Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@CrossExamined says : De Impact Apologetics: FREE Download of sermon I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist!: 👉📱https://cutt.ly/cInI1eo>> <<@ianking8315 says : meyer and minnich who is a microbiologist are two intelligent individuals.>> <<@danielhanawalt4998 says : Science has at least proven in my opinion, life didn't happen by chance.>> <<@cameronhesketh6814 says : Meyer's take on evolution? Doesn't get basic genetics, doesn't have a working model of intelligent design. All the things he can't explain, especially when his theories fall apart, "I don't know, God must've done it". Huge gaps in knowledge, what's the explanation? "God did it, trust me bro"!>> <<@norbertjendruschj9121 says : Meyer is just a liar. A disgusting liar. He knows better and still lies.>> <<@TheSpazzymoonpie says : Well that certainly explains the differences in racial biology and behavior>> <<@larrywestra9305 says : Love to you Frank for talking to Stephen here. You must also look into Michal Behe.>> <<@shadowlazers says : And for you people who believe you're in loving God design this place and us why do we breathe and eat through the same hole why did the planet have 75% water of which 99% of that water we can't drink on a planet that is 75% water wouldn't it be wise to design us to be able to you know breathe under that water amongst the myriad of other things why poison ivy o besides just the saltwater problem why is most of the planet uninhabitable mountains deserts Arctic deserts a why fleas why mosquitoes that deliver it horrific diseases it why are there huge rocks in space that can destroy us at any given point randomly why is the universe so big if it's just for us>> <<@shadowlazers says : I don't know who the guy in the middle is😊 but I do know he is flanked by two of the most ridiculous fraudulent quote doctors "on the planet these two have been debunked and proven is liars more times than the Earth is rotated around the Sun there is no code in human biology we make it a code it is just chemical reactions>> <<@shadowlazers says : The answer is zero zero systems are irreducibly complex>> <<@michaelmyrick614 says : Creating even a short protein molecule by random chance is so fantastically improbable as to be be virtually impossible. And the complexity only increases from there at every step. Random, undirected, chance chemical combinations can never explain the origin of life.>> <<@walkergarya says : Meyer's word salad explains nothing. He, like everyone at the Discovery Institute, is nothing more than a fraud pushing the nonsense of creationism.>> <<@orthodoxwitness2374 says : Glory to God>> <<@lukepaul4936 says : Darwinism of the gaps>> <<@michaelgonzalez9058 says : 700,6000,42millionsstructurs in the body>> <<@HuxtableK says : Oh hey, the renowned liar Frank Turek pals up with other renowned liar Stephen Meyer about the repeatedly debunked idea of Irreducible Complexity! Typical.>> <<@byteme9718 says : Meyer is a con man totally unqualified to comment on this subject. He failed in the workplace and found it was easier to con gullible fools telling them what they want to hear.>> <<@suzieque2020 says : "How many systems are inside a living thing that could be considered irreducibly complex?" "How many different systems in a living thing would be irreducibly complex? or could be or appear to be?" I would say that DNA, RNA and all the biological nano machinery working inside and outside the cells are collectively irreducibly complex because you need all of them at the same time in order to have life or even for them to continue to exist and continue on.>> <<@cmvamerica9011 says : Creatures evolve, there is no doubt about that; but how does primordial slime, turn into Brandon? Ok, bad example.😂>> <<@pharmagator says : Believing in ABIOGENESIS is easier the less you understand about molecular biology...>> <<@pharmagator says : Proteins are manufactured by other proteins (enzymes) and all of these proteins are coded for by DNA and RNA and other proteins "read" the code and signal other proteins when to stop or start... LOTS of information required for the most basic functions...>> <<@axisofbeginning says : I respect how unpretentiously Michael Behe describes his work. But, as I understand, instead of irreducible complexity, Behe now prefers the phrase "Purposeful arrangement of parts." Many essential thoughts work to form one great idea. Also, in peer-reviewed journals, the scientific community rejects Behe's theory as pseudo-scientific. But it is a conspiracy of peer pressure. Either publicly negate Behe's work, or we will eliminate your funding, and you can forget about tenure.>> <<@salvadoralvarado8685 says : Very simple minerals have information in their cristal structure and they are not living, it seems that information is just a property of chemical systems>> <<@AdventuresAwait123 says : "If you want to build a molecular machine you've got to have code. Where does that information come from?">> <<@AdventuresAwait123 says : Any cellular biologists out there who can explain the evolution of the cell with all its internal machinery?>> <<@thisladyisstrange6243 says : Dang I can't stand these atheists in the comment section at all.>> <<@THINKSOIAM says : Kind of amazing how these guys can spout bs so confidently>> <<@johnw4759 says : Thanks for everyone's ministries represented here!! God bless ✝️is♥️>> <<@MrWeezer55 says : If you want to talk to someone about the origins of life and 'complexity' I recommend talking to an evolutionary biologist, not a philosophy and rocks for jocks major. Just sayin'.>> <<@gareginasatryan6761 says : full video, please>> <<@dave1370 says : Naturalism of the Gaps...the necessary faith of the atheist.>> <<@mickqQ says : Isn’t this the thing that was described as “ unscientific “ by a conservative Christian judge in the kitzmiller vs Dover trial. And One of the main proponents of it, Dr Michael Behe is as forced to admit that under his definition of a scientific theory… astrology would be scientific, Furthermore His definition of a scientific theory allowed things that were already disproven.>> <<@andrewstidham7950 says : The first life was formed out of dirt and LIFE was breathed into it so it wasn't really alive yet until God breathed his breath into it. Then it became a living being..>> <<@mickqQ says : The only explanation there can be is magic, It has to be magic , there is no other possible explanation. Phew that’s that solved Life began through magic. What’s next ? The universe , that’s easy That was magic as well. Anything else need solved?>> <<@oprophetisfake9482 says : Amazing material>> <<@sierraclark6129 says : “If you declare with your mouth “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9). Now is the time to accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior. Obey His commands and repent of your sins because Jesus is coming back soon. Tomorrow isn’t promised.>> <<@avafury4584 says : Creationism ftw>> <<@bluwng says : This dope doesn’t know squat. Men are foolish.>> <<@philb4462 says : Stephen Meyer is a total quack who lies about science. He has been soundly debunked.>> <<@checkmate5338 says : Why can't atheists refute irreducible complexity?>> <<@therockstar17 says : Thank you Frank Turek and cross examined for all the great work you continue to do, I love all of the material put out!>> <<@melchized3294 says : Isn't it amazing that almost all the atheists in the comment section seems to have more "in-depth" knowledge about what's being discussed than Dr. Meyer 🤣🤣🤣?>> <<@incredulouspasta3304 says : Meyer treats "information" like a substance that needs to be created. It's just a long chain of molecules that interacts with other molecules. Long repetitious patterns happen all the time in nature. We already know how this DNA "information" increases: mutation, recombination, and natural selection. Inferring that it must come from a "mind" is just sloppy thinking, and isn't the least bit scientific.>> <<@Steven-ki9sk says : Why would Christian’s who are mostly scientifically ignorant, be so interested in scientific views that are rejected by the vast majority of scientists? Is it possibility because they’re desperate to find justification for their religious dogma?>> <<@Kaymen1980 says : Funny thing is... Everyone in here will gobble up evolution if you just call it adaptation, a trojan horse by christian design.. After that it's just the time aspect, and no sane person really believes the earth is only a couple of thousand years old anyway.>> <<@basgordijn9722 says : Good to see Stephen Meyer on the show!>> <<@InfoArtistJKatTheGoodInfoCafe says : "It is operationally impossible to separate information and reality" -- Professor Anton Zeilinger, Quantum Information Physicist. JK, Founding President, Universal Information Literacies Association, Washington, DC USA>> <<@stormy7709 says : What is the evidence that god exists?>> <<@stormy7709 says : "In the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial, Behe gave testimony on the subject of irreducible complexity. The court found that "Professor Behe's claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer-reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large." Why listen to what someone who is at odds with the scientific community has to say?>> <<@newcreationinchrist1423 says : I love these guys. Showcasing creationist scientists gives us a chance to see them in action. Good job CE>>