Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@Vreyanir says : useless video, the comparison of the regular and the heavy broadhead on penetration, is failed. For one, you didn't secure the wood boards sufficiently to actually see an accurate comparison; the fact that it made the whole thing fly, does not equal penetration. And on the gelatine, you did not test the regular one so we see the difference. waste of my time.>> <<@MsPedross says : The mega broadhead from Shartac looks like so good to boar hunting!>> <<@nicholasrice1071 says : I like your content and your repeating crossbows but I'd like to see if you could design a goats foot type cocker that can be used on modern crossbows instead of cocking ropes.>> <<@ericmilner1353 says : that laugh just makes the video's even better>> <<@Trumplican says : i think the single side sharpening keeps the edge thicker so that it doesnt fold over as easy when hitting bone.>> <<@jamesmandahl444 says : Damn. Literally like running an animal through with a sword.>> <<@alexnormal3031 says : Hi mister. I watched podcast "GrizzlyStik History Product Philosophies & Dr. Ashby", it's about single bevel broadheads theory, it was interesting.>> <<@headcrab980 says : Demolitionranch vibes on this one Joerge. Collab?>> <<@DementiaGaming69420 says : He says he doesn’t think that any weapon except for 50 BMG can go through some plywood. Me, an American - 😅>> <<@geoshark12 says : 13:02 this will keel>> <<@paultaylor6053 says : That spearhead would stop a car .>> <<@paultaylor6053 says : "Huge effing monsters" fine English Joerg ,hahaha , lovely .>> <<@andrewlambert7246 says : LOOKS LIKE A PRODUCT FOR ME. HOW THEY COST 200 USA DOLLARS. OKAY HE HAS BEEN EXPERIMENTING FOR THIRTY YEARS SO THAT IS WORTH SOMETHING.>> <<@andrewlambert7246 says : THATS WHY THE .45 IS CALLED A MAN STOPPER. BOW HUNTING GIVES THE ANIMAL A CHANCE AND PROVES THE SKILL OF THE HUNTER. HUNTING RIFLE NO. ANY IDIOT CAN HUNT WITH A RIFLE. THE ANIMAL DOESNT SUFFER IF IT BLEEDS TO DEATH.>> <<@andrewlambert7246 says : THATS WHAT MAKES A WEAPON DEADLY. ITS NOT IS POWER. YOU DONT WANT THE ARROW OR A BULLET EXCITING THE BODY BECAUSE IT IS TO POWERFUL. GET IT?>> <<@SerpentsBite says : Wie dieser Front Head heavy sehen meine selbstgebauten Arm(Faust)brust pfeile auch aus nur mit kugeln anstatt spitzen =D>> <<@hunik126p says : can you schoot with tose from siege 300 crossbow?>> <<@dustinh4175 says : The shaft is flexing too much. Its called the archers paradox. If your bolt is still flexing past 17ish yards your under spinded and you'll never get a tight group. Over spined and it's usually up and right>> <<@ERR0RR says : You can find the center of mass by holding the bolt woth two fingers on opposite edges and moving them slowly together.>> <<@shakir4429 says : It's edge look like ancient stone arrowhead>> <<@jacob1121 says : What happens if you put some lead weight inside the shaft at the front with the smaller broadhead? If the steel is good enough it would be able to penetrate even better and be less susceptible to wind due to smaller area. Might be something to think about.>> <<@smokedababa6900 says : 4:58 Do you have weaons? Please test it out, i think these 6 layers of beech plywood are not able to stop a .308 even a 5,56×51mm should be able to do it, a .50 BMG i think, would very easily penetrate. Even a 9mm pistol rund should do it i think.>> <<@imwithstupid086 says : I think it has less to do with the chisel grind and more to do with edge angle. Maybe a sufficiently narrow v-grind or hollow grind will do as well, if not better.>> <<@giannihenk says : if it is like bullets for just pure penettration you need speed and small bullets go faster. smaller / thinner bullets are better in penetration. nou this broad head would do a lot more dammage since the wound would be like thrice as big haha>> <<@alanware3512 says : I love your channel . Might I suggest you make the cheapest broad head. It would great to see you make a make and test them. Using a 6 mm wood Dowling rod. Cut a slot then insert a broad head made from glass. Keep up the good work. Kindest regards Alan Ware>> <<@bobjoatmon1993 says : It's all about kinetic energy.>> <<@elijah4666 says : 9 mil would pretty easily go through all of the boards>> <<@jopanash says : Wow! What's next? Depleted uranium? 🤣>> <<@jestenaguirre9108 says : During the slow motion you could see the first arrow broke the board on the bottom that held everything together.. the second shot finished the job.>> <<@quinnmoore1017 says : Its one of those items that looks like a hunk of metal but has like the technology of a spaceship>> <<@willshunting says : There seems to be some fundamental errors in reasoning here, which, if left unaddressed, could result in newbies unnecessarily causing animal suffering. Firearm projectiles are designed to predominantly kill by the conversion (upon impact of the projectile) of kinetic energy into traumatising tissue/organ damage. The emphasis is therefore on maximising the efficiency of that conversion. On the other hand, arrows are designed to kill by rapid blood loss. Thus, the emphasis is on getting, where possible, a full pass through; in the heart/lung region, creating the largest possible, unobstructed path for blood loss into the body cavity, and also out through the entry and exit holes or should I say, cuts in the hide . The goal is to have the game animal travel the smallest distance possible, and die as quckly as possible, due to the said blood loss. Where the game being hunted is particularly large and heavy boned, the resistance to the arrows ability to give a pass through must be factored in; hence the paramount importance of weight and sharpness, when hunting say African beasties. However, what ever the game being hunted, unlike with a bullet, we're looking to conserve the momentum of the arrow, so as to give a total pass through. With a bullet we are looking to do the exact opposite of conservation of mometum; in that case we want maximum transfer of energy into tissue shock. This fundamental difference is perhaps best understood by looking at Sambar Deer hunting. An experienced Sambar hunter using a rifle, typically aims at the animals neck slightly below the spine, using a high velocity round, incorporating a relatively blunt nosed and heavy bullet. The split second massive tranfer of kinetic energy into tissue trauma, shocks the nervous system, often instantly stopping and killing the animal where it stands. The experienced hunter using a compound or crossbow will typically look for a quartering, shot passing through both lungs, but ideally the heart, with the arrow or bolt completly exiting the animal. That said, the hunter using the arrow knows that it is extremely rare for an arrow penetration to cause the animal to die on the spot. Some post shot movement is almost certain; giving rise to the secondary importance of a pass through; larger, more conspicuous blood trails which allow easier post shot tracking of the Deer. Please do not confuse the two fundamentally, almost opposite mechanisms of causing death to the quarry. To do so, could result in you causing inadvertant suffering.>> <<@grimmoris says : Rhinos? Really? :/>> <<@ryaniko94brglowingkitty68 says : The Arrow for when you wanna one Hit a invader with a Foot shot>> <<@garryjohnson3107 says : A really cool comparison would be to find an expert Flint napper to replicate these broadheads as close as possible and see how close they perform.>> <<@cddevelopment363 says : As we all know, you can't spell "Shartac" without "Shart"...>> <<@madmike9398 says : that's like a damn flying sword. I'd rather get shot with a gun than hit with that devastating thing. That thing would shred your internal organs.>> <<@bobdobalina798 says : Alien archery 300gn broadheads $10 aud cheap cheap but two three uses>> <<@bobdobalina798 says : I use 300gn single bevel broadheads with 83lb draw bow 890 gr arrow ...they through buffalo>> <<@wenmoon448 says : @JoergSprave are those boradheads viable options for the Fenris package as well ?>> <<@wenmoon448 says : Can i feed the Fenris with those bad boys sir ?>> <<@mohammadaminhasani5213 says : love>> <<@thomasjames7568 says : These are stackable…>> <<@KiaAzad says : I can imagine why the single bevel goes deeper. It can be because the flat side has less contact area with the flesh, while two beveled is in full contact.>> <<@MyTimeIsYourDime says : 30.06 or .308 etc would certainly go through them all.>> <<@NapoleonPicard says : 11:03 on this question, I think the largest whales could survive a shot if not hit in a very vital area like the eye or part of the skull where the brain is. Salt water sterilizes the wound and their blubber is so thick that if it hit most areas of its body, it would just be very annoyed. Several would definitely be very deadly though.>> <<@flexithefurry11yearsago10 says : Make them more dangerous>> <<@therealzilch says : Toll wie üblich. Darf ich Dir einen Trick beschreiben, den ich von meinem Vater habe? Nach 2:20, findest Du den Balanspunkt des Pfeils, in dem Du den Pfeil auf den einen ausgestreckten Zeigefinger plazierst, und dann mit der anderen Hand den Pfeil hin- und herschiebst, bis Du den Punkt findest. Viel schneller und eleganter geht es so: Du gibts den Pfeil nicht auf nur einen, sondern auf beiden ausgestreckten Zeigefingern, die a bisserl auseinander anfangen. Dann schiebst Du einfach die Finger langsam zueinander. Die treffen sich genau beim Balanspunkt. cheers from rainy Vienna, Scott>> <<@Shifty51991 says : Bloodly hell you hunting small dragons with that?>> <<@potatostomatoes4599 says : If you are actually into bowhunting and want to use broadheads you need to tune your bow because they usually shoot slightly different than field tips. Just an FYI.>> <<@wellgaroa says : sad>>