Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@sudiptamajumder1162 says : Hi.. my husband was watching this video which got me to the comment box. First of all Thank you for giving your precious time reading such a long comment. I am a 31 years old, married for 2 years now. Soon after marriage I started facing various problems with my in-laws. Initially problem started when they insulted my parents,my culture etc and my husband said it was just for fun. Gradually the problem grew more when my MIL started lying about me to my FIL and an incident occured when I finally raised my voice and got into a conflict with my FIL . Now both my MIL FIL started talking ill about me to friends relatives and others. My MIL did not let the servants work for me, did not let my FIL eat the food I cook, did not let me use the refrigerator, hid my food, made food only for them nd not for me, told the cook seperately not to cook for me, defamed me in public, never asked me when I am sick and finally stpped making food for me at home and the list goes on and on. All this while, I wasn’t quiet because my husband was not ready to believe these until i showed him proofs. My husband after some attempts told me that he cannot make his parents understand as it is not possible to change them in their 50’s. Previously she was doing everything behind a fake smile but now it has become like an open war. I am suffering from depression, low bp, low hemoglobin. I have got a job recently and my husband has made me a seperate kitchen because I could not survive more on outside food thrice a day. I tried to get along with my inlaws.. cooked food, took responsibilities of the household chores etc. but could not meet their expectation may be. Actually my FIL was always against our marriage but had to forcibly agree bcoz of my husband. So, my question is which point from your video should I follow?>> <<@bwilson6269 says : Hands down one of the best videos ive ever seen, and at a time in my life i desperately needed to see it....>> <<@marcg1043 says : this is lo lame. everyone learns this stuff in high school…>> <<@wallywest2360 says : While this does mirror the interactions we have sometimes it's important to note that the strategies that win the prisoner's dilemma are driven by the rules of the game. Which are simplistic. Reality isn't. Just one example, in the game you know what your opponent is doing and can react accordingly. In reality people often try to conceal their goals and actions in order to get you to cooperate when they have no intention of reciprocating. With varying degrees of success, but it does work some of the time.>> <<@fernandovelasco2874 says : Sooo.... Comunism it's the answer.>> <<@Lyle1039 says : Initially I didn't watch this because I thought it was about Matt Pat. I'm glad I was wrong.>> <<@mervinlo1837 says : It is a video that China and US government should watch, Israel and Palestine should watch, HK's Yellow and Blue Camps should watch, and so on and so on and so on.>> <<@Nick-B78 says : This is a great video and really interesting however I’d like to know how this would change depending on what I would call ‘real world’ factors. For instance, the goal of this game is to simply accumulate points, not (as other people have pointed out) to ‘win’ or ‘beat the opponent’. To be truly ‘real world’ I think it would be fascinating to see what would happen if different strategies had different goals. I ask this because in life, one person’s ‘wealth’ is another person’s ‘pittance’ so what if “Strategy A” only cared about accumulating say 50 points whereas “Strategy B” needed 150. Once StratA hits its goal, maybe it shifts strategy and becomes more willing to gamble and so throws in random defections. On the other hand, StratB might get to a point where it knows it can’t hit its goal because there’s not enough rounds left so goes for the nuclear option and just constantly defects. My point is that yes, cooperation is obviously the best option however everyone has different goals as well as different factors for choosing to defect so it would be great to see an extended version of this theory adding in different goals.>> <<@theawkwardcurrypot9556 says : The selfish gene🧬, in a nutshell>> <<@hpnospam says : @Veritasium Do you have a video about Capitalism and what seems to be true (need scientific / mathematical demonstration) about what people say: "Capitalism is based on the assumption that there is an infinite quantity of resources to rely on" that does Not work if applied to a a system with limitations like the Earth planet itself ; Exporting Capitalism to outer-space is Not going to be working any better, But just expanding to the rest of the universe the awful mess we are all experiencing more and more nowadays on Earth...>> <<@MrRolnicek says : And this is why capitalism vastly outperforms socialism every single time in the real world. Socialism is a zero sum game but capitalism is a positive sum game. In the best and perfect case (though imaginary) value is created basically voluntarily under socialism and then distributed equally among everyone (defector moves are never punished), but under capitalism every single interaction only ever goes through if both parties agree that their value will increase from that interaction. Real world being much more muddy than that of course but the results still speak for themselves. Capitalism created the middle class and socialism rutinely creates poverty and famines.>> <<@Kovelia says : 11:01 - That is not ‘forgiving’. It exerting retribution and then being satisfied with having retaliated in sufficient measure to no longer need to.>> <<@PeterR0035 says : ❤❤>> <<@umarulfarooqkm2281 says : 9:47 from here>> <<@locochicken6757 says : Dude the second round was like game theory itself lmaooo>> <<@eloohag says : 7:54 JORT STORM!!! JORT STORM'S COMIN' TONIGHT!!! JORT STORM IT'S A CATEGORY FIVE—>> <<@theblog1016 says : Anyone here realized, that why Quran mentions, "an eye for an eye" or in other words "Tit for Tat".... Uh man, Islam is truly an amazing religion.... Edit: It is in Quran in Surah Al-Ma'idah - verse 45>> <<@CJusticeHappen21 says : This really helped me figure some things out. Thank you. This is really significant.>> <<@tommcfadden5232 says : Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations, (18:35) called this behavior enlightened self interest.>> <<@weasel9062 says : This comes down to essentially high trust societies vs low trust societies. Unfortunately almost all societies right now are low trust or the case like the United States, trying to fool the bulk of their population that they can still trust the government and institutions with propaganda and lies (which eventually always fails and the situation is worse the longer it goes).>> <<@yemapu says : But prisoner dylema is just a theory. A GAME THEORY>> <<@sivadasrajan says : So it is scienifically proven that it is better to be nice than nasty>> <<@lassemogensen7099 says : I think there is a twist to explore here: My level of trust in someone else is not based solely on my interaction with that one actor. If my general experience is that people can be trusted that trust will also apply when I meet someone new. The opposite is true as well, of course. It would be interesting to look into these secondary effects, and whether they might allow "con men" to hide in high trust societies, and if yes, how many before trust breaks down.>> <<@JohnSmith-zw8yy says : Really interesting topic and video!>> <<@AsenPetrov says : The best video on the channel!>> <<@ekki1993 says : This is a very important video to remember whenever politicians and corporate propaganda keep repeating the fallacy of free market competition being "the best way forward". The historical reality, at least within science, is that most scientific advancements were driven by cooperation while most scientific scandals were driven by a profit motive in a highly competitive environment.>> <<@johnnysmith863 says : Very interesting!>> <<@newfreenayshaun6651 says : I lost SO MUCH early in life, not conforming.... NOWADAYS, IVE WON BIG TIME, NOT COMPLYING!!!😂 good things come to those who wait.>> <<@germantanco3523 says : lloré cuando se mostró que, en un mundo de bullyes, un nucldo de tip of tap podían juntarse para transformar la realidad>> <<@daniloinvernizzi5233 says : My favourite video in youtube>> <<@topi2209 says : 10 mil views and for nothing. The game designers can put any number of points as reward to get any result they want>> <<@trentpratt6187 says : Stupid stupid video>> <<@TheSamwhyte says : It’s not “game theory” - it’s the self-destructive condition of human nature. That’s what game theory is - it’s a satirical mirroring parody of the toxicity of human nature>> <<@Hakucho64 says : This video is a great summary of The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins (40th anniv. ed.), which I read a couple of months ago.>> <<@An-earthling says : Oh, that's why I lasted 8 years with my boring girlfriend. Man, we were always playing "Tit for Tat" 🤯>> <<@Longtack55 says : Anything asserting "literally" is usually Grade A boolzheet.>> <<@yashawal says : What if being nasty had 6 points instead of 5? Edit: what if the points gained were random but somewhat matches this game>> <<@Ash-ng4mn says : I think there is a flaw in the setup. Tit for tat works (like all of the strategies) in the scenario where points exist instead of actual harm. ^ side A has 100 members, side B has 10 members. Is tit = the killing of one member of the other side, the tit for tat approach ends after 10 turns. Defects are not necessarily equal to the retaliation. The aggressive strategy wins almost always.>> <<@Menschliches_Wessen says : Now this is a religion I could be part of>> <<@Menschliches_Wessen says : Danke!>> <<@daemon1143 says : Nice presentation. Most people who try to explain game theory over complicate it and the audience collapses in a pile of algebra.>> <<@jchongtk says : mindblowing>> <<@yanasitta says : Yet the evil "elites" seem to be winning at least against us.>> <<@BRADYSTANLEY-pe1ur says : I teach this game to my middle school students now. It's shown a shockingly fast turnaround in their behavior once they realized that they are going to play the game of life with me for the rest of the year. Thanks!>> <<@SmithWasAlwaysRight says : This should be primary tought in schools all over the world. This half an hour shows so much!>> <<@grimeyjg81 says : If you don't know the short clip at 24:56 of this video I highly recommend searching "Golden Balls. The weirdest split or steal ever" Such an interesting example loosely related to the topic here.>> <<@papillon1232 says : its much easier to be nice then to be nasty yet in the real world the reward of being nasty is insanely higher then the nice one. Just look at the Palestinien conflict while the natives are forgiving and must be nice only to survive they still are easily provocable and act similar to a tic for tac yet they are completly dominated by a nasty strategie that acted first yet remains the one to always defect on every choice. The defecting one tho cooperates with nastier strategies in order to survive making the world a nasty world looking out for the nasty while farming the nice strategies for their ressources>> <<@aneeshad7435 says : At around 16:35, what is a generation?>> <<@MohitYadav-qp7ri says : Great video...loved that defect sound...bonnkkkk😂>> <<@nathanespinoza6327 says : Okay, what happens when there are not 2 players, but over 200 simultaneously, vying for not endlessly replenished coins.. but a rapidly shrinking supply, and just ONE of them Defects? Its easy to decide "okay lets not kill each other," much harder to relinquish your prosperity, even your life, for the sake of 200 potential defectors. Thats our world, and that's where Christianity comes in, yet not once has it been implemented according to its code in any lasting way, we are in need of a divine programmer to rewrite the system. I wish people without faith in God the best in their optimism for humanity. Until then I will "wait expectantly on Jehovah" Ps. 37:7>>