Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@alexandresobreiramartins9461 says : Most of it is because Dawkins is an actual scientists and Jordan is a Christian fanatic.>> <<@Ieueseuei says : What a hypocrite. He blocked me after pointing out how he confused love and desire as the same thing.>> <<@Chris-um3se says : BRAVO JORDAN>> <<@gabriel.trainer says : Shit let me write this down.>> <<@Michael-ii9fs says : The mistake is in thinking Richard Dawkins in after truth. No matter how much he has lied to himself, he is not. He has a cult agenda of atheism to "prove." He has acheived a genuinely impressive level of scientific education (unlike Bill Nye in a scientist sense) and yet he has harped at people that God does not exist, creation is not real, and ironically, wasted his career with this false evanglism while telling young people they shouldn't waste their careers with God. He has wasted his career avoiding his discipline in depth promoting lies....telling people propagating truth to stop. Dawkins is, objectively, a fool and an embarrassment when he didn't have to be.>> <<@pieinher67 says : But don't ask awkward questions about double standards, Jordan's true allegiances or about the g'side he won't condone that is a deep stain of exrement across the soul of humanity. Apart from that, all good.>> <<@danjon1099 says : Great minds seek questions not answers>> <<@gullf1sk says : Dawkins and Peterson agree on a LOT more than they disagree on>> <<@inspiringmedia3716 says : The truth is not to be found in the logical mind>> <<@waynemackenziesr5005 says : This interview with Mrs Ali is captivating. As a hobby linguist, I appreciate Peterson's decreased cadence and more common conversational vocabulary in this sitdown. Of note, he is being more passive here, more so than ussual. As for Mrs ali, she is an obviously brilliant and deep thinker with a perspective that we in America can learn so much from.>> <<@RandomWrongDeletion says : Competitive Intercourse > Competitive Discourse>> <<@phillippage8127 says : Jordan Peterson. You are very close to the root of this issue. Wait till I drop my own channel in a month to two months. This is indeed the closest you've ever come to the exact root of the issue. I'll give you some hints, straight from your videos. You said once in an interview that the problem with global warming is it's irreducibly complex. Implicit in that is the idea that that which is reducibly complex can be discussed. You said in another video that God tells Adam to tend the garden. You said part of that is naming everything and sorting it hierarchically. You've also pointed out the great importance of infrastructure. That's all you need to solve this riddle along with this video I'm commenting on. Race you to the finish. You're a genius. I'd be thrilled if you beat me to the finish line. It's not fun being ahead of the pack and waiting for others to catch up. It's lonely. Better to be with the pack. ❤>> <<@greenhornet5186 says : Jordan hasn't been able to crack the Dawkins code.>> <<@jamesragus1577 says : Exactly what group Bible studies do>> <<@ryleighloughty3307 says : As Dawkins cannot base any of his ideas on the Bible, if he is ever right on anything, it is accidental.>> <<@its_me_again2300 says : Dr Peterson I'd like to start with saying I honestly support your work and beliefs. You are an intellectually honest person and we can see that. As someone who doesn't think the way you do, my only constructive criticism for you would be to try and be a little more aware of how you may come across. I believe you can come across a little arrogant and dismissive. BUT I dont believe you are this way. I think you're a reasonable human, do with this comment as you will. Thank you for speaking out instead of being silent like the rest of us are being convinced to. You are an inspiration, we need to speak out. Because the majority online speaking out are the, well i could use many terms to describe them, but we all know who im talking about. The ones pushing these insane ideas and beliefs.>> <<@ackobracko1651 says : I like those PUNK suits. 💪👍>> <<@realology777 says : I will say this time & time again Sir, You are an amazing man In so many aspects of Life! ❤ Thank you for all the relevant Value you have added to this Life I am grateful for. I am grateful for you Dr. Jordan Peterson ! 🙏 Respect to you.>> <<@jeffcarino4077 says : The issue at hand is that Dr Dawkins is vastly more intelligent than Jordan Peterson, who is a pseudo intellectual, at best.>> <<@lenarsa66 says : A friend and me had a very intensiven discussion about a subject really pressning each other and I dare say also moving each other's standpoint without ever reaching any likeness of agreement. In the end we saw that now, at this moment we won't get any further, and, we're tired let's stop for now. 😆 We had had a very good flow letting each other talk and listening and both if us felt it had been a very good discussion. So we ended and continued whatever... The funny thing was a couple of bystanders who couldn't believe their eyes! They were like: You're not angry? not irritated at each other?! We were like: why? looking at each other shaking our heads... why? We were just discussing! The others: But you didn't agree. We: what has that got to do with us being angry at each other? We always disagree! ...almost. They still were totally blown away by the fact that we had been so intensly discussing and were not at odds with each other. 😂>> <<@chrisgabbert658 says : 🤔 don’t dismiss thoughts cause they don’t aline with you they can improve your own thoughts for the best out come.>> <<@stephenrsmith4175 says : Love the suit. Love you perspective>> <<@MHLivestreams says : that shirt reminds me of the Sunday best we wore in borstal, youth prison, 1985.>> <<@Air36874 says : Neither of us should be presuming we have the right answer - ladies and gentleman - THIS IS A SOPHIST.>> <<@mrmonk7197 says : Dawkin's seems to think he has all the right answers. A bore when not irritating.>> <<@GeniDeka says : This is the mentality people need to adopt in arguments. To come closer to the truth as the goal. Not being right as the goal.>> <<@BIGJONNN559 says : Good Job J.P 🍊>> <<@jermaine2021 says : He has the best suits>> <<@jtmmmm27 says : Dawkins definitely believes he's superior to Peterson IMO.>> <<@InCognito-yq5ew says : TO PERSONALLY UNDERSTAND AND MAINTAIN THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE, TO HONOR IT BY HIS OWN EXEMPLARY CONDUCT, AND TO PASS IT INTACT TO SUCCEEDING GENERATIONS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EVERY TRUE AMERICAN.>> <<@thetruthwillsetyoufree891 says : I don’t think there should be a moderator in all cases. Please watch brother Christian Prince debate Muslims. ✝️❤️>> <<@lukewalker1051 says : Let's cut to the chase here. This woman is black and feel discriminated against and further discrimination reviewing the history of black people. She denies Darwinism and that people are naturally born with different IQ and talents. She believes the plight of her own people aka black people is solely due to 'circumstance' and privilege of white people which is false and denies other ethnic groups that excel in spite of being a minority culture within white society. I am a scientist with talent in math. This woman is against offering people like me who have aptitude in math to have access to accelerated math classes because her constituency of black people can't do the curriculum. Ultimately this will put America behind. America should never sink to the lowest common denominator. If there is any debate about this, I am open to perform a calculus exam with this 'Dr.' and bet the farm I will have a much higher score. America needs top engineers and not the voice of dumber people trying to lower our standard of living.>> <<@Soldier_for_Jesus_Christ says : This dude is so smart>> <<@user-hj8ij9vu5d says : ✊🏻👑>> <<@EmporerFrederick says : "There is" or "there are" many things? Why is English grammar so flexible?>> <<@leeg5481 says : Being wrong sounds awful....>> <<@Malouco says : Everyone likes a good tussle! A little jostle is good for the soul! INTERESTS ARISE WHEN PEOPLE COMPETE! WHEN ITS INTERESTING THERE IS NO LOSER!>> <<@mpp9964 says : What is JP? This is INTJ speak. Has he ever announced his type of 16?>> <<@lillukka900 says : it's a pleasure to disagree and argue with a person who listens and reasons, and nothing is forced or too serious. through a different perspective, you can learn something new that you didn't see before>> <<@glrebert1 says : My mom was a liberal and I came out of the womb a conservative. We had that kind of discourse weekly. It always started with I love you and ended the same way.>> <<@1TakoyakiStore says : I think that's why Jordan Peterson likes debating Slavoj Žižek so much. Even though Jordan doesn't agree with a lot of his positions, the amount of original concepts/ideas are just so damn fascinating that he brings to the table.>> <<@BradKandyCroftFamily says : Okay, so how do you know when you've hit absolute truth if everyone is walking around assuming they don't have it? I get what why this assumption is a good thing, otherwise you stop seeking for more truth, but when do you know you've hit a piece of it?>> <<@rundbaum says : i LOVE responding to your videos & giving you the response you didn't expect! it's sort of 'abraxan' logic, but it works!! :)>> <<@Steve197201 says : Politicians should take note.>> <<@Lioness_of_Gaia says : Absolutely, yes!>> <<@noahthomas7464 says : Amen>> <<@titanscar2183 says : Talking about "competitive discourse" and how you should both be "seeking the truth" yet according to a comment on one of his videos stating "we ALL want to be right" he comes in with a "keep telling yourself that" Huh, I guess seeking truth is important until you get enough pushback or it's someone who doesn't think like you>> <<@l.k.1111 says : He is amazing.>> <<@robertjensen1438 says : My dad was so competitive that on his death bed, as he breathed his last He said, "Staring contest... GO.">> <<@andycremeans says : I’m a subscriber; I take my subscriptions seriously; I don’t have a TV and limit my digital intake / digestion, so this whole interaction has already taken more time than my fat fingers are worth (I.e., vertically held phone typing letters on a small piece of phone screen’s realestate) unless a furtherance of truth is conveyed, that is, discourse over bloodshed. Why not just talk with a willingness to be wrong constantly? Why not just have a dialog? Words are the most important thing in the universe. Why not hold everyone accountable for every single one they speak?>>