Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@veritasium says : Get your exclusive NordVPN deal here https://NordVPN.com/veritasium and try it risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!>> <<@Onjii-ys5in says : There's something we don't know about entangled pairs of particles if the effect of quantum teleportation still hasn't been solved. Could it be that the electron and positron are not separate particles, but part of a single whole? it just so happens that in our three-dimensional world with time as the fourth coordinate system, we cannot see that they are connected, but only see a side effect - quantum entanglement? could it be that these are two ends of the same "rope" and in fact there is no "distance" between them in a more multidimensional space, but it exists only in three dimensions, just as there is no end to the path for an ant on a paper Mobius ring, but in fact it is an object that has finite dimensions?>> <<@mr.hawthorn2629 says : 30:53 she say electrons and protons not electrons and positrons?>> <<@Mine-craftguy says : 37:00 FRIEND?! WHO TOLD YOU I HAVE A FRIEND 😂>> <<@jimmyjohn7929 says : Why would an observer speeding past the two disappearing objects see one disappear first?>> <<@LegsGyms says : How does this “experiment” contribute to the eradication of War and not its proliferation???????? MONUMENTAL WASTE OF TIME>> <<@007gurkan says : They keep effecting their state until the Range of speed of light but after that they keep the last state Before exiting the range>> <<@activat3d says : Can we impact the speed of the light? Can we slow it down? Do You know the next question? If we are measuring a speed of light and we are moving the same direction, whats the light speed? And what if were moving the opposite? :D>> <<@Xogroroth666 says : Aha, a video on Quantum Entanglement. But that was already "debunked" through Astronomy: In the first few Planck moments right after the singularity erupted, energy spread out to 30% up to even 50% (depending on which Astrophysicist you ask) the volume of our current universe. If Luminal Velocity was in fact the "ultimate speed", that volume in energy could not have become ... . Merely saying.>> <<@amichaelthomas83 says : There is certainty something rotten in the state of Denmark, to be or not to be that is the question. I am writing a science fiction series that has Hamlet and the many worlds vs copenhagen as a chapter.>> <<@catbert7 says : The irony of criticizing the obscure nature of Bohr's arguments against EPR, only to follow with an explanation of Bell's experiment that completely obscures EPR's local theory with anthropomorphized particles 🤦‍♂>> <<@mariateresalabtic5227 says : Did I just saw hitl- uh nothing there is nothing on 3:24 and pro tip don't go to the left>> <<@doge5762 says : Gyro>> <<@lairbox says : After countless hours working on that I've found a solution. That brings us to the name of Archimedes. Non locality issue is fundamentally solved if you consider that CMB isn't actually a relic of the past that has no function, CMB is instead a field that controls gravity and parity in the universe. I found this by reverse engineering relativity, this proves Einstein was right for the most part and at the same time he was wrong on other details. Just imagine that the two letters are being put on two boats, when you pick up the first boat to measure the content of the letter the level of the water gets up and the other boat reveals the other value. This very thin layer of energy is responsible for the balancement of information at the infinitesimal-scale but not in the wide scales of cosmos, where it acts in different ways promoting gravitational fields. This view is both compatible with relativity and quantum mechanics, while we think CMB is only a product of the Big Bang, I believe that it is the medium that balances and controls what happens inside atoms and quarks. If you want to solve the paradox between non-locality and locality, of relativity and quantum mechanics you have to abandon the idea of the Big Bang.>> <<@bmjsoundstt6624 says : A question I have to keep to myself and never type it online...it may cause war....great vid btw....>> <<@CeaselessJollity says : my dad leqving me is faster>> <<@burkepete110 says : Horseshit from Trump moves faster than light.>> <<@burkepete110 says : The baby's navel.>> <<@williamfowler616 says : how to travel fsater than light and not effect time?>> <<@alrightythen8453 says : I give up. What is faster than light?>> <<@CharlesPro-ig6yy says : The truth is faster than light because its wherever whenever>> <<@En_theo says : @3:46 That guy does not know what he's talking about, rulling out reality and locality are two different things. Reality : means we live in a simulation, hence the instantaneous relationship between particles. Non-locality : the world is real but it allows faster-than-light travelling OR object can interract at a distance and are somehow constantly connected.>> <<@leonardjohnny67 says : Im flumoxed, but thanks for trying>> <<@VictorAimbot-e6z says : I'm faster 😎>> <<@ultrainstinct978 says : I feel like Patrick...>> <<@winningjubbly9712 says : I once did a thought experiment: A massive tungsten tube 3-feet thick and its length was so long it took light 30 seconds to cover the same distance as the tube's length, then took it up into spece. If you pushed on one end, would the other far end begin moving at precisely the same moment you pushed it, or would there be a delay? I've always thought that if Einstein was right then the tube must surely ripple along at the speed of light, but that would also mean the tube deformed as the ripple went past.>> <<@winningjubbly9712 says : The Wang. It's all about the Wang.>> <<@grantreagent says : What are these ppl even talking about?>> <<@TheCuriousCase-m9y says : Still trying to figure this out>> <<@lonniep123 says : the result is nothing more than a temporal signature. in the experiment they fail to consider time. in order to measure the distant partical it takes time to get the result. this tells you what temporal frame you are in. Sort of like many worlds.>> <<@theultimateepicamazingguy says : Its wally west>> <<@ZiaAnnouncer says : For one: Relativity and the Lorentz Factor are BS. Time is ultimate. (I fall on the side of Galileo, Tesla, Beckmann, Dingle & Essen.)>> <<@jeffreycallison2676 says : 😂>> <<@jeffreycallison2676 says : Wormholes...>> <<@airlanggawlp says : I'm a mathematician Idk alot Abt physics and not that interested but are you saying that entanglement basically says particle The pair has one joint state. Each individual particle looks random, but the pair has a structured joint probability law. Wtf..... Huh???>> <<@weerapongbumps6962 says : 😮 this is so similar to the Sophons the Trisolarans used in the Three-Body Problem to monitor Earth with faster-than-light communication!>> <<@rasonance says : 37:41 I'm kinda confused. Is there an example of such frame of reference where the arrival of the reply comes before the sending of the first message?>> <<@En_theo says : Bohr was arguing in such bad faith. Truly Bohr-ing.>> <<@Ryarios says : Is there something that goes faster than light? Yes. Gossip…>> <<@HiTechYeti says : For the envelopes that could be positive or negative. The statement is that we open one the other has to collapse possibilities and instantly become the opposite. BUT, how is it not true that the other one was not simply always the opposite. For example I open envelope 1 (it's positive), therefore envelope 2 is negative, but why can I not conclude that envelope 2 was always negative, just as envelope 1 was always positive. Sure I didn't know for sure until measuring one of them, and probability shows that before opening envelope 1 it had an equal chance of being positive or negative. BUT once I open it I know for sure it was, for example always positive, which also tells me that the other envelope actually always had a 100% of being negative? Why can I not conclude this? At least from that example.>> <<@douglas7000 says : To say that one cannot communicate because the measurement is random is a gross misunderstanding of knowledge technology. It would be trivial to communicate FTL if entanglement really works.>> <<@lovepack031 says : I would've asked how would Shrodinger even know if he were Einstein's buddy?>> <<@alexiadamasceno1255 says : i liked the animations, the little particle guys are just too cute smaller than 3>> <<@russruss-f3i says : Better explained in books i read i think>> <<@RobertLove-e7g says : Baloney 🎉>> <<@WashYourWorld says : Einstein is a complete fraud, there is no space, but a solid firmament and water above. There is zero experimental proof that a mass attracts another mass. What we observe on Earth is simply Buyancy and density. And Earth magnetic field forces a downward direction. In any medium, denser material goes down, lighter goes up. No magical gravity needed on a flat immovable Earth>> <<@SciencetoSleep13.8 says : What struck me most wasn't the two particles being linked together, but the fact that distance no longer seemed to hold the meaning we imagined. If nature truly operates this way, then perhaps the universe is far more profound and bizarre than human intuition can comprehend.>> <<@ckeilah says : 30:55 protons??! I thought entangled particles were equal but opposite, so it would be an electron and a positron, not a proton. I may be too stupid to even begin to start to try to understand this. 🤦>> <<@udiorockmeamadeus says : Well you are theoretically a brain in a complex design.. Or you a dream in God's brain.. Or a simulation in a massive proof.. If you think of us as AI, then there is a need to simulate choice for us, to see the nature of our behavior, to see if we are stable and reliable. However the universe wishes to present itself, as God or however, its its choice, there is nothing special about us,we are working with redimentary tools and a fairly shallow form of communication.. Peopel think Im crazy whe I ask, whne adam and eve came to be did they have imperfect perception. Cause if they did, then original sin never really happened, it was a story to tell children not to break into the cookie jar. If humans had no sensory perception to begin with... God has perfect perception, that is regardless of whether gtod is outside of time or is a part of the time, experiencing change, God has the capacity to predict and compensate for all possible futures The same sort of arrogance that can say we know, will say "it is all predetermined" but thats contrary to the nature of what is fun, God would find no fun in setting things up unless God likes to watch dominoes fall. But we enjoy polaying dominoes, we don't really enjoy stacking dominoes cause playing has a degree of chance and fairness.. Stacking them, has chance but you are playing against yourself in hopes of fascinating someone... You'd be better off just playing the game.. So simulation yes, predetermined futures, no.. And if that is the case.. What does this event driven game ,. this simulation we are in, how does it play... In what dimensions does it occur.. Our whole drive to do all this science is to ponder things ouside of our perception, to engineer what is within our control.. But when its otuside of that realm, you go home, and enjoy a passtime, relax, cause youa re only so finite.. You are the center of your universe, enjoy what control you do have.>> <<@udiorockmeamadeus says : I don't know why I'm listening to all of this, I've always thought that if I just absorb information and sometime in the future it makes sense.. I have LD, Aphasia , took me a decade to get my computer science degree with a minor in art from UNM. But while I turned no heads at the school in computer science, I made an animation that attracted Pixar to our school and could be the reason they have a animation program there. My professor was Edward Angel and I Thomas Keller was my instructor.. I had hoped at the time to make it into computer animation, but that was 30 years ago.. But about the same time I encouraged Ton Roosendaal to develop blender via Email, told him Blender3D would be the Atomic Bomb... If you know me, I am a good evangelist.. Tech evangelist, Religious, whatever.. And after having learned Wavfront Advanced Visualizer include Kinemation, Dynamation, Composer, 3Design, IPR, with Model, Rend and such on my own... I could see what blender did that was better than what Alias/Wavefront wasn't... For Instance, blender obliterated a need for a file system.. Also objects could be selectively linked or unlinked.... Which makes perfec sense, but in other programs the idea of an object instance is like a separate object, not a simple pointer. Its like when Ton made blender, he took the approach to application design that Steve Wozniak took to computer design using TTL circuits, a processor, memory, clock, etc.. How he created a text display is one of those stories that should be told to little engineers at night before bedtime, cause it was such a great simple hack. The reason blender is so much a better 3D program than the commercial stuff.. It was designed to be used in-house, Maya and Alias were made to be used in schools to train people to use 3D programs, it may have begun life as inhouse software in a studio, but there are parts of Alias Poweranimators interface I learned that were highly modal, and only ever worked if you were following a tutorial. In 1996 Alias/Wavefront gave my $2k scholarship, but I had heard from inside sources that clients of wavefront were finding animations on my Wavefront website via Yahoo before finding Wavefront modest brochure site which lacked any demonstrations of their software.>>