Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@BurgerPrince10 says : Weight distribution, after the cut the two springs separate so each carries 1/2 the original Weight, naturally the mass goes up.>> <<@tsukeekage says : Its just serial vs parallel. With the green line, each spring is stretched for the full foce of the weight (serial) With the green line cut, each spring stretches for half the weight (parallel)>> <<@wisdom_tower says : Parallel vs series😂>> <<@rajnikanth3827 says : It is initially single thread with full tension supporting the whole mass. In the second instance the tension supporting against the weight is shared by two threads. Hence tension is half as compared earlier hence string would shrink , it will go up.>> <<@_SUPAVIZOR_ says : what do you mean somehow>> <<@AnantvirSingh-t8y says : Cuz the spring is not under tension after cutting and all the tension is towards the extra ropes>> <<@RavindraKumar-u4o4t says : Spring are in series turn to parellel ❤>> <<@thatoneengineer5652 says : I woulda guessed that, bc the weight goes from being on the tow springs one after another, to being on them both parralel>> <<@DVous says : The weight is distributed on two ropes more than one, so the springs aren’t as stretched as much>> <<@WalterEKurtz-kp2jf says : skip to 1:01>> <<@fardinsanil3473 says : I think turning the spring configuration from series to parallel caused the tension force increase, which up lifted the weight, since Kp ~ 1/Ks (for 2 springs K1 and K2 )🤔.... am I correct?🤔>> <<@acsumanth481 says : I knew it as soon as I looked at it !! So , do I have a chance at NASA ? 😂😢>> <<@anondrastic says : i thought the same because of the springs>> <<@tomipunmira says : At firs both spirngs are in series and stretcht to max each due to the weight. If you cut the green rope, springs will be in paralel, each of them supporting suporting half the weight and stretching less the springs. So it depends how how much slack length the black, red wire have. The springs itself will stretch less than when they were connected in series>> <<@abaman98 says : something about series and parallel springs>> <<@MukulAnand050 says : its serial vs parallel springs . weight goes up .>> <<@OrfivosGaming says : its gonna go sideways>> <<@utkarshkesarwani8713 says : Parallel>> <<@mukbangfasting says : Parallel vs serial..>> <<@ronaldddoooo says : gregor is so hot>> <<@sethy242 says : That one answer in the exam test became the actual answer>> <<@mandeepvishwakarma4788 says : Just use kirchofs voltage law>> <<@Winter-Cubes says : I think I get it when you cut the green rope there's no less force on the first spring>> <<@dingalingalong says : Oh I finally got it . Initially, both spring hold the same, full weight. After the cut, each spring only has to carry half weight. So each spring stretches less. So the weight is higher up. Clever.>> <<@mrbikerss says : Because in beginning mg is balanced by t now the mg is balanced by 2t....is it right??>> <<@alexgheorghe4906 says : I’m such a genius I called it cause attention was released. The only thing holding it down.>> <<@lukababu says : If you look closely, the single string creates a one giant spring bearing the load, but by cutting that you are now bearing the load on 2 springs making the springs work less>> <<@VeiledVentures01 says : Springs went from parallel to series>> <<@CrhysianArce-d4f says : Bro I literally visuallized the problem in my mind and had my answer before you even showed it. My answer is gonna go up.>> <<@brianvell says : Springs in series vs in parallel>> <<@vinayv243 says : Is it only me that thinks this is obvious?>> <<@worthtrying7512 says : It will go down if it was not a spring. After all, that green rope widen the spring but having two rope at different place (at the end of spring) would balance and help string lessen the weight so it would move up>> <<@SilencetheEvidence says : One anchor point vs two>> <<@anonNemo says : The red string is anchored to the to base so thats going to take up a lot of tension without the stretch.>> <<@abhinavjha3736 says : Spring in series vs parallel>> <<@chrislaub845 says : When you cut it , you by pass the top spring. By not using the top spring.>> <<@OmegaOne-i9u says : It's about pretension location>> <<@the_peanut-boi says : We should start disliking so they stop leaving us hanging 7v7>> <<@wirabayuwega says : Eyes can’t see tension>> <<@DH-MQ says : Series loading vs parallel loading>> <<@123Bean says : I feel like it’s gonna go up>> <<@jasonpramirez1 says : You're changing it from the pull force of basically a single spring to two springs by separating the springs.>> <<@kpsudeesh says : One is in series. One is in parallel>> <<@jeremye21 says : With the green string, you effectively just have one long spring. The weight capacity is the exact same. By having the two springs connect at the top and bottom separately they are working in tandem, doubling their weight capacity>> <<@TheBozn says : Simple.. it goes from series to parallel, halving each springs load > each springs extend less>> <<@kandyans says : When in series, the inverse of stiffness values add up giving equipment stiffness of k/2. When parallel, the stiffness values add up giving a stiffnessof 2k. So, the 1st arrangement was 1/4th the stiffness of the 2nd arrangement. In other words, first one deformed 4 times more than the 2nd under the same load. That's why even the extra lenths of the ropes got absorbed.>> <<@justedbin says : The springs were in sequence... Now they are in parallel.. that's why it went up. Imagine you pushing a car and your buddy pushing you.... Now imagine you AND your buddy pushing the car, it's a bit easier>> <<@evargasrivero says : It’s going to levitate and defy physics>> <<@wyldc4t316 says : Take a look at what springs they're using>> <<@infinnite4938 says : because the springs will look like acting in parallel...>>