<<@PatSmashYT
says :
The highest automation level should be 2
>>
<<@jcuprisi
says :
All it will take for a city to be brought to its knees is for a group of Luddites or terrorists to stand in a few crosswalks and bring traffic to a standstill.
>>
<<@AdvikTekkieTalk
says :
Meanwhile public transport is already proven to be better than cars, AND can be automated for much cheaper and is much easier as public transport such as metro doesn't require on the spot calculations, everything is planned if you know what im trying to say
>>
<<@user-kv4gj9jp4h
says :
Why not have trams everywhere instead of these it’s a waste of money land and it’s oppression
>>
<<@cardluvme
says :
Of course it's sponsored by waymo so this is the bias review
>>
<<@brucelivolsi
says :
Humans are superbly flawed... susceptible to myriad distractions, including their phones, fatigue, hunger, pain, emotion, etc. I will trust a heartless computer on the road more than a skin bag filled with blood and bone.
>>
<<@tonytriche8364
says :
Once you said "Sponsored by Waymo" I stopped. I want to see unbiased reports.
>>
<<@anstropleuton
says :
Veritasium vs. CGP Gray. Fight.
>>
<<@joeschmoe3665
says :
I just came from a video debating ever having autonomous cars because they ran over things in front of them, this is dumb and useless why not just make more trains?
>>
<<@charlesmigneault7918
says :
I despise the idea of a full automated self driving car. I have one question for anyone who thinks it's a good idea for this technology. Have you ever bought a computer that did not freeze or hang on you? I certainly never bought one despite the fact that I usually buy top of the line computers, they all end up failing, invariably, and when that happens in your office, no arme is done, but when it happens at killing speeds, then you're kind of screwed. A plane can go in every directions left, right, up, down, a car does not have those options up and down, further more a plane flying 30 thousand feet will usually not cross anything solid in it's path, the sky is a verry different place than city streets.
>>
<<@focusonkraft3333
says :
I had an idea for a video... I was thinking about photographic memory and different states of mind caused by dreams... I would really like to see this video😁😁
>>
<<@4dirt2racer0
says :
until computers are absolutely perfectly faultless theirs NOOOOO fn way im letting one drive me, or what about the kids, around other drivers. or even without other drivers... all it takes is a simple glitch or lag n u (n possibly other innocent ppl around u) wont ever get to let ur kid or mom or dad know u love them again yes obviously human drivers r also far from perfect, but it simply feels better being in control n at least having a chance of avoiding killing somebody or some poor thing, let alone ourselves
>>
<<@hamajan5886
says :
I love technology and i am looking forward for more improvements but i would never support a driverless car!
>>
<<@arcies9286
says :
Everyone calling this propaganda is braindead smh I bet they’ll all be using driverless cars in a decade or two tops
>>
<<@FireOfJagz
says :
8:45 And people call me stupid for always backing into a parking spot lol. It makes leaving the spot much easier and safer
>>
<<@jmmypaddy
says :
@Veritasium You've let me down, this channel is no longer for science and education, but simply a mode for corporate lies through stealth.
>>
<<@willardsteele4857
says :
I am disappointed. This video is miss leading and I have to assume it is intentionally so. Other companies are backpedaling on the technology. I am very skeptical that Waymo has a superior product or technology than their competitors. Veritasium to be fair and objective you should do an investigation of the driverless cars go wrong. There have been some horrible cases and ignoring this data is disingenuous.
>>
<<@kephalopod3054
says :
Find another job: truck drivers, bus drivers, cab drivers.
>>
<<@HetPatel-bh1dh
says :
15:26 how does someone run into a stationary car???
>>
<<@HetPatel-bh1dh
says :
1:09 Derek says that he likes the car didnt turn into the other cars Did he think it would have?
>>
<<@rajnagi6056
says :
Nice Propaganda video 😂 how much did they pay you?
>>
<<@Leftoftheslash
says :
There's probably someone in a conex box somewhere driving it with a joystick.
>>
<<@MS-60663
says :
This tech would also eliminate most of the road rage incidents, like brake-checking and deliberately trying to cause someone to crash. But the dark side is that this new tech will take millions of dollars from the auto-repair industry, as well as the tow truck services. Like it or not, the consequences of auto accidents puts billions of dollars into other people's pockets. And the scary bottom line is that those 40,000 American drivers who died also represented a significant movement of monies, through insurance, funeral costs, and medical/legal and emergency services. All industries that rely on pain, suffering, property damage and death to make a paycheck are not going to find this very beneficial for their bottom-line. They will secretly try to undermine this new tech for that reason. Human suffering = big bucks. Healthy humans, smart humans, happy humans, balanced and law abiding humans = broke principalities, jurisdictions and cities.
>>
<<@CountFisco
says :
Rare L
>>
<<@quicksesh
says :
Jeezus ... not even the biggest automakers are saying that the technology is mature enough to deployed. So what I am trying to say politely, you were in a 'controlled' environment that was 'rigged' to give the results that your sponsor wanted to get out to the world ... ie a steaming heap of bovine excrement has landed. BTW I read their safety brief .. it really doesn't show much good data (ie independently verified and with proper case studies) but was actually written like a prospectus for investors.
>>
<<@danielschroeder8546
says :
Planes category 3 autoland only works on category 3 Airports. So of course self driving cars would work better if the roads had sensors too.
>>
<<@ambiarock590
says :
We do need self driving vehicles, just put them on rails, add many more seats and doors, and call them trains.
>>
<<@guillaumepreudhomme4800
says :
It’s not a safety concern. It’s an economical concern. Bus and cab drivers would all lose their jobs if we switched to automatic vehicles.
>>
<<@Hunter_Bidens_Crackpipe_
says :
Hardcore shilling from the shillmaster
>>
<<@benjaminhoffman3848
says :
The biggest issue is the autonomy people lose when anybody with an internet connection can take your car from you. The government can just say you have deviant views and shutdown your car.
>>
<<@4verse79
says :
get humans off steering wheels now! all of them. btw: there was autonomous driving in the 80s already. knight rider ...
>>
<<@philstraszynski5214
says :
Isnt it time to add an update to this video .. what went wrong
>>
<<@TheBoeboe
says :
17:30 you can. Its called trains and busses
>>
<<@strategystuff5080
says :
Driverless Cars, how about better infrastructure? Any idea how much hilariously inefficient cars are in urban environments? Its such a meme.
>>
<<@user-wk7lm5gk6x
says :
WOW so amazing..I'm so proud me All people good technology.. bless you all
>>
<<@maciejd7823
says :
It's not about trusting the car when sitting inside. It's about trusting the car as a pedestrian or bicycle rider.
>>
<<@Nono-hk3is
says :
The statistic that 94% of accidents are caused by human error is irrelevant, and citing it as an argument in favor of driver automation is scare mongering! It tells me nothing about how many accidents there were, and more importantly, nothing about how many accidents there will be if the cars are automated. You get what you measure: in year X, 94% of accidents are caused by humans. In year Y, only 1% are caused by human! Amazing, we did it, folks! If we focus on this statistic, It's irrelevant that in year X the total number of accidents was 100,000 but in year Y there were 500,000 accidents.
>>
<<@Nono-hk3is
says :
Your credibility is irrevocably damaged by this video.
>>
<<@robertfox4114
says :
So where are we now, where are the self driving cars? I started disliking this video more after those years.
>>
<<@sciencehistoryandentertain734
says :
LMAO this video was an epic fail 2 years later...
>>
<<@roscoecoltrane9523
says :
This is just a big Waymo commercial. This is borderline clickbait.
>>
<<@AdInfinitumest
says :
Unsubscribed from Vertasium due to this unbalanced, poorly researched, sponsored content. Trust is hard earned and easily lost.
>>
<<@thomasslone1964
says :
a machine with one tenth the human ability to avoid accidents will still have one tenth the accidents a human would
>>
<<@vinh7889
says :
First they want electric now they want us to not even drive anymore 😂
>>
<<@IEJ7654321
says :
They already exist. Its called trains. BTW Waymo cars are everywhere in the Phoenix metro area. Chandler Tempe and Scottsdale are the areas you will see them most. They drive electric Jaguar SUVs and most of the time there is no driver in the front seat.
>>
<<@user-qo4ez7uo2f
says :
Actually technology is still 10 years behind; bcz lidars are not cheap & computation is there but if you pay 2-3x of normal car🤷
>>
<<@meh9607
says :
I do not trust the people making driverless cars, I do not trust the people using driverless cars, and in general it seems like a pointless option compared to just more trains and buses
>>
<<@petterlarsson7257
says :
please delete this video
>>
<<@TheNemocharlie
says :
Comparing elevators to vehicles is disingenuous at best. Nice and for Waymo though, if you overlook the all-in-price of $300,000 per vehicle.
>>
<<@rerun3283
says :
Dont tell me what i should want driving near me.
>>
NEXT VIDEO
>>