<<@ywtcc says : So your solution is to sign everyone up for a variety of pre Lincoln restricted government Liberalism that's compatible with slave owning states? One person's debts is another person's assets, that's not Marx's insight, that's been the case for the entire thousands of years of history of debt. Which is why his kind of Liberal doesn't like that part of religion very much! Why don't you tell the story of Jesus overturning the tables of the moneychangers, instead of bringing up this Marx guy?>> <<@mosesasplund6891 says : Peterson prepared for the Zizek debate by reading the communist manifesto. Bro does not understand Marxist ideas at all. If you're gonna try to attack them, attack the actual ideas.>> <<@turjyalaskar6312 says : šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚>> <<@efffiel6565 says : How on earth it is okey to allow someone a person, to own 1000 homes? Does that even makes sense?>> <<@efffiel6565 says : That a lie it was NOT the economic axis, it was the ownership of the means of production, who owns the land, who owns the factories, and why? Thats the main question, it is an abomination that we use the state legal ownership rights that were used back in rome, a slavery state. That basically allows anyone who owns an asset or means to own it forever, and to use it as they so desire.>> <<@efffiel6565 says : Lets start by saying that food and housing are not an asset thats an abomination, that creats ghettos and destroys society, saying that its exactly what deteriorates human relationships and lead many to drugs, housing, food and basic healthcare should be a right, once that is provided by the state, then in my opinión there is nothing else to provide the socialist state should only provide the basics for survival, once that is provided capitalist wont be able to exploit anyone because no one will have to choose between starving or working>> <<@Telepathic_Monkey_Experiment says : Marx said that it is the structure of capitalism that incentivizes division and oppression, not the moral character of individuals.>> <<@bretsalvatore2363 says : The only thing he ever read of Marx was the first few lines of the Communist Manifesto lol. Atleast that was the only source he could ever reproduce in a debate publicly.>> <<@01_SPACE_C0WB0Y says : Equally as wrong about Marx as modern "Marxists" are...>> <<@EnbyArtemis says : Marx didn't moralise you dimwit! He presented actual facts and then proceeded to offer a solution.>> <<@freddiemercerful says : Marx admired the ruling class and considered capitalism to be revolutionary! Peterson has never read Marx lol he’s so out of his depth!>> <<@naqeebkakar6716 says : I can bet this guy hasn’t ever skimmed through chapter 1 of DAS kapital .Yet he goes on generalising one of the most analytical and rigorous work of all time so casually . This is called the decline of academia.>> <<@GabrielGarcia-u8v says : Marx and Engels were both very ā€œparticularā€ about HOW he wrote his manifesto.. there was never any Moral criticism, condemnation, or celebration of any Moral stance or belief.. they explicitly treated Morality is a category in society, subject to change.. But they were very specific about addressing capitalism and communism as a solution, and were very specific about using historical evidence to build conclusions.. not morality>> <<@psikeyhackr6914 says : What do modern Marxists say about "Depreciation"? Are they censoring themselves? Karl Marx used the word 'depreciation' 11 times in volume 1 35 times in volume 2 80 times in volume 3 of his major work but the automobile had not yet been invented. What does depreciation have to do with planned obsolescence in a consumer economy? Where is the data on the annual depreciation of automobiles since Sputnik? Notice that our brilliant economists do not say much about the NET Domestic Product. But they beat us about the head with GDP, Gross Domestic Product. What is the NET Domestic Product & what has happened to the depreciation of durable consumer goods since Sputnik? NDP = GDP - Depreciation That Depreciation is Capital Goods ONLY! But Durable Consumer Goods were added to GDP just like Capital Goods and Bananas. So automobiles and air conditioners get treated more like bananas than Industrial Robots. The equation should be: NDP = GDP - (Dcap + Dcon) Dcap is Depreciation of Capital Goods Dcon is Depreciation of Durable Consumer Goods Explain the logic of treating Refrigerators like Bananas for 75 years. Buy a car and it gets added to GDP. Drive the car around a great deal and it slowly wears out, it DEPRECIATES! BUT, if that car is a Consumer Good our brilliant economists do not subtract that Depreciation to compute NDP. How many hundreds of millions of Automobiles have had their depreciation ignored since 1950? This was not Marx's problem since automobiles had not been invented. Even John Maynard Keynes never saw a television commercial for an automobile. So how do we cope with our techno-wargame culture while techno-illiterate economists fail to get their Algebra correct?>> <<@Tenoch-p1d says : Karl J E W I S H Marx.>> <<@seanbuskey357 says : Dude never even read Marx.>> <<@CaroRomĆ”nyoga says : Moral? You are jyst a sophist, a intelectual fraud. Feel so sorry fornthe people her that never read marx in trurh...>> <<@CaroRomĆ”nyoga says : Pseudo profesoršŸ˜‚ never read marx>> <<@Histoiredulivre says : Oh my god stay in your lane>> <<@WillDasag says : The Working Class morality is base on their principles Be not a burden! Be independent! Be practical! Be counted! Be educated! Morality is that law on how to behave and treat each other as human and Christian morality seems to serve the purpose, but Marx saw this as all hypocrisy, while the Working Class see themselves as the "human being" they want us to be like them, to be "just" a human being by way of their principles. And I understand them, believe them, and I will follow. Christian morality will not make anyone a human being instead it is creating a god, while the Working Class morality will make us all human.>> <<@tanders3441 says : What a bullshit mr peterson. You have such intellectual faƧade. You should not talk about things you understand.>> <<@GGustavson-hf3dk says : What's up with his weird suites?>> <<@Urm0mz says : Moral virtue of the oppressed would mean that there is NO moral value in oppressing others You literally proved his "statement" is something to....disagree with>> <<@BillyBob123xyz says : I really don't think he has read Marx>> <<@AmzHorrorStoriez says : He’s so wrong.. he use to seem so intelligent and credible>> <<@thiccbaby2967 says : All the Karl haters talking about how he wrote this out of anger. When it reads as the most thought out work of literature next to buddhist teachings and Confucius books. To put simply the bs is real and yes they laugh about us at breakfast being served hand and foot with loads of entitlement. They hate marx words not because they are lies. Because they show truth.>> <<@Realme-s2w1e says : AI views.,>> <<@jeganofsathyabama says : I wanna know what this gentleman thinks of the other reasons for modern day suffering. ?>> <<@natej1026 says : That moment when you manage to misunderstand Marx more than anyone ever has.>> <<@DavidBayili-y1c says : I’m dangerously confident now. Thanks a lot.>> <<@ouroborosnagyok9306 says : bro wtf are you wearing>> <<@avian8354 says : Bro never read marx>> <<@apex9806 says : So he claims one thing but doesn't believe in it? What?>> <<@veselsvocal says : Another terrible video. I wish my timeline would stop showing your face and misinformed opinions.>> <<@artificial-frequencies says : Marx was mentally challenged… just as all his followers>> <<@stathispanayiotopoulos9800 says : Purely wrong>> <<@Y0za says : I bet that clown never touched Marx's books>> <<@vikramhegde6406 says : What do you mean by' believe '?>> <<@lennaymaboyyy4848 says : Karl Marx was an actual intellectual, unlike JP.>> <<@nathanhoevet7929 says : LMFAOOOOO Bro does not know ball>> <<@donot-dabbad says : He really don't know what he is talking about>> <<@obiwanjabroniX says : This brother do be yapping>> <<@manotive6094 says : No he did not>> <<@uhtredsonofuhtred2867 says : Boy how I've slowly gone from being inspired by Peterson to being sick of him šŸ˜‚>> <<@nicholasszegho6768 says : Working class people who support pro capitalist ideology complain about the government taxing the wealth they created by don’t realise their boss taxes the wealth they created far more than the government. Taxes pay for things as your bosses profit pays for their fifth investment property>> <<@3reHYeager says : I think he's actually never going to read Marx because he'll reason with him, I think Peterson is smart enough to understand and get on the same wavelength with Marx>> <<@richcherwalk6349 says : Mankind has always tried to oppress each other, Karl Marx just illustrated the mechanics of how it’s done through capitalism. Why would anyone want to ignore that?>> <<@manu-jya says : Marx spent many years writing volume 1 of Capital, and he died before he could even finish volumes 2 and 3, which had to be finished by Engels Also, if you're one to take Lenin's advice, he said that you couldn't even understand the first chapter of the book without having mastered Hegel's Logic But go off on your YouTube Short Jordan>> <<@KEDDY_PRODUCTIONS says : i watched a 10 minute video about Marx's ideoligy and i already know that this is completely wrong>> <<@danielhuycke3419 says : The amount of people who are actually pro Marx in the comments is quite sad. The man’s ideas were put into action and the consequences were disastrous. Pathetic>>
VideoPro
>>