Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@veritasium says : Use code veritasium at https://incogni.com/veritasium to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan.>> <<@gyrrisha says : Falling for Incogni? They submit a request for data removal and that's all it is – a request. Most data brokers are under no legal obligation to remove your data. If you get your data removed from one database, it doesn't mean the companies cannot buy the exact same data from another source who didn't remove your data. Or they can just lay low and not use your data for a period of time and then start again. Additionally, don't you need to actually give Incogni your information for it to check for it in the first place? Meaning it might give the data brokers even more of your information whist "kindly asking them to remove it". If I am not mistaken, it isn't uncommon either that data removal companies are own by data broker companies. You're just paying for not wanting to waste your time to submit manual requests which they're under no obligation to comply with. Money down the drain, in my opinion.>> <<@Abdulmecid89 says : I have a a rubber band it does similar>> <<@buyanjan6548 says : In initial condition the springs were on serial and after cutting it is in parallel>> <<@CrackasaurusRox-o8v says : It’s bimodal dog. Understanding of physics isn’t necessary. People really need to get out more😅>> <<@QobelD says : 10:18 I love the epic inception of the connecting road thought.. being within the non-connected roads thought.. being within the Braess's paradox thought.. being within the New York 42nd St. issue thought.. being within the string/spring "paradox" thought... being within the thought of how to explain the original fidget-gadget. And, I can't help but imagine that if we zoom far enough out from the center of these thoughts, we exit Derek's forehead and obtain a view of his pondering face. So... Then I become the last layer of this inception!! .... .. ..Until, of course, you read this...>> <<@Arreat_Summit says : Thats what she said>> <<@I2obiNtube says : 3:11 this is incorrect it's proportional to the force of the weight divided by the spring constant stiffness k. If I modify k, then x changes. So the series/parallel is irrelevant, that is just changing weight distribution. I can modify k to get whatever displacement I want and achieve the same outcome. Very cool, but ultimately this is more optical illusion than anything else.>> <<@evanmckinnon2851 says : I dont know about people but a million sheep definitely turned up>> <<@christophersines87 says : The object gets supported by two springs instead of one. It’s obvious it will go up. You just have to look at it to see that.>> <<@mrcompisawesome says : 4:20 in shortest explanation, this is how two horses are able to pull 50% than than 1 horse alone>> <<@trewstory519 says : tether knot. a jam. things get short when theyre tied together.>> <<@Al_Reeh says : Everytime I watch a Veritasium video my brain grows by 30%.>> <<@FudgeTheWolf says : "pulling makes it shorter" I know that all to well.>> <<@arkfan5345 says : these designs been around for ages. it's one of the earliest spring systems.>> <<@Dre2Dee2 says : so you invented the spring>> <<@Tacticoolnerfer says : What if we make them pay to go on that road? That way, it’s less people going the shorter route.>> <<@CaptainJ52112 says : A(x)=x/100+25 Or B(x)=2(x/100)+1 ? >2400 = A <2400 = B =2400 = A B>> <<@LTCloud9 says : My mechanism also shrinks if pulled enough times.>> <<@Spencer.M. says : Might be great for car suspension>> <<@kritikal3172 says : Its called a penis>> <<@Sidowse says : Springs in series versus parallel?>> <<@shleemsupreme says : Correct title would be "This mechanism shrinks after being pulled" - its physically impossible for an object to shrink when pulled, else it wouldnt be pulled>> <<@harki6784 says : just like mine>> <<@ScottAmidon-u7t says : I told ppl. I figured this out in 1980_1983 so your thing is bs.>> <<@starwarsfan4242 says : Oh thats really simple you effectively half the weight because your spliting it along two seperate ropes Edit I just realized that since I'm right you have no way of telling when I said this I saw it>> <<@Zeesneakyninja says : Like a spring>> <<@dietmarfinster3176 says : Pulling doesn't shorten the time. Pulling "unlocks" energy that has already been stored. It's as if I were unscrewing the top screw on a pre-tensioned spring, e.g., a strut spring. Alternatively, the energy would be stored between the atoms, and they would move closer together when energy is added, through pulling. Eis macht genau das Gegenteil. Es weiter sich beim Abkühlen und zieht sich zusammen weim Energie Eintrag (Wärme)>> <<@lukeroberts7250 says : Story of my life 🤦>> <<@WandileChamane says : Am I the only one thinking 🤔 thinking weapons??>> <<@Nick_Bottom says : Your paradox depends on universalising the conditions of capitalism as human nature. If these roads were in a society where people weren’t expected to optimise every single moment of their lives it would turn out very differently.>> <<@HungryAlienWorms says : Sounds like pulling it released loaded spring which pull it upward>> <<@95rpm says : Auxetic materials do the job as good as this>> <<@diegoc.1212 says : What if you make the initial non holding strings 5 times longer? Or 1/2 shorter? It doesn't work anymore, I understand what's happening with the weight distribution, but the set up is limited to certain relations in length among the strings or it won't work.>> <<@rawdevmode says : 22:45 the sand mf increase volume when compressed 😂>> <<@cashdri says : amazing vid, btw. the analogy to a concept in 1990's nyc is a crazy analogy to this paradoxes purpose in reality>> <<@RyanLiu-g9u says : The weight goes down. Then the springs are pulled. I dunno how to explain but i know the mechanics i think. And i didn't watch the full video>> <<@Brutii_IV says : this right here is the future of space travel and you dont even comprehend how yet and that makes me excited>> <<@libercode9886 says : I mean, anyone who studied engineering and circuits could intuitively predict that, not a paradox, I would say>> <<@TheWendigosEsports says : Could be used in some kind of safety system to show stress has overloaded and the safety has activated to maintain XYZ tension/distance. Repair asap.>> <<@tylerhensley2312 says : This is just a regular old run of the mill switch with extra parts to make it a gimmick. The main center "spring" is just a switch that changes state when pulled far enough apart, everything else is just there to make it a gimmick. Any good engineer in the 60's would have taken one look at this and given you 200 different ways of changing spring rate through 1 single range of motion. This should be in a magic shop and not a laboratory, this is the perfect example of how far we have gotten away from mechanical engineering in favor of electrical/mechanical engineering, e/m engineering is a electrical PLC telling a mechanical device to do one thing based on an electrical program where back in the 60's EVERYTHING was mechanicaly based with the bare minimum of electrical only used where it absolutely needed to be like motors and lights, this is blowing people's minds today because we as a society have literally forgotten how mechanical systems can work together. This is simply a mechanism that changes state and thus spring rate when pulled from the same axis. The figure "8" in the force diagram is only there because of the extra pieces involved, theoretically anything can be designed to give you whatever force diagram pattern you are looking for so there is nothing special about this. The main issue with this type of mechanism and what makes it a gimmick is that it's very unpredictable, the reason there are green dots in the force diagram is because of how unpredictable it is in that particular mechanical state which makes it completely useless for anything that would need to be in a controllable state.>> <<@killeryue7 says : why is bro missing an eyebrow>> <<@edwardrivera4730 says : I used to live and commute by bike in Portland, OR. I’d see this phenomenon almost everyday as rush hour traffic would spill onto the designated bicycle paths next to the main thoroughfares. Then the drivers would get angry with cyclists for being on the bike streets too!>> <<@bombusbombus1384 says : So you made gleipnir>> <<@kevinrhodes8410 says : Make one with wood bows as springs>> <<@shreyasdhimate5126 says : I really thought this was very basic for any science graduate. The parallel and series functions of a springs constant.>> <<@RayParker says : Where's his eyebrow?>> <<@matthewboyd8689 says : 6:30 & 10:00 ah yes, the fact that all Americans hate traffic but refuse to make walking, cycling, or public transit better because they think it would rob them of being able to get around as fast, when in reality, the more people not in cars the less traffic there is even if there's 1/2 as many lanes for cars, thus speeding up your own journey. This is what I like to call, abusive car addicted culture. Ps 10:40 and the highways are like the strings, unless you have everyone for your city driving from out of town to get there like Texas and you just need one more lane bro 17 lanes and still stop and go traffic. An hour to travel 7 miles while living in the city on a bike you could get 7 miles in under 30 miles>> <<@someone-yw2qw says : this paradox is not only physical, its also political and economical if you think about it>> <<@MyNameIs_AJAL-Menjemput says : The points is, 1st= 2 Spring & 1 tie/rope 2nd=2 Spring & 2 rope 1st, it should be the green who holding all of it + 2 sping. Now you got 2 tie/rope with 2 Spring.>>