Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@DonFranco-z7k says : This kind of test is funny but absolutely rubbish for someone who really hunts with a crossbow.>> <<@cray-z7404 says : 🦈 SHARK BROADHEADS MADE BY SIMMONS ARE AWSOME ... THRY LEAVE MASSIVE WOUND CHANNELS & YOU DONT HAVE HAVE 300GR YOU CAN STAY WITH 1OO , 125GR , 150 , 190 ETC.>> <<@Fistmybeer says : Omg!!!>> <<@barretharms655 says : If you're going to go through a rib cage then you use an arrow if you're going to Simply go through the gut you can use a sharican because no matter how you attack it you can do no more damage than the weight that you send into it even at equal velocity but having a forward heavy Arrow not only means that you're hitting it harder because it's heavier it also means that it's flying straighter because it's heavier up front and if you actually had tapered shafts for your arrows your penetration would be nearly equal>> <<@barretharms655 says : You missed the point altogether the heavier head drags the shaft behind it after you have struck the target because that heavier head does not want to slow down as quickly it holds more energy in it because it is a larger Mass at motion and so it takes more to stop it the single bevel means that it will snap bone faster and be less likely to be diverted put the two together and yes you get a more lethal wound that is more likely to bleed out because it is more so opened up and it has done more damage if it is struck bone if it has not struck bone then it has most likely done more damage simply because it was heavier and required more to stop it. There is also one more point and that is once the initial shock of being launched out of the bow has happened the arrow shaft will quickly lose its word momentum in comparison to the arrowhead because Arrowhead is of a larger Mass and thereby will require more to stop it it may drop sooner but it will travel through the air with less wind resistance due to its weight and because Arrowhead has more mass it will have less Divergent due to wind resistance that is the arrow will fly straighter because it is point heavy.>> <<@torchofkck4989 says : I'm curious about the velocity loss comparison in say... Approximately 10m increments up to say 40 meters If the bolts looses too much energy from the heavier broadheads... The benefit of cutting area is lost. Thanks for sharing>> <<@Pinkielover says : so perfect if your hunting whale.. 😂>> <<@T_H_E_R_E_A_L_X says : The .50 cal of broadheads>> <<@andrewp6658 says : Used to watch your channel over 5 years ago and just came back for the first time in a while. Was happy to see you’re still uploading and doing good.>> <<@Mark-nr5uu says : I've been watching Joerg for years. Valuing his work as some of the most clever and informative on YouTube, I'd still come back just to hear him laugh.>> <<@dabbinchap says : These large, drilling broadheads might be actually quite practical for hunting animals. As I see it, the animal will bleed out faster, requiring less work afterwards.>> <<@mc6081 says : It’s great to see you still making videos! Ive been a fan of the channel for years!>> <<@arnoldashcraft5603 says : Jorge, Could you reference additional arrow (bolt) building resources in the USA? I have the broad-heads, but I am currently challenged with building the correct bolt.>> <<@tsz374 says : The single bevel broadheads more effectives than double bevels.>> <<@ponycentaur1456 says : just note: the heavier arrows make a bigger arch when loosing them. Thus need to adjust your scope accordingly for the heavier arrow. it is why the 'cooler' arrows are popular amongst hunters as they require less adjustment>> <<@RallycrossGT says : 3:07 shooting crossbows from a chair looks even more badass than standing>> <<@christianstonecipher1547 says : Correct me If I am wrong, but I feel like when talking about relatively flat penetrating objects, doubling the thickness of the head would not lead to double the damage assuming the same penetration depth. Since it is cutting material instead of removing, I feel like the circumference of the head at its widest point is what would actually need to be used to determine damage area since the bolt is cutting through flesh instead of removing the flesh in the area. For example, assume somebody was able to make a broadhead that was half as thick but twice as wide as some other broadhead, and when shot it penetrated the exact same depth. By this comparison, the wounds are equal but in my (admittedly uneducated) opinion, the wider bolt would definitely be the one that made the more serious wound.>> <<@theohaugen241 says : Great Show.>> <<@jannevellamo says : There are few animals thicker than 47cm, so even the heavier broadhead would have gone all the way through. Cows, some horses, buffaloes, rhinos, hippos and elephants can be thicker, but how often do you get to shoot at them with a crossbow? Most hunters will never shoot anything larger than a moose, so more penetration is not needed. The heavy broadhead is also less likely to break or bend when it hits the bone, so it's more reliable. The higher energy transfer is also useful, it can knock the target down, after which the animal may have a hard time getting up again. This can buy you time enough to reload for a finishing shot.>> <<@bob-seek-destroy-sd1708 says : Hex 400 is awesome>> <<@eternalsplitter7594 says : I would use 5 of the big ones for Putin's limbs and the final one for head after several days when he start to decay in his own juices...>> <<@christopherellis2663 says : For me, it is a matter of how soon shall the game fall from loss of blood, and with the least damage to the food.>> <<@dick_richards says : how much??>> <<@ryaniko94brglowingkitty68 says : The premium ammo that would actually break a game easily>> <<@ryaniko94brglowingkitty68 says : That would actually be some One hit death weapon for home defense>> <<@ryaniko94brglowingkitty68 says : With these broadhead now it counts as long range stabbing or metal chunk yeeting>> <<@leveticus5721 says : Absolutely devastating design. However, how much effective range are you losing as well?>> <<@EDC-MICHA says : Hallo Herr sprave warum machen Sie keine Videos mehr>> <<@thomaskurz5617 says : Quite impressive. But leaves the question how much damage is enough. I mean you can not be more dead then dead. Probably if you are hunting elephants or dinosaurs there might be a use for such overpowered broadheads. Otherwise for deer regular broadheads do well enough and are able to penetrate through an animal and even break ribs. Think such heads would rather lead to people who are not good shots going hunting in the hope that that arrow does enough damage even on a bad hit to get a kill. As other have mentioned would be interesting to see how they fare over distance.>> <<@bloodmoney88 says : and the shaft keeps the wound bleeding as it presses the flesh apart. That wide blade... that's a Dirty Harry of arrows.>> <<@Br0ns0n says : There is just no channel that is more fun!>> <<@axion8788 says : Physics.>> <<@outdoorschreiner2517 says : Entschuldigung, ansonstens fand ich bisher alles gut, was ich gesehen habe. Allerdings die "Mortaliät" einer Jagdspitze mit deren Frontfläche gleichzusetzen .... Für einen weiteren Vergleich schlage ich eine sehr breite und natürlich dünne Spitze (kleine Frontfläche) und sehr scharf vor. Gibt es am Markt, hat eine (meiner Meinung nach) sehr große Wundwirkung und läßt sich dummerweise durch Knochen aufhalten. Die "German Jager" ist getestet und gibt es auch in unterschiedlichen Gewichten. - Dabei ist meiner Meinung nach auch das höhere Gewicht vorzuziehen wegen des IMPULSES, den ich in einem Deiner Videos gelernt habe.>> <<@T.J-and-Soul says : Yes but what about at 50 metres??? The lighter broadhead would be travelling faster therefore penetrate deeper.>> <<@thegoldennugget59 says : Imagine what damage the last broadhead would do to a zombie 🧟‍♂️ Great video 📹 👍>> <<@garybest says : This is very handy information when taking on morbibly obese zombies. One other thing to consider, if the zombies aren't fat, the exit wound would become much greater.>> <<@claussperling4677 says : Why the short range when firing?>> <<@7h3F33d3r says : While not as fun as prototyping new launching platforms, I'd like to see that lawn chair made a bit more robust. I had a dark vision of that first shot being from a supine position and with a vertical projectile trajectory.>> <<@chadjenkins4846 says : It would be amazing to see a damage comparision at 100 yards.>> <<@TrollingHistory says : Very nice but ill wait for China to make some. USA thinks it can charge anything it likes.>> <<@krezac says : Hi, it also would be interesting to compare with broadheads cutting not "flat" but the "3D" wound like Flying Arrow Archery Toxic Broadhead>> <<@comfortablynumb9342 says : I don't want to get hit by any of those arrowheads. I do wonder about using the big ones on game. If they can penetrate enough to hit organs or arteries the big ones will obviously do massive damage. Ballistic gel is cool, but we need to see meat and bone tested. A whole pig would be a good test animal, or a side of beef. Or you could come hunt deer next fall in the states, and collaborate with Demolition Ranch and others too.>> <<@RealAirgunAdventures says : Amazing, a great video and demonstration. I think it's time I got into archery. Love your content informative and fun.>> <<@Ulthar_Catgirl says : Thank you for the ballistic gelatin test 💜 I LOVE SCIENCE 💜💜💜>> <<@a_fenwick says : I'm not talking about the arrows but If joerg lived in the medieval era, this man would have an entire empire with all his awesome weapons he comes up with.>> <<@codyashelton9634 says : Shot placement accuracy and enough penetration to reach the vitals are far more important than a heavy broadhead gimmick. Although interesting I would bet that they are impractical for hunting purposes unless you enjoy the idea of cutting down the effective range of your bow. But it's still a neat product. Remember evisceration is the name of the game with a broadhead.>> <<@Bouboukenka says : Ranch fairy fan?>> <<@georgeabdulnour2727 says : Hi from Melbourne Australia.>> <<@bringemyoungpbuh4123 says : Joerg, look up Paul Harrell on YouTube. He tests out different ammo in firearms with what he calls a meat target. A bag of oranges to simulate lung tissue, with pork ribs fore and aft. This is all covered with cloth to simulate clothing. I think these broadheads need to be tested against bone.>> <<@jamescaldwell2616 says : Doesn’t matter, there are broadheads that are just as good or better that are way cheaper.>>