<<@shamu851
says :
Umesh gat vaishali patare dir chya porach amruta fadnvis porach nav agastya Muni thevlay Aditya thakre,udhav thakre,Uday dukre, mi zavloy amruta fadnvis la.agastya Muni vishalcha aahe ka?
>>
<<@NuryadiDmax
says :
Computer eror iya film Transformers
>>
<<@NuryadiDmax
says :
What robot Shaolin no Shaolin stanman yes robot Shaolin
>>
<<@NuryadiDmax
says :
Sahguru Shaolin demontration film Transformers universal
>>
<<@anish-opx
says :
To ancient civilizations 😮 very old connection 🇮🇳❤ 🇨🇳
>>
<<@HierophanticRose
says :
Yes the Shaolin School has one of its sources in Kalari, that much is recorded and can be seen in forms as well. But, not all martial arts in China come from Buddhism. There are well known Sects which have their origins in Taoist wanderers.
>>
<<@chedorichie2171
says :
He was a black man
>>
<<@MissesWitch
says :
Kung Fu designed to fend off animals.. Well I am sure most animals are wise enough not to attack a monk!
>>
<<@Pejoncè
says :
KUNG FU MEANSS 1 HAND NAMASTÊ!!!!
>>
<<@Mikea6205
says :
Jai HIND!
>>
<<@JustinThorts
says :
NOPE ! On the origins and Damo: In the BBC series "Way of the Warrior" it tells of a Chinese monk that settled in the same village that Damo came from, 400 years before Damo was born, who taught Chinese fighting arts to the population there. Chinese culture likes auspicious things, people places which explains why so many kung fu schools link back to auspicious things people or places : Damo, Zhang San Feng, Shaolin etc etc - Spinning Dragon Tao on another video. You can check the Way of the Warrior video also on his channel
>>
<<@KoushikDey-l4w
says :
Whatever it is respected guruji. I don't have any different.I have deep respect to both. But the question is this has spreaded over the country even now. But on the contrary The China made it done with respect , with tradition all over the world. We should thank them . Ji namaste.
>>
<<@DisorderlyBastard
says :
It actually originated in Africa. We invented martial arts and indians stole it from us. We the true Shaolin monks.
>>
<<@Shaziarkhan
says :
Complete History of Martial Arts: System / Technique Country Approx Start Chinese Tribal Combat China 3000 BCE Taekkyeon (early Korea) Korea 2500–1500 BCE Shoubo, Shuai Jiao China 1100 BCE Muye (Korean martial system) Korea 1000 BCE Qin Military Combat China 221 BCE Han Martial Manuals China 200 BCE Qi Gong beginnings China 200–400 CE Da Mo’s yoga & meditation India → China 480–520 CE Shaolin Kung Fu China 500–900 CE Chinese styles explosion China 900–1600 CE Okinawan Te Japan (Okinawa) 1300–1600 CE Tode (Tang Hand) Japan 1600–1800 CE Karate formalization Japan 1860–1900 CE Modern Karate (Shotokan) Japan 1920s Taekwondo Korea 1940s–1950s Modern Wushu China 1950s
>>
<<@onisiforosalexandrou2551
says :
Chinese martial arts date back over 4000 years ago, not 1500 years. Bodhidharma is considered the first patriarch of the Shaolin temple and the martial arts that first developed in that temple based on Kalaripayattu, one of the oldest martial arts in the world originating from Kerala, India. However the further development on the martial arts developed in the Shaolin temple have surpassed Kalari both in performance and variety.
>>
<<@MultiBopo
says :
Sorry to disappoint everyone, but Shaolin Martial arts, are not Kung Ku, and Bodhidharma did not teach anyone Martial Arts. Bodhidharma was also, not Indian, he was a Persian whose ancestors migrated from Iran alongside other tribes and who created the Gupta people, which spoke Persian, Sanskrit, Prakrit, Gāndhārī and Aramaic. Nobody spoke Hindi. Also, after Bodhidharma's 9 year meditation, he lost the use of his legs, so how on earth did a legless man, teach any physical movements, requiring human movement. Obviously, after 9 years of total stillness, Bodhidharma's leg muscles completely atrophied, leaving his with zero leg strength. Shaolin Martial Arts more than likely was taught by the dhyana master Buddhabhadra (跋陀), commonly known as Bátuó, who was the first Abbot of the Shaolin Monastery. Bátuó was also a Persian who came to China in 464AD. He was a Nikaya Buddhist and taught for 30yrs, integrating Taoist and local folk with Buddhism. In 495AD, the Shaolin Monastery was built by Emperor Xiaowen of Northern Wei, and Batuo was appointed as the 1st Abbot. Remember, the whole idea of India and the Indian people, is British. It was the British who created the country called India, and gave all of the people a common identity as Indians, in 1858AD. At the time of Bodhidharma and Bátuó, there was no such country, as India.
>>
<<@rajdeepmukherjee995
says :
Yes, absolutely to defend thou self from wild animals. Yes wild animals of two leg's standing tall. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
>>
<<@phoenix-rising2025
says :
It is correct here. I studied before
>>
<<@Shiva14082
says :
❤🎉🎉🎉
>>
<<@frankblack8266
says :
This is such bs look at the facial features of the real first kunfu master who taught the monks he was fram africa is is most chinese blood
>>
<<@jevv-g1z
says :
Kung fu came from Africa and Bodhidharma was a black man
>>
<<@bhuvaneswariharibabu5656
says :
குரங்கு பிடி குங்கு பிடி குங்கு பி குங்கு பீ குங்கு பூ
>>
<<@moonwalker905
says :
Kalari and kung fu has no relation, it's all fictional
>>
<<@ScriptureforEveryone
says :
Bodhidharma did not really “found” Kung Fu, but he became a legendary symbol of its spiritual and physical balance, especially in the Shaolin tradition.
>>
<<@Gauam_Tas
says :
I don't believe it unless i go to china.😢
>>
<<@MrJoseph-u7t1f
says :
✌️
>>
<<@edtyehehsgsgsj188
says :
This general story is true. very famous in China, I'm chinese😂
>>
<<@kinwai27271
says :
I. Chronological Impossibility Foundations of Chinese Martial Arts Oracle Bone Script Evidence: The character for "combat" (斗) appeared during the Shang Dynasty (1600–1046 BCE), predating Buddhist introduction to China by 800 years. Historical Records: The Book of Han (2nd century BCE) documented 199 martial arts treatises (e.g., Hand-to-Hand Combat and Swordsmanship), predating Buddhism’s arrival in China (1st century CE). Legendary Origins: Records of the Grand Historian described martial techniques used by the Yellow Emperor (Huangdi) in battles against Chiyou, suggesting combat systems existed in Neolithic China. Contradictions in Indian Martial Arts Timeline India’s Kalaripayattu is traced to the 13th century CE, while Shaolin Temple was founded in 495 CE (Northern Wei Dynasty). This creates a 700-year gap. The "Bodhidharma creating Shaolin martial arts" narrative first appeared in the 17th-century novel Shaolin Ten Precepts, lacking early textual support. II. Evidence of Indigenous Evolution Archaeological Discoveries Northern Qi Dynasty (550–577 CE) carvings at Xiaonanhai, Anyang, depict Shaolin monk Zongbian practicing martial arts identical to later Shaolin techniques. Monk Zongbian trained at Ye Temple before bringing martial skills to Shaolin, with no Indian influence. Unique Technical System Integration of Daoist Philosophy: Shaolin Kung Fu merged Daoist health practices (e.g., Muscle/Tendon Changing Classic) with military combat (e.g., spear techniques), forming a "Zen-Wu Unity" philosophy rooted in Chinese thought. Systematic Development: Ming Dynasty texts like Jian Jing (Sword Classic) by Yu Dayou and Ji Xiao Xin Shu (New Treatise on Military Efficiency) by Qi Jiguang documented Shaolin staff techniques derived from Chinese warfare experience. III. Debunking Bodhidharma Myths Timeline Inconsistencies Bodhidharma arrived at Songshan Mountain in 527 CE, but Shaolin Temple was established in 495 CE. Early monks focused on meditation, with no martial records. Literary Fabrication Claims of Bodhidharma creating "Arhat Fist" first emerged in 19th-century vernacular novels, contradicting authoritative Tang Dynasty Buddhist texts like Continued Biographies of Eminent Monks. IV. Logical Flaws in Indian Claims Cultural Reverse Diffusion Paradox Indian Buddhism introduced meditation to China, but Chinese practitioners later adapted it into Chan Buddhism (Zen), demonstrating cultural innovation, not unilateral influence. Lack of Material Evidence No pre-10th-century Indian martial artifacts or texts have been discovered, while China has abundant Qin/Han-era weapons and combat diagrams. V. International Academic Consensus Scholarly Validation Japanese scholar Tang Hao (1930s) compared Dunhuang murals with Shaolin manuals, confirming roots in Chinese military systems. American Sinologist Timothy Brook: "The Bodhidharma legend was a 19th-century nationalist myth to counter Western cultural imperialism." UNESCO Recognition Shaolin Kung Fu was inscribed as a Chinese intangible cultural heritage in 2006, affirming its exclusively Chinese origin. The historical and cultural origins of Shaolin Kung Fu are unequivocally rooted in Chinese civilization, as evidenced by archaeological findings, textual records, and philosophical frameworks. Firstly, China’s martial arts traditions predate the introduction of Buddhism by centuries. Oracle bone inscriptions from the Shang Dynasty (1600–1046 BCE) already documented combat techniques, while the Book of Han (2nd century BCE) detailed martial treatises that far antedate Bodhidharma’s alleged arrival in China. Secondly, Shaolin Kung Fu evolved through distinct Chinese cultural syntheses, integrating Daoist health practices like the Muscle/Tendon Changing Classic with military combat strategies from texts such as Jian Jing and Ji Xiao Xin Shu. Its unique "Zen-Wu Unity" philosophy, emphasizing meditation and physical mastery, reflects indigenous intellectual traditions rather than external influences. Conclusion: Shaolin Kung Fu is a product of indigenous Chinese civilization, evolving through Daoist philosophy, military practice, and Chan Buddhist thought. Indian claims rely on ahistorical legends and lack empirical support. The global recognition of Shaolin’s Chinese roots underscores the importance of preserving cultural authenticity against politicized narratives. Thirdly, the myth of Bodhidharma creating Shaolin martial arts lacks historical credibility. Bodhidharma’s presence at Shaolin (527 CE) postdates the temple’s establishment (495 CE), and Tang Dynasty Buddhist records make no mention of his association with martial practices. The tale first emerged in 17th-century vernacular novels, centuries after the Shaolin school’s peak. Fourthly, Indian claims suffer from chronological and empirical gaps. India’s Kalaripayattu, often cited as a precursor, emerged in the 13th century—over 700 years after Shaolin’s founding—with no surviving artifacts or texts predating this period. In contrast, China possesses abundant evidence, including Northern Qi Dynasty (550–577 CE) cave carvings depicting martial techniques identical to later Shaolin styles. Finally, international academic consensus firmly rejects Indian assertions. Japanese scholar Tang Hao’s 1930s analysis of Dunhuang murals and Shaolin manuals confirmed their basis in Chinese military systems, while UNESCO’s 2006 designation of Shaolin Kung Fu as Chinese intangible heritage underscores its global recognition. Indian narratives, reliant on fictionalized legends and nationalist rhetoric, fail to meet scholarly standards of evidence. Thus, Shaolin Kung Fu stands unequivocally affirmed as a product of China’s indigenous cultural evolution, transcending politicized debates about cultural ownership.
>>
<<@g33k_Tech
says :
1 handed namaste
>>
<<@TurstinTorque
says :
Dekh liya na Shahi love you 😅
>>
<<@TurstinTorque
says :
Main to hamesha tumse majak karta hun jise Tum hansti raho ok na Shahi love you 😅
>>
<<@TurstinTorque
says :
Or na jab ham dono ke beech vah bhi Jana to do char din bad band kar dena Magar kabhi chhodkar mat Jana ok na Shahi love you 😅😊 aur na hi Main Aisa kuchh bolata hun jise tumhara Dil ok na Shahi love you 😅
>>
<<@deejay.trader
says :
If you're not terrorist, you must be anti-terrorist. Either ways, you're not god.
>>
<<@petertuckergoettler5720
says :
Merci.
>>
<<@happyfreeky
says :
According to the Akashic Record ls, Bodhidharma was one of Shiva 's incarnations, as was Agastyamuni
>>
<<@devadason6394
says :
Do you know Silambam, Kalari, Adimurai, Varmam, Kung fu.
>>
<<@Happy_World_1
says :
Source : 7aum Arivu , Why do we Indians always dwell on the past , we don't even encourage our own martial arts even now ., but likes to take credit in everything
>>
<<@Nilz-ie8li
says :
He definitely wasnt african
>>
<<@VincentFrancisJavier-n7m
says :
Salute to Hindustan
>>
<<@pnkpanther4203
says :
proud to be half indian and Chinese,i learned the art of both yoga and kung fu
>>
<<@Kkapil96110
says :
I was so frustrated before watching this 😅 finally someone talked this 🥹
>>
<<@bharathirajanpalanivel9262
says :
Pranams Guruji 🙏🙏🙏
>>
<<@tanparagu1038
says :
❤
>>
<<@jarredrylemma
says :
Wow .. no wonder the world been telling us Indians are weak .. don't listen to the world , arise
>>
<<@henryrey-df7tj
says :
I read a book about shaolin from the beginning until the end in the past.
>>
<<@wolfbane717
says :
Caves have spiritual powers
>>
<<@dinodamo9752
says :
An elder will not hesitate to find the meaning of life upon an infant. Those who take their place in the beginning will find the end.
>>
<<@pseudoemperor9343
says :
Can anyone tell the title of bgm?
>>
<<@Anonymous-yh4ol
says :
Bodhidharma wasn't the founder of Kung Fu nor Shaolin Kung Fu. This has already been debunked. Kung Fu is an emergent product of the culture and is as old as Chinese history going back thousands of years before Buddhism entered China. Kung Fu was already present at the Shaolin Temple since it was built before the arrival of Bodhidharma. It was common for Buddhist monks and nuns not only to practice Buddhism but also martial arts. The idea of associating Bodhidharma with Kung Fu came from when a Qi Gong manual was written in the 16th(?) century and the actual author deceived by having Bodhidharma written to be the author.
>>
<<@samsaf9800
says :
come on even if you are right at least India would have multiple form of marshal arts, if china is saying china has prove of multiple marshal arts in their countries..it is only fairy tale on the Indian side
>>
NEXT VIDEO
>>