<<@farishanafiah8461 says : I've been looking at MeLe's PCG02 Pro PC stick and Overclock4C/Quieter4C portable mini PC. Considering they all run on Intel N100, this is one of the rare exceptions where I'd skip Windows and go for Linux. That said, I'm still eyeing the RPi 5 to couple it with UPERFECT's UPi B7 portable monitor. That would be a perfect 10.1" RPi tablet.>> <<@briccimn says : Chris, you are always a reference. You underline the human side of things. Many can make a review, pour out numbers, comparisons... But everyday use is another thing. Thank you.>> <<@KevinNguyen-zn4vv says : They serve different purposes. The Pi is open sourced for programming and developing, while the x86 is for personal computing. In terms of cost/computational power -- the Pi is a POS.>> <<@pleappleappleap says : Why is this so much slower than the LattePanda in the kdenlive render test?>> <<@raverjames says : Next time please add an AI test - run inference on the same LLM model and time how long it takes for the same prompts.>> <<@janhanson6296 says : this is awesome; he has the same vibe as the open university lecture that came on the bbc after the normal programming in the 90's>> <<@helloboris says : For me the biggest gain in choosing a N100 is the AVX instructions. I can run an up-to-date MongoDB, not end-of-life 4.4.>> <<@SpeccyMan says : Comparing mismatched systems can hardly be a surprise when the results are in. Even before watching the video I knew the N100 would outperform the Pi 5. I would still choose the Pi 5 over the N100 simply because it offers good value and performance at its price point. I'd just like to see Linux Mint on it as I'm not a fan of Ubuntu. I have installed the cinnamon desktop over Raspberry Pi OS on mine with some Mint theming to get as close as possible and it performs well enough for my needs - even a Pi 4 does. To me, Ubuntu just seems to get uglier with every iteration since I last used it back at version 9.10 Karmic Koala.>> <<@jayesh_15 says : Nice comparison ๐Ÿ˜Š>> <<@retrig202 says : The Radxa X4 is $89 with 8 gigs of RAM, an N100 processor, and a 64 Gig EMMC. RPi 5 form factor. Has an RP2040 chip on it to power a full 40 pin GPIO. It even has an 2230 M.2 nvme slot. No hat needed. Truly a Raspberry Pi killer in almost every single way. I love my Pi5, but it's hard to justify it. I was going to upgrade my brother's Pi400 to a Pi5 for his emulation needs, but it makes no sense. Settled on a N97 mini PC.>> <<@contra_plano says : veeeerrryyyy niiiicccceee indeeeedd>> <<@Andrew-sx4re says : n100 can run 4k videos 60fps. big difference>> <<@harcial6316 says : I have tried to find a reason to choose RPI5 over the N100, and the truth, the only one, are the GPIO ports, the N100 beats it in performance, and price. Power consumption, is about the same, the RPI5 at maximum use, with the fan connected, has exceeded 15w, the n100 in a plex server stays from 10 to 20w, maximum about 25w when they are running 2 mechanical disks, the consumption is because it has higher performance, in amazon there are offers and coupons of N100, for less than 150 dollars, 16gb ram and 512gb ssd, normally I have bought N100 for about $110-115 with 8 and 256, then RPI 5, is not a good option, not even cheap, I do not see why continue buying it for projects such as casasos, servers, docker, game emulators, nothing, I do not see anything attractive.>> <<@johnk6757 says : radxa just announced the x4, an n100 machine for $60.. I'd actually be reversing your question, can a n100 replace a pi5? (yes)>> <<@Kryptstar_mack says : There is an n97 in Japan with two HDMI on sale for $100 with 8gb of ram and 256gb none>> <<@Barnardrab says : The Pi5 wins because it has 2 HDMI ports.>> <<@alexandrbig6825 says : A strange comparison, n100 in the form of a ready-made micro PC costs about $150 with 16Gb memory, power supply, case, and 512GB drive. At the same time, we should not forget that there is a noticeably larger amount of software on the x86 architecture side. And also you can change the RAM amount on it, because it is not presoldered.>> <<@YSam-rb9bz says : consider the size and price, pi 5 is such a great broad !>> <<@briankleinschmidt3664 says : Type "hello" and make it big?>> <<@willmil11 says : rasberry pi 5 runs better on rasberry pi os tho, you can put gnome on it to make it fair. The infernal snap store of ubuntu makes it unusable. For best performence overclock the cpu and gpu of the rpi5 /boot/firmware/config.txt in the [all] section if not there add at the end of the file: arm_freq=2900 gpu_freq=1100 over_voltage=6 Only on rpi os tho.. Sometimes you can push the cpu a bit farther to 3000mhz, if you get problems aka kernel panic etc. plug the sd card into a computer and change it back manually. Only damage possible while overclocking is overheating or if you put over_voltage above 6>> <<@abdulaziz1484 says : first boot ubuntu n100๐Ÿ˜ฎ, ya iyalah lambat>> <<@stuartlatham9814 says : Very good ๐Ÿ––๐Ÿ˜Ž>> <<@juriom7023 says : hello , ran your sysbench command on a 15 year old server mac computer, and the result was "Total time: 0.0012s" "total number of events 10000"? can this be?>> <<@robertcartier5088 says : Without both systems running the same OS, I don't see the point of comparing them. Basically you've proven that a tiny OS specifically designed for a certain tiny system runs a little quicker than a full-blown commercial OS. Ok, um...Woopy?! ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ™„>> <<@shanold7681 says : I think if you want a Light duty PC the N100 is a no brainer. There are endless prebuilt systems that cost basically the same as a pi 5 with everything you would need to cobble together your own mini pc.>> <<@ii-9049 says : now we need to compare red and wet ๐Ÿคก>> <<@OriNachum says : Now Iโ€™m curious to see your N100 against LattePanda Mu>> <<@garywillingham7853 says : Loved your PI5 vs N100 YTube presentation. Is there a link to a complete 5:18 parts list needed to build one>> <<@pieterboots8566 says : It is time for openai to make an operating system.>> <<@cedrikb7124 says : Hi, very nice video. Are you sure that video rendering indeed uses hardware acceleration on the n100 ? because to me , but i may be wrong for example in handbrake it will use them (core i5) only if I select the adequate compression (QSV). isnt that due only to a better multi core performance ?>> <<@rtc3000 says : I won't go for the PI. I feel that it's an over priced hobbyist product. You could easily get a n100 mini pc plus this mini pc can play 4K easily too. PI is too restrictive. No cables, assemble yourself, fixed ram sized, poorer quality case, add on for more ports etc. Yuckie doodle>> <<@็€šๆ˜Ž้™ข says : The always free arm vps with 4 VMs from Oracle just runs that sysbench test at 1.9459s! respect!>> <<@ssteele1812 says : I love the micro hdmi on the Pi. I wish more of these sbcs used it. Hell, there is also a mini display port that could be used or just throw the usbc on there with video out capabilities. I have all three of those cables already. Lol As for this video. I am really impressed that the comparison came out so close. All vomes down to use case and connectivity preferences. Everything else was pretty much a wash.>> <<@badpants says : Your boot test is invalid since the N100 has the overhead of the bios loading and that usually includes a delay so you can break into the bios. While testing the desktop response times, you fail to mention the resolution you are running at. You should test them both at 4K @ 60 Hz.>> <<@talos86 says : In boot time comparsion, that Asrock board can be much more faster, if you can enable the Instant boot feature in Ubuntu and reduce the default 5 sec POST wait time. With Sata SSD my Asrock E350M1 need 12 sec to boot into Windows 10 desktop Instant boot enabled and the Post wait time reduced to 2 sec. No need for more to BIOS access, because ppl usually spam the Del or F2 buttons to accaes the (UEFI)BIOS.>> <<@serpentine8914 says : interesting and highly relevant comparison ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘. These are machines that we'd most certainly love to get our hands on. Thanks๐Ÿ™>> <<@truthjunkie3 says : GMKTec G3 is only $135 w 8gb RAM and 256GB SSD. That includes the power supply. Equivalent Pi 5 I believe would be more expensive, not less.>> <<@hwmasters says : how about unstable Pi5 for 24/7 usage, system just stucking after few hours?!>> <<@thanatosor says : N100 isn't worthy unless you need x86_64 application like Blender to run on it. Else Orange PI 5 Plus w/ 32GB Ram should be sufficient.>> <<@pakiw2 says : Orange pi5 is slightly better))>> <<@yaboiminecraff says : I wish that rpi form factor n100 sbc came out would be awsome for projects>> <<@danielmoraes9637 says : Tks>> <<@kuku201075 says : Good viedeo as usual>> <<@onlywork8132 says : Thank you. Maybe you test power consumption of video render.(Know Total Energy cost)>> <<@cheapmod says : crazy to think how tech savvy and genius can easily be scam. after pi3. no more pi in my desk.>> <<@pweddy1 says : The Raspberry Pi has the 40pin header that can do things or cannot do with a PC without add on cards. I kind of feel like thatโ€™s the real reason why you should be buying a raspberry pi. Not just use it as a PC, but for the embedded use cases.>> <<@Andreeeba says : N100 is better for mini pc at all>> <<@SP-ny1fk says : Would these make god NAS machines?>> <<@wyk72 says : Raspberry pi makes VERY little sense at these prices, imo. N100 if far superior in every aspect. Even an old thin client w an outdated AMD quad core is STILL better than a Raspberry 5, I can find Ryzen cpus at that price, with FULL case, FULL power, FULL usb 3.0 ports in a small package with no fans. I can understand the fascination of the "underdog" raspberry, but prices are way too high for such a barebone system.>> <<@yordankrushkov8488 says : What's the point of building N100 in such a huge case? Just got one of those mini PC's that are the size of 4 CD boxes and that works perfectly. Bought that after ordering Pi5 that I cancelled because honestly with nvme shield + SSD + charger it's almost the same price for way less performance.>>
VideoPro
>>