Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@davidking6986 says : Your wondering why young people call em pigs now we know facist capitalist money holders F him>> <<@jehn0 says : At what point is one man's labor done then?>> <<@maualecortes says : You shouls.go hiking to the mountains>> <<@gavxps1 says : Word salad.>> <<@crewcutter2030 says : communism and even socialism for that matter fails even if there is no corruption, for the simple reason that it hampers desire for achievement, and will eventually lead to people being lazy, and if everyones lazy, then everything just stops including basic necessities.>> <<@redrob6026 says : What a terrible thing to wish less mental wellbeing on those who are poor.>> <<@tracevandyne9860 says : Two very smart people who are dedicated to speaking the truth. I thank God for them, and pray for their well-being, and continued journey.>> <<@deansmith4928 says : Define contribute. Like those who dig the coal and those who own the coal based on historic theft.>> <<@itsamindgame9198 says : Sadly, this is completely absent the concept of charity, where CAPACITY to contribute versus need are also recognized. The worldview that this pair are agreeing on means zero compassion and those who are in vital need of help simply perish. That isn't a "society" at all.>> <<@Worldeaterosg says : Most wealthy people dont contribute a thing😂they hoard their money, it never goes back into the economy and it DEFINITELY doesnt trickle down. Honestly this multi decade long fellatio our society has had with billionaires is embarrassing>> <<@user-qu2io5ul2i says : two egoheads opinions, they just licking their supreme asses>> <<@arcangeloblues says : Everyone should have a well paid job, in way to live and not survive. Period.>> <<@douglasdavis9256 says : flip side, is where you get a world with belittled royals, who tell the peasants to eat cake.>> <<@josephgriner4749 says : We have socialism for the rich. Why should they get that taxpayer help?>> <<@ethanhansen6433 says : Yes but there should be a humane bare minimum that is easier to maintain>> <<@joostginhovenvan4671 says : I agree in case of money but not in basic needs like foodprocessor and water.>> <<@arthurwagar88 says : Well said.>> <<@ronyerke9250 says : People who have more don't necessarily contribute anything.>> <<@FlatpickingJournal says : Jesus wouldn't agree>> <<@danielgarrett7226 says : I don't give a damn if everything's equal or not. I DO give a damn if the world is distributing EVERYTHING to the top 1% of the population who has never worked a day in their lives. I'm sorry but there's a happy medium to be found here, its just that republicans are NOT looking for that medium.>> <<@ab.7272 says : This narcissistic notion of "contributing" more is beyond me, people are working for themselves not for the well-being of society... Those two narcissists are the essence of what's wrong with society.>> <<@FluidMotionEnergy says : So what, at this point we can try regardless of what u think or feel. That is blasphemous to not even try i think.>> <<@rafakaplan4630 says : There were and there is sosiet that know the advanced tecnologics but chose a frugal way of life like the incas and egiptians the problem isnot economic is moral.>> <<@MrGaleanon says : evenly distributed, no. held to a very high minimum standard? yes.>> <<@esan0715 says : Isn't this some sort of communism?>> <<@Daniel-rp7nb says : V surprised JP put this clip up with no commentary - seems he agrees?>> <<@diymicha2 says : which os a good thing. Just do the minimum, and if more, only what you really love to do.>> <<@sarahjones79 says : ❤>> <<@ImaDoGToo says : Backwards. It punishes ppl who contribute less by not helping them become someone who contributes more. They stay down and never become all they are meant to become through their contributions>> <<@mikimarkos4696 says : So you want it to be determined by pure luck? Your IQ is mostly the result of your genetics (pure luck) , the same can be said about many of your attributes that detemine welath. It's all pure luck.>> <<@piliparbotond says : Oversimplified "solution" to an otherwise difficult and complex issue. The term was "well-being", not money, not even necessarily resources. Do you think people who are well, contribute more because they have to? "Punishment for some" is a childish way of thinking about universal wellbeing.>> <<@Inferencejargon says : Jordan peterson just avoids providing substance by pulling out big words or using other non contemporary philosophers as an ethos for his own argument, among other rhetorical strategies. Absolutely nothing to learn at all from this short. No proposition at all, just an invitation to those who already agree with you to get themselves off over it. If you need the threat of being homeless or the reward of more power to get you to be of any use to the world, you're far from virtuous in any case.>> <<@johntasci8694 says : I don't want a world where wealth is so extremely heavily concentrated on a thousand or so Billionaires either. There should be no Billionaires. One extreme is not any better than the other extreme.>> <<@letterbombfilms says : It’s not about punishing the rich, it’s about creating a system where rich people earn money from work, not earn money from money.>> <<@spinanslide says : A lot of kids/young adults don't get it!>> <<@mnnic4292 says : Specially if your views are merley materialistic. A Father or Mother give very much, but seldom will say they feel punished. The way rewards satisfaction and "punishment" is considered is not materialistic. Keep advocating for an unsustainable system, some prefer alternatives, and there are many, to what we have now.>> <<@Ravinofsin says : If it were even partly distributed some problems might be solved and no one with any sort of power wants that. situational design is real.>> <<@ifitscool says : I like capitalism, I like innovation, I like that desire to push myself BUT thinking this way is so one dimensional. Laughable.>> <<@MrDufDaddy says : My employer is learning this the hard way. Production is down 30+% because they stopped holding employees to minimum production levels. As a result, the lazy make as much as the hustlers and the hustlers have either quit and found someone better to hustle for or they have become lazy and now get paid the same to do the same amount of work as the lazy.>> <<@edendman says : Yeah, but basically no one is arguing for this extreme. This is a straw man argument.>> <<@Sean-ms8hx says : I agree.>> <<@jackeown says : Define contribution please. The rich using their insane wealth to passively grow itself is not what I'd call contribution. The average CEO makes over 200x more than their median employee. That is absurd>> <<@tbonelemons8777 says : The 8020 rule will still exist. People will work in their passion industries and they will do more in accomplish more than slaving way at a job that they don't like if the pay is the same. Then all will do is work in our passions. Robots can take over the industries of actual labor and so on, and we should be living a passion driven industry of life. Not this equation of highs and lows. And who has more and it's ridiculous that I can't get you all to understand how important it is that we have an equal at least on an economical level.>> <<@bakaniellece9688 says : So i shouldnt get married..ayt thanks>> <<@davidbazet says : Lo dicho presupone que la única forma de gratificación social es la monetaria, se pueden diseñar y actualmente existen otros incentivos y castigos.>> <<@AMG1985 says : And the slithering mouth breathing Democrats are obsessed with doing exactly that!!! 🫣😬🤔🤦>> <<@StevenTucker-oy7dr says : They are correct. I just wish these fools would get out of the way.>> <<@casperwallen6443 says : I agree and get the point, but would like to add the aspect that contribution (true value creation) and monetary reward does not always correlate.>> <<@lamontt.rossjr.3101 says : Make more punish less, make less punished more ↔️ "Evenly distributed" = (you see this equal sign or symbol it mean just that😂😅) = make less punished less make, more punished more↔️ "Evenly Distributed" So it doesn't matter which way you flip it it still means the same thing so cut the BS you're just worded and it different with the same outcome😅😂 they just can join the two make more punish less make less punished more you see that everybody's greedy everybody's struggling no one can get to the top or less you're that percentage but everybody know the more you make the less your dollar so it's better to just keep the money moving and whatever whatever😅😅😂>>