<<@TomBilyeu
says :
WARNING: I will never ask for your contact info in the comments section, that is someone impersonating me!
>>
<<@SueAnnePerez
says :
Great discussion on both ends!
>>
<<@bobleguy
says :
The more you dig into Lex Friedman's resume, the more HE seems like an actual strawman
>>
<<@maracummings9767
says :
Thank you for an interesting dialogue. In regards to what is truth, may I recommend Jiddu Krishnamurti's inquiries into a human mind. Specifically his book "As one is". JK was a philosopher. In many sources he is referred to as an Indian spiritual speaker and teacher, but he never considered himself either Indian or a spiritual anything.
>>
<<@Edword317
says :
I FOUND THE RELIGION THAT SAYS you SHOULD ONLY LOVE OTHER PEOPLE - but its not a "religionš·" š® It is the way of life "Love the father with all your heart" & "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" Everything else is HISTORYš® - NOT A STATEMENT OF MORALITY All the immorality in the bible is No Accident - they are events to reflect on and choose differently than how we "feel" ---- + you can always just ask him - for now Don't wait too long tho (he will come like a theif in the night - no prep, no warning - this and everything else, has been your warning) Seek and find or don't
>>
<<@neologian1783
says :
My ideal "friendship" = another person (anyone....literally anyone....god please anyone) willing to sit down with me while understanding full well it will consist of a "free ranging conversation" like this and not be comprised of a bunch of inane cliche's or meaningless sports or weather talk while enjoying the exchange.
>>
<<@sauroros
says :
This is heck of an intro. kudos.
>>
<<@WayneAustin-f3u
says :
Happiness is short term and is based on what happens, while joy comes from God and is eternal
>>
<<@ehaley6838
says :
So hereās the thing - if we can look back and see the dietary restrictions were for the good of the community following them as was mentioned in the interview with pig meat, why canāt we do the same for the instruction on stoning a āchildā (it more accurately reads āyoung manā) who is unable to be handled by his parents? If we had signs and indications to warn us about someone who would grow up into the next Hitler or Jeffrey Dahmer, wouldnāt it be ethical to prevent mass murder and horrors that would be committed at their hands??
>>
<<@xelaklement3367
says :
Comparing Trump to Himmler made him look like a complete idiot. As a German, it's baffling how people, especially some Americans, keep playing down the horrors of WW2 by comparing anyone they don't like politically to literal NAZI leaders. Get a grip, or go read a history book.
>>
<<@jasonk8775
says :
Read atlas shrugged
>>
<<@laneantunes4059
says :
It's hard to imagine this super smart guy sees nothing wrong with the way Elon Musk or Trump deliberately lies to everyone (democrats are not much better btw). Some people seem so sincere, so kind, so intelligent, but they will defend whoever will benefit their careers. It's really sad because I thought I had finally found another intellectually honest person to listen to.
>>
<<@ABCD_163
says :
Bring an amazing guest. Talk more than the guest. Truly a tragedy.
>>
<<@BlakeMiller
says :
Too many ads, not worth watching even though Gad is amazing. Ads every twenty seconds. WTF
>>
<<@porter9260
says :
Saad completely missed the point on gender identity and WTF bro why you just let that pass?
>>
<<@elizabethk3238
says :
Tom, you are "disagreeable" in that your language is often offensive to your audience. Especially since you are equipped to refrain from using harsh language.
>>
<<@mikee6618
says :
great take on saccharine lex's bs
>>
<<@chrismichael9556
says :
The audio is normal during the ad and then the rest of the podcast it's like they are whispering
>>
<<@iuvalclejan
says :
Gad is right about some things, but wrong about others, and I'm "going after him". First, working hard is not something most of our hunter-gatherer ancestors did. It's a relic from agrarian times that had evolved some special things like "the treadmill of infinite aspirations", when we moved to cities. See Suzman's book "Work" for a better evolutionary perspective. Second, the whole "cuckolding" thing only makes sense in a monogamous culture, which means mostly agrarian, as monogamy is also a relic of agrarianism, as shown by such evolutionary thinkers as Ian Morris. In a tribe, there is not much advantage for spreading my genes more than other men in the tribe, but there is great advantage in collaborating with other tribe members in childrearing. In other words, group selection trumps individual selection in that environment. In a post-agrarian, urban culture, the situation is more complex, with some advantages to monogamous child-rearing (as shown by Henrich et al.) and some advantages to polyamorous child-rearing (as shown by Christopher Ryan). Third, evolution can be used to justify anything, in so-called "just-so" arguments and naturalistic fallacies. Whether something is good for some people's happiness or not is not determined by evolution. It could make us want things that are make us happy in the long-term and unhappy in the long-term. It could also be a mismatch (as Gad pointed out but didn't flesh out here), something that made us happy in the past, but is making us miserable now (like jealousy for some people in agrarian cultures). It could also be that some people don't have the cultural and genetic make-up that causes some behavior in most people, and that they could be selected for in the present and future, although they were deselected in the past, because of a changed environment (e.g. feeling jealousy or rage because of the possibility of being cuckolded). It is ironic that the European Enlightenment which Gad is a proponent of in his values of individual freedom (moderated by Theory of Mind about others) and authenticity, is also at odds with many of the chimp-like behaviors he is an apologist for (especially the ones with a gender differential).
>>
<<@0i0l0o
says :
Yo. Give my high-value lazy a ** tinestamps.
>>
<<@adoteq_
says :
What I do, I answer everything with a question and as a question. If someone tells me something, then to me that is a question. At the same time I answer where I want to go. The answer to that question is the question to the answer of where I want to be
>>
<<@wendellbabin6457
says :
2:55:10 A PhD from the "School of Hard Knocks"?
>>
<<@wendellbabin6457
says :
2:46:42 ALSO NEVER forget that Reputation Destruction and SAVAGING us the NATURAL, "Evolutionary?" playing Field of Women and Machiavellian Sociopath Types Precisely because they are PHYSICALLY Incapable of Retaliation. Especially when Reputation Destruction can be accomplished WITHOUT ANY cost or Repercussions at ANY Level. And in the Current Pathological "Woke" cultural landscape that is EXACTLY what maybe even Western Civilization is MORE Threatened than anything besides External PHYSICAL DOMAIN Enemies. BASICALLY "Surrounded" within AND without.
>>
<<@wendellbabin6457
says :
1:19:47 I wonder if Tom is confusing Gallipoli and Lebanon?
>>
<<@wendellbabin6457
says :
33:23 What I think Peterson often describes as viewing History of WWII Germany through perspective of Germans RATHER than the BROADER Allied view. NOT Perp and Victime or Oppressor Oppressed the "Woke Mob" do NOT even Identify as Marxist uf Not ouright Stalinist at its core. May NOT even be CAPABLE of doing SO. But like just discussed by Solchenytsin in Gulag Archipelago in the Soviet case. With a nod to someone like Dave Chappelle, the joke in the USSR back then also often mentioned by JBP by the Ordinary Folks was "we pretend to work, and they ("Soviet Government") pretend to pay us.
>>
<<@wendellbabin6457
says :
13:07 I am not educated in any way to level of someone from DR. Saad's "Ecosystem", and when he uses this " Big Word, I guess "Scientific" descriptions I naturally, like most similar folks struggle for the Personal equivalent(s). My best take at this for those he calls Ontological and (Edit: consequentialist ?), see I would now need to rewind in the middle of typing this comment to even remember the other one "Real Time", but maybe a "Lay Term(s)" would be the Human Level at which these operate IRL. ONE'S affects or consequences LIKELY go NO FURTHER than MAYBE ONLY one other Human Scale Relationship. Do I look fat in these jeans is his examle for us. The Other is one that POTENTIALLY has 2nd or 3rd or FURTHER (Edit: add ORDER) consequences if Lied about in either COmission OR OMission or BOTH. (Edit: EVEN unknown, or unknowable. Potentially catastrophic. Why, I believe, The U S Founders and Framers WANTED ANY of these sorts of Political "Experiments" to first be THOROUGHLY tried at the LOWEST POSSIBLE "LEVEL" of Government FIRST. before, say, Amending the Construction at the Federal Level or EVEN multiple States. Of as Diverse as possible as Humanly Manageable. Small vs large, rich versus poorer. Industrial versus Agricultural or mining. Party alliliation. Neither of currently existing ones even EXISTED at the time. Certainly Republican Didn't. Not certain for Democrat if existed or "Evolved form prior" whig for example. Think it was Madison who didn't want ANY. Too old and worried about merely Maslovian Existence at this point in life to LIKE EITHER "Staight Ticket" any more. Haven't for DECADES.)
>>
<<@jennifermerva9538
says :
The problem is people think their opinion is them. That's why they get offered when you disagree with the opinion.
>>
<<@Nyumc99
says :
2:50 minutes , ish. What Tom is saying in my opinion is, be strategic with the use of your personal integrity . Wonderful podcast gentlemen. Thank you. ššāÆļø
>>
<<@christobita8038
says :
On Lex, there's a discussion to be had about whether his message of love is helpful or not... But the fact Gad can't recognise he's being genuine about it says something about the type of person he is.
>>
<<@Dorythefish13
says :
Ew. Man mind porn. Right wing garbage science.
>>
<<@avogue7831
says :
It's interesting the guest can't differentiate between social democracy which are capitalist and their taxation regimes which vary. See Canada, France, Germany, New Zealand Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Australia as examples. New Zealand is a good example of graduated taxation, also known as progressive taxation, in which the tax rate increases as the amount of money being taxed increases. The goal of a progressive tax is to reduce the burden of low-income individuals. No entrepreneur believes this discourages risk taking or expanding their businesses, financial rewards for innovation and hard work (sic) or discourages striving for success, afterall they all have accountants that manage their endeavours within the taxation rules.
>>
<<@onseayu
says :
Gad, you are right about Lex. Soooo annoying and fake most of the time
>>
<<@AnnaMishel
says :
I also have an aversion to reading fiction. Reality is INFINITELY more interesting!
>>
<<@AnnaMishel
says :
You donāt have to make a choice on which books to bring. Just have them all on you iPad.
>>
<<@marnikondor5885
says :
I love how Gad brought up Confucius.
>>
<<@jonnyenglish-10
says :
Gad is brilliant, with a fascinating background and wonderful stories to tell. He advocates for seemingly just causes, but humble he is not.
>>
<<@cassiahector3191
says :
Tom, I do enjoy your podcast! You bring on the most interesting guests, including Dr Sad. What I find disturbing is your need to swear, youāre such a robust individual with an amazing broad command of the English language. Iām so turned off when you use profanity.
>>
<<@emilyknowlton8602
says :
The average person has to constantly work jobs they hate just for food, shelter, and medicine.
>>
<<@MikhaelaBryden
says :
Such a good interview and conversation between you two! Love it!šš¼šš¼šš¼
>>
<<@cecilcharlesofficial
says :
Oneās beliefs arenāt a choice, though certainly they can change over time. While also, they are incredibly and irrevocably important to your experience of life. But theyāre not chosen. And this is what allows you to finally have faith, trust.
>>
<<@RoxannaDayl
says :
the law by frederic bastiat has astounding insights - all within 76 pages. spend $6 and see why he and Ben Franklin were friends
>>
<<@YungKingz__
says :
Im so much like gad saad
>>
<<@adriansinclair5323
says :
Tom, you so need to host Charles Hoskinson on your show. He would be an excellent source who could fill in your curiosity about potential solutions to the financial future of the world conundrum with very meaningful ideas.
>>
<<@tapeburner3942
says :
audio is shit
>>
<<@z0uLess
says :
Why did he quit soccer just because he was injured? Sounds like someone that does not want to work
>>
<<@z0uLess
says :
Have people noticed that the word "authenticity" has popped up recently and now everyone is using it?
>>
<<@danielbrunelle6709
says :
Valid point of view on taxation. However think about your book sales and imagine how it would have never gotten out of the ground because you need people with disposable income that in other case(without gradual taxation end redistribution of resources) coiuld not afford id because they are struggling to pay thier share for hospitals and other stuff. simplestic but meh, it's more complicated but i guess you get the point.
>>
<<@TonyWeirPD
says :
My takeaway from this video is that I need to use the phrase "social-science imbeciles" more often.
>>
<<@sondrax
says :
Itās called⦠Aspergerās. š (And this isnāt a weigh-in on his positions, many of which I agree with. But his approachā¦)
>>
<<@rayhayden4553
says :
Richest man of Babylon got both fiction data
>>
NEXT VIDEO
>>