<<@JoeBen-w1e says : The NYT is good for the BATHROOM !>> <<@kennethchao1678 says : Fake fake fake fake fake fake Fake fake fake fake fake fake Fake fake fake fake fake fake Nyt - fake fake fake fake fake fake fake fake fake fake fake 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮>> <<@kennethchao1678 says : Fake fake fake fake fake fake fake fake fake fake Fake work times Fake fake fake fake fake fake - Nyt nyt nyt nyt nyt nyt - Fake fake fake fake fake fake Fake fake fake fake fake Fake fake fake fake fake Fake fake fake fake fake fake Fake fake fake fake fake fake 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮>> <<@whitetylerperry says : These comments are nuts LMAO yeah because PragerU isn’t already itself a very compromised and biased organization.>> <<@danguee1 says : And look how it's lied about Climate Change. Mind you, it's not on it's own - all the Left Wing press, all the 'science' journals, all legacy media, all virtue-signalling Hollywood royalty and jet-setting government are doing exactly the same. It's shameful, costing lives of (literally) millions of poor people and shining up the egos of the rich...>> <<@jacktbugx1658 says : Trust N Y times YES if you want to hear the TRUTH NO if you don't like the TRUTH>> <<@DaDitka says : "They are liars. We know they are liars. They know that we know they are liars. We know that they know that we know they are liars. They know that wr know thaf they know that we know they are liars. And they couldn't care less." They will come to their end, and no one will help them.>> <<@Z_MIB says : They also said that in the 1960s a woman named Kitty Genovese was murdered in front of her apartment building, and that 38 people watched her being murdered from their apartment, but no one called the cops. However this is completely false, it's true that she was murdered, but in reality many people called the cops, it just took them hours to respond. The really sad part is that many psychology courses still teaches the false narrative that no one called the cops, and use it as an example of the Bystander Effect. Honestly, a ton of stuff taught in psychology courses have either very little evidence behind it, or false evidence behind it. The Stanford Prison Experiment is another example, it's taught in psychology courses that the guards just turned evil simply because the had power, but this is completely false. In reality, the doctor running the experiment told the guards to be aggressive, but of course he neglected to mention that part when he publicized the experiment. Stockholm Syndrome it yet another example, where is taught that people in a hostage situation will identify with their captors. However the entre basis for this theory comes from bank employees being held hostage where the cops didn't care about the safety of the hostages and the cops deflected any criticism by claiming the employees had identified with their captors. These are all the examples I can think of at the moment, but I'm sure many more exist which i just haven't thought of.>> <<@SChen-ei8gx says : The NY Times is 💩>> <<@JohnWilliams-channel says : The NYT may not get everything right, but you assholes get everything wrong.>> <<@aShaiguy says : Very relevant post oct-7>> <<@rudigereichler4112 says : Yes, you can trust it is a propaganda outled which belongs in the toilet.>> <<@WhiskeySam1 says : So, if Satan needed his own newspaper…>> <<@leonardmacaulay9833 says : Much like the coverage of dead Arabs has been in the MSM today.>> <<@legotechnic1314 says : Short answer: No. Long answer: This entire video.>> <<@stevehicks8944 says : Sheds light on why so many call the newspaper “The New York Slimes”.>> <<@thomascoleman8300 says : How are they still in business? Why are you buying the paper and supporting businesses that advertise with them.>> <<@rphb00 says : I trust that NY Times tells me what CIA wants me to know>> <<@parrotraiser6541 says : Like most rhetorical questions in the media, the answer is "No". The NYT is the paper that never met a genocide it couldn't ignore.>> <<@JumpingJack6 says : Can you trust the NY Times? Can a cow jump over the moon?>> <<@dejavu9605 says : The part about Vietnam is true! I was born in Vietnam after the war ended. I have never met a Vietnamese who knew anything about the war that spoke highly of the rebels from the north. We call them commies. Lives were turned upside down after Americans left. My parents’ generation regard 1975 as the year they lost their country.>> <<@fromhigherground4272 says : I don’t completely trust Prager U either.>> <<@JuniorDiamond5360 says : I like New York times, its’ paper for wrapping fresh fish or meat, 😅>> <<@yurichtube1162 says : Never knew NYT ruined the lives of millions and altered human history. The damages have never been undone.>> <<@joecampana3398 says : Bravo 👏!>> <<@jkmerriwether9919 says : Not to mention their reiterating of the Bush administration's lies that led us to invade Iraq.>> <<@narlimarli7406 says : Not just no, but HELLS NO. Any publication that would suppress the human annihilation of a certain race of people or pushing a hoax against the American people, doesn't deserve any consideration or accolades>> <<@fredweesly6209 says : I am fairly sure that during the inter war period that most journalists, except one, didnt know anything about the famines.>> <<@THATMOFODIRT says : They’ve shot themselves in the foot, just like most MSM. They’re a tabloid.>> <<@WebberAerialImaging says : Not even good as the Toilet Paper that it is>> <<@willemmcalpine9040 says : never>> <<@MLJ7956 says : I didn't nickname NYT 'The New York Slimes' for nothing (in my opinion) 😆....>> <<@strongmermaid4651 says : Thank you for making and posting your work and sharing it with us>> <<@luigiferretti2705 says : Why, is it still the most influential?>> <<@thomasdaily4363 says : I'm sorry, is that a serious question?>> <<@evanhce135 says : Seriously? You’re cherry picking a few examples through history when the Times was wrong? Sure, the NYT hasn’t gotten 110% of everything they’ve said right, but they are by far a more reliable and factual news source than pretty much every other. Seriously, what is a better news source? I bet you can’t name any.>> <<@hgff69 says : Currently, NYT, Washington Post, Bloomberg, CNN, Al Jazeera and BBC are destroying the image of India as breeding ground for Islamophobia where we non-Muslims are overcoming Love Jihad, while shutting down everything about killing of non-Salafi Muslims and non-Muslims in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh and suppression of Xinjiang and Tibet by China>> <<@YaBoiJonesy says : Funny how PragerU The "Journalists" who are run and funded by Nazi's thinks they can verify other news networks>> <<@holdencobb8353 says : Because pragerU is a trustworthy and reputable source...>> <<@60-second-HACKS says : Can we trust Prager U?>> <<@Soviet_Union_69 says : Thanks for proving your hypocrisy!>> <<@tavuzzipust7887 says : Absolutely not.>> <<@uddipanchaudhury3023 says : New York Times also supports terrorists in Kashmir.>> <<@jonathan-f2d3r says : Why would you believe this guy no one knows about saying random stuff with no sources that could be 100% made up... plus even if you still don't trust NYT well you don't have to trust this guy either>> <<@dovidell says : not even fit to use as emergency toilet paper in the out house>> <<@koldonn1111 says : You have a point... But can I also trust YOU? Not really, lmfao.>> <<@aaronfarkas6890 says : In the past year, Pulitzer Prize winner, Glenn Greenwald (for his reporting on the Edward Snowden/National Security Agency), described the political bias at The NY Times, as being, “hyperpartisan”. That, says it all.>> <<@kevinclarke1222 says : To answer your title question : No !>> <<@arthurwright8827 says : Not any more. They must have changed something in the way the paper is made. It’s gotten so bad my parrot refuses to crap on it!>> <<@ashutoshsrivastava3618 says : MY DEAR USA CITIZEN IF YOU ARE LISTENING TO THIS YOU ARE THE RESISTANCE. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT ALMOST IN ALL CASES THERE IS A SIMILARITY THAT NY TIMES IS SUPPORTING THE COMMUNIST ALWAYS AND DEMOCRATIC SETUP HAS ALWAYS FAILED TO ARREST THE FALSE NARRATIVE.>>
VideoPro
>>