Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@Coffee1776 says : "The acquisition of apocalyptic weaponry by Tehran" Trump in 2026: "Hold my beer....">> <<@ivandaly3679 says : That theist's ramblings on infinity and oter scientific notions are so desperately illogical and faulty. And as far as the laws of nature being fine tuned for life, what is this fools iq? Its definitel below average. Its all by chance and that is apparntly too much for his little religion-corrupted mind. Idiot.>> <<@Un4_given says : God cant tell the future!! Could not anticipate Eve eating the apple, the snake, Satan, every dramatic story in scriptures, wars, suffering, murders and so on. But he does require you to worship or else. Why?>> <<@JukkaX says : Would you buy a used car from this theist guy..? Though so.>> <<@jahprime6932 says : Physicists made the bomb. A Christian president gave the ok to use it idiot.>> <<@Wild_2098 says : How Craig gunna argue that the universe cannot be infinite due to internal contradictions... And then turn right around and say, but I know this infinite God exists.>> <<@Wild_2098 says : Of course the comments are empty of anything useful.>> <<@pamew says : Host has the most powerful dad aura I have ever seen. What a lovely chap.>> <<@krayt2547 says : Coming back to this debate, it’s absolutely insane there are still people thinking Hitchens won, lmao>> <<@moseybear says : William Jennings Bryant vs. Clarence Darrow>> <<@danp1980 says : Craig says "Jesus wouldn't take away the human rights of another person." Then all Christians should immediately stop trying to convert and take away the human rights of gay people and admit that we are fully equal and deserving of rights in society.>> <<@ceroth8716 says : what a stupid argument in the opening... so is it more likely that life happened by chance ooooor is it more likely that a godlike being created every galaxy, solar system, planet, element, then the combination of elements and the resulting sentience, the shapes of things and the shapes they evolve into and so on....>> <<@poleline111 says : Christopher Hitchens is so brilliant, but his arguments are so full of nothing.>> <<@Max-Current says : Brah brah brah..... what happenend when god left the USA?>> <<@HowToHomeLife says : From a very young age, especially after being raised in Catholicism, I began doubting everyone's beliefs about everything! After some years and the understanding of the scientific method: "a systematic, evidence-based process for understanding the world, involving observations, forming testable questions, creating hypotheses, conducting experiments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions, all while minimizing bias through skepticism and reproducibility to build reliable knowledge", I was constantly challenging my perception of reality. To this day, I understand the human condition as the "ultimate variable", skepticism is my long-time constant companion! Sadly, challenging another person's "beliefs" is a daunting endeavor, most individuals are not willing to think or believe otherwise, I call this "auto-corroboration", only gathering facts that support their own beliefs, never skepticism, this is why I live the life that I do! David Riddle>> <<@nataliesharif2167 says : The resurrection...in our modern understanding makes Easter a Christian Halloween and Jesus a zombie.>> <<@marculatour6229 says : It is easy to prove the existence of God. You just need to invite Him to breakfast and then take a selfie with Him. That is how I proved the existence of my neighbors, too. They aren't even omnipotent, and they had no problem having breakfast with me. The only reason they wouldn't come is if they happened to be on vacation. So, if God doesn't show up when you invite Him, He’s probably off on vacation somewhere.>> <<@CharmyCharmy-v8r says : The rape example? Hell no!>> <<@GrandGolem-t6x says : It's no surprise that Craig won't let go of his weak argument that he need not prove Christianity but that Hitchens must disprove it. Craig has invested so much of his life into a belief system with zero evidence. Of course he dismisses the concept of the burden of proof. Placing the burden of proof on everyone except those making the central claim is just a cheap shot dressed up to look legitimate. It's not. And, for what it's worth, it is hard to believe that Dr. Craig is too stupid to understand this comment, he's just too dishonest. Not the moralist he pretends to be after all. All this is so, so tired. I don't care if people want to believe in god. They are free to do so and I would have it no other way. But that doesn't give them license to demand others disprove their claims or accept them as proven. That's the truly annoying petty thing about the likes of Dr. Craig. One last bit, for Dr. Craig to claim evolution is improbable and therefore it must be god is not just a bad argument but it is an abjectly bad argument that threatens the very integrity of life. I really miss Hitchens.>> <<@kucharukadam says : If god is a being that created all like time, gravity, all universe and its law.. do you really think we as people can understand him? Know what he wants? Its like microbes would debate on my porn search ;)>> <<@yK-oq3to says : 1 qns: if christianity is true about the 1 and sole creator, why are there so many other gods and religions? Are they just the same chrisitianity in different forms? why did god not send his sons to Asia and Africa?>> <<@feverdreamsstudio says : 57:07 Craig’s argument that the “miracle” of evolution and that the Atheist has a presupposition which limits their ability to follow reason is frustrating on a number of levels>> <<@cbatzo6786 says : Facile arguments on both sides that ignore the depth of the question.>> <<@jurijkratz4792 says : Believers always serve a empty table, there is NOTHING ON THEIR TABLE, the arguments are extremely weak and say nothing at all.>> <<@marybuford9591 says : Religions plan your afterlife, second life, resurrection, reincarnation. Plan it any way you choose. Unplanned basically go into a criminal pit. If you're in a world of crime that's hell. You'll know them by what they do. It's quite difficult to comprehend. It's a hard life then you die and go to hell. There's always someone who wants you to burn in hell. Christ's teach8ng basically told people to stop creating hells. Good advice but people cant do it and then they blame god for not stopping it. It's not worth it. Birth rate is dropping. You should know suicide solves nothing. It just gets worse. The vices of hate, anger, envy is huge, Jealousy, laziness etc are overlooked. An envious person will throw a Saint into hell. It's quite hopeless.>> <<@blatantly7832 says : ":nice try" Craig....but the substance of your propositions + a Zero/ Nil. You sound pathetic PRECISELY bcs you provide No Source material for your "pseudo-facts" that support your POV.>> <<@quartytypo says : The bigger question: Is atheism provable?>> <<@JD-ev1uj says : Just a few years before Mr. Hitchens death. His debates with Professor Lennox and Mr. Craig I could sense a very angry debater for his thoughts on God were very crass. Unfortunately that doesn't play well except for his crass new Atheists.>> <<@bobdecarlo7778 says : Has anyone heard from Chris since his passing? He spoke eloquently & I was wondering if he might have anything new or different to advise us.>> <<@gabevillarreal5118 says : first off its a complete strawman to argue that atheists 'believe" there is no God....atheists don't believe in the Easter Bunny either, or Zeus, or Apollo etc just like Christians don't either yet those beings are not up for debate because we know Zeus doesn't make the lightning and Apollo doesn't control the sun........ and even assuming we were all put here by a powerful something or someone....there is still ZERO evidence of any kind that what ever created us is in any way divine for all we know, we are the genetic experiment of some aliens, i'd argue there is more evidence for that than a divine being with all the details of the Christian Bible....Religion, ALL religion has always been man's way to try and explain the natural world....its only the past couple hundred years that humanity has started to move beyond superstition and began discovering science>> <<@giuseppeabatangelo8715 says : Almost nothing of what craig said makes any sense unless you believe in ancient superstitions.>> <<@B.S... says : The Problem of Evil is sufficient evidence that monotheism is superstition.>> <<@UselessClubFoot says : Hugh Hewett had parents with a great sense of humour.>> <<@christopherroyer7635 says : 56:00-1:06.30…Craig absolutely destroys 99% of atheistic arguments…just wow…even if you disagree, you have to admit that was impressive debating.>> <<@christopherroyer7635 says : Craig is the GOAT!!>> <<@ryanmorris5709 says : The more I listen to Willian Lane Craig the more cringe it sounds>> <<@alanarcher says : And now, over a decade later, Alex O'Connor is debating WLC as well, being a huge fan of The Hitch>> <<@devious6947 says : WLC displacing the burden of proof Edit: Multiple times lol>> <<@christopherroyer7635 says : 32:20 👌🏼>> <<@cabbagereviews8513 says : I still don't know why Hitchens was ever propped up as this great atheist thinker. Like, instead of putting a rhetorician (Hitchens) up against a mediocre philosopher (William Lane Craig; sorry Craig, the Kalam is just not allat), we could've been putting up actual titans against each other. Like, why would anyone want to watch Hitchens whine on stage for an hour when we could watch Graham Oppy debate Rob Koons, where both sides actually make coherent points...>> <<@PulverizeSunrise says : When Hitchens says “I encourage you to swab the inside of your cheek and see how closely related we are to other primates and beings”… does that not point to one creator..? Like a signature. 🤔>> <<@Vaden8ter says : 1:50:49 Hitch has the same look I had throughout the debate whenever turek was up at bat>> <<@AWordwithZeke says : Jesus is king>> <<@mikerotcherson says : I'm dead serious: William Lane Craig is an absolute master of logical fallacy. His ability to so effortlessly interweave them at a moment's notice, is genuinely impressive. I'm not being sarcastic. My jaw literally dropped in amazement several times during this debate. Many of the ways he employed fallacies to make it seem like he was presenting something sound, I honestly wouldn't have even thought of.>> <<@AndrewLane-pm2ro says : Christopher Hitchens was so dumb, he actually believed that life on earth was the result of mindless natural processes. 😅🤡🤣>> <<@SERVANT317 says : A idiot would rather die by his own ignorance ,instead of excepting wisdom out of his own confusion 😢>> <<@cybersquatch6938 says : Concerning the comments here: It really seems people heard the debate, but didn’t really listened to it.>> <<@MrBadPriest says : It is remarkable, to me, how the atheist view is just missing the mark and arguing against a straw man. Clearly, he doesn't know the least part of the Christian worldview. And yet, he's hailed as such a great mind... I mean. Great eloquence, fine speech, smart, cutting wit... but. Quite shallow. I don't see any compelling evidence, apart from his own emotive appeal to "divine cruelty" (that is entirely based on the way he views theism, far, far removed from the God Christians worship). He seems to think he'd do a better job designing life than an infinite, supra universal, all knowing God. Buddy, we don't even have good medicine for migraines... we can't do anything without an INCREDIBLE amount of power and resources. Also. If the criticism against God is that, in Hitchen's words, any god would be a poor designer, then what must we think when he defends our own capacity to do good without a God? Are we then, better, at being moral than an eternal divine being? The atheistic view is inherently flawed, and has to be defended entirely by hand waving problems (evidences included) away. That's why every such atheist debater is likewise witty, edgy, sour, sarcastic: there's literally no alternative where they remain with an intact, cohesive worldview. Edit #2: Then he asks: do you believe Jesus cast demons out? That'd be sorcery... This, coming from a person who affirms "he studied religion truly" shows an APPALLING lack of knowledge of the basic facts of the religion he chose to oppose in this instance. What a farcical take.>> <<@athefirst5790 says : 1:54:06>> <<@arekrataj3111 says : Hitch lost. He knew. He admitted it.>>