Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@AzazelKarnKane says : 🥈v🥈v(D-)>> <<@RosarioMorris-y3e says : Bjorn Lomborg is, by far; the most credible and trustworthy researcher and scientist who evaluates the world’s problems and offer wholistic approach to resolve them… you are on of a kind Dr Lomborg ❤!!! May you continue to be an inspiration to all of us>> <<@bethstinebaugh6817 says : Don't mind me fan girling those house plants. He's one smart plant daddy ❤>> <<@vlndfee6481 says : We and China did not really got rich.... it is going in debt a lot.. Creating wealth out of tin air.>> <<@MrOfcourseitsme says : the "poor" are voiceless, so when the progressives can weaponize them against the right, claiming to have the "poor's" interests at heart...there is no voice to challenge their claim other than those who attempt to use facts and stats against the absurdities. Unfortunately, as long as the left controls media, the narrative will always vilify any reality - while the "poor" they claim to represent ride a bumpy road to worse and worse conditions.>> <<@serjmusiccrosstown91 says : Great interview thank you. 👏👏 Q; on what data , science does The brilliant Bjorn rest his belief that humans change climate ( not weather) thank you 👊✌️>> <<@henrik4438 says : Climate change is the smartest trick so far from the World Economic Forum to keep people scared while an unbelievable amount of money keep rolling from the poor (us) to the rich (hem). 'You will own nothing and be happy'>> <<@nelpontejos says : Grants for EV is based on price not brand. It's odd that Tesla has been singled out for government grants.>> <<@ronnyparker7433 says : I don't know. Seems like a nut job to me.>> <<@ronnyparker7433 says : Implementable and practical Easy read on its own. Maybe you can make reading cool again>> <<@michaelprecourt4943 says : simply lets talk about that irish guy who found a way to tranform used plastic to diesel by plastic i mean that one in ocean>> <<@spectralisation says : The biggest problem we face is the fact that real solutions to real problems doesn't help to bring forward a totalitarian dystopia, and are therefore undesirable to our overlords.>> <<@grimadean3432 says : Subsidies are the flipside of tariffs and have to be paid into by taxes, which include tariffs. Such a suggestion shows that Bjorn (who should be educated on economic theory) doesn't support Free Trade nor capitalism; he supports protectionism and corporatism/corporatocracy.>> <<@TheMusicscotty says : If either of these super geniuses go rogue they'd be unbelievable Marvel-sized super villains.>> <<@jimiellis6060 says : Carbon tax and prosperity are contradictory to peoples back pockets.>> <<@5ilvergun says : Thank you!>> <<@odoggow8157 says : This guy is must a big fraud don't talk about doing good when ur wherein child slave labor 🙄 products.the hypocrisy of these conartists>> <<@staatsgast4934 says : Why do Lomborg, a political scientist, and Peterson, a psychologist, think that they have more expertise to talk about climate change than....well....actual climate scientists? Invite one of these for an actual discussion and then see how it goes. That doesn't mean that he's wrong about everything, but it's strange to NOT have this important debate with someone who actually researches these things and knows what he's talking about.>> <<@xxkittkattxx1230 says : On the free trade point: it sounds amazing until you start to consider some of the governments in the 3rd world are corrupt. How much of that $2000 would actually get to the people? Or are we setting the people up for MORE dispair?>> <<@Orson2u says : Bjorn gets in his horse of Carbon Tax. But William Happer physicist (w vann Wingaarden) has MEASURED the warming of increasing atmospheric CO2 gas in two recent paper (plus a third relatively simplified version) shows the curve flatlining (Beers law). And therefore there is no “heroic gain” in demonising CO2 or in taxing it. On the contrary, the net fertilisation benefits of added CO2 is greater than the negative impacts.>> <<@FIXBUMS says : Man, you could have managed the Intro without reading. Please just be you, you is the best we got as far as i know. heartfeelinx>> <<@elliedino1904 says : Why is Bjorn's book "Prioritizing Development: A Cost Benefit Analysis of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals" £92.07 for a hardcover on Amazon?>> <<@shlomobachar4123 says : Everything comes from extreme consumerism which is driven by extreme capitalism which only sees money. Ego (i.e. the will to receive pleasure) is the source of the problem.>> <<@valdis.rg1 says : The way i understand this argument is that it is almost all about the efficiency and compleat cycle of things. By efficiency i mean if I'm producing electric cars and up against Tesla i need to deliver same or better car for lesser cost to myself this way i will beat Tesla and it will not be question of initial capital or amount of infrastructure it will be question of time. By compleat cycle of things I mean not to stop when my car has been sold and then I don't care, i mean are the end of life of that car it has to ho back to the same basic elements that car was constructed from. In other example if would mean if I was a farmer it would mean to have closed loop production environment that would not contaminate soil and ground water around my farm that would be self sustaining with minimum imports and that my exported produce would have as short of logistics chain possible with real data on consumer benefits (amount of actual vitamin and mineral probiotics mass and health benefit). Because in todays world everything revolves around profit and unfortunately science is structured in such a way that it gets sponsored only for projects that have potential to bring profit and unfortunately stops at the other side which would be risk assessment. Example would be pesticide that is cheap to make works very well, sold... Not until several years later do we find out that it is also responsible for deaths in beneficial insects like bee's. So overall it is not desirable product for me as a farmer. In fact when that product was developed it should have been tested on beneficial insects and it should have been tried for results on human health, then maybe it could be properly finished and then sold.>> <<@TheStickinator says : Fixing TB around the world won't make John Kerry rich now will it?>> <<@september29ification says : Lol, do we have it better? The fact we have running water is enough. Even the poorest in developed counties live better than any king!!! Our lessons on history are frought with bullshit!>> <<@tnonior says : Dr. Peterson, I am a 52 year old Mexican woman, living in the Deep South, in Savannah, Ga. Not all your followers in YouTube are men! I enjoy your lectures, and videos. I thank you, and send best wishes for you and your loved ones!>> <<@davidpereira9224 says : @36:50 why isn't nuclear power advantageous economically?>> <<@rachelb.9828 says : Before Trump imposed the taxes on China it was completely unfair trade market between the US and China because China imposed huge taxes on the U.S. The effect… product came into the US with little or no tax imposed but it was very expensive to move product from the US to China. These are important points that he missed.>> <<@marcelcourchesne9519 says : too many people working for less than living wage that is why people aren't willing to spend more then 24$>> <<@nyChannel09 says : AND its such a complex topic, that many can just use to try to explain many problems in the world. For many, solving climate change solves many other problems because in their mind its the big cause for all evil.>> <<@jesseleighbrackstone8365 says : At the moment, too many people in the west cannot heat their homes, buy adequate food, or pay their mortgage/rent. I highly doubt that they’re going to buy the point of view that they’re somehow getting richer. I don’t buy that myself. I’m concerned about food availability, supply chains, manufacturing, pharmaceutical availability, the integrity of the grid, the availability and/or affordability of gasoline, natural gas, and pretty much everything needed for survival at the moment. This conversation took place only a year ago. At this juncture, we’re going to see tens of millions of people in the western world either starve or freeze to death this winter, and this situation was manufactured, manipulated, and purposed to effect depopulation and the destruction of the western economy. This IS the end of the world for (ultimately) billions of us.>> <<@jesseleighbrackstone8365 says : People need: Love Water Food Shelter Education Meaningful work Dignity Address these needs first. ‘Fix’ the people and the people will then fix the problems. Blessings! 🙏🏻 Jesse.🌹>> <<@SuperAnders63 says : The UN looks at everything from a leftwing point of view and thereby invalidates everything it does given that the left always lies.>> <<@physikus1123 says : The problem I see with climate change is that so much resources wasted might lead to a significant rise of political parties opposed both to capitalism itself and to any rational solution of this problem (because hey, we spent so much bazilions of dollars on it and it did NOTHING!). Surely Peterson should focus on this harder in the next interview, should there be any. As of now, best of luck to both of you!>> <<@farhanaslam2764 says : “People shouldn’t outsource their ability to think critically>> <<@ScaryMary-7 says : Why don’t these social scientists ever say how addressing all the climate funding will be measured? Who maybe harmed? What if we 🎉celebrate for nothing but more harms and new scare topics like nuclear war, famine due to zero reliable energy grid etc.>> <<@gemmadavies2922 says : Minute 30: By anti capitalist do you mean Davos WEF Elite?>> <<@randymurphy says : It must be very frustrating to have such great ideas and have nobody take them seriously enough to implement them.>> <<@Drkjuju says : Global warming is great when I'm suntanning in south Florida.The end is near and I'm going to be on the beach watching girls in there thon's.>> <<@sth6027 says : Is there anyone who can give me an explanation of how subsidising 'rich farmers' will stop them from blocking free market growth? I don't understand that part very well.>> <<@judythrobertson6433 says : Don't worry their will be a global warming, God will make sure of that in the end>> <<@billabonggolkpr says : I find it funny YouTube puts a UN claim on this video despite both these dudes working on the climate shite for the UN. You can't make this shite up.>> <<@omegademocide says : @52:00 But think of the Moloch! (In his best Mod Flander's voice)>> <<@JoeStopkaMusic says : Why does Youtube place the "Climate Change Context Message on this video" Political Correctness abounds">> <<@jonnya3425 says : Jordan, I love you, honestly but you constantly interrupt your guests right as they are wrapping up their point. From the POV of this frequent listener it really disrupts the flow of your discussions.>> <<@nocensorship8092 says : I'd say instead of focusing on the problems, focus on what societal system would be the right "tool" to solve them. I'm working on that, my life goal is finding a better system. That is because I can not see how logic, science or reason has a place in our current systems. Our current systems of organizing society are erratic, irrational and emotional and that's not how you solve problems.>> <<@OlTrailDog says : Global warming fear merchants are simply not interested in what you have to say or looking at common sense solutions. They are hell bent on enriching themselves and controlling others by robbing you and imposing totalitarian governments.>> <<@davidohmart1336 says : IMHO we don't have the right focus in the first place And looks to me the wrong people are in charge well DAMN ITS NOT THE END OF THE WORLD wake up people>> <<@URProductions says : I agree with almost everything he says, except for one thing: the carbon tax. Fuck. The. Carbon. Tax.>>