Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@CrossExamined says : Download FREE Cheat Sheet “The 4-Point Case For Christianity” 👉📱https://cutt.ly/ZYMC4nl>> <<@brianwilson6950 says : nonsense bible nutjobs always lie and grasp fpr every straw no god no demigod WANNABE son grow up>> <<@fordprefect5304 says : Israeli Archeologists have buried the story of Moses and Joshua. Israeli archaeologist Ze’ev Herzog provides his view on the historicity of the Exodus: *The Israelites never were in Egypt. They never came from abroad. This whole chain is broken. It is not a historical one. It is a later legendary reconstruction — made in the seventh century [BCE] — of a history that never happened*>> <<@fordprefect5304 says : Ancient Jericho(1997–2015) by Prof Lorenzo Nigro In any case, the ruins of Tell es-Sultan include massive collapsed and burnt mudbrick structures. One may imagine that the terrible destructions suffered by the Canaanite city both in the 3rd and 2nd millennium BC had surely become part of the local shared memory, and possibly were narrated as the Jerichoans had been able to overcome them almost every time. *There is no way, however, to link them directly to the Bible* , except for the fact that the biblical author may have reused one of these stories to validate the historicity of his narration (Liverani 2003, 316–317). The ruins at Tell es-Sultan are far older than the alleged date of Joshua’s conquest. Moreover, if we consider the time when the biblical text was written (the 6th century BC), or that when it was orally transmitted (12–7th centuries BC), as well as the long story of its written transposition, it is clear how hazardous is any attempt to seriously identify something on the ground with biblical personages and their acts (Liverani 2003, 313–321). Nonetheless, the already famous ruins of Jericho were exploited by the biblical author giving them an everlasting fame.>> <<@anthonymarlowe6986 says : Never believe in any pagan Christian historians.>> <<@WatcherNine says : Nope. Archaeology has actually supported the biblical writings, including the old testament, many times over.>> <<@Anon0nline says : Archaeology doesn't support a world-wide flood.>> <<@rustysim says : There's no archaeological evidence for bronze era patriachal characters eg. Moses, Abram, Isaac etc.>> <<@Catwhisper175 says : Well Jesus Christ is real and i know he is real because ive seen things>> <<@Psalm1101 says : Yes>> <<@debunkingthefundamentalist says : The problem the apologists, as I say repeatedly in my own vids, is they ignore the fact that many Hebrew stories are modified stories from other cultures. No one could logically argue that the flood story came from the ancient Sumerians for example. So when they "prove" a historical "fact" or relic that they claim gives legitimacy to the Old Testament they really aren't. Or they find a piece of evidence for events in history and make this grand leap that it proves the entire bible story. Like when a piece of evidence showed Hebrew slaves. I'm sure there were some Hebrew slaves. But there is nothing to show global slavery nor exodus of what would have been several million people. That is a fallacy and the type of fallacy the apologists use in most of their arguments. Cheers, DCF>> <<@DesGardius-me7gf says : "The problem isn't that the Bible doesn't contain history, it's that it doesn't contain the _right_ history." ―Kenneth Humphreys>> <<@nori_tutor says : When I was a Christian I tried to be honest with myself. I honestly couldn't just swallow stuff by saying "Abscence of evidence is not evidence of abscence." Why? Simply, with this argument a Muslim could also say "Allah is the true God, not YHWH." I would say "Can you prove me?" He could say "Just because I don't have evidence it doesn't mean it ain't true!">> <<@bitofwizdomb7266 says : You guys are just flat out delusional>> <<@ajgibson1307 says : Amen and God bless>> <<@XxlightxX says : There is evidence on every page, but I want a writing of moses. He existed and evidence check out for the exodus that's found but I want a writing of him.>> <<@commonsense0692 says : 😂 none of anyone important, Jesus …names of cities & kings isn proof>> <<@vampireducks1622 says : "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." Repeating something like is a sure sign of a poor thinker. Just pause to think about that pseudo-principle for a minute. Yesterday I was walking around my neighbourhood looking for evidence that the area had been nuked the day before. I looked and looked but could find no evidence whatsoever. That is absence of evidence. It was clear that I had good evidentiary grounds for concluding that my neighbourhood had not in fact been nuked. In other words, the absence of evidence served as evidence for absence (in this case, of a nuclear explosion). Also, my mother claimed that an African elephant had been living in my bedroom while I was away for a week. But when I came back I found no evidence for this (all the furniture was just as before, etc). I concluded that my mother was fibbing. Again, I had taken absence of evidence to be evidence of absence. Examples like this my be multiple indefinitely.>> <<@NewEnglandPuritain says : 1:13 you still failed to explain the falling of the walls, the timeline of events, and/or gods intervention with the Jewish people at Jericho. Then cower behind "see these obscure real people? Exactly!">> <<@unc1589 says : First of all archaeology is a faulty measurement of truth. Something is found in the ground then it is explained by those who observe it. Was the object found? Yes! Is the story behind the object true? Well, It’s a story! Do we automatically believe storytellers? If it serves us.>> <<@philcrimaldi3317 says : he just completely dodged the kids excellent question>> <<@breatheeasily4013 says : Unbelievers, what would make you believe? What's the evidence you need? Tell me and I will try to help you. Please, only comment If you truly want to believe.>> <<@cygnusustus says : Yes, absence of evidence can be evidence of absence when such evidence should be expected to exist. Moses and the Exodus? Completely debunked by archeology. Jericho? Completely debunked by archeology.>> <<@tavaresmanuel3523 says : So the oldest inscription of YHWH is in Africa. Interesting.>> <<@patprr1756 says : Yehweh is a desert god .>> <<@ricksaunders8074 says : Of course not Man has always tried undiscover GOD>> <<@Tremont24 says : THATS ME IN THE VIDEO>> <<@UnEviLGaming says : where can i attend these!? i'd love it ah>> <<@jhmejia says : It is true that the Exodus may have had a somewhat historical basis, but it is clearly mythological and just not true. Source: me :)>> <<@rena6895 says : Alexa (Echo Show) just said today there is no archaeological evidence that the Jewish people were slaves in Egypt. I had asked how long they were slaves in Egypt. Then this popped up in my newsfeed. Thank you!>> <<@jesuschristdestroysmarxism3916 says : Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"""" I could not have said that better myself I'm going to use that totally use that I can hardly wait when I so when I run into any of these scum bag or atheist I'm going to use that and I had to post this more than once because of the scumbag Marxist YouTube tried to delete my comments because they they got physically mentally hurt by my comments grow some balls YouTube you're not going to ever silence the truth of Christ so stop trying to mess with our freedoms I'm going to screenshot every one of these so stop trying to delete our comments>> <<@jesuschristdestroysmarxism3916 says : Biblical prophecy happens every single day therefore proving that God's written truth the Bible is true "" so many prophecies happening daily>> <<@fakename3208 says : I don’t think this is a fruitful endeavor. Look the Bible has a lot of fantastical elements to it. It cannot go toe to toe with empirical science. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t have value, but this isn’t the arena you should be picking your battles in.>> <<@japexican007 says : Atheists will accept an Argument from silence when it affirms their rejection of the truth>> <<@The-F.R.E.E.-J. says : Very cool!>> <<@Arturo-ge9lf says : Praise the LORD thanks crossexamined for bring us this>> <<@walkietalkie1973 says : The bible is the word of God (Jesus ). One of the characteristics of God ( Jesus ) is that he can't lie. Evidence of his word spoken is truth of his word revealed to all mankind.>> <<@karcharias811 says : One of the best confirmations of the OT is the Great Isaiah Scroll. It was found in the 1940s and dates to between 350BC and 150BC. This is over 1,000 years prior to our then earliest copy of Isaiah, and yet, there is scarcely a difference between them.>> <<@monalisa6264 says : People have been misled- Satan (darkness) and Lucifer (light) are 2 different entities. Lucifer was mentioned only a few times and Jesus said he was the morning star. The line in the Bible was Satan saying to Lucifer how far you’ve fallen. Lucifer is Jesus, remember Jesus went to hell for 3.5 days for us for our sins! The 1st testament god is a mean and jealous god that punishes. The 2nd testament God is a loving and forgiving God that saves not punishes. This is the true Almighty Alpha & Omega God the one Jesus prays to. This God aka Elohim is 2 in 1(The Male & Female merged) Jesus said to the Jews I do not worship your god because he’s from below, mine is from heaven. So father god in the 1st testament is different and he exults himself higher, he is Satan. The 10 commandments came from Satan. Follow Jesus in goodness and love that’s the new covenant. You abide by government rules and commandments but forsake love and you let them make you their slave!!! That’s what Satan is and wants. Genesis 1:27 1st Woman Lucifer aka Jesus 1st Wife to Adam Genesis 2:23 2nd Woman Eve 2nd Wife to Adam Adam is Satan aka father god. He was mean to his first wife so she left him hence the sacrificial lamb Wake up and take back your God given rights❤️🦁>> <<@SeauT says : There is so much archeological evidence in support of incredible events depicted in the Bible - including the great flood, the parting of the Red Sea, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and more - that anyone claiming that there is no archeological evidence to support the Bible accounts is either clueless or a liar.>> <<@2ndPigeon says : Still cracks me up that the Exodus could have been accomplished if they all held hands in a straight line.>> <<@Derek_Baumgartner says : Keep up the good work!>> <<@leonarddement4058 says : History itself debunks the Bible.>> <<@sukruoosten says : until THE END OF TIME it self his words will prevail always above simple mankind laws theories en ideas>> <<@redfaux74 says : I like the videos with Frank. He carries authority and convincing arguments with power. His son and the chic.... not at all. Thanks Frank. Keep up the great work! 🎈🥳🎈>> <<@lastchance8142 says : It is worrisome that no evidence for the exodus has been verified by archaeologists.>> <<@davidmorris9668 says : The ROCKS are crying out! Like the blood of Able spoke to God, well He just knew what happened between the brothers, evidence is out there! It is the ones that say within themselves, "No, this can't be!" Why the shock? Why the vehement rebellion? Why the hatred when they claim there is nothing personal about it all as it points to a real loving personal Creator who has a name?>> <<@tor9273 says : It was already debunked by talking snakes, talking bushes, parted seas and pillars of salt.>> <<@JamesRichardWiley says : Has archaeology debunked the belief by Creationists that the first man was made of dirt, and the first woman made from his rib by an invisible Hebrew god with three personalities named Yahweh?>> <<@kevinwesterville2115 says : Yes>>