neandthal female cross mated to a Denisovan male annnd produced hybrid offspring. The Denisovans Cave Siberia. That is the truth buddy supplied by modern DNA technology. Move forward from n invisible magic god don't you think. Cheers>> <<@Ejaezy says : I disagree with Turek (as usual). If people popped up from the dead routinely, it would prove that people CAN pop up from the dead, which would give more merit to the resurrection of Jesus. It's like when Christians say that doing miracles on demand was only during the bible times. How can one say that god can do miracles through people (such as prophets, disciples and apostles) yet we don't see it happen now? This is nothing more than a convenient excuse from people who want to have their cake and eat it too. Where are prophets calling fire from heaven like Elijah did? Where are disciples of Jesus raising others from the dead like Peter did? Where are preachers healing the sick like Jesus did? I find it very convenient that god WAS able to do miraculous things like stopping the sun in the sky and causing dead people to be raised and walk the streets of Jerusalem, but all of a sudden god doesn't do miracles like that anymore...>> <<@Makai77 says : About 20 yrs ago I read a great book by Hank Hanegraaff called "Resurrection" It's an amazing book about the evidence for Jesus' resurrection.>>