Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@PlaywithJunk says : I really like space travel, but when you think what else we could have done with those billions... Maybe we should fix our own planet before visiting others.>> <<@CRSolarice says : Political speak is only understandable by the exceedingly gullible....>> <<@patricknintemann924 says : 25:00 aaand they didn't do it.>> <<@LeBurkaTron says : Destin took one for the YouTube comments 🙏🏼 your and thunderbolt are my G.O.A.T.S. of yt and I thank you both and Phil for the immense work on the videos. Destin really pulled it out of the bag, had the audience right where he wanted them and had the balls to take the shot. As he said you've got to be able for negative criticism. I think given a project of this magnitude that was hugely ballsy for Destin. The full video is great and I just have shared it so many times coming up to the sls launch Artemis. Deescalate and lettuce live and travel freely in the only place that humanity has ever called home and likely ever will..>> <<@F1avorF1av says : The only thing I will say on this video. Is maybe the goal isn't necessarily what we learn when we get there. It's learning while we are trying to get there. The material science, improvements in the life support. improvements in portable power. It gives us an excuse to develop these things that potentially could be passed down. That, I believe to be the true thing that we would discover. Another thing to consider is that romance that's consistently mentioned. While scientifically irrelevant, the public isn't motivated by papers. Unfortunately it is viewed as boring. Is the new launch of Artemis as shown. The public very much has a much more vested interest in a human participating in space travel. While the hard science gained might not be huge. The impact it has on the Publics view on science might be worth it. Look at the amount of kids that want to be an astronaut when they're young.>> <<@DanielSingularity says : hmmmmm>> <<@TheTadiwos says : You never ahve to explain youself to anyone Thunderf00t, You're doing the lords work. Well if he was real anyways.>> <<@di4bel1989 says : This video today has even more power where trump failed to invade in Iran and strated Artemis>> <<@vk6xre says : All I can say is ... N1 ... more hint ... Russia ..>> <<@SomeRandomDude-q1i says : 14:20 i am in awe, it is the small thing that feeds my soul, that humanity may come to it's senses and not try murdering itself on the inside, for the usual pointless reasons!>> <<@pumpuppthevolume says : military budget is only 900b ? hmm>> <<@pumpuppthevolume says : Obama guessed it ...mid 2030s>> <<@Beer_Dad1975 says : I used to love Dustin - but his religious mumbo-jumbo got the better of me. I mean, you can't believe in Christianity and also talk about rationalism and not be a hypocrite. Spend an ounce of honest thought on Christianity, and it is clear it is a millennial-long cult... and then regardless of how rigorous your scientific endeavours can be, they are open to question by morons.>> <<@JBMSBot says : "SpaceX will be bankrupt..."? How about "SpaceX achieved significant profitability in 2025, generating approximately $8 billion in profit last year" By the way, NASA's Artemis has launched 2 rockets for $72 billion in a decade.>> <<@Nichols_Radial_Injection_Model says : Here we are in April 2026 and it still hasn't been to orbit and now we are on version 3.>> <<@Yanquetino says : Absolutely a “communication problem.” E’loon skuM has been singing “Razzle Dazzle ‘Em” for years, be it with the Semi, the Roadster 2.0, the 4680 batteries, the hyperloop, the starlinks, the tunnels, Fool-Self-Driving, the Cyber_uck, the Cybercab, the robot, the Twatter platform, his… Starshit. And his cult keeps swallowing it hook, line, and sinker. Meanwhile, he just keeps stuttering out new verses for his con song, while we keep destroying our Pale Blue Dot. Wake UP, sheeple!>> <<@HellbornGummybear says : Bit late for me to comment. But why and when did we get to the point of having new technologie that is only a fraction as efficent as the "old" one? 1 rocket to the moon compared to 15+ rockets for a chance to go to the moon.>> <<@robertmoffett3486 says : KENNEDY inherited the Bay of Pigs invasion from Eisenhower. He didn't want it done, but the preparations were so far advanced that canceling would disaffect our anti-Castro Cuban allies. So there's another influence on him>> <<@dougjohnson4266 says : The USA has gone so far backwards, we are unable to compete with ourselves from the 1960's.>> <<@darrenivak4536 says : No more Rockets until you are able to remove the space junk that you already left>> <<@Raz.C says : I don't see a huge problem here. SpaceX has already failed in their obligations. NASA should be well within their rights to sue SpaceX for breach of contract, to recover their 3 billion dollar investment. Right?>> <<@FloPm3ister says : I have to agree. We could have invested all this money into rocket development, robots to all the planets, and space telescopes, all useful things that would still advance our knowledge. 44:00>> <<@hunnybunnysheavymetalmusic6542 says : in my personal view, there is literally no reason one can come up with for going to space. Period.>> <<@Arson85 says : Elon talks out his ahh like Ricky from tpb>> <<@deathkeys1 says : 09:06 hard to do that with the ever increasing budget of that little party going on in the middle east of which most of the supplies come from... LM, as in Lockheed-Martin>> <<@horusthreesixteen3843 says : As requested, we're now r gonna have a pissing contest with China, see "CSS PRESENTS - A Bad Moon On The Rise". And with Elon and StarShit in da mix, da "USSA" doesn't stand a chance...🤪>> <<@comradical says : The ~$3 bn ISS budget is not 3% of the US military's $900 bn budget, it's, give or take, 0.33%... One can only imagine what NASA could do on a $27bn ISS budget.>> <<@ObiWanCannabi says : KSP would be really boring and easy if you got paid to fail 100% of your contracts>> <<@ObiWanCannabi says : they think they can land on Mars but they cant even get "back" to the moon>> <<@romanvarcolac2238 says : Meanwhile in late 2025, we are just a month away from actually launching Artemis II which shows that yeah, we are actually going back… sometimes pointless cynical videos will be pointless.>> <<@jasonbrowny23 says : Update from the end of 2025. Not much has changed>> <<@TOBI-0-0-0 says : We are going back to moon to establish a permenant presence on there Don't ask me why we want a permanent presence on there>> <<@kettler5429 says : Three complications to settle humans on the moon. 1) Human waste and having clean underwear 2) Gravity and bone density or calcium depletion 3) Water Now imagine China settling first on the moon and starting the first Dry cleaners in outer space.>> <<@PaulvonOberstein says : Unfortunately, anything involving government making decisions on how to spend tax payer dollars, including complex engineering projects, is inevitably a question of policy and politics, even when answering the question really requires honesty and objectivity. EDIT: I get many scientists disdain politics and foreign policy infringing on scientific matters, but the truth is there very much is a new pissing contest in the form of Cold War II: The U.S. versus China, in which China poses a far more tenable alternative than the Soviet Union did to the western model of free market democracy. It might sound ridiculous or irrational, but if China can get to the Moon first before the United States and its allies (because Artemis IS an alliance between the U.S. and its allies), then that's a major feather in China's cap, much like winning the space race against the USSR was such for the U.S. in the first Cold War (reportedly, winning the space race was a big reason why Gorbachev believed Reagan's SDI was actually feasible despite the skepticism of his science advisors, and may have helped contribute the the Soviet Union's demise).>> <<@willumwhitmore9419 says : Is there a lander???>> <<@Holocaustica says : Watch the movie, “Don’t look up.” That’s a perfect example of the dynamic relationship between the government and science. There’s a real world tie-in for nearly everything that happens in the movie. (Including the food at the White House part).>> <<@garystyke2384 says : Update year later and musk still has not got any of those stupid rockets into space yet and he is on 10+ launches and what a joke and waste in my tax dollars>> <<@seenseen100 says : But thunder there's no space>> <<@JacquesMartini says : 34:40 As usual, this DID age well! Two years after the original "smarter very day" video, no real progress has happened in the starship program and it is NOWHERE to land on the moon. It took NASA two years to accept reality! Well done!>> <<@austin4855 says : We're a failed empire being picked apart by vultures. This is what happens when meritocracy is completely abandoned for nepotism and grift.>> <<@Drewpost19 says : The motto of this channel. Those who can’t do. Criticize those who can.>> <<@TheBarrwen says : I enjoy listening to the perspective of someone who is more intelligent than I am. Thanks man>> <<@adairjanney7109 says : I bet China read it and followed it>> <<@axelBr1 says : I watched his channel for a bit, (he's a typical over excited American), and then one day he mentioned his Bible study group which shows you the level of his critical thinking.>> <<@robertmoffett3486 says : THE POLITICIAN did his POILITICAL job, as appropriate>> <<@ovakem says : Can somebody answer my dumb queston? How did we do it in 1969?>> <<@funkaddict75 says : 2025, almost 6 and he blew up billions. He's reaching for the stars!>> <<@drjenschn says : Well, by now they could to a banana (1) over completely empty. Which blew up. That pushes the progress bar to 200g/150,000,000g which is massively different from 0.... Why are we still giving SpaceX tax money again?>> <<@s4098429 says : But the CGI!? NASA just needs to hire Musk’s CGI department, they know how it’s going work.>> <<@CutChemist0406 says : So happy I found this channel again. Thanks 🙏>>