<<@pamelanewick7579
says :
Oh god. This is so dull and the headline is erroneous.
>>
<<@PLsiim
says :
Can you imagine having thousands of vehicles on the road with nuclear reactors???? The dangers with that!!!!! Good way to commit suicide!
>>
<<@DCO92
says :
Bill Gates is promoting Natrium nuclear. Might be the one time lobbyists will play a positive role in educating voters
>>
<<@scottrisley4467
says :
Nano Nuclear Energy = NNE ticker This stock is so undervalued its incredible. My advice to anyone is get in while its still this low !!
>>
<<@wyckofury2198
says :
6:12 James Walker is also CEO of Ares Strategic Mining. It's the only permitted Fluospar/Fluorite mine in the US. Ares is also constructing an acidspar plant right now. Acidspar (acid grade fluorspar) is used to manufacture hydrofluoric acid. Uranium dioxide (UO2) can be fluorinated to uranium tetrafluoride (UF4) by hydrofluoric acid (HF). Uranium tetrafluoride (UF4) is the base material for liquid molten-salt SMR fuel cores.
>>
<<@fppro1679
says :
Too much risk for not nearly enough power. Nuclear reactors work best when you have high power density. That means a real facility. These little ones though have the potential to be used for low-cost nuclear submarines!
>>
<<@MarkJones-si2bb
says :
I never really realized how big Canada is, and hiw blessed w natural resources. With a dependable and reasonably priced energy supply, Canada could lure businesses leaving too-expensive Germany (green energy *cough* - NP shut down *cough*). Trudeau is a disaster, and I never thought Canadians were that whacky liberal. Possibly too polite to shut down the wackos?
>>
<<@Stumpy1854-Orion
says :
SMR's are too expensive to purchase and maintain, thats why, after decades, we still haven't seen one Personally I wouldn't feel safe with one of those near by, no matter how many fail safes were installed, unlike the Solar Panels on my roof.
>>
<<@Stumpy1854-Orion
says :
We have seen the proposal of SMR's which looks promising but after many decades we still haven't seen one in operation supplying power to the community. The price of the energy supply is the problem, these things are extremely expensive to build and run, which puts it out of the practical daily use. Solar Panels are 6x less to build and require no maintenance to run, every roof, car park etc has the potential to be covered in solar panels with no use of extra land and linking with a battery produces power 24/7. I have Solar on my roof which on a sunny day gives me more than twice the power I need, at no fuel cost and batteries power the house when the sun isnt shining. Every house can be it's own power generator with excess going to the grid
>>
<<@warrenpuckett4203
says :
The main problem with Nuclear is finances. Takes too long to break even. Nuke disposal is actually easier than the disposal of of petroleum and coal waste. As for the mining scars? The earth will heal. Just won't heal your lifetime. The planet will still be here when the last homo-sapient dies.
>>
<<@zackpane7973
says :
I call it portable Chernobyl
>>
<<@henrycarlson7514
says :
interesting , Thank You . If it works , We Need
>>
<<@readthetype
says :
Anyone who says “reach out” instead of “contact” is either an idiot, manipulating you, or both.
>>
<<@DavidShort-lf4jn
says :
Australia has plenty of uranium production mate sure we could sell you some. But unfortunately our government bans the use in generating electricity!
>>
<<@fredericbastiat5653
says :
It's not "green" enough.
>>
<<@truethought369
says :
Yep: like I thought, Nuclear energy is NOT good for the environment, NOT good for health, NOT good because it still costs far too much. Water, Wind power, is still far better, for than all other types of energy.
>>
<<@MichaelSmith-qv4yn
says :
Thorium is a better fuel for SMR's .
>>
<<@devinledesma5005
says :
Something they don’t focus on is when you leave uranium in the ground it most likely leaches/bleeds into the environment during its decay
>>
<<@Nicklan1961
says :
And just exactly how much is it going to cost to store the wsste the next 1000 years? Are you guaranteeing that you will be the first 1 to ever build a reactor on time run budget And if there is a meltdown which there have been many Are you gonna be personally liable for all the people that will have a very slow death from the radiation poisoning?
>>
<<@orbitingeyes2540
says :
Why are we still using Uranium with its long-lived waste products? We should move on to Thorium at this point. Much safer.
>>
<<@mnewln1800
says :
Hardening of our electrical infrastructure is imperative. Modular nuclear technoloy should play a big part. It's treasonous that this hasn't happened decades ago.
>>
<<@andreassjoberg3145
says :
No need to mine uranium. Treat the used fuel rods and get new rods back. Problem is there is plutonium in the used rods, and people are scared they fall in the wrong hands. I say make thorium reactors, and use the plutonium as starter-fuel to burn the thorium, and we get rid of the plutonium as a bonus.
>>
<<@alanbatten5548
says :
Uranium hexafluoride must be a fairly heavy gas. What would be the effect of a major spill of such a gas? If you move anything sooner of later there will be an accident!
>>
<<@fredflickinger643
says :
I like the breadth of your interest and right in line with my engineering side!
>>
<<@windmolenfarm8030
says :
It's simple Jordan, Hillary Clinton sold our mining production to Russia a number of years ago since we apparently didn't need it for those nasty Nuclear Power Plants (or even nastier bombs).
>>
<<@jimmy9fingers1
says :
Nuclear Power is clearly a super efficient technology, however doesn't High Level Nuclear waste remain Toxic for thousands of years?. If there is a way in which radioactive waste can be eliminated entirely or rendered totally safe then obviously it's the solution, otherwise no man made storage facility for hazardous waste could possibly last the duration, not even close. Whenever there is Hazardous Waste to dispose of and huge sums of money at play, there is going to be corruption and corners cut.
>>
<<@RayFinkle
says :
Stop using Uranium. Use Thorium.
>>
<<@billybobwombat2231
says :
Yeh, a shrink is always good to get advice on how we power up our grids 😂🙄
>>
<<@GiveEarSaveLove
says :
I hope this good energy for the world.
>>
<<@Tesla_Ampersand_Friends
says :
They were flying around reactors in an airplane like a half century ago its not like they magically shrunk it all down just now
>>
<<@terranhealer
says :
I really wish the guest didn’t mention the word bomb when talking about uranium. This topic was about uranium for nuclear power and there is no way for that material to explode like a nuclear detonation
>>
<<@kcbroncohater
says :
This was part of Biden's New Green Deal that he was running before the last election. Small nukes to power small cities and big nukes for a large city. Biden never talks about it because voters would freak out if they did.
>>
<<@StopRoguePilotsNow
says :
Jordan, REALLY?! Why outsource? Doesn't it poison our land and people? Of course we don't want anyone poisoned, but what if it was your family, neighbors, water and farm being poisoned? What happens when this starts turning up in your steaks?
>>
<<@romangasior4046
says :
👀👀👀👀👀👀
>>
<<@sfrahm1
says :
Hmm. cia the-world-factbook/central-asia/ Central Asia uranium sources Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan My bet is on Thorium / Fluoride Molten Salt Reactors Thorium is a nearly free waste product found in piles & piles of mine tailings across the globe just laying there. I think the science is mostly waiting on regulators to get up to speed IMHO.
>>
<<@stuartedge5906
says :
Great work bringing attention to this. Thanks Jordan. On the lighter side, some bloke called Homer Simpson has just applied for the job and Marge has been making yellow cake for years.
>>
<<@janpalsson8935
says :
1:16 i heard that thorium should be almost the same just without the benefit of making weapons of the leftovers…
>>
<<@DoniIionescu
says :
OK go and read a sci fi story by Asimov. It's called "Silly Asses". Forget the spin off of the nuclear arms race. We should be looking at Molten Salt reactors. This is a failure right from the start.
>>
<<@YTGhostCensorshipCanSuckMe
says :
Such a clickbait title
>>
<<@Brohymn80
says :
Dr Peterson needs to ¹start following GordonMcDowell 's YouTube channel. ²Get in touch with fellow Canadian Gordon McDowell (I've emailed him before. He'll respond.. and I'm a nobody. Dr Peterson is Dr Peterson) And ³get Gordon to catch him up on what Kirk Sorensen & Jim Kennedy are working on ala thorium-fueled molten salt reactors and rare earth mining & processing counter China's grip on global supplies. Given Dr Peterson's defenses against far-left climate model manipulations, a crash course in switchgrass & kelp farming combined with an understanding of both the environmental (predominantly via soil health but also air quality) & energy economic value of biochar and its carbon-negative properties could also become an incredibly & increasingly valuable knowledge set to have .. .. especially where agricultural benefits has such an impact on crop health & nutritional capacities in foods .. which clearly play an integral part in both physical & mental health. Several positive feedback loops there with near-infinite scalability which run counter the artificial scarcity based narrative increasingly pressuring so many of his followers.
>>
<<@dustinherk8124
says :
Don't even need to sell uranium reactors to the public. they have a taboo behind them. can now sell thorium reactors to the public as a generally "safer" fissile material for both small scale and large scale power production, and Saskatchewan has even MORE ore than Uranium. but if you do want to go the route of Uranium 4th gen reactors using LFTR or FAST reactors it can run on what is already deemed "Spent" uranium fuel waste, and significantly lower the "shelf life" of its harmful decay period from thousands of years, to a couple centuries; with much less of it as the final product needing storage.
>>
<<@MeanOldLady
says :
I loved the old Galen Winsor lectures on nuclear topics. What a bold guy he was!
>>
<<@jonathanwaddington965
says :
How about releasing the real free energy such as water Electrolizing.
>>
<<@MrWackozacko
says :
I think Aliens wont let us build nuclear. We can end hunger and carbon dioxide outputs with nuclear but the government wont do it
>>
<<@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
says :
Great video, Jordan...👍
>>
<<@klimatbluffen
says :
Sweden also has large reserves of uranium, with the old kind of nuclear reactors, Sweden could electrify all of Europe for hundreds of years.
>>
<<@Ikrell-Laires
says :
thought this Jordan Peterson Guy was a psychologist ? why is he flapping his gums about nuclear physics ?
>>
<<@lawrencekeeley8966
says :
Hey you should have bought it from Hilliary . I understand she had a bunch of it, Uranium One I believe it was called, I wonder what happened to that.
>>
<<@audioglitchguy
says :
Ive been talking about SMRs for years. They are the solution to the energy crisis.
>>
<<@patrickbass3542
says :
...and WHO gave away right to the US URANIUM deposits to "foreign" unfriendly entities! Wasn't it HILLARY? But on a lighter note: can that reactor/generator system produce enough amperage to move an 18-wheeler, loaded with cargo at highway speeds?
>>
NEXT VIDEO
>>