Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@JonathanJollimore-w9v says : BUT I CANT BE GENUS I ONLY SCORED 115 IQ TEST ha ha ha ha ha dipships make me laugh>> <<@JonathanJollimore-w9v says : for someone who likes to talk about Christianity in the Bible a lot you don't know the verses in the instructions in it very well>> <<@JulioBorja-Minimalist says : Fyp>> <<@janstkrunker says : I'm only halfway through watching this. But I have to say it did the beautiful for me today. Just knowing the suffering Sam has gone through to share this, then hearing Jordan listen attentively.>> <<@leascaart says : 29:00 I used to believe/think "happiness" is a goal. I don't mind being happy, I love being happy. The problem with making happiness a goal is simply false. Happiness comes and goes. Telling people they should strive for happiness is misleading them.>> <<@davidreeder1544 says : Sam Harris "if the facts where different I would have been right" truly a great rational thinker. 😂>> <<@tombecks5150 says : Of the Four Horseman of Atheism, Hitchens, Dawkins, Dennett and Harris, Harris of baby corpses in the basement fame is by far the dumbest and least interesting. His black heart is easy to detect. I cannot understand why Peterson talks to this clown.>> <<@stavrosktorides says : Thank you both for this amazing conversation and mutual exchange of incredible ideas. I have found Perterson first in covid era reading his book 12 rules of life and then i found Sam whose bring me to the beautiful world of meditation and reason. Am really grateful for both of you! Hope you are doing both well!>> <<@DamonHowell-o8p says : These kinds of conversations make me feel better. I don't like watching people beat each other into submission as if the world will go to hell in a hand basket if someone asks a question.>> <<@QuarterMan88 says : Two extremely overrated frauds in one show!!! NICE!!! GFY jordo. You're a FRAUD.>> <<@Kniives01 says : nice ahh mic wtf>> <<@pawelstyszko5591 says : Such a smart people. I admire you both.>> <<@RealHistoryExplained says : Almost teared up with the last minute>> <<@klausmuhlbach1869 says : Unfortunately Peterson blew it.>> <<@DrSidBorg05 says : 1:00:37 identification with thought is analogous to dreaming>> <<@CrowquillsCrowquillz says : super interesting talk, really enjoyed this>> <<@giridharpavan1592 says : kind of a timewaste of a conversation, no topic is fully discussed deep>> <<@maryjooppy4210 says : Sam Harris Has Always been arrogant, has Zero self awareness and is oozing with pride.>> <<@mohamedkhaledyoussef8028 says : They both accidentally understood the sufi understanding of islam which is mind blowing to me. It is crazy how while sam was trying to specifically prove that islam is the issue of the world jordan was able to point out that the quran is saying exactly what sam has discovered over the course of his life but in metaphor. I don’t care what anybody thinks at this point man.. god is real and he loves irony.>> <<@fagusformigordusfagordumfl1798 says : Sam looks so normal and average is weird>> <<@U_lingo says : SAM HARRIS HAS SAVED MY LIFE , Literally. I suffered from severe depression for 17 years & took handfuls of pills every day and through his app and by meditating, the depression was gone in less than 6 months.>> <<@SaintAndScholar says : Sam Harris is missing the point on purpose or he is slow. The Bible is the most unique story on the planet with the utmost influence that has lasted throughout time and he has the nerve…he’s honestly trying to play both sides of the fence and he’s balancing publicly>> <<@sparky-lini says : 57:03>> <<@bubsyoutube says : I’m interested in their focus on paying attention. Jordan sees Interest as something that should be paid attention to in the present moment, which will lead to your destiny. Sam sees paying attention as beginning anew into the present moment to become mindful of the sacredness that is clouded by memory. Has there been any general rule or protocol on how paying attention should be navigated? Should I try to be in the moment at all times? How do you balance this with thought?>> <<@bubsyoutube says : I’m interested in their focus on paying attention. Jordan sees Interest as something that should be paid attention to in the present moment, which will lead to your destiny. Sam sees paying attention as beginning anew into the present moment to become mindful of the sacredness that is clouded by memory. Has there been any general rule or protocol on how paying attention should be navigated? Should I try to be in the moment at all times? How do you balance this with thought?>> <<@TheSocialSmilingMonkey says : I'm in ore of the potential of words . Albeit the facade may coerce misappropriation by our own ignorance or in self promoting a cause that is felt more by the individuals who seek that type of gratification. Yet wise words do promote self awareness and for me an awakening to understanding with more clarity ❤. Thank you Mr Petererson and Mr Harris..>> <<@jasonbarlow1448 says : in the distinctions toward the end when we were trying to parse apart the subjective/objective orientation toward religious text and how best to achieve solid ground with regard to man's estimations of the sacred, two nested ideas came to mind -- first, Jung's feeling function seems to provide a unique bridge between the purely rational and intuition (at least as i have it worked out) -- the feeling function is interesting in that it arrives at value not from a purely rational approach, but also not from a place of emotion or any imposed complex -- rather, it seems to have one leg in the rational and one leg in the space beneath the rational, yet without losing the cold-calculation of rationality which science minded folks seem to fancy. Second, the realm beneath the rational is quite real, whether we call it the UnConscious or the Irrational; this seems to be a space Jordan very much celebrates and Sam clearly recognizes and shows no shortage of interest in. I see the challenge being that the truths contained within this space trend, as a rule, toward paradox, and thus require subtler tools than logic, pure rationality, and cold calculation in order to be extracted, much less understood. Esoteric truths, being more yin in nature, don't bend to logic's markedly stiff approach.>> <<@burieddreamer says : I really like when these two talk. It's refreshing.>> <<@christopherhunt1072 says : The comradery between these two despite their difference in belief is so refreshing.>> <<@noellecuisine8912 says : What a wonderful conversation thank you so much. Where is the follow from this?>> <<@ChadJeepity says : It’s amazing that through this conversation at some point I felt love and optimism despite the modern human condition . Unfortunately what keeps being a trend in my recent discussions is me suggesting : what about we decide to be decent fraking human beings and I am seen as an alien … Sad times>> <<@bsspkr says : I started writing a scifi story. Not sure why. A world, a universe, in which reality was distorted after for a split second everything happened at once. A man traveling, searching, exoring a world he doesn't recognize anymore while having conversations with his litte AI friend through a bci. After a lot of pages of writhing by hand I realised it was about me.. My quest, spine tingling moment but it is nice to finally have an intelligent inner voice and dialogue. . The story continues..>> <<@Luckey900 says : Blah Blah Blah.................>> <<@tamaraomari8305 says : If Jordan can do a debate with you, you should know that you are stupid>> <<@justinsgarage1125 says : Watching in may 2024…I wish other guests that have been in the show would push Jordan to let them finish thoughts and answer questions thoroughly. Jordan likes to ask 4 or more questions at a time and only give the guest the opportunity to answer one of them before he goes down another rabbit hole.>> <<@earth1710 says : Sam says that in meditation at no point do you have any realization that you have a brain or neuron firings. But the opposite is also true, when looking at the brain at no point do you know you have a mind or a subjective experience of any kind going on or happening at all.>> <<@SaulEmersonAuthor says : Sam Harris finds himself shouting into the wind - I fully empathise. Turn the observation on its head. Take the most backward, violent, misogynistic & hypocritical* regimes in the World - in terms of egregiousness & volume of influence - & track back to which book it all stems from. Clue - it's not Shakespeare or the Dao. (* 'Photography is forbidden for everyone!!' Reality: man standing posed next to his rifle for a portrait. Or: alcohol is forbidden!! Reality: ready drinking of the stuff in places while outside, women are covered up & banned from education & driving)>> <<@SaulEmersonAuthor says : 1:24:22 'If you just imagine how good a book would be, could be - if it was literally written by an omniscient being..." J.P. Counters that 'putting such a transmission into words would be a very difficult & complicated process...' However - the Qur'an is taken as having been transmitted as the very literal words - to an illiterate receiver (Muhammad). It is said.>> <<@SaulEmersonAuthor says : 1:22:00 The inevitable update to my vocabulary list, from J.P. : _Ossify_ A wonderful example of its use as a metaphor.>> <<@derrickminion9874 says : In what grounds do you claim that out of all the 31 flavors baskin robins offers, vanilla is the correct choice?>> <<@neusprach says : Ffs let the man talk.>> <<@BigfootOffgrid says : When it comes to intelligence on a real comprehensive level, very few people excel when tested on IQ, etc... most people, on average, score rather low. A 65 is a passing score in public education. It is the average score among most people.. it takes a level of intelligence to reach a level of conciousness and understanding. What concerns me most is how "intelligent" artificial intelligence will ultimately be, if it gets most of its knowledge from the average person consuming things on the internet.. if we are honest with ourselves, then we can agree that most comments made by viewers on most of these podcasts is complete nonsensical jibberish.. It is not possible to hold even a basic elementary conversation with most consumers of the information they are viewing.. AI will be flawed if it is learning jibberish from the average person. And the average person far outnumbers intelligent people... This could get real bad. Intelligence is no longer valued. Decisions will be made on a mob rule mentality. Elections are conducted through mob rule.. And look where the mob gets us every time they vote.. The average intelligence person will not vote for a man like RFK jr because the average person does not value the intelligence of RFK jr. So they will vote for someone more in line with their own limited intelligence, Trump or Biden fits that bill. We see it all the time.>> <<@is-ness says : Essentially, religion is theory reliant on an outer. Sam’s discussing experiential VAST DIFFERENCE between salvation and self realisation. Jesus taught salvation bc that’s what the population then could handle. He was a genius. That was then though. We are all that we seek.>> <<@EdwinVazquezMusica says : I'm grateful for these discussions because I particularly see these discussions as exchanges that we are all hungry for and that we sometimes find difficult to individually articulate ourselves.. Sort of like a songwriter might do for those of us who can't quite express what we're feeling.. I can only wish and pray that this type of exploratory discussion where history, science, philosophy and search into truth can branch out into the political realm. We need to explore our cultures, their commonality and differences, the history and science as a means of understanding behavior and reason so that we can all responsibly arrive at healthier world decisions. I believe we need to apply our love for life to the very perspectives that separate us so that we might redirect ourselves into a common place of interest and balance because in the end we really all just want to experience fairness, a sense of union and respect for each other. We shouldn't have to resort to war to find this. +E>> <<@lyncheatingdonut says : Wait, how is that a solution to the is-ought problem? I agree that we can scientifically reason about our suffering, but why should we value the peaks and not the valleys? Sam just says forget about morality and all that, and takes a subjective standpoint, essentially making the value of wellbeing his axiom. That is not a solution nor does it collapse the problem in any way! Nobody disagrees that humans typically value wellbeing because suffering sucks. But that is exactly a subjective standard. Which is fine btw. No clue why morality needs to be objective. We already agree that science furthers our understanding of suffering and wellbeing, and we can democratically improve our societies.>> <<@beckline01 says : Do you know how useful your conversations are to young people, almost indispensable, we deeply need audio visual knowledge like this to push us to start thinking, instead of just cat videos. It's a shame we don't read anymore, but this is life saving from stupidity.>> <<@SoundSloth247 says : You two are always great together, i could listen all day, thank you!>> <<@marcusfossa6695 says : This interview increased my respect for Jordan Peterson. It takes a lot of wisdom to be able to accept that the person you are talking to knows more than you and to ask genuine questions. Sam has wisdom because he meditated, but Jordan has the humility to see it. Hope these two will remain friends.>> <<@invisiblecollege893 says : There’s a sh*t tonne of evidence that UAP’s are real… yet next to no one in the public intellectual circles are talking them except from a handful like Eric Weinstein>>