Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@AndrásGyarmati says : they influence eachother its not completely random 50/50 where they go each layer>> <<@rafakrawczyk5403 says : Can you drop the balls in one by one to check whether this principle still holds when they are added individually? 😋👍>> <<@bobbyhill5067 says : So a pachinko machine?>> <<@Elida-The-Author says : Pascal's triangle reference! 🔥🔥🔥>> <<@AddItUp-11235 says : Normal distribution is probably one of the least effects on the price of stocks :p>> <<@Vermont-Critic says : Is literally capitalism>> <<@amcdh26 says : No but this is just the shape they fall? What if the opening was all the way on the left or right?>> <<@SpaceFaceFPV says : What's the larger golden ball meant to represent in the device?😅>> <<@radiopete7290 says : Look up the Adam Theory>> <<@FlamouriAI says : Reminds me of double slit interference.>> <<@hyprion1 says : I can't slow down the short to make sure but I have a strong feeling that it's not just going left or right but some are crossing back to an other path>> <<@User-th6yy says : Well its not 50/50, its literally gonna bounce the same way every single time given you push it with the exact same force, in the exact same angle, same rotation and everything else. Its never random, just not easily predictable>> <<@Viixle says : Send 1 down at a time so they don’t interfere with each other. All of them! It would take forever to record and set up but I’d love to see if it’s the same or different! ❤>> <<@goldstarhypnosis8277 says : binomial distribution, not normal distribution>> <<@isentient666 says : I wonder if the Galton board is truly random for each peg. I feel when a ball pics left, for example, on one peg it’s momentum will carry it left on the peg below it or perhaps the opposite if it bounces the right way first.>> <<@gabrielfellow says : even if we knew it were all totally random, cant we say that is its predictability? that is its pattern.>> <<@CharlesBlackburn-z4q says : Are you from veva-the -dirt league?>> <<@im_out_roaming says : The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.>> <<@rickson50 says : There isn't a 50/50 chance of going left or right. There's two routes. Either route aren't as likely>> <<@jcortese3300 says : I'd really like to see someone do this where the bumpers aren't laid out in that standard Galton board shape. The fact is the shape of the distribution sort of isn't random if it depends on the layout of the bumpers. If you built a Galton board with the bumpers in different arrangements than the standard triangle, and people could see the distribution at the bottom change shape as a result, that would go a long way to communicating what's actually happening.>> <<@marianbadea369 says : So can we use a Galton board to predict stock prices!? 🥴😁>> <<@Camyran.M says : What's that golden ball for?>> <<@sayedabdullah95 says : Drop 1 ball at a time then we will see.>> <<@dennislee5582 says : I get that it's a 50-50 chance that a ball will go left or right when it hits a peg. But in this demo with the Galton board there's a bottleneck at the top rows with balls jostling with each other. Is it still 50-50? Try doing it one ball at a time. Will you still get a bell curve?>> <<@Guest-x6y6v says : Does this relate to entropy?>> <<@tunestone3071 says : No try it individually>> <<@higherverse says : PLEASE READ! Can you please make this test in 2 ways? One with all pegs rolled at the same time and one with pegs rolled one by one? Kind of double slit experiments.. you will see the core path of probabilty in real world>> <<@ThePgkessler says : This video would have made grad school statistics so much less painful!>> <<@bigdawg1265 says : The visible problem with your exam is of the ball bearing hits on the left side or always goes left there is no 50/50 and the same problem when it on right side of triangle so your 50/50 is wrong even from first impact all ball bearings do not hit the point of first triangle most hit one side or other determining which they will continue down destroying any idea of random selection. Unless you make every ball bearing hit exact tip of every triangle the direction is bias by where each ball hits each triangle.>> <<@objective_psychology says : Always fascinating when mathematicians and physicists or other natural scientists stumble upon the same pattern independently>> <<@memycellsandi says : Been watching man from when I had all the hair until I now have some of the hair. The man still look like he hasn't aged day 😅>> <<@FortheGreatest-Good says : Can someone make a chart applying this equation to a random set of stock prices to see how accurate this theory actually is?>> <<@mohamadalrashed9064 says : In my mind this contradicts the gambler's fallacy... Like i know it has something to do with independence of consecutive tests but I just can't make it stick in my mind ... Like how would we eventually reach a 50% probability for a coin flip after 100 head result without getting more tails???>> <<@oldandtired-555 says : Imagine discovering every video topic Veritasium covers throughout your lifetime and then meeting a kid who just watches Veritasium videos. They seem so hollow because they don't know the mystery and wonder of accidental discovery but they at least know many concepts are historically hashed out. Interesting shift in the world.>> <<@delCaneDogs says : Plinko?>> <<@CarlosVieira-r2m says : Never knew pegging could be so fun>> <<@Christian_Prepper says : *What? No practical application?*>> <<@DavidGordonLermit says : What about the interactions between beads!>> <<@KeithAllpress says : Would be binomial if it was 50 50. But in fact the split is perturbed by a gaussian on average. The central limit theorem trends the result to a Gaussian>> <<@MichaellSv85UA says : Uau I forgot I was watching a short 🙌👏👏👏💪>> <<@herbertgreen2824 says : Reminds me of my Statistics 101 class. The median always wins.>> <<@PaulKersey-b9h says : Great visualization. However, concerning stock prices, I think if you account for external factors, it will affect the distribution and hence future price.>> <<@domvasta says : Stock prices aren't random though>> <<@nathlech919 says : Sure am seeing a lot of similarities between a Galton Board and Double Slit 👀>> <<@KXKKX says : Those aren’t “ball bearings”. They’re balls. Probably steel balls. Maybe even bearing balls. Some might even call ‘em “ball bearing balls”. But they definitely are not ball bearings.>> <<@thirdmanout says : Does it yield the same results if you drop one ball at a time versus all of those? It seems that they not only bounce on the triangles but bounce off of each other and I would be curious to know if the balls hitting each other play a big part in the direction they go>> <<@PaulJakubik says : I'm a dumb ass, this is too clever for me.>> <<@beannox says : And thats how it was scientifically explained that plinko is a scam>> <<@MutantBamHammer says : That one ball was bigger>> <<@DamoXXX says : I’d like to see this done with one ball at a time. I’m wondering if each ball influences the others when dropped together.>>