Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@DJCharalampos says : Light is like a Horse. It travels yay fast more or less. It will be continued to be used like the medium of comparison and astronomical relativity. It’s bizarre to assume nothing is faster and even when recorded it would be silly to assume the same thing>> <<@abhishekgupta-rk7nh says : Scientists are compelled to sensationalize their work to get funding, modesty = no tenure>> <<@jamieswithenbank1813 says : I had other ideas how you might do it 🤷‍♂️ but let's face it, most sci-fi is just nonsense, hand waving, and made up plot armor 😂>> <<@NettyBall-q6z says : Reaction encapsulation If gravity is displacement and not a indentation in the fabric it means a object experiences the gradient and the subatomic particle does not this is why there is no quantum gravity its because of encapsulation. If the universe is a reaction rather then a field or a fabric it encapsulates matter and the reaction is always happening at every point and they intersect and since displacement is done by atoms and atoms are mostly empty space then it makes sense that the displacement of the reaction causes an overlap at the minimum intersection point this is what we call space time the act of crossing the minimum intersection point is what we call time if you have more displacement it causes more overlap at the minimum intersection point causing relitivistic time dilation because matter is null void or the lack of the reaction encapsulated this is what mass is and mass relates to time at the minimum intersection point because null void or lack of reaction exerts negative pressure pressure and a photon does not because it is enccapsulated reaction so not pressure when it crosses minimum intersection point that is why it travels at the speed of light because at the minimum intersection point the reaction generates and decays and it wants to intersect so it can sustain and since speed is distance ofer time and the reaction is always cycle it is like a traffic light and light hits the red each time and that is why we have the speed of light its also why when you increase speed for objects with mass they exery pressure on the crossing on the minimum intersection point and this is why there mass increases because they approach the redlights of the decay stage of the reaction at the min point. —------------------------- If matter is the void encapsulated by the reaction and there is anti matter and matter and a electron has a posotron then charge is direction of encapsulation but the geometry stays the same that is why there is matter anti matter at all and that is why they aniliate its also why like charges attract and oppsate repel they are directionally encapsulated also this is what is happening in magnetism directionality is influencing the reaction and that influences the encapsulation mechanism through directional encapsulation and metals have a aligned strucher that supports the generation magnetic field that is why certan metals are magnetic and some arnt and some repulse its the encapsulation meeting the atomic structure and allowing for contiguous flow this directs the reaction which because the reaction is the primary mechanism of encapsulation the matter follows the field and we get magnetism if the photon is the reaciton encapsulated how does it work well the void left by the electron as another it changes energies the reaction hits the generate stage and the decay stage meet to intersect and form geometric encapsulation this is also why photons are the force carrier for eletro magnetism and how they carry momentum without mass and since energy causes dcisplacment e=mc2 still works Well how do bosons not obey the pauli exclousion princapal its because they have one cover its also why they have the spin value of 1 fermions who do obay the principal have a spin of ½ its because they have 2 covers and the higgs boson having 0 is because its its own particle anti particle so they cancel each other out its also why it can decay into ½ spin particles and why the higgs boson decays into quarks because its own particle anti particle so this is how quarks get there 1/3 and ⅔ they charge inside the ambient reaction crushes anty particles that arnt stabilally encapsulated out of existence the w boson has charge because of its geometry it has —---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- directionality applies to its single cover the ambient reaction cover but bosons dont obay the principal because the geometry keeps the encapsulation unique which allows the cover to remain and since the reaction is always reacting it means that the unique geometery is maintained and since the reaction is able to be displaced over itself against the ambient reaction pressure in a smoother gradient it means that they are the external reaction cover also we can look towards bose einstein condensates because the reaction through cooling alters the outercover allowing shared behaviour So how does the atom tie together since glueons have no mass we know that they are reaction encapsulated and if the reaction always wants to intersect and quarks are frationally encapsulated then they are forcing the point of intersection and when puled far enough apart the quark is creating a anti quark indentation and vise verse and when the quarks are pulled outside of glueon intersection range the glueon slaps away and forms the shell in hadronisation this reaction displacement creates of the quarks makes a geometric shell through its displacement influence and has a outercover the geometric mismatch means they follow the exclusion principal in neutron betadecay the w boson is able to form inside because the neutron is away form its protective displacement of the proton and the proton which means its exposed to ambient reaction conditions meaning it causes outercover instability moving the inner cover causing a 1 in 15 min chance at w boson forming then decaying and changin into a proton the proton is displacing the stage of the reaction corosoponding to its charge direction this creates a imbalance in the charge this is why orbatals are proportional to the nucleus of the atom the proton and neutron create charge and displacement imbalance which shapes geometry to form electron orbitals and its proportional to the influence of the nucleaons during motion or collision the electrons are able to come free and the zones of reaction influence by the charge of the proton are able to join through various means based on the influence electron configuration —-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Imagine you have a glass of water and there is a tiny particle of dirt you go to get it out and you finger displaces the water and moves the particle this is essentially what is at the heart of quantum physics to do anything requires displacement of some part of the reaction effecting the particle this is what we consider the observer effect and if the reaction is the encapsulation mechanism and a blackhole totally warps spacetime and the maths points to a singularity being 0d or infinite we can reason that this is the reaction ebing totally displaced then the reaction is providing its own dimensions its not some etherial grid and time is a action of crossing the intersection points experiencing encapsulation pressure then the void and the reaction encapsulated in photon and electrons allow entanglement and you dont even need to break locality since they are the same 3d reaction and same 0d non reaction encapsulation zeroed If encapsulation and the reaction can happen and if the reaction can happen and the reaction is never still then how did inflation happen well if encapsulation and the reaction rely on geometry and they say space is always fluctuating in zeropoint then it makes sense foy my model purposes for not to assume the reaction is eternal its the intrinsic property diffrence bwterrn moving and not moving the age old nothing and something this gives chance for encapsulation to happen and give enough time a supanova event or a big bang is bound to happen and because the reaction has relative stillness and eventually it would reach a point where a supanova like even spreads matter this causes a temporary disruption of the reaction cycle causing the problem of 0d into 3d causing inflation of the reaction returning and then encapsulation and matter is able to form —--------------------------------------------- Well if radiation is tied to time then it makes sence why its connected to halflife if the reaction is the outercover it means that when to mant protons cause to mant nerurtons eventually what happens is the first cover is displaced to much altering its strength and the atom can no longer hold together because its size is to large relative to the minimum intersection point this is why heavy elements radiate and also why it stops at the stable point because the ratio supports it and since time is crossing the minimum point and each time it does that its risking a chance at decay via outercover weakness The electron in the way is a ratio to the minimum distance this is why it is captured by the nucleus the alteration in the encapsulation mechanism creates the orbatals and bands on all the energy levels relative to displacement The reaction wants to resolve the void and the void wants to overtake the reaction one starts at the most fundamental scale and the other ends at a blackhoole and at the edge the reaction slowly resolves Throught various forms the reaction and non reaction explains everything i see modern understanding as a ladder and all the rungs are circles we have the ladder almost fully built we get to the end but gr and quantum are square and triangle pegs and a new approach is needed to resolve the contention i believe encapsulation is the answer we have a finite matter infinite reaction space is a reaction matter is the void reaction encapsulated void void shapes reaction and everything else is flow on from that>> <<@wongseng3072 says : Anyone can suggest me where is the fun way to learn about chemistry online? Im a white paper in chemistry, intended learn up until intermediate. Please guide>> <<@luisguilherme2403 says : One of the first fusion power devices, if I'm not mistaken (I didn't finish my research and youtube has almost nothing of it), was called the Perhapsatron lol just imagine... "I created this machine. Perhaps, it works">> <<@definitelyrealbeethoven says : My dude absolutely DUNKING dem scientists>> <<@bartwilliams4478 says : Used to simply call it junk science>> <<@kyleshaw4954 says : Gotta love the French, man! Say it how it is, or..: “Dis-le comme c'est”>> <<@ToofKilla says : Carlo Rovelli? Loop Quantum Gravity explainer Carlo Rovelli? I should have watched this when it came out I guess.>> <<@josephsakos8491 says : I think it's very important to make science accessible to people in ways that do not require a PhD to understand its importance and limitations. The most successful scientific results are the ones that can be communicated that way, because if we can explain something simply, there is a good chance someone will find a mistake and help us move forward. What I have come to realize is that the science we can make accessible in that way with current technology is significantly broader than many close friends in academia think it is. I remain hopeful, though. Progress is being made.>> <<@MafiaCow01 says : When I started my BacSci, I hadn't put any thought into going into research. Then I did the compulsory unit that taught us about research, and the grant chasing and news articles that go with it. At that point I realised a definitely didn't want to go into research.>> <<@nickblacksoul4318 says : Yeah things like this are always popping up ,if you stop to think about it you will figure it out if you don't you will take it as truth and you can't always analyze them , this one I knew it was a hype and I don't care, because quantum computing is in it's fist infancy>> <<@HyungnamGu says : scientific investigations have confirmed that the superconducting-like phenomena (such as sharp resistivity drops and partial levitation) observed in LK-99 samples are caused by copper sulfide impurities. These impurities are not inherent to the intended LK-99 compound but are a byproduct of the manufacturing process, which involves heating lead oxide and lead sulfate to create lanarkite, then mixing it with copper phosphide.>> <<@HyungnamGu says : Although primordial gravitational waves have not been detected, researchers have successfully detected "lensing" B-modes, which are caused by the distortion of CMB light by large-scale structures (galaxies) over the past 14 billion years.>> <<@NurWed-mi5ow says : keadaan sekarang sedikit dipengaruhi masa lalu dan sedikit oleh kondisi masa depan>> <<@darkknight8098 says : I think you are right But just because we don't know yet or the things aren't as great as the sound Doesn't mean we should call them BS They are a step in the direction>> <<@filipsemerad2299 says : I study plasma physics and nuclear fusion, so I feel a bit offended😂>> <<@HyungnamGu says : Science hype, the exaggeration of scientific findings, stems from intense academic/commercial competition, funding pressures, and a desire for fame, driven by universities, media, corporations, and scientists themselves, all amplified by the digital age's demand for clicks and sensational stories, leading to overblown promises about breakthroughs like AI or genetics that often fall short of initial excitement. Key Drivers of Science Hype Academic & Institutional Pressures: Competition: Fierce competition for funding, prestigious publications, and career advancement incentivizes overstating results. Self-Promotion: University press offices and institutions use hype in press releases to attract attention, funding, and students. Publishing Incentives: Journals favor exciting, positive, and sensational language, boosting an article's chance of publication and press coverage. Media & Public Engagement: Sensationalism: The media's need for “hooks” and captivating headlines often leads to oversimplification and exaggeration. Digital Age: Social media amplifies hype, creating echo chambers where sensational claims spread rapidly. Public Interest: Public interest in "miracle cures" or futuristic tech (like AI) creates a market for hype, notes The Guardian and Quora. Commercial & Financial Interests: Commercialization: A strong push to commercialize research creates pressure to highlight potential profits, even if uncertain. Corporate Involvement: Major tech and pharma companies often fuel hype to drive markets and investment (e.g., in quantum computing). The Nature of Science Itself: Uncertainty vs. Presentation: Science inherently involves uncertainty, but hype presents findings as conclusive and transformative, misleading audiences. Cognitive Biases: Researchers can overestimate the impact of their own work, contributing to unintentional hype. In essence, science hype is a complex feedback loop where systemic pressures meet human motivations and media dynamics, often leading to unrealistic expectations that can eventually backfire, notes the Science | AAAS and ResearchGate.>> <<@Augcliffe says : “Scientist need to get funding for their research”…let’s not underestimate this line.>> <<@charlesrackoff9696 says : Here is what we learned from the neutrino story: If your result is unbelievable, keep checking all the cables and all the connections until you find a problem. On the other hand, if you like the result and find it believable, don't look too closely at all those connections because you might lose a really great publication.>> <<@andrewtormanen says : It seemed to me when I was doing research that my peers would purposely write their papers as badly and obtusely as possible to obfuscate the fact that their experiments didn't really do anything of note. It was exhausting to read BS slop and not get anything out of it and is one of the main reasons why I left the research field.>> <<@GageKelley-r2v says : I remember one of thosr articlrs where they mention creating a particle out of nothingthing usrs electromagnetic fields, and my immediate thought was "but a bunch of energy went in, what are they talking about?". Another eas whrn i had heard second hand that they turned lrad to gold. Turns out you can, but adding s ubatomic particlr that i forgot which it was, but that provides a ridiculously small amount of gold, so its entirely impractical.>> <<@spidermanandsnape says : I'm watching this years later, and I think this is still very relevant. Sensationalism gets so much attention, but slow, tested truth doesn't and it's getting worse and worse with AI and social media. It's why fact checking is so important, but even that gets hard too, especially when you aren't an expert and can only understand what you're told and broken down for you>> <<@Beddy27 says : 10:55 Fusion has been 5 to 10 years away since 1970s or so>> <<@abelsikaonga491 says : 0:31 and thank me later>> <<@Garfield_Minecraft says : science is for dumb people, I'm even too smart to be reading science articles now>> <<@calinionut-alin2154 says : They did a simulation....just. if that man say that his phone do the math, why don t do himself a simulation to see if is true or not>> <<@AdRock says : You sellout. Owned by private equity. Awful.>> <<@binfeng5051 says : That’s why I subscribed this YouTube channel.😂don’t to be hyped 😅>> <<@mobilephil244 says : Journalists are usually people who didn't pay attention in science lessons at school and think everyone else didn't either. They don't care about the consequences of their drivel, they just want the readership. Part of the fix would be to make sure ALL journalists MUST be qualified and experienced in science and engineering before they are allowed to write about it.>> <<@melonmelon2848 says : Colossal's direwolf this sounded like, the garner media attention to fund further research part, anyone see the similarity? 🙄>> <<@Ariel.Altamirano4 says : Genius and very much funny>> <<@SedativeMouse says : Assuming an established body of knowledge doesn't have gaps is rather amusing.>> <<@Hyungnam1970 says : Science hype refers to the excessive or misleading exaggeration of scientific findings or claims, often in popular media or by institutions seeking to promote their research. This can involve overstating the significance of a study, drawing unfounded causal conclusions, or implying broader implications than the data actually supports. Examples include breathless press releases, catchy but uninformative graphical abstracts, and over-claiming the generality of methods in scientific papers. Here's a breakdown of examples: 1. Overstating Significance: Claiming a "breakthrough" when the research is incremental: Instead of acknowledging a small step forward, hype might present it as a major advancement, especially in press releases. Using percentages to make results seem bigger than they are: A small increase in a study might be presented as a significant percentage change, creating the impression of a larger impact. Suggesting a phenomenon observed in a small group affects everyone: For instance, a study on marathon runners might be hyped as a universal truth about exercise and health without acknowledging the limitations of the sample. 2. Unfounded Causational Statements: Linking a correlation to a direct cause: Instead of stating that two things are related, hype might claim that one causes the other, even if there's no evidence to support that. Drawing broad conclusions from limited data: Hyping a study's findings to the general public without acknowledging its limitations or potential biases. 3. Other forms of science hype: Catchy but uninformative graphical abstracts: These can be used to grab attention in scientific papers, but might not accurately reflect the content of the research. Over-claiming the generality of methods in papers: For example, a study using a specific type of data might be hyped as a universal method for all similar research, even if it's not applicable. Predatory journals: These journals often publish questionable or unsubstantiated research, further spreading hype and misinformation. Fakery: In some cases, deliberate fabrication of scientific findings can be presented as legitimate research, leading to hype and misinformation.>> <<@flavioferreira6220 says : But this is happening in every field, not just science. Hard times.>> <<@kelechi09 says : "There is no facts, only interpretations."--Nietzsche The problem of truth is the problem of perspective. Perhaps there is more than one truth, and by seeing it from a different perspective, we have a more complete understanding of "the truth," if there really is such a thing. Science isn't religion and isn't a pursuit of immutable truth, just relative truths-- posterior distributions with faith in their reproducibility and probability that they represent the most likely and most common instantiation of "reality">> <<@ShadowriverUB says : I think room temperature super conductor thing is more possitive, as it was not said it provfn, it made everyone hunt for proof and following that following science of it was fun and magnetized lot of people to look on sciance and maybe inspired it.>> <<@otwock2 says : Amen! I'm so tired with this LLM (the only "AI" today) hype and quantum computers hype...>> <<@avrilrandle5576 says : Ah, of course it's AdS/CFT... string theory nonsense always finds a way to try and make itself seem reasonable even now... I wish string theory people would stop insisting to everyone else that their higher-dimension manifolds, none of which we actually live in, are somehow "real." Scientific sunk cost fallacy at it worst...>> <<@thomasb.8808 says : Big rule to apply when reading a "science" article : If there is a question in the title, the answer is most likely to be no.>> <<@Boomboi27 says : Wait, energy isn't stored in chemical bonds.>> <<@MJ46.91 says : Scientific propaganda?!>> <<@juxyper says : 4:00 veritasium inflation theory>> <<@darosaweb says : I came from the future: let's talk Pyramid and Lidar 😂>> <<@phantomdraigon6961 says : It's fine tho 4:36 it's fine though we have just found another method that doesn't work which means a step closer to the truth. Isn't that what's great about science?>> <<@gasman11 says : Just because you can do something on a computer doesn't make it real I can play a game on a computer, but it is created not real you can make anything real on a computer>> <<@NmpPnm says : Schoupify>> <<@snoopstp4189 says : was waiting for the self report.. @ 4:00>> <<@pesokpesok says : Unfortunatly the saying, from this video of "Lie travels around the world while truth is still putting its shoes on", does not limit itself to scientific realm only. Big, bombastic false statements are instantly repeated and spread by millions, while even the most conclusive proof of that statement being false - gets ignored by most, because it takes time to disproof a lie, the very time a false statement has to reach millions. Modern polititians are sucessfully using this advatage, one of the most recent examples was a lie about Haitians eating pets in a certain city. That lie has started as a simple facebook post from a woman who lost her cat and blamed her Haitian neighbours of eating it. It was picked up by current ruling party and energetically pushed at every opportunity, despite the mayor as well as a police chief of that city issuing statements that there were no reports of this at all. By the time the woman found her cat in her own basement - the lie took on a life of its own and even grew to include wild geese in addition to the pets. Even now, months after it was publically proven to be false - there are millions that still believe it This problem will only get worse as its easy and only takes few seconds to make up a lie, that just happens to support your beliefs, while it might take days/weeks or even months to conclusively prove it to be a lie, and by that time the damage is done and no amount of evidence will sway some people from believing the lie. We can fight this by requiring all news channels to run an automatic and instant AI truth checker during all of the political statements being broadcast, but i doubt this will be allowed under a current president>>