Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@dineshirengbam-j7e says : If i solve it will you give me money>> <<@FamíliaMoraisRocha says : √12=2×6=12>> <<@LucasWilber-i2c says : At 22:15 , if you look closely you might notice there is 6 consecutive 0s for this BEEG prime number. How curious.>> <<@fantomghost6213 says : Quantum computers are on the way!>> <<@SebastianWillcox says : Can someone please explain what stops 1 from being perfect? I mean its divisors are 1 which adds to 1...? I know it's wrong but please tell em why?>> <<@Goku-c12 says : The real question is....why ,why all of this for just some imaginary things>> <<@nonononono222222 says : isn't 1 a perfect number?>> <<@Vivelefreedom says : Me: Last math class was grade 11 Also me: “lets see if I can figure this out”>> <<@ilovephilosophyandsciencesm says : ‏‪6:47‬‏ I replaced the p with 6 and the result came out 2016 and this number is not a perfect number, how؟؟؟؟>> <<@JohnCarter-t4k says : This was super helpful, thanks!>> <<@loveinbed says : 12:40 KERBLAM shot by sniper>> <<@redimade9058 says : perfect.... means either 1) add all proper divisors or 2) add consecutive numbers? i mean 10 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 and 28 cannot be divided by 3, 5 and 6....and the result is the perfect number?!?!?!?!?!? not even 3 minutes in...>> <<@Ramacat66 says : Let us know when AI solves this one... maybe by the time of the heat death of the universe?>> <<@VAIBHAVSINGH-m7k says : (2^{136,279,841} - 1\) is a prime no.>> <<@Bmizzy2662 says : What’s the point of solving this anyway>> <<@inspo_expo says : I dont think there is enough computing power to find a billion digit Mersenne prime. Guess I'll work on a new way to verify primes>> <<@inspo_expo says : Euler is soooo underrated>> <<@inspo_expo says : Have they even made a hypothetical way to solve it? Have they found odd numbers that factors add too high?>> <<@w00tn33s says : 20:19 Am I the only one who just spotted an OBVIOUS typo on page 572???>> <<@qaysar_King says : Easy 2🧌>> <<@fagusakindrucisaintrootsdufur says : Thanks for sharing this, learned a lot.>> <<@drxcyclopessdrx3920 says : i say in additian cause if i exlained in in negative it wouldn't make sence bit that the way i look at math>> <<@drxcyclopessdrx3920 says : im curious on this just don't have rime anyone intrsted in math learn there own way i count backwords easy for mind to make sencece of it easy example 58 -73 i say 5+7 12 then the res 8+3 that 10+1 sounds long but i do it my head in like a second if i had a tearcher to tell me look at the base and count backwords math would have been so much easier>> <<@jhunilatabilas6138 says : Bro. I am in class 9. Its getting over my head after seeing the map of pure maths and applied maths>> <<@limzhenglelol says : How to 28*13 1. Times 2. 28*3=168 3.168*13=41184>> <<@TJ-hg6op says : Duh it’s 1. (I’m a genius I know)>> <<@Pawel_W1 says : 6 is not a perfect number. Why you ignore 6, but not ignore 1 that gives you 6? That's a stupid problem.>> <<@bridgetbanerjea7588 says : My son figured out another prediction. He says that every perfect number has to end in a 6 or 28>> <<@meijis_keen says : 9:14 67!!!!>> <<@Hehen264 says : The answer is: 6, 28, 496, 8128,>> <<@De225dud says : Judging by my pfp, u know why i am here.>> <<@your_opponent says : Of course Euler is involved>> <<@aiste_Ali says : (3.23mins in) When you talked bout those numbers 11100 and so on. Couldn't you use those numbers to also generate new perfect numbers. 6¹⁰=110+1000+0 that is just added =11100=28=11100 add 2 more 1 and 2 more 0 you get 111110000=496¹⁰ repeat that you get 1111111000000 = 8128¹⁰and if you repeat that you get 11111111100000000 and wouldn't this number be the next perfect number (idk how to make it the other number)?>> <<@26.7thepowerfulcreator says : What is the formula for perfect numbers?>> <<@nazartverdokhlebov says : 8:55 2^(p-1) = Super Perfect Number>> <<@Michał-t2h3i says : 6 28 496 8,128 33,550,336 (≈)8.6B>> <<@danputaranui3182 says : I’ll sleep on this one… the answer usually comes after a good nights sleep:) 😂😂😂>> <<@Ultimate_Guy_07 says : Beauty of Mathematics ❤>> <<@ParallelLives2025 says : I'm an odd perfect number>> <<@tsubasaDensetsu says : Me watching this because i am bored, and doesn't even understand how division works properly and yet understand how this thing works>> <<@gamingpompomdrybones says : Guys the answer was 8128>> <<@rasan-w2n says : There is a Numberblocks band because of this.>> <<@piruthvy_pawar says : Watch 20:48 , the largest mersenne prime of 2018 book shows that the perfect number is odd , yeah, it ends with 1 , I think no one saw it>> <<@Cutiegurl123 says : Me: Just use desmos>> <<@doanhcaokhac1735 says : This video was amazing, learned a lot.>> <<@shnailgirl says : Probably stupid but what about infinity? Feels like set theory might b a decent approach>> <<@eduxcwb says : 28 is perfect because it's a sum of 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14 2:41>> <<@steinanderson says : the answer is no>> <<@fibetyjibets says : PERFECT NUMBERS MAKE PERFECT SQUARES OR RECTANGLES STARTING WITH 6 AND 28 THROUGH INFINITY. And every perfect number, including 28 and all perfect numbers upward ([28], [496], [8128], [33,550,336], [8,589,869,056]) can ALL be divided by four in to a whole number. They also can all be divided by four until them come to a mersenne prime. The number 7 is a mersenne prime number. The number 28 is a “perfect number”. 28 ÷ 4 = 7, a mersenne prime. The number 496 is a “perfect number”. 124 ÷ 4 = 31, a mersenne prime. The number 8128 is a “perfect number”. 8128 ÷ 4 = 2032. 2032 ÷ 4 = 508. 508 ÷ 4 = 127, a mersenne prime. The number 33,550,336 is a "perfect number". 33,550,336 ÷ 4 = 8,387,584. 8,387,584 ÷ 4 = 2,096,896. 2,096,896 ÷ 4 = 524,224. 524,224 ÷ 4 = 131,056. 131,056 ÷ 4 = 32,764 32,764 ÷ 4 = 8191, a mersenne prime. All perfect numbers are systemically full of sevens, as the number 28 is, as well as either the 6 or 1 parts of 7. All perfect numbers, except for the first two , 6 and 28, which are separately a pure, even 6 and a pure, even, multiple of 7, are a combination of an odd or even multiple of 7 , plus a 1 or 6, which makes the combo even and a perfect number. An example is 496. 496 is a perfect number. 496 is a combination of 490, which is an even multiple of 7, plus the even number 6. These two interior even numbers are in the perfect number 496. Another example is 8128, a perfect number. The odd multiple of 7, 8127, plus an odd number 1, combine inside 8128. The perfect number 33,550,336 is within a combination of the odd multiple of 7, and all the groups of each boxed subdivion of multiples of 7 within, plus the single and only added number 1 that makes 33,550,336 even, perfect, and logically consistent with all the elements of perfect numbers. This could be expressed as p for perfect number equals some odd(*~) or even(*-) multiple of 7, plus 1 or 6, where 1 attaches additionally to the odd multiple of 7, and 6 to the even multiple of 7. This makes all of these combined odd and even multiples of 7 and 6 or 1 into the perfect number they are. This is not building a perfect number from any multiple of 7, plus a 6 or 1. This is just recognizing the internal parts of perfect numbers. Perfect numbers are a ornaments on a chain of numbers. They are fruit on the number branch. They are charms on a number chain. Their fruit seeds are 1’s and 6’s attached to fruits of multiples of 7 that combine to make each perfect number fruit, and that they are always even and cannot be otherwise because of this structure that systematically forces even numbers. Perfect numbers all are forced to be even as all right angles are forced to be equal. They all want to be even. They all have the systemic “DNA” of the first “sewing stitches” of the properties of rectangular 6 and rectangular 28 , with it’s four mersenne primes of 7 expressed systemically and in some ways alternately and complementary in every fruit of propigated perfect numbers found in the number chain and linear branch of numbers at every perfect number along the way. All perfect numbers express the mersenne primes in dividing by 4 to a mersenne prime, like 28 divides by 4 to the mersenne prime of 7. They alternately express the first stitch of 6 attached to every internal multiple of 7, however astronomical the perfect number may be. I think it’s notable that the first perfect number, 6, if divided by 4, is 1.5, which is 1.4 plus .1, and that 1.4 is 2× .7. An internal .1 makes the 1.4 an even fourth of 6. The 1.4 +1 = 15, combines a fractional multiple of 7 with 1, and does it four times internally to make the 6. And I think it’s also worth noting that the four 7’s in the perfect number 28, interiorlly are 1+6. These interiors of the roots of perfect numbers keep expressing echos of themselves in every perfect number that materializes along the number chain as it’s tree grows ever larger, branching and bearing bigger perfect numbers like fruit. This is like Euclid’s axiom that all right angles are equal. All perfect numbers above 6, divide by 4, are able to be rectangular or square with whole numbers, are a whole number that is the number 1 combined with an odd multiple of 7, or the number 6 combined with an even multiple of 7, making all perfect numbers as reliably even as all right angles are reliably equal. FibetyJibets, May 26, 2026>> <<@laverdadescondida.366 says : ... 3790....>>