Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@AprylBerry710 says : No, as I understand Cain and Abel were never stated to be the first two humans, they were just the ones named.>> <<@Ahab-0691 says : 58:10 shut up, Jordan 😅>> <<@Ahab-0691 says : This is a conversation between the most ideological leading intellectual with the least ideological>> <<@kalervolatoniittu2011 says : mr sapolsky seems to agree everything mr peterson claims. so there's little or no confrontation,which leads to nobody's feelings are hurt>> <<@MichaelLabriola-k9i says : " The sopolsky on depression" video really moved me and made me a fan. I was like someone really does understand.❤🙏🗽💗>> <<@drabadeer says : do not stain sapolskys work with this grifters speudoscience>> <<@dougcortes6567 says : Wow! ❤>> <<@abhishekmangaraj says : 01:09:40 The @aamaadmiparty government trying to develop healthcare and education while the @bjp trying to stop them and put hurdles in their way.>> <<@GeoffreyNoPants says : Someone should make a dramatic film about Jordan Peterson and cast Bob Odenkirk as Dr Peterson because they sound so much alike. Also, very happy that these two got together. I watched Dr Sapolsky's lecture series "Human Behavioural Biology" about twenty years ago and it changed my life, and I started watching biblical analysis by Dr Peterson a couple months ago, and that changed my life too. Great minds, and a great talk right here.>> <<@barrywhite9114 says : Truth Love Life Mind Soul Spirit Principle = God Seven Synonyms for God Mary Baker Eddy 1988>> <<@TOM-AssociateCreativeDirector says : Thanks God _ this is a masterclass _>> <<@hawkarae says : I missed this when it dropped, and it feels like my birthday to discover it today. ❤>> <<@hankroest6836 says : "I feel giddied with intellectual stimulation.">> <<@Kitkatteg says : The more I watch this, I don’t believe this conversation actually happened, the uh huh uh huh uh huh and the cut away and Sapolsky nods but never addresses anything that Peterson says. Glad ChatGPT noticed as well. Talked past each other: Peterson would introduce a concept (often framed through religious or mythological lenses), and Sapolsky would respond with a strictly biological or materialist explanation without directly addressing Peterson's framing. Limited Direct Reference: As you noted, they rarely referred to each other by name or explicitly acknowledged the other's preceding point before pivoting to their own prepared thoughts. Divergent Frameworks: Peterson focused on metaphysical truth and the utility of religious narratives, while Sapolsky adhered strictly to neurobiological determinism, leading to a conversation where their fundamental premises rarely intersected.>> <<@tysonw81 says : Everybody thinks they're a good person. That you're concerned about the fate of the world, say, means nothing. Zedong, Hitler, Stalin, etc. believed that they were making the world a better place. I'm sure Peterson doesn't not believe that the world should be preserved for future generations: that is, for the intellectually and morally superior like himself. The mass of inferior humanity are hopeless, neglectable, and even disposable if needs be.>> <<@tysonw81 says : Oh, shucks, I was getting to like this guy. He seems like a fairly modest, interesting academic. I didn't know he was part of this same tacky network of public intellectuals being performatively smart to make their bread. It does, I'll say, come with the benefit of being worshiped by a cadre of followers, too, which seems very important to guys like Peterson. One thing you have to say for Chomsky he had enough dignity not to run around in these circles. When he let himself be morally or professionally compromised at least it was for good money and getting to hang out with other Ubermenchen (although it says little for him he thought Woody Allen was one of those).>> <<@alexandermikolas8343 says : That bat research scenario at 24:00... Imagine aliens kidnap you, spray you with an IBNS anti-theft dye, stick stolen banknotes in your pockets and dump you out on the street just to see what happens to you 😬>> <<@nikolaykolev5125 says : Unmatched scientific and philosiphical clash between opposing opinions about existence of free will.>> <<@ععليحسن-و1م says : Fear God, the Lord of the Worlds. I fear for you more than my own life. I seek forgiveness from God, the Almighty, and I repent to Him. I confess my sin. I punished myself at your feet. I imagined a naked image of you. You would kiss me now, spit on me. I am entirely yours. Glory be to God, the Almighty, who created you. Forgive me. I confess my sin. You are like Joseph, peace be upon him. God forbid! I am Zuleikha. I am telling you, "God willing." May God protect you wherever you are. Your servant.>> <<@bojanmisic9295 says : Where do you get these morons!>> <<@ollyr_3710 says : Robert Sapolsky looks so much like Robert Plant😊>> <<@АнтонИванов-я3с says : Thank you>> <<@JimineyBob says : 10:51 New bio: top lobster and dominant as hell>> <<@sophiesseeyes says : I just figured how to say Roberts name I kept pronouncing it SPALASKY. tomato tomatoe>> <<@BornSlippy1999 says : I like how Jordan designed the introduction as if 90's talkshows, "Hello everyone, today our topic is going to be etc.">> <<@Swenser says : There really is no secret. Don't over think it Most humans are evil self serving assholes. QED. No need to thank me. No book necessary.>> <<@scres87 says : Leave abortions and planned parenthood out of this jeez>> <<@presidentpotato222 says : THIS SAME SCIENTIST THINKS TRANSGENDERISM IS AMAZING>> <<@knife_gun_axe272 says : We make such a big deal out of what is actually just a simple life. Family food, shelter.>> <<@Steven-n3u5d says : Having too become what is necessary>> <<@Plutoman09 says : interesting how baboons can "wipeout" the "aggressive psychopaths' in their troops, but we humans still have to deal with them governing our countries ...>> <<@Plutoman09 says : "punishment for being generous" ... .I picked up a fellow work mate one day as he was hitch-hiking home after work. It was a very hot day and I though a ride would be a lot better .. When he got in the car the first thing he said to me was, "where I come from being nice is a sign of weakness". And i answered "well you can get out and continue hitch-hiking if you like'...>> <<@Plutoman09 says : 41:16 - 43:34 Robert Sapolsky hits the nail right on the head. I totally agree>> <<@Plutoman09 says : FUCKING AWESOME !!! The psychological AND the evolutionary characteristics of all life all in one video. How great is that ??>> <<@UVBluesman says : I have huge respect for both of these gentleman. Watched hundreds of hours of video from both of them. Sapolsky first and then Peterson. It's absolutely shaped my thinking over a period of the last 15 years.>> <<@avielp says : I wonder what Sapolsky would say about the Planned Parenthood plug in>> <<@bradleyjack1970 says : I really enjoy listening to Sapolsky. Not so much Peterson>> <<@mohammedomar4652 says : TWO OF MY favourite people ever ever>> <<@stuffguy6664 says : Two unique minds conversing is refreshing.>> <<@glamaz0n says : I am a 79 yr-old grandmother and a big fan of these two intellectual giants. One day while describing in a text to my daughter my fascination with all the content presented here, she replied with “You’re not a regular grandmother”.>> <<@yodiyup says : This conversation between Peterson and Sapolsky is one of the best I’ve ever heard—a perfect 'Yin and Yang.' It’s a powerful example of how the pursuit of science isn't about being right-leaning or left-leaning. This is what scientific discourse should be the norm. It's a stark contrast to the discussion with Dawkins, which didn't look good for anyone. Even as someone who leans left (and respects Dawkins's scientific arguments), I thought it looked particularly bad for Dawkins and the lefties. Kudos to Jordan Peterson for being the one extending the hand and fostering this kind of essential dialogue.>> <<@IdleWorker says : Why didnt peterson ask anything about trans neurobiology?>> <<@Noobener says : 17:56 The Author of game theory won: He took money of the buyer without the buyer being able to take any of the author. The funny part is that you are thankful for the knowledge confirming the opposite requirement the theory.>> <<@domclarke92 says : What an absolutely wonderful conversation. Such a heartwarming and fascinating story about the cultural shift in the baboon troop. Thank you very much for putting this together and sharing it! Time to start reading Sapolsky's 'Determined' this afternoon!>> <<@ccpositron3650 says : Mr Peterson, next Time, please buy a better pen :) For key lines you need a high-quality Pen :) Herr Peterson, nächstes Mal bitte einen besseren Stift kaufen :) Für wichtige Zeilen braucht man einen hochwertigen Pen :)>> <<@harry.l.morley says : And does this mean dopamine has its roots in biological evolution? As in, is it essential for the survival of our species? That makes sense in my head, even obvious?>> <<@harry.l.morley says : When you're about to get something and then the possibility of getting more of that something suddenly arises, in the moment (in anticipation of a BETTER future reward than the current one) . . . That feeling, that's the double dopamine spike they speak of. (Think food, shopping, clothes, money, drugs, sex etc.) It indicates the motivational nature of dopamine as much as its reward seeking fiction. As I see it, they work in concert to produce a driving/motor like/pleasureful/exciting/kicking sort of experience to get you do that something that will release more the sweet, sweet dopamine. . .>> <<@garyluciani1082 says : When they were talking about reward and dopamine and the hero, jordan said if there's no future of more fruit yet discovered, it becomes dull,boring. The thought popped into my head. This might explain why Adam and Eve gave in to the temptation of eating the forbidden fruit. As humans they were compelled by their being human to eat that fruit. God created them to be that way. Shame on you God. You set them up.>> <<@Sly_Hound says : Poor dr Robert is just waiting for his turn to talk 😂>> <<@harperwelch5147 says : I find this very confusing and your speaking your own language. Surprisng a professor would be doing thus. Too exotic.>>