<<@commonsenseskeptic
says :
Thanks so much for the shoutout - our episode on the Starship launch is going to be coming out before the weekend. Hope to see you in the chat!
>>
<<@Laxyr
says :
20:27 "We're not gonna launch humans until we have a successful test" Very reassuring...
>>
<<@FizzleFX
says :
8:08 2 years later and the ice melted... when Starship *exploded on pad level* ... โฅ
>>
<<@KarbineKyle
says :
I _never_ liked Elon Musk! Even I knew his promises were pipe dreams, or just infeasible! He's a rich and greedy dunce! I saw this launch on TV, but I had not kept up with it beforeโat all. I only saw the launch. When the rocket engines started melting, then tumbling, and then it exploded shortly after that, I was so confused as to why people were cheering. That's when I was like: "Oh, of course! This was Elon Musk's rocket. He's like a child that likes to launch model rockets for fun. However, he has an insane amount of money to do the exact same thing, but with really powerful rockets for space-entry. No wonder it exploded! What a waste!" Congratulations, Twitter-Guy. Yet again, another _massive_ pile of taxpayer money burned in record time. Seriously, have you no shame?
>>
<<@damntheidiots3265
says :
Hey chundafoot seems that clothes dryer seems to work. Not vacuum cleaner vacuum space vacuum wot do you say
>>
<<@madelinedelisle5314
says :
KAAA BOOM ~~~~~~~~~
>>
<<@JRBendixen
says :
Nobody knows what a sliderule is these days. Iโm 50 and the only way I know what it is, is bc. I got one from my now dead dad. He also showed me it, bc I asked him when I was young, bc. I heard about them by teachers.
>>
<<@Henrique-hl3xk
says :
Thunderf00t is EXACTLY THE REASON why governments are inefficient and corrupt he would have pick ANY company besides SpaceX to land on the moon, even if they haven't fly a single time to orbit, charge a lot more and the amount of cargo was a fraction of what starship could deliver just by hate for being so frustrated and extremely stupid
>>
<<@hellishome4u
says :
This is the most pissed off Thunderf00t video I have seen. For good reason, too. Science denial produces Musk et al to pawn their snake oil to the masses. So, as a science/tech/reasonable society collective, how many Titan sub experiments will go on before we realize Musk and cronies have a few screws loose? Bottom line, they are and will be, frauds.
>>
<<@KoRntech
says :
7:50 what is with these Musk/MAGA fans worshipping Russia, the past two years these maga influencers or YouTube channels or personalities on right wing news go in about how great Russia is all the time, America camt compete. Like what in the absolute fck?
>>
<<@AfroGaz71
says :
Aged like milk. ๐ The sad thing is that Phil is reduced to drinking beer whilst hoping for scientific endeavor to fail. His dislike for Elon Musk has clouded his judgement towards the brilliant scientists and Engineers that work for SpaceX. "Critics are spectators, but doers are on the field."
>>
<<@VulpinetideCuteTimes0w0
says :
Itโs almost like part of being a scientist and engineer is testing things and learning from failure in order to progress forward. If youโre so smart Phil, why donโt you contribute to these projects in any meaningful way? All you do is put others down for trying something new and having faith in themselves because they want to hope for a better future for humanity. I didnโt know being an Atheist meant being against your fellow man.
>>
<<@cryptotharg7400
says :
All these wildly cheering "SpaceX engineers" are obviously jobless hipsters being paid minimum wage to act out when Musk requires them to do so.
>>
<<@klauskohler8048
says :
So you all. You we're all wrong. SpaceX did it! ESA sucks!
>>
<<@finncharlodavide
says :
Hahaha your digging your own grave fucking pathetic
>>
<<@badtrekee4348
says :
THUNDER FOOL DID THEY GO BOOM TODAY?
>>
<<@sethjansson5652
says :
This aged like milk. Eat your words limey bastard...
>>
<<@samcameronberko
says :
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ fuck you Thundeerfoot. Fcuk you ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. They just caught it. You carry on with your negative ckickbait for your sad fans for you ad revenue. ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
>>
<<@InsaneStryker777
says :
โIโm an optimist. You might die.โ If you read between the lines, thatโs every Tinder profile.
>>
<<@waterwomaninFL
says :
It really pisses me off he has no concern about the environmental impact. the people around his launch area Iโve been trying to preserve turtle habitat aside from their own quality of life. He canโt even turn off the freaking lights so that baby turtles nowhere to go. I hate this guy.
>>
<<@thestrangeone2274
says :
This isn't aging well๐
>>
<<@terranu1
says :
SpaceX accomplished less than the soviets 60 yrs ago with 10000x larger budget and tech advantage in terms of astronomy and space exploration . If anything SpaceX sent space exploration into stoneage. All Musk fid was convincing us that rockets blowing up moments after launching are a success .
>>
<<@twelvewingproductions7508
says :
These videos (And Thunderf00t's opinions about Space X reuse-ability) aren't aging very well.
>>
<<@TaeSunWoo
says :
25:37 these arenโt the flexes you think they are ๐
>>
<<@michaelsommers2356
says :
NASA: Failure is not an option. SpaceX: Failure is the only option.
>>
<<@luisangel444
says :
Make a public apology to SpaceX
>>
<<@magua73
says :
Today 06/06/24 4th Starship test flight! Eat your shorts, you antiscience and antiengineering fanboys! Science will prevail
>>
<<@leonnunhofer3453
says :
Every engine has a small possibility to fail. That's why you try to go with just a few. Better to have 3 big engines than 10 smaller engines, and 1 of them blows up your rockets. Putting 28 engines on a rocket just is stupid. Even if they would work 99% of the time, every few launches one of them will fail. So imo the whole design is dumb. The whole idea of many small engines. Imo it wasn't surprising it exploded ๐คทโโ๏ธ
>>
<<@jackknight1899
says :
I owed NASA and Marvel an apology for my Elon Musk presentation as Iron Man in high school
>>
<<@Schildhuhn
says :
Lowest quality video I've ever seen. They're not making it 100 times cheaper because there's no competition. They're already the cheapest, why cannibalise your own profit?
>>
<<@user-ho9fq7bm7v
says :
i doubt that the communist rocket should compared to the rockets today. Its testing , analysing and inventing. Bro, make some scientific analyse about this topic and not a biased opinion of you. I noticed that you went very biased after you gain alot of subs. Delte your channel, no more internet money for you.
>>
<<@csnipper524
says :
His simps need to comprehend that no one wants Musk to fail, we just wish he would stfu and stop lying all the time.
>>
<<@csnipper524
says :
Elon was all but saying expect failure, and for once in his life he was actually being honest.
>>
<<@TMCNJ
says :
Itโs funny because, if Thunderfoot really wanted the money, he couldโve just kept quiet and used his science knowledge and keen sense of bullsht; and played the stock market. Thunderfoot is so bang on the money about all of these companies, itโs really entertaining tbhโฆ
>>
<<@donwald3436
says :
Save us FElon!
>>
<<@Winticket7
says :
wait ..so because they didn't make an effort to create flame-diverters on the pad, they damaged some engines/boosters (not sure) and that is why it blew up few minutes after launch? Soooo....if Musk pulls more millions out of the tax payer, maybe the next one won't blow up? At least not in the atmosphere? ๐ค
>>
<<@That1ufo
says :
This video didn't age well
>>
<<@Andrewdrs2WilliamsonYT
says :
At this point every time Elon opens his mouth ๐ฉ comes out ๐
>>
<<@djmjay2
says :
All of his self-praise regarding being the first or the best at everything reminds me of someone else that makes similar claims. I can not picture who that person is but the colour orange keeps coming to mind.
>>
<<@paulchen9145
says :
3:42 hmm thatโs crazy if Starlink is so commercially unviable then why did they announce 3 months ago that Starlink is now at commercial break even point I wonder? And all that without Starship even once transporting Starlink V2 satellites to orbit? I love your comically stupid chain of thought of this one: Thunderfoot: Starlink V1 small and ok -> need Starkink V2 big and good -> need big starship instead of small falcon -> starship delayed -> disaster vs. SpaceX Engineers: Starlink V1 small and ok -> need Starkink V2 big and good -> need big starship instead of small falcon -> starship delayed -> letโs make smaller Starlink V2 mini satellite for the time being -> small and good -> fits on Falcon without need for Starship -> no big deal easy money
>>
<<@Paul-ey1ct
says :
Did we even go to the moon? Im starting to doubt it ๐ฎ.
>>
<<@oosakasan
says :
One of my favorite scenes in Apollo 13 is them in the middle of the disaster, switching from the command module to the lunar lander and Jim Lovell just calculating numbers by hand, then asking Houston to check he has them right and all the busy bees at the control center get out their slide rules (...he had them right). Semi-relatedly blows my mind how one of their first responses is to turn off the computer and turn it on again. Wait... don't you need the computer on to make the ship, like, work? Nope. It really inspires in me the alternative Moon Landing Conspiracy which is that it happened but aliens were involved because how could humans in the 60s possible have had the technology to do this? I don't want to say "clearly it wasn't that hard" because clearly it was but it's impressive just how little computing power the whole thing required. Then I look at how Crew Dragon has touch screens and I freak out just a little bit. Star Trek is very cool but I'd rather the spaceship you could turn off, navigate with a pencil & a steady hand and survive plz.
>>
<<@kristianalbl1044
says :
i thought that falcon 9s are being reused tho, is it similar situation to space shuttle?
>>
<<@JabelldiMarco
says :
Wasn't one of the trick of the Apollo program that NASA didn't place all it's eggs in on basket in form of one partner, but bet every important part on several independent manufacturers so that only one of those had to be successful?
>>
<<@rubevaughn
says :
I can't stand Musk but I think the saddest thing right now with the space contracts NASA is handing out is that space x is the only one coming close to hitting their timelines. Like the vehicle to bring astronauts to the space station. We're still waiting for the second attempt by Boeing Starliner and they were supposed to hit 2017 for their first flights with passengers. This is why Musk looks to so many like a genius.
>>
<<@mattromano5146
says :
How and why are his projects funded by tax payers?
>>
<<@Mr_Hertz_Donut
says :
Thereโs no amount of money that could get me in a Tesla let alone in a space x rocket!!!
>>
<<@erichaynes7502
says :
It took Elon 4 tries to get the Falcon to orbit it will take Elon 3 or 4 tries to get the Starship to orbit. Once Starship becomes operational(3-5 years) Elon will have the first fully reusable rocket in history.
>>
<<@rhobot75
says :
Regarding STARLINK.. and gosh I hope seen by the channel, maybe.. OK so random that i also follow a superyacht channel?? Like, news and stuff about rich jerks and rich wierdos. Well! Just last week the big news, the "gamechanger" for superyachts is they are all getting STARLINK, and I thought about the video about STARLINK not being viable and thought bout boats all alone on the ocean sucking up all that glorious bandwidth. Till they all get back into port, of course, because video explained but then I suppose they hop onto the locals' internet service.
>>
<<@attractor9
says :
why do they ask a total liar questions. that makes NO sense.
>>
NEXT VIDEO
>>