Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@CrossExamined says : Download FREE Cheat Sheet “The 4-Point Case For Christianity” 👉📱https://cutt.ly/ZYMC4nl>> <<@MountainMan-sc8xj says : You’re moral claims are either religiously based or preference based.>> <<@ChildePC says : Question... Do religion abide by state and government law already? To build a church, it obeys law reguarding building construction electric and water and sewage. Yes... It follows. Human laws Does a church require teachers to be governed by licences? Licences are state required! Yes churches already follow state and gov laws. When a church first is made did they tell the state by requirement that it exists? Yes you need a certain number of followers to found a church by state law. Does the church pay tax? Why the hell not>> <<@unc1589 says : The framers made a lot of mistakes but they were pretty spot on when it came to “religion” in society. In fact, God handles the issue pretty much the same way. America won’t legally force religion and neither will God! You guys gotta watch the Benjamin Franklin documentary on PBS to see how these guys slug it out over how they framed a nation. Think of it. There’s no “how to frame a nation” handbook. Nobody got everything they wanted and everybody compromised their position. Beautiful! But fragile.>> <<@greatfilmmaker says : You speak on abortion as you must but how come I never heard you talk about gun laws or address things that happened in Texas and Buffalo>> <<@KarrEternal says : This isn't meant to be an insult but that guy's (The one asking the question) posture really needs fixing. And before you reply, I know why it's that way. Just saying he might wanna work on that.>> <<@adegbeyekayodecoadegbeye8077 says : It's a real tragedy that man imagines that there's liberty of any sort outside of Jesus Christ. God said "I have created you for my own glory" and then He said "This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased, hear ye him". That bit about freedom of religion is mortal replay of Eden. God is not religion, religion is choice between obedience and rebellion no matter the hue. He is instruction, to which the only acceptable response is obedience no matter the reservation. He will explain Himself if queried but that's as far as man's opinion goes. The bright side is, He pulls His weight every single time. He will not spare Jesus Christ crucifixion but He will not fail to ressurect Jesus Christ either. MARANATHA>> <<@memastarful says : Just sharing some food for thought. An old wise Jamaican man once told me, " Feelings are real, but they not always correct.">> <<@memastarful says : Thank you atheists for challenging my faith and sparking renewed growth and rekindling a new fresh fire for God within. This song goes out to the 6 atheists who interacted with me on this Christian podcast channel. Youtube: New creature- Fresh anointing ( feat. Yeshiva boys) By: gospel hydration 🔥🕯🔥🕯🔥🕯🔥🕯🔥🕯🔥🕯>> <<@tTtt-ho3tq says : Do you believe Satan and demons actually exist? I mean literal. Do you believe witches actually exist? If so what should we do with them? I mean legally?>> <<@enny148 says : Frank u r amazing! God bless>> <<@memastarful says : Evidence? ☆Google = biblical archeology = research and see 👀>> <<@memastarful says : Google = Scientists who believe in God. Research and see 👀>> <<@TalentMthiyane says : Wait doesn't God's nature go against freedom of religion (the first three commandments)>> <<@captainmarvel76927 says : 1-3) All Christians subject themselves to one of four authority traditions under the Son of the Living God: Catholic/Eastern Orthodox, High Protestantism (Anglican/Lutheran, etc.,) American Christianity (Reformed, Non-Denominational, Evangelical), or their own private Opinion. Of all these "churches," only the Catholic Church has the spiritual and historical commission back to the Apostles and Jesus Christ. Private Opinion is condemned in 2nd Peter, and thus as an Athiest would say, you are a product of your religious environment. 2) The Bible and Infallible Judgement. It is a historical fact the official closed canon of Scripture came in the second half of the 4th Century (Councils of Hippo, Carthage, Rome.) If you grant Scripture is "the infallible" word of God, you must give the Church Bishops "infallible judgment" by the Holy Spirit that picked the specific books of the canon. You cannot have one without the other. If you reject the 73 book closed canon based upon the argument of Martin Luther, then you are rejecting a closed canon of nearly 1100 years. If you accept any non-Catholic translation such as the King James Version, you still must grand the men who compiled that translation infallible judgment, which directly refutes the Protestant Position. Secondly, what Bible translation do you use, and is it a good translation? An excellent argument for an English translation is the King James Version (but not 1611); however, the Douay Rheims is a better version translated over 41-42 years. Thus what version do you give authority to, and why, and do you grant "infallible" judgment to the translators. If you don't, then your translation is not safe. 3) The 60-second Position of the Church for Salvation is a confession of belief and baptism, then love the Lord Jesus and keep his commandments: (Acts 8: "Then Philip, opening his mouth, and beginning at this Scripture, preached unto him, Jesus. [36] And as they went on their way, they came to a certain water; and the eunuch said: See, here is water: what doth hinder me from being baptized? [37] And Philip said: If thou believest with all thy heart, thou mayest. And he answering, said: I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. [38] And he commanded the chariot to stand still; and they went down into the water, both Philip and the eunuch: and he baptized him. [39] And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord took away Philip; and the eunuch saw him no more." "If you love me, keep my commandments.">> <<@arthurb2005 says : How can the government function(punishing evil and protecting righteousness) without the moral law giver. Legalized murder of inconvenient children is the horrific example of rejecting (ultimate good) and replacing it with your own (feel good)>> <<@oprophetisfake9482 says : This is why the interpretation that the anti-christian band want to put on the amendment is a complete perversion of what was intended. The amendment was to protect different denominations and beliefs held in good conscience from the dictatorship of the state. It was not to stop people who believe in prayer from praying to God in state owned buildings, rather it was to prevent Anglicans or Catholics or Methodists taking over government and forcing their ideology on others. But now those who anti-christian (and antijewish) want to force an atheist ideology and practice on those who do believe in God. It is the exact opposite of the original intension of the constitution.>> <<@drumrnva says : We can have "God- given moral rights" without having a religion? No. I guess we can *assert* that rights are god-given, but...I don't think the rationality of a premise is related to how passionately it's asserted....🤔>> <<@captainmarvel76927 says : Ahhh Protestants fleeing Protestant Christians...oh the irony. Its ironic for this man to seperate morality from the Christian Faith when he claims his God made morality....hmmmm.>> <<@captainmarvel76927 says : Haunting and uneducated words as the speakers fails to realise that Thomas Jefferson was heavily influenced by free masonry and naturalism, and crafted a non christian divinity document that no where actually mentions the God of the Christian relgions, enshrines a seperation of Church and State, and has utterly succumbed to secular and marxist overatures. Bravo!>> <<@matthewjr.626 says : Many men wanted to become God. Only 1 God became a man.>> <<@sierraclark6129 says : “If you declare with your mouth “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9). Now is the time to accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior. Obey His commands and repent of your sins because Jesus is coming back soon. Tomorrow isn’t promised.>> <<@arcguardian says : It's all religion, not in a bad way, just an honest way. Saying no religion allowed is religious in itself, and it's bizarre how ppl don't realize that.>> <<@stephenkaake7016 says : the presence of God has to be in the courtroom or there is no justice, the 'other guy' is running the show>> <<@TheDrummaBen says : So.....hold on....... Franks favorite question is always "by what standard." How is the first table of the law NOT a part of God's moral standard???? See Frank would say God's nature is the standard....then appeals to Thomas Jefferson's interpretation of God's nature (which is nowhere near orthodoxy or historical Christianity) as a "balanced standard." I'll just pull the Frank move out and ask "bAlAnCed By wHaT StANdArD?" The answer is Frank's standard. Because if it were God's moral standard, that says "you cannot worship any other gods....period. Frank is a dear brother in the Lord but dangit if he doesn't leave so many doors so wide open for any atheistic student of logic to decimate his arguments I'm sorry.>> <<@J.luis1 says : Literally, they're own court, in fact the $1 as well speaks it for itself. What? "In God we trust" of course>> <<@GreatBehoover says : The idiocy of people thinking that they can pull morality out of their rear ends was never addressed. I think you missed a huge opportunity here! The fellow is obviously an atheist who agrees that everything should be secular in our society. You never address the problem with where he gets his morality from. Or the fact that not everyone shares his morality. All this fellow was saying was that might makes right. He's blind to the fact...that in his silly view...the majority can impose whatever morality they desire upon the rest of society. He ASSUMES that society will always choose HIS preferred morality. He feels justified and empowered because Hitler isn't the one in charge...this time. These people simply have an emotional neediness for a Godless universe. That emotional BIAS leads them to make many mistakes in their issuance of morality toward others. Namely, that he can prevent people from expressing their religious beliefs openly ... EXACTLY as our forefathers so obviously tried to allow and protect! The Constitution and the Bill of Rights all point to a benevolent God who gave us those unalienable rights. Our rights don't come from the Judiciary, or the legislative, or executive branch of our government... as silly people like Sotomayer ASSUMES. By removing the power of our government to issue rights, we protect our freedom. Without it, tyranny will rule. Just look at all the tyranny now verses when Christian morality was the norm. Our government is bankrupt in money and truth...and how exactly is this better???? Seriously....either you have God's morality, or you get Mao, Hitler, Stalin, Ghengis Khan...all atheists...all disasters. Atheists, or Marxists/communists are all moral disasters! Pay attention.>> <<@Kevin-jc1fx says : God bless the thumbnail guy 🙌>> <<@ThatAkatsukiGuy says : Yet again,... someone give the thumbnail maker a raise>> <<@jaredhonegger9918 says : I was stuck spiritually in my mind for years and years. I hated myself for not having achieved more but i was still proud. I was proud angry and hateful. I thought that because i had been through abuse and homelessness and never gave up that i was better than everyone. It wasn't until i confessed my sin in front of another Christian that my life changed. Instantly my pride, something that was destroying my life since birth completely disappeared. God delivered me from my sin and i feel like a completely new man. We're all lost and broken. I never belived that. "No one could be depressed like me or anxious like me. No one could be so hateful towards themselves and others." And that's not true. Everything any human has felt emotionally is the same as everyone else. I came to Tennessee with nothing, living in transitional housing. I now have a car and a place, and friends i call brothers. I didnt achieve or deserve any of this its only by the grace of God. I couldn't change myself only God could.Thats my experience. All my mental Illness, my depression, my anxiety, my self hate instantly disappeared and i dont deserve anything i have nor to go to heaven. Everything i have is through the grace of God. Unimaginable grace generosity and infinite love ✝️♥️Listen carefully i beg you. You have to start looking for God. Those who seek will find and I'm living proof. I sought out God while living in the Chicago area and now I'm in Tennessee with a brand new life. It was hard. It was a very hard year of searching before I found God. If you seek you will find i promise you that. God not only can give you what you need God WILL give you what you need>> <<@coolnegative says : Amen!>> <<@Paulthored says : The best, not perfect, but the best human stance on this topic... Yeah, America gets it better than most. But it's still a Flawed Human invention, that has its own shortcomings and problems. Though Frank may be excused for the word choice, as I'm sure that he has already been answering questions for a good while at this point.>> <<@greatfilmmaker says : When did Jefferson say that I'm just asking I'm not trying to cause a fight I wanna know when did Jefferson say that>> <<@mr1spamification says : That guy seemed nice and genuinely hungry for knowledge, but I can tell from his voice he's in deep with the sex cult, hope jesus helps him break free of it so he isn't a victim to his own urges anymore.>> <<@j0nr3y says : This is the first time I see Frank kind of confused but smilling by looking at him and waiting to answer his question. 🥴 thanks frank and the guy's question, kind of made my day 😉>> <<@helloscammer says : All laws are religious in nature. Every one of them has a religious/faith-based proposition at its core. Only question is, which faith will form that foundation?>> <<@Dominick7 says : If religion deals with ones duty to God and morality deals with ones duty to man, could it be they're two distinct things, but as far as how you ground them, how can one have objective morality or religion without God? As far as showing religious influence in law, check out not only all the references to God in the declaration of independence, but also as far as more recent things, the year of the bible under Regan where its set as law to study the bible and put it into practice.>> <<@roelsvideosandstuffs1513 says : Nice explanation>> <<@Gruuvin1 says : This poor guy is a marshmallow. No father.>> <<@DiscipleShaynePlaylist says : God is not a religion. But a relationship of reality, that declares And testifies that Jesus Christ is Lord. And His Word is what matters. Jesus is Alive!!! ✝️💕🏃💨🌎>> <<@2l84me8 says : No, and religion has no place in the constitution nor education.>> <<@emmanuel5566 says : For his project, he just has to show that religious notions already exists in the laws. It's important to define religion here... It has 2 fundamental parts. One part talks about morality (present physical relaity) and other part talks about salvation of one's soul (future spiritual reality). So he can argue that religion in the form of first aspect is being used in law and it'll always be necessary to justify why it's objective and not subjective to human's whims and fantasies.>> <<@BrianBadondeBo says : "We'll legislate morality but not religion, see there's a difference". Yes, when religion can, it usurps and poses as morality. When morality can, it shows what a waste of time religion is.>> <<@7throse328 says : Jesus said if you love Me keep My commandments. Love God above all 1 2 3 4 Th commandments and love your neighbours as yourself 5 6 7 8 9 10 Th commandments. Jesus is still the same Yesterday Today Tomorrow and Always.>> <<@acem82 says : Human law doesn't exist to enforce morality, it exists to balance the scales of justice, in human to human cases (Genesis 9:6). If human laws were to attempt to enforce morality, all would be guilty, "for all have sinned". The issue many Christians run into is they think they are required to send the exusia (the human government) against unbelievers to attempt to make them act morally. No. Justice is "an eye for an eye, a life for a life (etc.)". Human law/justice only exists to ensure that certain sins against humans are paid back to the victim (almost always by the guilty). Justice is presented as an accounting issue, a debt that needs to be paid. This understanding of justice also makes clear what Jesus did on the cross. He paid all the debt of the entire world. In doing so, he ought to have freed us from any misunderstanding that our human law/justice should even begin to attempt to use force against someone to get them to repay God for the sins (debts) they've incurred. That's already been dealt with!>> <<@lthlrsny says : THE THUMBNAIL yall are too funny on this channel>> <<@nathanoswaltmusic says : WOW. Dr. Turek is SPOT-ON in his assessment of the difference between legislating religion and legislating morality. I feel that today, those who hold to the ideology of Radical Socialist Leftism believe that there’s no difference; therefore they seek to completely upend the moral system. We’re seeing this upending happen in front of our eyes, what with all the LGBTQ+ indoctrination of our kids, the over-sexualization of pop and entertainment culture, and the rise of POC-supremacy racism disguised under the slogan of “Black Lives Matter” (of course Black lives matter, because ALL lives matter - that’s common-sense morality; otherwise why do we have laws against murder? And what about the unborn? Shouldn’t abortion, which RSL-ism endorses for the sake of sexual convenience, be considered blatantly immoral under the same grounds?).>> <<@incredulouspasta3304 says : _"Every government has to ground it's laws in some sort of moral principle... why not God's nature?"_ 1. Because that's extremely vague 2. Because we have no way of coming to an agreement on what God's nature is. You can't objectively test the nature of God. For some reason, Frank is extremely concerned about objectivity when criticizing _other_ people's concepts of morality, but not his own. Weird. 3. Because it isn't really relevant to the purpose of government: protecting the collective welfare of people. Just use a moral principle that we can all agree on: protecting our collective welfare.>> <<@tTtt-ho3tq says : Ok I'm not smart. I'm not leaned nor well educated. I'm not a student of history either. Not sure but did he say the first US Constitution was based on God giving moral standard or something? God giving objective moral standard? ... But the first US Constitution allowed slavery? America was a colony and there're plantations with slave labors. And the original US Constitution allowed slavery, didn't it? Or American Christians didn't free slaves then?>> <<@christiantruthmatters says : This poor guys need jesus.... I find it hard to understand that he is even there studying apologetics but yet is homosexual and wants to figure out things and debate people on issues and he clearly living as homosexual 😬😬😬>>