Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@michaelgentry402 says : Why is it when you type his name, GOD, or his son's name, Jesus on you tube you get censored. Googles pain won't end...ever.>> <<@michaelgentry402 says : Hey @majmage, I can't answer you because your friends at google/youtube are censoring me. Cowards, you and them.>> <<@getsomehelp68 says : Dna proves it>> <<@TaciPhaup says : I believe that the historical, scientific, archaeological, and logical evidences for Jesus's existence are just bonuses. My absolute proof is that I have a personal relationship with God. Someone can come up to me and tell me that my husband doesn't exist but that would be silly because I know him. In the same way, I know (absolutely) that God exists, because I know Him. So, in order for someone to argue that they have to argue against my personal experience. It just doesn't work unless I'm lying.>> <<@BestBuysReviewed says : One strong proof often cited by proponents of the existence of God is the fine-tuning of the universe. This argument suggests that the physical constants of the universe—such as the force of gravity, the mass of subatomic particles, and the expansion rate of the universe—are finely tuned in such a way that life is possible. Even small variations in these constants would make life, as we know it, impossible. The precise conditions needed for life to exist point to the possibility of a purposeful creator or intelligent design. This is often referred to as the Teleological Argument or the Argument from Design, and it suggests that the complexity and order of the universe are best explained by the existence of an intelligent being, rather than by random chance>> <<@united_europe says : No one is looking for absolute proof for god. Science doesn't work with proof. All we want is evidence. And there is no evidence for god.>> <<@Lightbearer616 says : Are you still waiting for "absolute proof for God"? No there is none and never will be.>> <<@arturomunoz6378 says : Don't worry about atheist ,love ur God ,follow your believes ,love you life and stop attacking atheist>> <<@philhart4849 says : There is no such thing as proof in science. Moreover, nobody has ever presented any falsifiable evidence for the existence of any god, let alone the God of the Bible. All I see in this video is weapon's grade nonsense.>> <<@DariusExplains says : I asked for Proof not Non Answers>> <<@Mrdonotknow5 says : "i'm not 100 percent sure that i'm not in the matrix." oh boy>> <<@Rolando_Cueva says : 1:15 I'm sorry but no. That's an argument for Deism, not for the Christian God specifically. October 6 update: I still think this is a weak argument. But I finally found Jesus. Here's a song for y'all, Psalm 117>> <<@majmage says : It's just sloppy if an atheist asks for "absolute proof" (and it happens rarely enough that I'm not even sure if the questioner here is actually an atheist -- 99% of the time, it's the theist bringing up the phrase "absolute proof"). Instead, we should demand reasonable evidence. Sufficient evidence to justify belief. That's never presented. * the moral argument is just saying things are true for no reason (that objective morality exists, and that if it does it's best explained by a god) * the cosmological argument doesn't even conclude with a god * the teleological argument doesn't provide evidence that a god caused the design in our universe (it never even really provides evidence of the universe seeming designed)>> <<@bartleon says : Romans 1: 19 because that which is known about God is evident [m]within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. John 14: 21 He who has My commandments and keeps them is the one who loves Me; and he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and will disclose Myself to him.” 22 Judas (not Iscariot) *said to Him, “Lord, what then has happened that You are going to disclose Yourself to us and not to the world?” 23 Jesus answered and said to him, “If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our abode with him. 24 He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine, but the Father’s who sent Me. John 12: 46 I have come as Light into the world, so that everyone who believes in Me will not remain in darkness. One can start reading the Bible in New Testament: Gospel of John and/or Acts.>> <<@markmerry1471 says : YOU LOT OF GOD NUTS DO COME OUT WITH SOME BULL>> <<@lobsterwhisperer7932 says : This dude has a smug vibe about him.>> <<@ciaopeople9664 says : Again and again with the same old shits ... 😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨>> <<@truthgiver8286 says : Fine tuning yeah 99.9% of the universe is toxic to human life 98.9% of life that has existed on the planet has become extinct If it was created by a god he must be the most inept god ever. As an atheist I don't have to prove god doesn't exist I am not making a claim I am simply simply saying I don't believe you when you claim god does exist. You make the claim he does and the onus is on you to prove it. If I say I am god do you have to prove that I am not?>> <<@gingercake0907 says : God doesn’t ask us to provide absolute proof of His existence because we don’t have the capability, comprehensive, complete knowledge to prove He doesn’t exist because we are infinitesimal in the universe. So He requires us to exercise what He has given us to prove His existence: faith. “ Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” Hebrews 1:1. “ But without faith it is impossible to please Him( God) , he who comes to God must believe He is and He is the rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.” Hebrews 11:6 . I love God because of His love for me that comes in the form of honesty , no lying. I love God because He isn’t like man, who is selfish, weak and unrighteous. I love Him because in spite of the fact that we are unrighteous, He still wants me you and everyone else. God still thinks we are a good thing He created. “ But God demonstrates His own love towards us, in that while we were still sinners Christ died for us.” Romans 5:8.>> <<@ericwantsbbd says : Lol. There is *NO* evidence for God. His answers for problems don’t prove God and many are downright deceptive in framing. Most atheists would change their mind with any proof. But the God dude can’t even provide a tiny simple bit of evidence.>> <<@kiwisaram9373 says : To want absolute proof is the same as wanting God to force you to believe.>> <<@DJPastaYaY says : Looking through a lot of these negative comments can be hard. Will be praying to have strength through this 🙏🙏>> <<@Enigmatic_philosopher says : Regarding the universe’s fine-tuning, a favorite argument among theists posits a divine hand in its precise conditions. But let’s cut through the chase – positing necessity is a game anyone can play. It’s not about whether one can claim the universe or God as necessary; the real challenge is determining which explanation is the most parsimonious. Why resort to a divine explanation, replete with its own complex set of assumptions, when the laws of nature provide a simpler, more direct explanation? Overextending the hypothesis only adds unnecessary layers to the puzzle. Then there’s the moral argument, suggesting that objective moral values point to a divine lawgiver. Again, we can apply Occam’s razor. Is it more parsimonious to believe in a deity imparting moral laws, or to see morality as an emergent property of human societies, shaped by evolution and social necessity? The latter does not require us to leap into the metaphysical unknown. It’s grounded in observable human behavior and historical patterns. The cosmological argument, the venerable first cause, is another area where parsimony should be our guide. Theists argue for a necessary deity as the universe’s creator. But introducing an uncaused, complex, and omnipotent deity raises more questions than it answers. Why not consider the universe itself as a brute fact, a simpler hypothesis that avoids the infinite regress of causes? Finally, the burden of proof. While theists often claim it’s on atheists to disprove God, let’s apply the principle of parsimony here as well. When natural explanations suffice to explain our universe, adding a supernatural layer only complicates things without adding explanatory power. The more parsimonious view, and thus the one that should bear less burden of proof, is the one that relies on the least number of assumptions. In essence, the theistic arguments, while thought-provoking, often fail the test of parsimony. They add layers of complexity and assumption where simpler, more direct explanations suffice. As a proponent of reason and critical inquiry, I advocate for a worldview that seeks the most straightforward, evidence-based explanations, not those shrouded in layers of divine mystery.>> <<@papiamable44 says : Why bother talking with or explaining God to an atheist. They are already condemned to exist spiritually in eternal gloomy-fire separation from Him. For whatever their rejection reasons, they are lost. One day they will be standing before God and Jesus explaining to them why they don't exist. Their free will choice, foolish but their choice. Forget them, move on.>> <<@zh1992 says : There is no “absolute proof” or evidence, that’s why it’s called faith. The burden of proof is on the believer. Even if we can’t explain why we’re here or how everything began with absolute certainty, claiming “god did it” isn’t a sufficient answer. That’s the “god of the gaps” argument.>> <<@derrickpurdy7011 says : My burden of proof is simple: if God doesn't exist, it should be easy to prove. Since that can't be proven, we may believe based on possibility.>> <<@graphguy says : From a logic perspective the burden of proof is to prove a negative, not a positive. You can't prove God doesn't exist... that is not a logic possibility, whereas the ability to prove something exists... is always a possibility.>> <<@ta3p-theannex3project84 says : God of gaps in action. Secondhand salesman talk.>> <<@lysanderofsparta3708 says : These debates and discussions reveal that atheism is typically not much more than a childishly stubborn, lazy, unimaginative, unreasonable anti-intellectual cop-out rooted in moral complacency, common ignorance and petty resentment (and perhaps a smug, self-righteous, bigoted sense of superiority over anyone who dares to disagree with them). All you ever get from atheists is, "Oh, I simply lack a belief, therefore I don't have to prove anything. Prove that your god exists, or else I am right." That is the full extent of their churlish argument and we keep hearing it over and over again ad nauseum. What these atheists do is not really debating at all; their close-minded attitude is meant to terminate any real discussion before it even begins. Stubborn, stiff-necked atheists seem to assume that theirs is always the automatic default position and that they don't have to explain, prove or justify their own logically incoherent and untenable worldview in any way. However, according to the scientific findings of anthropology, this bizarre assumption of atheism as the social and psychological default setting of mankind has been proven demonstrably false across all human cultures throughout history. When atheists do condescend to debate their opponents, the best you will get from them is some glib, mealy-mouthed reference to the multiverse theory, random abiogenesis and evolution by natural selection, and the quantum vaccuum as foundational justifications for their position. But these are all rather extravagant metaphysical speculations that simply cannot be proven empirically, which is ironic given that empiricism is typically the only epistemological standard that atheists will ever accept. And even if these speculations are assumed to be true, they don't actually explain anything; they only raise yet more vexing questions: "Where does the multiverse come from?" "How did abiogenesis occur by purely material means when this has never been seen to occur and cannot even be demonstrated theoretically?" "What is this mystical determinative mechanism called natural selection and how did it come about? How can it be random and teleonomic at the same time?" "How does something come from nothing when the quantum vaccuum is not nothing but something?" Indeed, atheism raises more questions than it answers, which most atheist simply cannot be bothered to address in defense of their cherished position. For them, atheism does not need to be proven, it should merely be assumed on blind faith -- and the fanatical piety of most contemporary atheists never ceases to astound me.>> <<@christianhayter says : More utter gunk aimed at relieving the gullible from their money>> <<@reiforsale says : The fact that we can neither deny or confirm something tells us about it's existence. It's really just a "creation" creating a "creator" and saying the "creator" created the "creation".>> <<@Angel-nl1hp says : Ah, so typical. You theists still really like to shift away that burden of proof, I see. It's almost like you don't have actually have any. And no, the cosmological argument, the argument from design and the argument from morality are complete fails that have been debunked countless times. I don't have to explain life, the universe and everything to point out that your "explanation" of "God did it all!" is severely lacking in consistency, evidence and logic and is actually not much of an answer at all.>> <<@bigcorky4687 says : If there was a God we wouldn't be looking to this loudmouth to convince us that there was>> <<@Nashvilleja says : I know there is a God (Jesus Christ) because I have a personal relationship with him. It didn't happen overnight, I had to seek him and read his word (Bible) along with fasting. He reveals himself to me in every way, even to the point where I hear his voice. So I would emphasize or urge people to try and seek a relationship with him. Jesus said “Draw near unto me and I will draw near unto you; seek me diligently and ye shall find me; ask, and ye shall receive; knock, and it shall be opened unto you” - The world wants to treat God like a fast food drive through. It's doesn't work like that.>> <<@redpillfreedom6692 says : We don't need to prove your sky daddy doesn't exist. You don't prove a negative. You must prove that he does. But that's the problem with unfalsifiable claims; there's absolutely no way to test or verify them. Hence why you can never prove your sky daddy exists>> <<@96tolife says : Atheist: There is no absolute proof God exists. God: I am satisfied with the evidence I have provided. It is not about what the unbeliever demands to change their mind. It is about God being satisfied He has provided enough evidence that satisfies Himself. He is the ultimate decision-maker on the subject. Furthermore, the Bible says that people "suppress the truth in unrighteousness." This means they know the evidence exists, but they ignore it to continue living their lives of sin.>> <<@silkavenger says : It takes a big man to admit when he doesn’t know something. Pretending your imaginary friend made the universe doesn’t mean you actually understand the universe. It just means you are good at make believe.>> <<@specialk5070 says : EFV , God is everything everywhere. If you totally understand that then you there! 🎉🍺🍻👽❤>> <<@nicholasemond1388 says : The universe may have had a beginning though the cosmos beyond that might not have, but know one knows either way, the universe is not fine tuned and there is no absolute or objective morality. Even if there was that does not require a god.>> <<@murraykelm5691 says : It's a matter of faith either you have it or you don't.>> <<@phineas8532 says : I feel like my belief is hinging too much on Pascal’s wager, especially since I believe on the one true gospel, once saved always saved, free grace, “easy believism”. I’m not fully aware of the literal works of God I see in front of my eyes each day.>> <<@matthewlio6995 says : That's your opinion my friend not proof of evidence>> <<@HansBezemer says : C'mon Frank - the "Kalam" cosmological argument is debunked a hundred times. It is by no means certain that the universe is "fine tuned" as much as there is proof that the sum of the angles of a triangle could be more or less than PI or that under some circumstances 1+1 could be anything other than 2 (for which, BTW, is mathematical proof). And since no sane person has claimed that there is such a thing as "absolute moral values" since Hume stated that "you cannot derive an 'ought' from an 'is'" - apart from the fact that nature is amoral - we don't see our "absolute values" reflected there - there is no proof. And even if one or two of them WERE true, it wouldn't automatically reflect a Christian God. It could be an absent God. Or even an evil God. The latter would nicely explain the "question of evil", BTW.>> <<@linkfiedproductions2246 says : Remember, The Big Bang theory was coined by a Belgian Catholic, and evolutionary theory doesn’t clearly state we evolved from apes, monkeys, etc. I forgot who came up with the monkeys thing, but I genuinely don’t remember who it was (look it up I guess).>> <<@Itsmejoywe says : Don’t be ignorant, get to know God before it’s too late. You never know when death is coming>> <<@Matt5093 says : God doesn't owe you squat. Not proof or anything else.>> <<@godswill2260 says : The question that should be posed to them is, how did nothing create everything and if they say there was energy that created the big bang what created that energy?>> <<@Isovapor says : There is zero evidence for any of the 10,000 gods humans have worshipped over the past 10,000 years. None! All religions require faith. Faith is the opposite of fact and evidence. If there was a Christian god there wouldn’t be 2000 Christian denominations. There would only be ONE. You believe and have faith so you will need to work through this yourself. Pathetic!>> <<@bullheadedgideon1673 says : Algorithm>> <<@TimzyTactical says : People during Jesus' time had proof. Saw Jesus and his miracles, with even over hearing it then seeing it mainfest. Why then didnt they believe? The issue isnt about proof People know smoking kills but smoke. The devil knows God, but you dont see him repenting. Its a heart condition. We need to trust God, even if we see him, theres still more of him>>