Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@myshadow6693 says : Glen Greenwald is just so dam likable 🥇🙂🙂🙂>> <<@THEFIRSTANDTHELAST77 says : THE CROWN OF THORNS THAT KILLS SINFUL THOUGHTS🧠🧠🧠---THE HOLY WORD IS THE SEED THAT CRUSHES THE SEED OF THE SINFUL WORD IN OUR HEAD, THINKING, AND WISDOM 🧠👉👉👉 Genesis (3:15) I will put enmity between you and the woman, between the seed thy and her seed. She will bruise your head, and you will bruise her heel."===1 Corinthians (1:19) Because it is written: "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise and take away the understanding of the wise".===Psalms (68:21) Yes, God will crush the head of His enemies, the top of the head of those who live in sin.= ==Psalms (110:6) He executes justice among the nations: everything is full of dead bodies; He crushes heads throughout the land.===Isaiah (29:14) therefore, behold, I will again do wonderful things with this people, wonders without likeness; and the wisdom of his wise shall perish, and the understanding of his intelligent shall be hid".---THE CROWN OF THORNS IS THE HOLY WORD AND THE HOLY HEAVENLY THOUGHT THAT PIERCE AND PUSH THE SINFUL THOUGHT OUT OF OUR MIND, THE CLEAN THOUGHT KILLS THE UNCLEAN THOUGHT, THERE WHERE HOLY THINKING IS INSTALLATED, UNHOLY THINKING FINDS ITS END IS DELETED UPROOTED, UNINSTALLED, 👉👉👉THE EARTH THAT BRINGS THE CURSE UPON SIN IN US BY TRANSFORMING THE HOLY WORD INTO THE EARTHLY BODY, SO WAS THE UNHOLY EARTH TRANSFORMED INTO THE HOLY LAND👉Genesis (3:17) To the man he said: "Because you listened to the voice of your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you: 'You must not eat from it at all', now the ground is cursed because of you. With much toil you shall draw your food from it all the days of your life; (3:18) thorns and thistles give you and eat the grass of the field!-CURSING SIN IN US, AND BLESSING RIGHTEOUSNESS IN US THROUGH THE HOLY GROUND WHICH IS THE HOLY WORD FOOD FOR ALL DAYS👉Luke (11:3) Give us our daily bread every day, AMEN.>> <<@6-piemeil-9 says : There are 2 opposing systems that have competed for dominance historically - the imperial/oligarchial system, which, except for brief periods, has dominated throughout history, and the republican/humanist system represented today by the American experiment. The founding fathers were explicit that America was to be an anti- imperialist enterprise. The forces of imperialism based in London never relented in their efforts to beat back republicanism in America. They finally succeeded in the aftermath of WWII, and that's who Eisenhower spoke of when he called out the Military/Industrial complex in 1961. The Kennedy's tried to push back, and we all know how that turned out. That M/I complex (a Wall St/Washington nexus) included the intelligence & law enforcement communities and has since expanded its sphere of influence to dominate academia, the media, the tech sector, and all the cabinet departments of the federal government. The Deep State is in the service of an Anglo-American oligarchy. Not satisfied with the control of the state, they want to crush republicanism completely. To that end, they are waging a cultural war on numerous fronts in order to tear the fabric of American society apart and be rid of the principles enshrined in the declaration independence and the Constitution (+ amendments). The feminism movement was created to destroy the family and emasculate men, CRT & BLM to pit blacks vs. whites, DEI to institutionalize unfairness & sow resentment, cancel culture to silence the voices of moderation. Polarization with a goal to incite violence so that they have an excuse to step in & abolish any freedoms Americans may hold dear. Divide to conquer.>> <<@6-piemeil-9 says : The "elites" responsible for the surveillance state, the forever wars, economic policy designed to widen the wealth gap, and the culture wars that are tearing apart the fabric of society are one and the same. It's the oligarchs behind private equity firms like Vanguard, Blackrock & State Street. The families that intermarry to maintain their blood "purity" and believe in their hereditary right to rule. They masquerade as capitalists, but they are feudalists at heart. Their motto is: all for us and nothing for anybody else, and they won't rest until they get their way. Their kind has always been around and will never go away. They are specialists in intrigue & manipulation at the highest levels. They are the masters who cast the shadows on the walls in Plato's allegory of the cave. And, yes, they are psychopaths. Until they are unmasked, once & for all, we will never be rid of them, and humanity's potential will forever be forestalled.>> <<@theartifactualinterface507 says : Greenwald is a pioneer of independent journalism because since his first indi blog in '05, through the Salon years, the Guardian, and the Intercept, he never worked for an organization that he didn't have a contract with for complete freedom to say what he wants.>> <<@theartifactualinterface507 says : I used to say that there are two kinds of people in politics: people who pay attention to Glenn Greenwald, and people who are drooling on themselves. No, actually, I still say that. He is essential to a well rounded perspective.>> <<@oldspammer says : 17:25 approx. What if we were all lied to and as a consequence believing in lies we reject the truth when we hear it? What if hate speech is NOT inaccurate? It is still stigmatizing unwelcome views by having a publically accessible database of people deemed by "someone" as crack pots or fringe elements, when often these conspiracy theorists end up being right some significant part of the time. It matters little if government or some proxy becomes the authority of truth to determine who should be on a blacklist that is made public if the consequences are that the object of punishment is disproportionately punished for holding unconventional views on a topic of dispute. If a guy had no facts, logic, reason, or wisdom, then no one would care when they heard their nonsense, but it poses a very big problem if the proponent of some ideas has multiple proofs of what he or she was saying was dead accurate. How many times have we heard truth tellers pilloried with baseless name-calling attacks of being a Nazi, white supremacist, bigoted racist, scammer, rapist, or whatever else? Like Julian Assange by Mike Pompeo and company? Often the authorities finally figure out that the guy or gal was good, but his accusers were the morally reprehensible people who made up untrue notions and want those notions to be upheld for unfair gain over us all. One way to tell who is telling the truth is when you find out that nothing said by the accused has any logical contradictions, but many of the things being stated by his accusers asks us all to believe that everyone in an entire country was completely crazy and that was how history came to be. People tend NOT to be discriminated against by who they are, but by how many have behaved in many previous incidents. Some people learn from a young age that we are all victims of wrongs done to us in the past, but that is very one-sided because usually people are judged by their behaviors. This begs the question regarding how much of written history is a scam or biased retelling or whatnot? What if we were all lied to from a young age in our schooling and accepting of lies as our truth? Same thing is happening today with the long march through the institutions of society or civilization--the teaching that white people are the source of all wrong doings when a cursory look into the matter shows that slavery was outlawed by British Christian abolitionists--the complete opposite than what is claimed to our children when they attend mind control centers known as public education systems. If something is extra judicial, it is likely a scam. That is what human rights courts were. Look into illuminated Freemasonry. It is identical to Marxism. There are ethnic and religious partitions in Freemasonry. One such branch of one ethnicity were the ones who started human rights tribunals in Canada, and likely other places. I heard one company owner tell a fellow employee a high complement--hey look what the dude has done--it's great, he must have used higher order innovative thinking to have come up with that cool thing. Thinking is what is needed, and not listening to someone is a sure way of avoiding thinking. You have to apply domain expertise of logical consistency so that you determine if axioms selected by the speaker make any sense, regardless of the lies we may have been told otherwise. We have to remain logically consistent with our thinking without presupposition that this guy or gal is a bad name just because someone may be falsely accusing them as being such. This is how mathematicians work in a problem space. They do not involve thinking that is inconsistent with that problem space domain. Only then if a logical contradiction arises is the system plagued with inconsistencies that cannot all be true at the same time or that it is so unlikely as to be ridiculous. However, I suppose that I must describe what probability involves. When I asked the AI if Hawking radiation of a black hole had been observed by anyone, the AI said that the probability that a black hole had evaporated due to this kind of radiation was very improbable because it would only happen once in every ten raised to the 50 or 60th power years, but the universe was only an estimated 10 raised to the 14 years old or so. What is the likelihood that anyone shall witness one, let alone 100 of these events per day? Slim, and none, I'd say... If there are flaws in one's thinking, one can easily be tricked into believing lies. When you believe in lies, it makes you decide and do things that you otherwise would not do otherwise, and thereby make wrong or unjust decisions or mistakes or whatever else. If one wants to avoid mistakes, one must be smarter than your opponents, who are trying to lure you into a trap of logical contradictions and inconsistencies to persecute the innocent and reward the guilty--the opposite of what a responsible person would do.>> <<@oldspammer says : I saw a big criticism of the PDB podcast guy. Interesting all the details and proof given... Reference YouTube Exposing Pyramid Scheme uploaded by Always Marco about 30 days or so ago. Interesting the potential amount of harms done by means of "multi-level marketing" scams, etc?>> <<@patrickwontor2061 says : 16:30. I though Milo was kinda cancelled for talking casually about MeToo’ing someone, a minor iirc>> <<@angelinejohnson9511 says : Despite any complaint of Glenn on his show about how much time was taken, I think it was a fine investment. We DESPERATELY need these conversations. I appreciate Glenn's show, but I miss seeing him on Democracy Now and other venues I first ran into him on.>> <<@lahaza6515 says : How I missed this I don't know!>> <<@noobboy81 says : Glenn Greenwald is one of my favorite journalists. Great interview! Would be great to have him back for another one!>> <<@kingklank6732 says : Mass populous anger? Im one of those people.>> <<@FlanzShirt says : 24:57 EXACTLY>> <<@patbranigan6501 says : Hillary was complicit in the murder of a million people in Iraq. Donald was a blowhard/questionable businessman who killed no one. Which is worse. Well Americans think the blowhard/questionable businessman is worse because they were Iraqis' not Americans who were killed so it was so removed from them they just don't care. What has happened to American morality? This is not the country I grew up in.>> <<@arthurslugworth4661 says : I'm glad to see Glenn pointing out the frog-in-a-pan-of-water methods of the cabal. I found myself momentaril thinking,, upon riding past another wholesale re-developed section of my city "well, I guess it's just a normal consequence of the passage of time". There's nothing Fucking normal about this process whatsoever. It's Evergrande Junior everywhere you look.>> <<@futuropasado says : Glenn is one of the few known real journalist and maybe de most important in the last decades. Very important truth seeker and speaker against abuses of power.>> <<@rivciks5045 says : 1:14:48 Was that a fart😮?>> <<@dprestons0318 says : Would anyone agree that today the term elite carries the connotation of "untouchable." Thomas Friedman writes articles to justify the Iraq war. Later it is discovered that he was dead wrong, but there are no consequences. This makes him an elite. We can go down the line: people commit crimes and do not go to jail because they are "elite," Corporate leaders in the midst of loses layoff a thousand people, but are themselves "untouched," even giving themselves raises. I could go on and on. This is interesting to me. We could even connect the idea of "untouchable" with priestly castes and the idea of the sacred (maybe?). The elite are above something. What are they above? They are "above" the usual economy of rewards and punishment, i.e. the law or even simply binding norm and standards. Aristotle said that a being outside of the law is either a God or a beast. In the case of the elite, the idea is clearly to take on godly type of function and/or status. In the communication sphere, one thing the elite is above is the normal process of argument, criticism, good faith dialogue, and the revising of positions that are---or once were--the norms of discourse in liberal society. If they want to be elite, then maybe by definition they NEED to avoid this middle class, bourgeois stuff and take the aristocratic approach of simply skipping the discussion and punishing dissenters. In short, Elites do not need to justify their ideas and if they starting doing it, then it would cost them their elite status. What is needed, perhaps, is an analysis of different forms of elitism. This could be interesting. For instance, in the cultural sphere at one time were musicians and artists "elites" who were "outside" conventional norms (sex, drugs, rock n roll) and even celebrated for it. In the realm of theology, we see something similar. As opposed to a God bound by the norms of logic, reason, and morality, there is the "divine command theory" that says God is not bound by these things and is essentially "above" them. A question here would be whether or not our willingness to love and admire this God is rooted in unconsciousness' admiration of envy of its power to erupt in extraneous and unconstrained action. Maybe we want or even need elites? Maybe people want something to worship? And if so, maybe they want this something to exercise our repressed unconscious forces by transgressing norms? Likewise, if one is installed as an elite, then one must give the people what they expect from elites? (I am starting to sound cynical, but I do not think the likes of Fromm and Dostoevsky would protest) What is humanity's relationship with elites? We seem to love them and hate them? Do we want or need them psychologically? If the latter, then what psychological need do they fulfill? Maybe what is needed is deep dive into our relationship with elites?>> <<@theflexitech says : I mean you try and build a society, and only 2 generations later, the idea of why you wanted to build a society in the first place is already lost. Video was tastily thought provoking not bad.>> <<@dalelimoges9024 says : The left, and the right, go too far when they make everything about power instead of relationship.>> <<@dalelimoges9024 says : What about the practicality of it is an evidence. By the way most of physics is that way. Gravity and magnetism forces aren’t rational at all yet they have practical effects.>> <<@theamericandream5917 says : Glenn greenwald is one of the last few remaining journalists with honor and integrity that we have left today. Glenn’s voice is so important in todays society especially with govt and big tech getting more and more authoritarian by the day.>> <<@tabby7189 says : The alliance of the culture war extremists with the big governmental and corporate powers is not merely unholy; it is abominable if not also fascistic. On another note, who wrote the subtitles for the sections of this video? I can't believe a Peterson staffer confounded "your" with "you're." On track for failing the admissions to Peterson University!>> <<@AntonShields says : The lost value religion holds. I’ll do my best to keep the short. The steady decline of a family structure and morals and principles did once come from faith-based religion; however, because mini faith-based religions are so anachronistic, many people have begun to lose faith because, in my opinion, they have lost the understanding of why religion was so important and heavily practiced all around the world. There’s more to a religion or faith than the practice of serving a God. Within the religion exists a series of belief systems built by millions and millions of people to give the individual or individuals the ability to believe in something beyond the self to satiate the ego. Once this is achieved the religion can begin to help others create or restore human value from within others or help the individual create or restore value from within. And I may be oversimplifying what I’m trying to say or maybe I’m making it too complex. Without faith or religion, it becomes challenging for human beings to re-create value from within themselves innately. Especially, if they are completely isolated from the knowledge of faith or religion or have been indoctrinated by generational traditions or cultural practices that operate similarly. Mankind's hubris knows no bounds. Today, have denounced religion as a further lost understanding of how crucial it is to feed and satiate our egoshings when needed because “the self” has an insatiable hunger. This is true for all humans with unique tastes having shared commonalities among the group or groups of humans.>> <<@CeraunophileHa says : Just remember not to force feed or fight over your love .🌩️💙>> <<@jladdyost says : These two have articulated the best argument for separation of church and state, while at the same time championing the existence of "church" in the very broadest sense.>> <<@jladdyost says : These are two good men, and therefore they are both reviled and demonized.>> <<@gyldanword says : You gentlemen should look into some serious Christian apologetics. There's more concrete evidence for the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, who is the Christ, than you might think.>> <<@phsycresconquest6636 says : Isn’t it funny that we live in a timeline where in order to be punk you have to believe in conservative values now?>> <<@dpowers9242 says : I think women making laws has really infringed on freedoms in America, laws should not be made to make things safer, they should support choice. 60 years of laws being passed at first gently towards making things safer now punish dangerous behavior even if that behavior caused no harm. There shouldn't be a single law on the book that is preventative, because it may be dangerous. You can call me sexist, but i remember a country that favored choice destructive or constructive.>> <<@martypatterson7382 says : What Glenn is describing as the functions or necessity of religion, as a foundational element regardless of belief, is absolutely true. However, religion isn't the only institution that can fill that need. I would argue that two guys in a rusty 4x4, a dozen miles or so away from civilization, on a dirt road with a cooler of beer, contemplating just what the hell their woman expects from them, and whether or not she can even know what the hell she expects, is serving the same self reflection, self development necessity, and possibly to a greater degree than church would. Now, of course, that is dependent on Karen being asleep already, and any maraudering road pirates exercise better judgment and refuse to commit their eternal souls to Dantes 9th circle, otherwise they could just as quickly ruin their life which probably falls back on the oldest social order of moderation as a right. Of course, the activity and the necessity for which it happens will change with age and circumstances, but I think the level of attack on these "other spaces" is undeniable. In many areas around the world, there is essentially two "other spaces" church and the local tavern. Some place for adults to get away from expectations and socialize, face to face, with other adult humans. Children have tons of socialization and rightfully so, but for most of us after school, its off to the races. Marriage, mortgage, and maternity leave. None of which offer a good place to speak your true thoughts and just be yourself. Life demands so much that too many of us can not even remember who we are. Conformity to the all-encompassing societal demands without any regard for the person to simply.... just be.... has got to be the fastest way to break the spirit. It's been decades ago, depending upon where you live since the attack on "other spaces" was pushed out in the form of smoking bans. When the government said that grown consenting adults were not allowed to smoke cigarettes in an establishment that prohibited admission to anyone under 21 years of age, and thus eliminating the "protecting innocent children" claim the could be used in almost every other circumstance.... here's your sign. The Government DOES NOT want any American with the balls to defy the scientific establishment or the Surgeon General's warning, to be allowed to propagate the general public, let alone the severely dangerous possibility that they should congregate together in the presence of alcoholic beverages..... My God! That's how revolutions are born.!!!>> <<@fifibibi3213 says : And when all things are subjected to Him, then the same milk will also be subjected to Him who subjected all things to Him For God to be all in all (First Epistle to the Corinthians 15:20) I mean.. one day we and Jesus will be submissive to God>> <<@fifibibi3213 says : And when all things are subjected to Him, then the same milk will also be subjected to Him who subjected all things to Him For God to be all in all (First Epistle to the Corinthians 15:20) I mean.. one day we and Jesus will be submissive to God>> <<@TioDuw says : See, what I do not understand about Greenwald is that he is in fact a defensor of free speech and liberty (I know for a fact that he personally helped in Bruno Aiub's censorship case to flee to the US), but in the case of the so-called "corruption in the Brazilian judicial system" the alleged leaks that he provided did not show any corruption at all. It only shows messages (obtained ilegally through hackers invading personal Telegram accounts) exchanged between two people involved in the case that culminated in the prison of the corrupt former president (which was convicted not only by this judge, but also on all superior instances, including the one that changed the ruling a few years later, releasing the indeed corrupt president due to a technicality. Note that the evidences of the corruption were not in any way disregarded). I actually believe that he was played in this case due to his personal involvement with a person that was directly involved inside the heart of the left-wing marxists. Right now, Glenn is one of many responsibles for the former corrupt AND convicted president to rise to the top of the executive power and leading the pink wave.>> <<@soganox says : Great discussion! Thank you Sir.>> <<@kimj5037 says : The guise of compassion brings to mind an old CS Lewis quote, “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”>> <<@markbirmingham6011 says : Comment for traction>> <<@fjallaxd7355 says : Excellent talk lads, as always.>> <<@sheldonvideos says : Evil is superstitious, therefore only superstitious (religious) people look for it externally, i.g. “the four horsemen of the apocalypse “.>> <<@paultaylor1750 says : Thank you ❤>> <<@marcusteblano6376 says : I'm glad they finally came around to identifying that the "elite" (what I call the criminal elite) having embraced transgenderism as the highest cause to promote is a cynical stance on an issue that they surely don't care about. It serves to manipulate those who embrace the authoritarian mindset as if it were a fundamentalist religion; more importantly, transgenderism is a particularly divisive and confusing issue. The Owners seeks to undermine traditional societal values and norms. Divide and conquer is their modus operandi. In order to build a new world order or introduce a great reset of society the old structure must be destroyed or at least severely weakened. We have seen traditional values, structures, and institutions, such as the Constitution, come under ever more serious assault in recent years in their quest to institute a global totalitarian state.>> <<@derekww4844 says : All ism's are religions including atheism Wich is the only one that is godless and steals all of its morals from the other ism's>> <<@AwakenedPerspective1111 says : Anyone who truly understands what Greenwald is saying about how we are affected psychologically by political measures, what we are slowly getting used to, should be terrified. Terrifying conversation in general…>> <<@derekww4844 says : When those who talk about left and right are talking about the socialism political spectrum where communism is on the extreme left and the Nazis being on the extreme right although socialism is on the extreme left of the political spectrum which is only exist on with those who believe the bigger the govt the better and who also believe that the individual is defined by the characteristics of the group the person is associated with>> <<@kate3264 says : I don’t see what is so special about this man👽>> <<@flashwashington2735 says : They do make you do humiliating things. Buit what gets me is every body does it before anyone calls Simon says! Ruined the game for me. People can;'t have fun anymore. God bless.>> <<@janelajunguiana says : What a dense comversation! I love it when you bring people with historic left winning positions! Thank you very much for the work you both do in favor of free speech and dialogue between different sides of the political spectum! We have more in common than we have differences and we are stronger together. Thank you so much!>> <<@JessicaStarStrong says : I would love to talk both of you. Im not one to ask for help. I'm at a point where duck what feels comfortable for ME. MY BABIES /ALL CHILDREN who've have INDURED people in authority hide abuse continue to gaslight an steal they're lil souls. Lie lies they PROJECT. They DEFLIMATED my character,I'm not EVER GONNA GIVE UP. I MEAN WHAT I SAY & SAY WHAT I MEAN. IM GOIN NOWHERE MOMMY IS HERE.EVERYTHING DONE IN THE DARK WILL COME TO THE LIGHT. MAY GOD WATCH OVER MY CHILDREN MAY HE WASH HIS LOVE OVER ALL HIS CHILDREN WHOM ARE IN NEED OF GOD. SHOW THEM HOW POWERFUL YOU ARE. THANK YOU!!! I WILL CLEAR MY NAME AN GASLIGHTING & NARCISSISTIC ABUSE WILL BE ADDED TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CATEGORY. EMPATHY TEST WILL BE DONE ON CPS WORKERS AN FOSTER HOMES. PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS, DIFFERENT AGENCIES NEED TO WATCH OVER THEM WHOM ARENT GETTING PAID BY THEM. SAVE THE STRONG FAMILY HERE IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA WITH UR FAITH INGOD HE WILL ALWAYS PREVAIL!!!❤❤❤>> <<@anetahans6770 says : Could anyone explain the logic to me? Neonazzi applies for a job, he's rejected -> they fight for his freedom of personal believes. But doesn't the company has also right to choose employees? All companies aroung the world have some company culture guidelines - if you don't fit you're not hired. Completely normal. Why would anyone let's say in multiculti company have hired neonazzi? Doesn't make any sense.>>