I mean it's cool and all. But on the other hand it's gonna ruin lots of jobs and that's sad 😢
@frankyy5091 Says:
Is zora available now?
@rayhanhajlaoui9919 Says:
There's a research area called deepfake detection that I'm actually working on one of it's fields. The concept here is that we create an AI that can detect AI-generated voices, videos, or images. So maybe in the future social media apps can process every uploaded piece of content to see if it's AI-generated. Then, they could label the content accordingly, perhaps with a note on the post itself or a YouTube video saying "This video contains AI-generated content." for example.
@bluezy710 Says:
Many people don't see this yet but it will come a day when the human body of the masses will be considered completely useless for the workplace in general other than individuals who can strategize in their industries and people who create AI, manage AI, troubleshoot AI and strategize AI. Start owning your robot fleet from now.
@TakinArrowsToTheKnee Says:
How long until video evidence will no longer be admissable in court?
@eldiestro1990 Says:
maybe in your case this tech will give you advantage instead of competition. Because you have the ARTIST asset in you, the reason why a piece of paper and a bunch of uneven shapes painted on it with low precision and no realism worth thousands of dollars😎
@carlosricardoziegler2650 Says:
Amazing content, only to remember today we have OpenAI Spring Update, lets see what coming :)
@JesumariaeBelleza Says:
This was used to ruin the reputation of our priest. We need help to explain the truth and not just to believe what was done to AI to just to ruin one’s total self.
@dookula Says:
Without precision and control for the user, this technology isn't going to take off. Same with generative AI images in general. After a bit of observation, the same-o quality of the footage becomes quite clear. This technology has a built in expiration date
@AetinaJackal Says:
These are impressive, but even the "most convincing" you described has a severe flaw: at 5:43, the trail behind him from disturbing the white sandy soil as he's walking just stops. The flaws are definitely subtler... They're most apparent with physics and character's interactions with the environment. They're things that would be missed without a keen eye obviously...
@DocReasonable Says:
Soon we'll be able to ask for a full movie including all of the elements that we are guaranteed to enjoy
@MichaeLSwagTV Says:
That´s the sign we need to go back to the traditional lifestyle. I don´t feel like living anymore with all this stuff. It´s like a prison and you´re not allowed to feel or be human.
@marquisforefather8929 Says:
I'm a rapper if you need music for your content let me know. You can edit the clips however u choose. I'll be a nice project for you
@SquirrelGamez Says:
This is very impressive!
Of course the better it gets, the longer it will take to get better, so the next year of progress won't be even close to the same amount of improvement from Will Smith spaghetti... but still. Give it a few years and it will be near-flawless.
@MyTv- Says:
Impressive! Gonna be a good creative tool. Also gonna get us to question authenticity.
@brotherhoodtake2 Says:
Many artists who animate are also targeted.
@kurtdewittphoto Says:
I want to see Sora's version of the Shaq Shaker Shamillion
@l.5832 Says:
It's almost like you could sit a princess on a bench and talk about her health......
@Andreas-ov2fv Says:
"This is the worst the technology is going to be from here on out"
That just isn't necessarily true.
1. They ripped off a LOT of video in order to make this. Probably including yours. Someone's going to take them to court for that. Corporations have spent decades honing copyright law; now they're going to regret it.
2. AI generated "art" can't be copyrighted. That means you won't be able to buy AI-generated stock footage. You'll have to "make" it yourself. Which, once they start charging you an actually profitable price for it, is going to be expensive as hell. Think medicine expensive.
3. Once AI starts eating AI-generated content, it gets less creative, less responsive. In text, this means words get repeated more often, and styles start to break down or merge. In video it's unclear what this means, but I expect you're going to see a lot of the same styles of footage, framing, lighting, virtual lenses, etc.
4. Lack of editability. You're not going to get this material in LOG or RAW. You're not going to be able to color correct it properly, or grade it. In fact, you're probably going to get a finally compressed result.
@gump8585 Says:
I would like to see them recreate the same type of video. Interacting with somebody consuming spaghetti is a difficult video even now for AI
@phillipcoetzer8186 Says:
2:49 her feet are sliding
@CannaSama Says:
Just think of how different life will be for the childs being born right now
@ArkhamCityIsGOATproveMeWrong Says:
2:24 just love how she switches her legs around.
@past_the_event_horizon Says:
Man this is scary
@articobum3878 Says:
its starting to feel like blender is useless now
@articobum3878 Says:
there goes my job again
@ashtoncartner Says:
2:39 the girl's legs swap places and everyone occasionally does a lil' shuffle.
@alexm.a.d892 Says:
Wow this sounds like a terrible thing
@cyberjunk7258 Says:
they change a lot
@shieldgenerator7 Says:
plot twist: this whole video was AI generated
@martythebeaglenese9023 Says:
2:26 her left and right legs completely switch mid-step. Also, the feet are never stying in one spot while on the ground. Sora still has some way to go (thankfully)
@venuecam Says:
Opens Open AI: "solve world hunger"
@stephenrasberger6807 Says:
It will be funny when creators stop providing content for AI. The AI will eat itself.
@georgeuzzle Says:
I thought for sure you were going to say this whole video was AI generated at the end. I'm paranoid already.
@tubester358 Says:
For me the distinction is mainly around cool, high quality content versus production-ready content. There's always a lot more consideration from the professional artist, designer or editor than just "a cool drawing" or "smooth footage" when doing something upon request, considerations that their client might not thing of in terms of handing off the right deliverables (files/items) and additional guidelines about how to effectively use them/present them. AI can generate stuff but someone needs to be able to determine which of those generations are the best to use & how to tweak them.
AI tooling will mostly be useful for fun (personal content) and for creative professionals to use as part of their process, but the right tooling for those professionals will take the longest to develop well unfortunately, and in the meantime attention-focused social media algorithms will necessitate saturating that content market with lower quality stuff.
@Orangemushroom554 Says:
Lol now youtuber jobs are getting replaced by AI
@lestershenk924 Says:
I like it. 😊
@valentinhetzel4422 Says:
Her legs are smoothly switching sides 02:25
@mtjoy747 Says:
I imagine AI slowly gradually taking over everyone's jobs, so we can all enjoy this endless "retirement" more LOL - if some cricket players retire at 30, how about the rest of us doing the same?
@FeZaCx Says:
this is just crazy... speechless
@Mr.French.Fries. Says:
a trustable and unremovable watermark huh?
I think that's only possible if the watermark is spread throughout the video instead of just a corner.
and for that to not cause disruption in viewing experience,
maybe the watermark will hafta be a specific identifiable number and pattern of particularly distinguishable colored pixels spread throughout, say every square cm of AI generated videos,
or an even smaller area to make sure cropping a specific required portion becomes entirely useless since the smallest meaningful cropped portion will still contain that identifiable pattern that would act like an unremovable QR-like watermark that will be able to identify the software and prompt used and the generator of the image. Designing an AI that can read these watermarks will be a fairly easy task, the working will be similar to QR scanners but way more complex.
such watermarks will cause no viewing disruption since they will be on the scale of individual pixels.
ofcourse there will be prolems of somehow keeping these watermarks working across different resolution conversions but that's not really a big deal give that we've already come this far.
screen-recording will still contain these watermarks and so the only way to effectively get rid of the watermark would be to shoot the screen using another camera which is perfectly distinguishable from an actual video, so people will automatically not believe such videos given the obvious effort to get rid of the watermark.
what do ya think?
@DanielVerberne Says:
Serious question - does this tech concern CGI artists in any way? Is it a potential tool for anyone wanting to tell stories to knock up quick visualisations that could then be taken further, or is possible AI tool descendants of the ones we have available now might eventually be able to 'ingest a detailed screenplay-like prompt' and produce, for lack of a better word; a movie?
@DanielVerberne Says:
To what extent are these models producing far greater results because there's an exponentially greater sum total of material for them to ingest and 'learn' from? I'm assuming there's been far more actual improvement within the model itself than just the data available to it, but that could be part of the answer.
My understanding is that these models know nothing about humans or animals or planets or cheesesteaks, they know about language and the mapping language to images and patterns they've been given examples of, times many billion.
@Zoeincredible Says:
More job losses. We'll have to conform to the future in order to survive.
@misurebanks1538 Says:
Those "flaws" you pointed out was only pointed out because you know it's AI.....you would have never ever acknowledged the frame rates in the freakin reflections...😂😂
@Dave_the_Dave Says:
There is a downside for some roles for artists and producers and photographers and technicians. But at the same time, this technology massively increases accessibility for people who have a creative vision and limited resources to realize it. But you could say the same thing about other creative tools that have made artistic expression easier: Digital cameras instead of film. Cheap drones instead of helicopters. Red video cameras instead of huge film cameras. Cell shaded animation instead of hand-drawn animation. Imagine if young Stephen Spielberg had tools like this. The equivalent kids are out there right now and this type of technology lowers the barriers for people to make their feature length films, or new types of art projects we haven't conceived of.
I am on the side of making creative expression more accessible for all.
@unclemercy Says:
could tell it was fake when he was reading on the cloud because his hair was different and also anyone who has sat on a cloud knows that its more like a beanbag.
@josephkamo1324 Says:
Shower thought: AI doesn’t generate images or videos but takes prompts that align with a real action/event happening in another dimension🫨
@symonjamesmusic Says:
Thank you for such a great run through, explaining, exploration. Subbed and look forward to future adventures.
LATEST COMMENTS