Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@DylanMorisson says : I think all you have to do to understand this is look at the examples given (except for nuclear fusion) and also understand what room temperature means.>> <<@null__void says : As a fan, Thunderfoot; this aged poorly>> <<@DragonToothlessTwitch says : 20:00 "Whether you're browsing the internet." Clearly that person has zero understanding of what the internet is and how it works. Not only that, but you don't actually see current 4K screens and how they are presenting an image to you due to the physical limitations of the eyes (insufficient rods and cones in each eye to see that level of detail). Your brain gets numerous empty spots in the visual field which it then proceeds to fill in by guessing what is in those spots based on what is around them.>> <<@sharrpshooter1 says : I mean truly the biggest current issue with superconductors isnt the physics or discovery, its the engineering and the chemistry, as someone whose worked in the field a lot of possibility exist, its just that they all have caveats, like needing high pressure, or being hard to draw wires out of or metastability or a number of other issues. But I don't think its fair to say that there will never be an application for any of this stuff, undoubtedly a breakthrough will be made that will have massive success in certain areas, and over time with better engineering it could find its way to other applications, but again saying that the whole field will never lead to anything is just as dishonest as pop science is in the other direction>> <<@noxthemc7717 says : Now I know why the Tooth Fairy needs all those teeth>> <<@DorisCorey-j7i says : Lewis John Robinson Donald Perez Sandra>> <<@JoseRodriguez-m4g says : Brown Elizabeth Taylor Cynthia Davis Cynthia>> <<@evolutionaryadvantage says : That guy had the oddest looking 5 O’clock shadow. It was like he drew it on.>> <<@csnipper524 says : Whenever you hear someone use the term game changer multiple times in a minute you know they are talking out their ass.>> <<@dessertstorm7476 says : Every single (other) video on this spent at least half of it talking about what game changing technologies room temperature super conductors would unlock. I got so tired of hearing it>> <<@andregiger3822 says : Would it (in theory) be possible to get a metastable-room-temperature-super-conductor? I mean cooling a material to the point where it is superconducting and then let it get to higher temperatures (where it would normally not be superconducting) keeping it‘s superconducting properties. Or is this impossible due to some quantum-wibbely-wobbely-stuff?>> <<@tokyowarfare6729 says : could a very fine powder be put inside a flexible tube to build a cable? or needs the material to be continuous?>> <<@lengould9262 says : This tfoot gets a lot "wrong". Making wires of ceramic is no problem. See the MIT fusion company, Commonwealth Fusion. They figured out that, compared to a superconductor, a strip of stainless steel is a perfect insulator. So the just sputter the ceramic onto a strip of stainless steel and wrap it round their tokamack. To splice the conductor, they simply clamp two supercond faces together. Works perfect. This guy's "science" is bogus, downvoting.😢>> <<@6teeth318-w5k says : I-AM-BACK>> <<@obiwankenobi661 says : lol, those photos look epic>> <<@thereeljahjah says : Thank you for saving me 🙏🏼 from crap information… subscribing now>> <<@Technichian462 says : Here is my sample of Lk999. I took it one step further. Mine actually levitates. https://youtube.com/shorts/hcpoQxeoi2A?si=4w-s_O2xuwPlkaof>> <<@tonymurphy2624 says : In other breaking news, another RTS wally, Ranga Dias, has had his lawsuit against his university dismissed. The suit was based on allegations by his university, the University of Rochester, of scientific misconduct. Article available in this month's Nature.>> <<@csnipper524 says : What i came understand is when actual scientists make announcements or predictions many people doubt our criticize run them. However when regular people or vaporware salesman claim the most obvious BS, mostly everyone believes them without hesitation.>> <<@CainXVII says : Quantum computers, what are they good for? Absolutely nothing.>> <<@CainXVII says : I feel like we can already build much faster trains than we have, the problem is not the speed, it's making them work with everything going on around them>> <<@CainXVII says : Hey 1997 is not 30 years ago!!! I am only 26!!>> <<@thisguy9993 says : delete this video now before you embarrass yourself>> <<@TheAandGprojects says : Wobbly wobble>> <<@TheAandGprojects says : Wobbles>> <<@TheTboi82 says : This guy does not even know what year it is. How would he know f’kin magnets, how do they work?>> <<@JabelldiMarco says : Indeed, theirs excuse for not test at higher tmeperatures is a red flag, and similar the desperate fishing for applications. Nature is right her: there's simply nothing besides cryptography and - maybe - simulation of quantum process that quantum computers are good for. Even Protein folding profits more and more easily from AI, cloud/distributet computing or employing humans. And no game has to be more realistic of faster then the player can notice or react to, and realistic graphics are a a matter of taste and appreciation: nearly the whole asian game culture successfully employs obvious drawn graphics, and very few players take minutes to stand around and admire the perfect reflections and refraction on / through objects.>> <<@drumunism3781 says : Mmmm now I have an apatite for lead 🤤>> <<@gmctech says : Well it's actually quite simple isn't it?? Didn't somebody recently promise to negate wind resistance by "inventing" a train that runs in a vacuum tube? Oh wait...... LoL>> <<@user-vq6ym6qg4j says : Turns out it’s real, always knew it was 🤭>> <<@anntakamaki1960 says : YBCO superconducting at 93K, which is not room temperature. Lk99 claims superconductivity at room temperature. So I don’t know why you used that example, can you explain?>> <<@swim2kill says : I have levitated magnets many a time>> <<@brechtbanneel2170 says : Where can we see your superconductor?>> <<@CharlesLeeScoville says : As an EE enthusiast I can at least support that the psudoscience of superconductors making computers magically better is 100% false. The on die resistivity of an integrated circuit is only a very small part of why conventional computers hit speed limits. For one, *relativity*, which isn't going away just because you "now have" reduced resistance. Second, there is the capacitance, which, again, doesn't go away "now that you have" minimized resistance.>> <<@SpydersByte says : 3:09 "is it levitating?" Well, if you considering me to be levitating when I stand on 1 foot instead of 2 then yes, its definitely levitating. >.<>> <<@kimchigook6673 says : don't forget the LUNA was best crypto innovation everything from korea very innovative>> <<@ScrappyTheKnell says : 400 K = 126.85° C = 260.33° F I imagine they used Kelvin purely cause "Big number sound cool" compared to Celcious or Fahrenheit.>> <<@supertornadogun1690 says : Ah so we need a super conductor that works at liquid nitrogen temperatures that you can make wires with.>> <<@Naomi.Robertson says : LMFAO @ No sane man would mix these elements together...unless you're Thunderf00t of course. That's why I love you. Glad you didn't blow up the lab in your undergrad days.>> <<@anonymouscoward9643 says : i find it interesting that mercury isn’t as popular for SC compound research, yet experimentally you can do wild things with it in the EM domain.>> <<@wanderingbufoon says : the tooth fairies were on to something and it worked. This is why we don't see them anymore because they've done their superconductor engine to go back to their home planet.>> <<@ufochannel01 says : you begin by stating how wrong everything is and how right only you are lmao! all you guys listen up a guy named thunderfoot who cant say his real name said it so it must be true! i cant watch fools like you sorry you dont even try to prove anything your the only bs here imho.>> <<@ZarrosUE5 says : Is there anything you haven't busted?!>> <<@greenprinceverdantenobilus4101 says : All my friends are all like, 'follow the science'. So I'm like, "well, here's the long, boring and accurate description of why what you're thinking is dumb". REAL science. #'s.>> <<@arthurstemler1160 says : It is not necessary to screw the foot to the ground, the robot could balance itself using a gyroscope.>> <<@whycantibefree says : Loving your content. Found one of your Musk videos and found myself binge watching all of your videos. Great stuff. Thank you>> <<@AliothSpectranet says : what is this schizo editing>> <<@shohamsen8986 says : For 9:09, your claim is that roll resistance is going to be the only thing that changes for the maglev train design. How about the claim that it is supposed to be more energy efficient??>> <<@janosszabo98 says : Besides the point of the video, the "worked 30 years in the field" means absolutely nothing. You can work 100 years in a field without discovering anything. You can become an expert of your field, but that's not the same as coming up with new stuff. A carpenter with 50 years experience might be an expert in all joinery, but that doesn't mean a carpenter fresh out of school can't come up with a new joinery method. You know what I mean?>> <<@parzivalwolfram7084 says : i know very little about circuit design and modern CPU fabrication, but it's been described very well by someone I know who does: "superconductors in CPUs are useless because the speed of light is only so fast." Most of the battle seems to be getting things as densely packed as possible, because the bottleneck is the speed of electricity, not the material's resistance!>>