<<@pastesauce says : make it a blockchain called perfectcoin>> <<@Palestinian1967 says : put it in a blockchain>> <<@besteirolnerd2615 says : The audio unsynched with the video is so disturbing>> <<@FREEPALESTINEFTRTTSEA says : I think it's unsolved because people just keep falling asleep 😴 💤>> <<@G-SUS420 says : Imagine if part of math class was learning where the algorithms we use are from and how/why they were made. Personally I woulda loved a math teacher that would teach this in order to help me remember>> <<@hihihihihello says : Uh its prob because zero doesnt really exist but you guys make it exist because delusions of grandeur>> <<@hihihihihello says : Nerds>> <<@Abhishek4EV3 says : So Even computer is not the best in it's class. Glad to hear that. I'll tell this everytime as an argument against my teacher in the class.>> <<@starwalker7409 says : this video is 31:32 long but ends at 3:27, and this video has 5 different progress bars at the same time and it's all bugged, it's only this video specifically, why the hell is youtube glitching this video, I can't watch any of it because of this bug>> <<@GonnaLearn241 says : Don't forget, everybody. Euclid likes to troll.>> <<@angusmackaskill3035 says : More a chemestry problem. Why does every substance on earth shrink as it gets colder (by 1/273 per degree Celsius) except water which shrinks until 4 C then expands?>> <<@angusmackaskill3035 says : Why is pi square?>> <<@2Fast4Mellow says : I really hope that Japanese book doesn't contain a typo...>> <<@hansmestdagh3814 says : Whats the point? they have discoverd the binary code...as simple as it is, as simlpe is the solution...1 or...0, and the rest is....a coincidence..even today with the "help" of the supercomputer we can't solve the problem, because of the simplicity of this story...1 or 0..>> <<@Plaasbakkie says : I quickly found 2 new ones besides the 4 mentioned in video.>> <<@Bob-bx2vk says : Six does not divide 28>> <<@AshishSaw-tk4rp says : I have solved this problem what I have to do>> <<@Aterhallsam says : Me looking at the thumbnail: - Broken wood plugs. Interesting. Click.>> <<@shaileearadhya says : Is 1 a perfect no😅>> <<@GRudeger says : I'm a simple man, but when I see a formula involving multiplying 2 at it's root function I can see there will never be an odd number produced. Either the formula is correct, therefore the theory is correct, there are no odd perfect numbers or the formula is wrong and who knows what could happen. So if I'm interpreting this "problem" correctly, the question is, is the formula correct. Am I there, or am I too stupid to understand what's being explained? <- highly likely...If I'm undertanding this correctly, I wish the video had just stated that at the beginning. "The problem is trying to figure out if this formula for finding perfect numbers is correct or not. Here's the formula. Here's how it works. This is why we can't solve the problem. This is why the problem is important to solve." Nope, I still don't even understand the question. Again, probably because I'm too stupid, but...if I don't understand, maybe more of your audience don't understand as well and won't choose to subscribe as I have chosen not to?>> <<@ChristianBarry-hm5my says : No way we’ve got a function, called the Sigma function>> <<@yourpal6542 says : Maybe this is my engineering brain, but what is the point of looking for these or finding them?>> <<@user-gi4uo7td7x says : "He made a new weapon. the sigma function" - famous last words>> <<@ehsanyakoobi1880 says : such a waste of time. Solving it for what, how will it be used in this world?>> <<@garylist9 says : I worked it all out. Answer is 42.>> <<@ArchDavis-rp3if says : But does this have any descriptive physical value?>> <<@dave0927 says : What about 3: odd, perfect: 1+2>> <<@SaifS.1 says : 1>> <<@davevon1786 says : Great video 😊 made me sleep very quickly 😴>> <<@progaming-kx7is says : 1 is a perfect odd number {multiple of 1 is only1 means it will not be added to any number} hence 1 is only PERFECT ODD NUMBER>> <<@pgre says : 1 is a perfect number, no?>> <<@Ghostnelius says : Yooo this here stuff goes hard>> <<@rishiaman2288 says : 1:58 endings with 6 and 8… so why would there be an odd number?>> <<@letsgobrandon6281 says : Why is there 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 in 28. 3. 5 6 don't go into 28>> <<@Shadowkxx says : Clearly the answer is "No" as the proof is obvious and simple, it is left as an exercise to the reader.>> <<@davehollis5816 says : What I've learned today is that I am not a math person, thank you Veritasium>> <<@catdash465 says : Because a perfect number is the sum of its proper divisors you can't have an odd perfect number they would always be divisable by 1, no odd number is divisable by 2 or any even number without decimilisation, therefore 1 plus another odd number or the required odd numbers would come back to an even. The odd number can only exist as the count of the divisors>> <<@gamefrom31 says : just found this channel. make math more interesting than I learn in schools>> <<@amandeepbathla says : This is probably the most interesting problem I couldn't care less about 😁>> <<@TaylorJohnson1020 says : vertasium is a fake debunker Elon Musk boot licker, He is pro scammer>> <<@ItsElior says : Did I miss anything? 198585576189 is a perfect odd number, regardless if 22021 is a prime or not. The primes are only a tool to be used in the algorithm to find perfect numbers, and as stated in the video, other ways can exist. You ended with that now we are looking for prime numbers that assist in building perfect numbers, instead of the perfect numbers themselves.>> <<@digbyjackson6233 says : Why is it that when you just add the digits in the manner Tesla does do you always get 10 then 1. Except 6 which is less than 10? 8128. 8+1+2+8=19,1+9=10,1+0=1>> <<@joanaalheiro9864 says : I’m currently studying Law and, thought I appreciate most of its aspects, I sometimes still feel like I could’ve easily pursued another line of study. I have always liked mathematics, chemistry, physics and biology, and if it weren’t for such uninspiring teachers I genuinely think my “life’s mission” would’ve been completely different. We really do need more devoted and enthusiastic teachers (and to pay them better, obviously), and boy do I wish I saw your videos when I was younger. I know it’s never too late, but I’m currently in my 3rd year of Law school, I’ve dedicated immensely, both financially and physically. The concepts that I have retained from my high school years aren’t solid enough because I spent those years uninspired and unfocused, and I haven’t neither got the time nor the monetary possibilities to simply pursue new lines of knowledge as passionately as I wished. Alas, my life is doomed to the metrics of human contractual law, possibly the abstract philosophy, and definitely by a stretch, poetry and other word and rhetoric related areas. Your work is important. Love from Portugal ❤🇵🇹>> <<@S_DeFect says : Imagine using an odd perfect number for cybersecurity reasons or crypto 💀>> <<@al-homamsalah says : But does 28 have the dividors (3,5,6)?. It's (1,2,4,7,14,28) if you add those "28 not included" it will be equal to 28 or am I missing something 🤔?>> <<@Mars5124 says : sigma function>> <<@Caeck says : 524032?>> <<@FMAxBrotherhoodXx says : Pascal Ochem is so funny. Man was just born to participate in STEM.>> <<@ankushds7018 says : Something about a mathematician quoting Edison in a favourable way is mildly off putting>> <<@jere.nurkka says : How does school manage to ruin so many interesting things? Math, language learning, science and PE?>>
VideoPro
>>