Image if we could use it to propell let’s say a spaceship
@jakub-stachu Says:
If protons are sped up to 99.93% speed of light and then they both collide, do they collide at 199,86% the speed of light?
@asum7786 Says:
Me: I think I'm a reasonably smart person
Meanwhile smart people:
@lorenzomuraro8496 Says:
i'm sure dott perèz was hiding the cigarette
@cemuka88 Says:
“Antimatter” is a ridiculous term, because there's no such thing as “matter”!! (particles) What we perceive as matter is merely a state in the quantum universe that we can perceive and measure... There is no matter; there are only forms of energy.
@mimika9541 Says:
Ah yes, The Radiation will kill you!
@inbuiltmonk Says:
They should sell some of their antimatter and build another BIGGER accelerator
@MananAnwar Says:
It is hard to imagine that this level of script, editing and animation quality is available to watch free.
@HackedToaster Says:
Duh, to flatten cities of course
@BaronWictor Says:
53:50 for the simulation
@CRAIGB-h4p Says:
Should we start with a more basic question? Determine whether all the spirals are clockwise or counterclockwise.
@CRAIGB-h4p Says:
Sounds like the behavior of a Black Hole.
@MrArron1357 Says:
I'm antipositive about this
@afterthesmash Says:
This is the kind of clickbait title that turned me against Veritasium.
It's now titled: _If dropping 0.1 grams of antimatter destroys a city, then why are we making it?_
Are we "making it"?
No, we are not. We have almost certainly not manufactured 0.1 grams of antimatter in the whole of human history.
Here's a title for a follow-up episode, which retains the same spirit:
_If CO2 will soon destroy the planet, why do people continue to burn candles?_
Once upon a time, Derek, your channel was a beacon of light, and you fought the good fight. Now you work your ass off to find a way to make your users more stupid, before the shock and awe spectacle of pulling your own blinders off of their eyes.
@89qwyg9yqa34t Says:
Why else would we be making antimatter? -- boil water, obviously.
@mashinajoe Says:
Big bang garbage. Pure lies 😂
@DoodiePunk Says:
What can we do with antimatter and do we all have clones of us in a mirror universe?
@ssthrillsbharat Says:
7:19 found a miss, "no stuff around us" includes us too. So there should be no stuff any where!
@Animator.X-v Says:
16.000.000 km slow 😅
@SENATORPAIN1 Says:
2:28 Can you smell what Dirac is cooking?
@JustinRoberts-hc5xl Says:
🐊 of 💩
@Sandra-h1z5h Says:
I don't know, so maybe you could bomb Iran, Russia, China, and the rest of the world so that you can kill innocent people.
@sheikhibteshambhuban9556 Says:
Where is Derek? I don't like this other guy
@ReDwHaLe_V2 Says:
Anti madde madde ile etkileşime girmiyor,
Öyle ise tekeri patlayan bir bisiklet tekeri kadar etkisi olmaZ!
@Fkd-About-Found-Out Says:
why would the good guys make weapons that can destroy the world, again......
maybe because they arent good guys?
@RonDaGreatEst.93 Says:
What part of the video recites the rituals???
@HowToJoshShorts Says:
How does this have so many views it's completely boring regardless of the fact that it's an interesting subject this is so poorly worded I don't think very many people would have the attention spans to continue watching this after the first 10 minutes or the interest.
The more I listen to this kind of stuff and the higher Sciences in math the more I laugh because these people are wasting their lives trying to discover things that exist despite the fact that you understand them or not and I think technology has corrupted Humanity more than it has helped and it's definitely assisted those who want to control in manipulating the masses.
You're wasting your life explaining things that are irrelevant because they already exist despite the fact that you understand them or not and you can still use them whether or not you're ignorant of their inner workings which you guys are proving you will never truly understand anyway you keep rewriting your rules and laws every so many years it's pretty hilarious...
@dannyarcher6370 Says:
Somewhere out there anti-Veritasium is calling US anti-people.
@dannyarcher6370 Says:
“Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.”
@Esehrk Says:
Why are they making it? To destroy cities, duh.
@gokukakarot6323 Says:
This is what tony stark made. So its not a nuclear reactor, its a small big banger
@Robert-oe7uh Says:
No one is asking the important questions. When are we getting anti-matter ICBM's? why destroy a city when you can level an entire continent. Just imagine what 20,000 pounds of anti-matter would do
@mclark23 Says:
What about the froth that exists in empty space. Will it anhiliate antimatter or have no reaction????
@dannyspangle Says:
It’s all an antimatter of opinion.
@TheDainerss Says:
The ending was perfect, you found the most polite way to say, "All you end of the world nut cases are bonkers." when they started claiming that CERN and the LHC were going to destroy the Universe or create a black hole that would suck the solar system up.
@yurikha Says:
it kinda sounds like stable diffusion inference
@iihta12 Says:
cern??? do are they by any chance trying to make a time machine?
@FractalStinger Says:
Why dobthey still want it,vecause ,just like gambling addiction,theres power addictions to that blinds the intelligeant.😅
@Stephendedalous Says:
How many bananas does it take to make an eighth of a gram tho
@MrVolksbeetle Says:
Does that mean events play out the same way no matter which direction time is flowing? Maybe what I'm asking is if you were to "go back in time" you would appear back where you started/not move at all?
@Galileo406 Says:
Antimatters can potentially be used in Weapons which can become terrifying
@myrddrral Says:
Why make it?
For the Seventh Weapon.
(Invader on My Back, Phillip E. High.)
@josephmalter670 Says:
Who is the new Oppenheimer going to be and what will they develop?
@kaslo1462 Says:
The fact that "Antimatter Factory" is a thing.
@KINGSHORTIKS030 Says:
if you got hauptschulabschluss hit me up
@RobertSullens-dh6bz Says:
why not use an antineutron which probably exists? instead of anti hydrogen
@satomiller Says:
👍
@nightingale9425 Says:
Well.. maybe what we are useful just a more stable form of the energy. Like.. compounds sometimes have more stable states, what if antimatter is just a less stable state so that's why it didn't stick around long enough for tgere to be a 1:1 ratio? Idk
@oneiroclaud Says:
I'm an engineer, and I consider myself reasonably educated and intelligent. I've probably watched thousands of educational videos, from this channel and many others, ranging from physics to biology, engineering to psychology, chemistry to astrophysics. It takes a lot to impress me.
And yet, rarely have I ever felt so small, so humbled, and so dazzled by the heights humanity can reach as I did while watching this video’s explanation of how an anti-atom is made.
LATEST COMMENTS