Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@CrossExamined says : FREE Download of sermon I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist!: 👉📱https://cutt.ly/cInI1eo>> <<@flonix55 says : Thank you>> <<@2l84me8 says : The theist who makes claims about their gods must demonstrate them and therefore has the burden of proof. Skeptics have no burden of proof unless they make a positive assertion.>> <<@BlackHat-v4j says : Whoever makes the claim doesn’t have burden and that dumb>> <<@Dave_Langer says : The person making the claim has the burden of proof Not sure why this is so hard If you claim there is a god the burden of proof is for you to prove that>> <<@manuaiipondraken8376 says : As a Christian, we don't have the burden of proof and we don't have to, because we are not making any claim here. We only believe the claims made by the person of Jesus. So the he burden of proof lies upon Jesus. He is the one who made claims, that we believe in. And he proof his claim to us by his resurrection, that we have hope after death.>> <<@belphemmore3802 says : He had perfect logic in the first half.. then i realized hes an indoctrinated dumbass.. wondered why turek was in such agreeance>> <<@eklektikTubb says : The question "who has the burden" seems pointless. Each of us make claims, each of us have free right to prove them, but that is not "burden", nor obligation. It is just a fun game, a hope for a lucky chance to convince someone by showing him our best reason(s) for why we believe or disbelieve.>> <<@Thundawich says : Considering in your example you ALSO made a claim, isn't it ALSO your burden to prove it? I mean essentially whats going on there is that there are two competing claims with neither party willing to defend theirs, both people in that equation aren't doing their job. No need to single out the skeptic.>> <<@MrFossil367ab45gfyth says : Believers and nonbelievers can have or not carry a burden of proof. Both are capable of making claims and asserting them as fact.>> <<@LawrenceB123 says : “Behind the debris of these self-styled, sullen supermen and imperial diplomatists, there stands the gigantic figure of one person, because of whom, by whom, in whom, and through whom alone mankind might still have hope. The person of Jesus Christ.” - Malcolm Muggeridge>> <<@LawrenceB123 says : ive found recently that unbelievers will argue until they are blue in the face that God doesn’t exist, but they seem more willing to acknowledge that the devil exists! the devil has so overplayed his hand in the world that its much easier to see his works, countries in turmoil, greed, idol worship, wars, child trafficking, witchcraft etc etc>> <<@fredthehead4603 says : The fulfilled prophesies in the Bible are adequate proof that the text is truthful and reliable.>> <<@thierry860 says : And yet, in thousands of years, religious people are unable to proof the existence of their sky daddy. How pathetic is that ?>> <<@MGoudsmits says : _Who has the burden of proof in an argument?_ The one who makes claims that go against science ! That is the first.>> <<@hitman5782 says : Theist:" Mx god is more real than all the millions of other gods humans invented." Atheist: Do you have any proof, any convincing evidence or at least a single rational argument for this claim to be true? Theist:" No, but can you proof that my god is not real?" Atheist: FACEPALM!!!>> <<@rydrakee57370 says : They defend it, don't they? That's why there's peer review and testing H0 in statistics. Christians can say something against it if they think it's wrong, but to this day there are still misconceptions about science floating around debunked countless of times, and if just on YouTube or Quora (as most have better things to do than reply to the same claim over and over again). (Examples: the the silly "you don't know if the individual of this fossil had children" to the famous "why are there still apes" argument or about Lucy and other species as if it was the only specimen found) These ultimately destroy trust in famous channels like (hovind for the first example) aig or genesis apologetics (here that latter example applies, see one of the recent videos of gutsick gibbon) On the other hand, you're making the claim that it's not that way so hypothetically you should defend it against their defense, no?>> <<@MightyJabroni says : The concept of a monotheistic god is unfalsifiable by it's own rudimentary design. It is like contemplating about the contents of a box, that can never be opened .... and where it is utterly unclear if it is indeed a box to begin with. Asking for proof is a complete waste of time.>> <<@MAC...007 says : 🙂👍🙏>> <<@steveprofiler says : People can not even defend they are what is called conscious.😂>> <<@steveprofiler says : Why care?>> <<@Kramer-tt32 says : An athiest is someone who rejects the "CLAIM" that God exists because they dont find the evidence provided compelling... full stop...>> <<@ajgibson1307 says : Amen and God bless>> <<@StringPlunker says : Koukl: "Hey, I have an idea. Let's move the goalposts!">> <<@SuttonCreative says : That’s a really good point, I need to remember that rule 😊>> <<@stormy7709 says : This is good. a concept very few christians seem to understand. so what is the definition of god and what facts are they based off?>> <<@iancampbell2295 says : Considering the advances in science over the last forty years ( James Webb telescope ) there will be no religions in forty years time, and I hope I'm there to see it , the human race will never move forward until this happens!>> <<@joegame4576 says : even in court cases, it's not a good idea to default to "i don't have to prove my innocence, you have to prove me guilty". when you don't present any evidence of your innocence (such as alibi) while the prosecutor keeps coming up with evidence (not proof) of your guilt, there's a good chance that you will lose the case even if you're innocent. also, this "innocent until proven guilty" is there to protect someone wrongly serving sentence. it is therefore an "unfair" rule. this unfair rule does not and should not apply to debates.>> <<@teddyrascal6305 says : Atheist have gathered every bit of evidence available in the entire universe, and have decreed that there is none. Lol, the audacity.>> <<@workinprogress9613 says : "There is no god"; "your god is a myth"; "your make believe skydaddy"; etc., these are all claims that the atheist/naturalist/skeptic try to deny they bear the onus to prove. They claim they do not need to prove these claims because a negative cannot be proven. However, though these are claims about a negative, they are positive claims about a supposed negative reality. All positive assertions bear an onus on the person(s) positing the assertions.>> <<@Theo_Skeptomai says : Any party asserting a claim to truth encumbers a burden of evidence. This is NOT complicated.>> <<@hamster4618 says : 1:01 but how is the district attorney gonna prove I killed my husband, just because I supposedly was the only one in the room at the time? Why does the DA think I took the knife to stab in hubbies back. Surely God was present, so how is the DA gonna prove it wasn’t God who killed my hubby?>> <<@hamster4618 says : Indeed, if you make the controversial claim of the existence of a god none of us have ever seen nor detected, for which is no evidence, make bold claims of zombies existing, virgins being pregnant etc, heck yeah, the ball is in your court to bring some evidence, some proof of your bold statement including threats.>> <<@hamster4618 says : The Christian makes the claim of the existence of a god and then of their “God” in particular when it’s clear their is ZERO evidence for that claim. Now I don’t give a damn about your beliefs, and if you want to pray before eating, or if you want to sing in church. You may believe what you want. You needn’t prove anything. We are simply having a conversation and I may ask for your evidence just like you may ask for mine. HOWEVER, if you want to push your unfounded, unsubstantiated beliefs onto me, trying to limit my freedoms, heck yeah, you will have to PROVE the existence of your god. And no, asserting a god is NOT EVIDENCE!>> <<@frankcardano4142 says : “The bible is the word of god” How did you come to that conclusion? PS. Because the bible says so is not a valid reason>> <<@emojidinosaur7300 says : the atheist on youtube dont make claims because they know they CAN'T back those claims up. they lie and say they do not have any beliefs.>> <<@stephenkaake7016 says : I was told 'good luck proving your innocence' in America here, Government should be run by people who care about the truth>> <<@chikombechela2460 says : Wow this is quite some perspective. I never saw it that way. Makes so much sense and absolutely provides a great position from which to defend the faith. Love it 👌>> <<@TheTrinityDelusion says : Unless they are just ignorant atheists, atheists who understand their own position are normally not making any claim about the existence of God but challenging the veracity of the evidence of the theist claim. The onus is therefore upon theists because they are claiming God exists and the burden is on them. I am a theist and it appears to me that Koukl is just trying to find a way to move the goalposts.>> <<@deadbunnyking says : You have the claim so you have the burdon. As an atheist, i have no burdon because i simply do not velieve you or your claim. So bring evidence and stop trying to shift the burdon of proof.>> <<@nothingbutthetruth613 says : Is he for real? This is the epitome of irony. He is right that the burden of proof is on atheists when it comes to religion in general. But when it comes to Christianity and the other religion which was the only monotheistic belief system that existed 2000 years and for millennia before that, they think the burden of proof is not on them. What?? Hello. Where is the evidence and proof that Christianity changed the bible? Where is the evidence that the status quo that was in place for 1300 years before Jesus which originated with Mount Sinai and the giving of the bible, was abolished? Where is the evidence that everything being done up until Jesus was not needed anymore? The burden of proof showing every single doctrine in Christianity is true, is completely on the Christian to prove....and they can't prove anything. Nothing in the nt has anything to back it up.>> <<@txtnray says : Common sense is better than claim>> <<@Gek1177 says : The burden of proof is traditionally on the person making the positive claim. That's why the burden of proof is on Christians with regards to God and the Bible. It could be said that an atheist who claims there is no God has the burden of proof to prove their is no God. Contrary to popular belief it is possible to prove a negative but with that said most Atheists would probably concede that a God may exist but that it's existence has not met the burden of proof and they therefore do not believe God exists.>> <<@brettreed6732 says : That is really good advice. Thanks>> <<@Peter-wl3tm says : Every time a skeptic, atheist, or unbeliever make the silly claim “God doesn’t exists” I simply ask them for the proof of their position, it comes down to evading their burden of proof or emotional rhetoric, proving that they have no good reason to deny God’s existence.>> <<@DrewTrox says : There's this teapot orbiting in-between Saturn and Jupiter I'd like to tell you about.>> <<@tomster7574 says : Who has the burden of truth? What sides do. If you can’t prove your point and still think he won because the other side didn’t prove their point, you’re a fool. Every atheist I’ve ever had this debate with always says that the Christian is one that has the burden of proof. To supply evidence. Yep no matter how much evidence you provide for them, and even proof if you have it, they deny absolutely everything. Completely ignore it or deny it. Yet every time I’ve asked them for any kind of proof to back up their side, not once. Not one shred of evidence. Is there a proof along with that obviously. Absolutely nothing ever. Yet they still think they’re correct.>> <<@SK-bw2cv says : If someone comes into a debate with a counter argument, they have the burden of proving their counter argument as well. Unless you want it to be easily dismissed.>> <<@jessebryant9233 says : ALL atheists are intellectually lazy and they just don't get it. They will claim they aren't making any claims—then keep making claim after claim after claim. And if you call them on it, they throw a fit.>> <<@mikeramos91 says : The earth is flat Prove me wrong>>