Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@TubersAndPotatoes says : Who's this guy? Did Verisatum for bought over?>> <<@chu3191 says : Off topic, but in a class i connected the notion of consciousness to these abstract (or whatever, I like this word) things... Topic was special relativity and the thought that speed of light remains the same irrespective of frames (inertial ofc) was WEIRD least to say. So I asked my prof, what would a photon going in the opposite direction of another feel about the speed of the other or (much weirder question ahead) what would I see/feel if I sat on that photon... My prof simply nudged that question and said that we cant talk bout it in that sense and I do understand it now that we can't understand that thing that way :] Anyways I just remembered so I thought I'll drop this so yeah ^^>> <<@staheos says : And you can run faster on wet sand closer to the water than on dry one. Ridiculous>> <<@Jacknom-tp5fb says : if you are complaining about the answer not being clear, derek said that the people who say the video thats not clear performs better than people who said it was>> <<@damonhicks969 says : I plot out all possible paths to the bathroom at 4AM then stub my toe on the nightstand, hop on one foot to the door and fail to turn the doorknob before attempting to push through the door resulting in slamming my face into the door then because I am sore and woozie; I decide to sit down to pee so I don't fall over and as a result of morning wood, I pee through the toilet seat gap and piss on my underwear... What is the calculation for that path?>> <<@leooilYT says : Btw dogs are good in this>> <<@abercrombie4lyfe says : There's also ocean drift>> <<@AcuteChronic says : This is the parallel problem in basic calculus textbook: Laying electric cable to an offshore island. On-shore cable is cheaper than the under-water cable. The is an optimal point to transition from shore to sea.>> <<@suhankumarchoudhury9958 says : Does not matter, now I am calculating the fastest path to his funeral.>> <<@kayloko1 says : Light does not , it just goes into all direction like a brute force technique does and ends up hitting the fastest path anyways>> <<@Aadi129 says : Saleem sir method 😅>> <<@god-of-motion-savitar says : I would even same my friends from volcano... unless its hot in there>> <<@RBkaj says : Which corporation bought Verotasium?>> <<@user-SmashHit1234perfect says : Brother are you staying like Snell's Law and looks like a Pythagoras Traingle 🤔. May be ?>> <<@errowtin says : Isn't every second spent on running just multiple seconds saved by not swimming? Thus, the option to run down the beach seems more efficient>> <<@anticorncob6 says : I clicked to see shirtless men.>> <<@ralphchurch7 says : This video makes me want to watch a nutter>> <<@mathperson1234 says : "this is one of the craziest thought experiments", he said while scientists put cats in boxes with unstable gunpowder.>> <<@chrischiesa609 says : I was just going to say that period will you think it looks like light magically chooses the most efficient path because we only see the end result. Clearly, there are multiple dimensions of time involved, so that light can explore all possible paths without standard human time, t, elapsing per se during the process. Feynman's "The Strange Theory Of Light And Matter" does a great job of showing how to calculate what will happen, precisely and exactly by adding up the contributions of all possible paths, some of which reinforce others and some of which cancel out. A single theory is able to predict every conceivable phenomenon involving light -- from the illusion that it travels in a straight line as a beam, to reflection, refraction, filtration -- even diffraction which, to my great amusement, is triumphantly trotted out as concrete proof that light from a source is exploring a path to a place you would never think it could have gotten to, and which only becomes visible once you black out alternate strips to eliminate the paths that would have canceled it out. It's a brilliant analysis and explication. Regarding electrons comma i've read that photosynthesis would not be energetically advantageous if the particles being transported -- electrons? protons? I forget -- were not free to explore all time and space before making their jumps to their bonding sites. There's something in the mechanics of DNA itself, too, that turns out to depend on quantum tunneling, which is probably just another instance of all of this in a slightly different form.>> <<@vmafarah9473 says : Qhy should you elaborate the answer , even though, you dont know anytjing about it>> <<@sergeyk3kov says : His last thought - huh? Light is exploring "all possible paths all at ones"? BS.>> <<@North_9 says : Garbage>> <<@sniegius5 says : clickbait>> <<@Osmium-is-an-element says : Path of least resistance?>> <<@lamarozzo says : we don't take every possible path, that's plain wrong.>> <<@ambhaiji says : The optimal path is running and regularly steering towards the person drowning, your legs are not locked at an angle until it touches water. Math is important, doing this kind of math is stupid.>> <<@MyMushroom says : Light refracts coz it experiences electro magnetic waves of the oscillating electrons of the material of incident medium Infinite paths theory may have been a hypothetical probability nd principle of least action is a coincidence Principle of least action is only for quantum particles, not for practical realistic objects>> <<@drk_blood says : I'm still wondering since I first saw this guy on this channel ... Wtaf happened to his hair. 😢>> <<@wdfaseer5898 says : My thought is the other path of the photons do not cancel each other, it is the path that needs the Least Time has the first "wave function collapse" ,so other paths just remain just probability.>> <<@eridondemaj9012 says : Light bend because of medium spinning. For example when sunlight enter Earth, earth rotation makes light enter not directly but bended.>> <<@Lee-haw says : Same as in electricity, it flows through the least resistance path, for example a power source connected to two different length wires>> <<@RouandSido says : Quantum crap>> <<@soulandfeeling says : This is LITERALLY just a mathematical model! It doesn't mean a quantum particle ACTUALLY computes all paths — that's just an artifact of the math.It's like saying a guitar string calculates sine waves to vibrate at the right frequency>> <<@conc5063 says : This isnt a fair comparisson; you are not considering energy consumed, its not just the speed and distance. Sure you may be able to split the difference but realistically, the shortest distance to swim will always be the best option, swiming may be slower but its also harder for most. Not only this but you need to swim back, with the drowning person, this doubles the length of the total swim distance immediately.>> <<@AnasNoor_8 says : SHUT UP MIKE IM MATHING HERE>> <<@SighTology says : What’s the name of the long form video that goes deeper into this>> <<@stardreamix786 says : Damnnn this actually really gives me more questions than answers, really interesting though, an example that links our optimality to how light behaves with a medium.. would love to know more!! interesting>> <<@cruisingwithClaude says : "Heelpppppp!!!!" " *hold up!!!! Im answering* ">> <<@vidwatcher00 says : its path that uses current to shorten the straight line with water as power assist if choices are straight line, slightly left, far left ,right answer is slightly right>> <<@Anax100 says : Because it's acting as a wave, so automatically creates the optimal path.>> <<@matthew-o5p says : id probably just let them figure it out themselves instead of doing all this thinking>> <<@CCumva says : The holograms video is insane. It's a single best explanation I've seen in my life. I highly recommend watching it carefully. It's mind-blowing>> <<@chinmay_077 says : I watched this full video it was a amazing experience thanks 😊😊>> <<@boringdallas says : Light is lazy.>> <<@MissesWitch says : The most important thing is you make a choice and stick to it! Don't sit there calculating!!>> <<@Sovereign-skeleton says : Yes but did you account for the shark eating your friend? Didn’t think of that now did ya.>> <<@Harzberg says : Analogy strikes me a little bit, because we have current induced vectors>> <<@teekay_1 says : This is an old question. If you're in soft sand, you take a diagonal path to hard sand then you go in a straight line.>> <<@rfatefehelvacoglu335 says : or the electromagnetic waves are only stable in the direction that keeps their traveling speed constant the optimal speed that makes waves most sustainable governed by |E| = c|B|>> <<@jonokay3198 says : What about the rip?>>