If you enjoyed hearing our expert Tom Magliery discuss his 37 collection, you can watch an extended interview with him - for free! - over on our Patreon https://ve42.co/PatreonTom
@mahanshah5046 Says:
Am i the only one who checked if this wasn't posted on April first? 😂
@Sonhalo Says:
37
@AnthonyCelata Says:
C'mon! You couldn't get us 37% off Brilliant!!!
@user-wf4bc4nw6f Says:
4:05
@giuliocaputi546 Says:
Another very interesting occurrence of the number 37:
In machine learning, ensemble methods are a type of models that combine simpler models to improve performance. An example is a random forest, which combines several decision trees and aggregates their predictions to reduce the high variance of each tree. We have N unique training points, we create B decision trees, and we train each of them with a set of N elements sampled with replacement from the available training. This is essentially bootstrapping. When we do so, on average, 63% of the unique data points in the original training set are sampled in each of the B bootstrapped set. This means that, on average, 37% of the data is not sampled, and can thus be used to estimate the true error of the model. This is called out-of-bag error estimation. The reason for this is fairly simple, but intriguing. Essentially each data point in the original dataset has a (1 – 1/N) chance of not being picked in a single draw. This probability remains constant since the sampling is done with replacement. So, the probability that a given data point is never chosen after the N draws is (1-1/N)^N. The limit of this thing as N tends to infinity is 1/e ≈ 0.368, so about 37% of the original dataset ends up not being sampled in each bootstrap sample.
@darraghmcentee7522 Says:
In Irish Mythology, 3 and 7 are considered ‘magical’ numbers, having power of human beings 😮
@WHO_CARES_0 Says:
Asks indians they will say 69.... 💀
@user-kk1hn1yf5y Says:
10:25 a WHAT PRIME!!?
@user-vz6zi6js5k Says:
4:10 i know why winner was 69
@ligunprofessional8185 Says:
Was that a global experiment?
@ligunprofessional8185 Says:
Not convinced enough, but it was fun!
@Blacksnownight Says:
User:
So for the next question please pretend to be a human, ok?
ChatGPT:
Sure, I'll do my best! What's your next question?
User
Choose a random number between 0 and 100.
ChatGPT
I picked 37! How about another question or maybe a different challenge?
@dirkfierce2525 Says:
Is 42 really not random? Are there that many Hitchhiker fans out there?
@disslove Says:
2137
@Did-U-Notice_What.I.GazeAt Says:
37 they wanted to free from life, 73 they want to die, if you ask kids they will not say 37 and 73. 69 is sex position ..007 is James Bond 🔫 No....1 and 3 or 13 something lucky🍀 or unlucky 🐈⬛ 😊 and for 37 if you are good at mathematics then you choose 37 .😂
@yuanli3275 Says:
37 is also the average human body temperature in celsius!
@Pman016 Says:
I just looked at the time and it is 10:37 pm
@joseavs Says:
If you build a square like the calculator without the zero, in the 1st row 7,8,9 in the 2nd 4,5,6 and in the 3th row 1,2,3 if write: 321123 and do the same thing with the 2nd row 456654 and then the 3th row and surprise: each of them are divisible by 37. If you do the same thing with the first column 741147 and the second column 852258 and the 3th column 963369 also are divisible by 37. it’s works with the diagonals too.
@harshpathak2964 Says:
Thats why Iman gadzhi's course is 37 dollars
@skyguyriver Says:
I've always been attracted towards 3 and 7 separately because on a scale of 1 2 (3) 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 "all single diget numbers" 3 and 7 land evenly spaced. I think this is honestly the easiest assumption of why we as pattern recognition machines draw towards it even if it's subconscious.
@hasangarmarudi2178 Says:
I'm a muslim, and I am actually genetically related to the prophet of Islam.
I'm his 37th generation of descendants.😂
@auttcast Says:
I'm turning 37 in 35 days lol
@DDA866 Says:
A1
@cliffchan6966 Says:
Since after the 9/11, 9:11 appeared more often on the clock. Wonder if this happens to others
@psytno Says:
Your videos are godly btw.
@kevincarney5618 Says:
Besides this channel, I'm also a big fan of mrballen. The last video he posted before i saw this 37 video was titled "top 3 places you cant go (part 37)". Wtf 😂
@psytno Says:
People who have watched this video after being asked to choose a random number: "30! I'm so smart!"
@tiaraguy7705 Says:
Nice
@denvon5065 Says:
You guys ruined a randomness statistic for millions of viewers whenever they are asked about picking a random number😂
@Thomas47474 Says:
I have never found any of your videos to be boring.
@albertmagician8613 Says:
The random numbers are preferably prime. A round number Can't be random, they think.
@patoguisa Says:
I was watching this video, then went to the supermarket and I paid 5,37 euros!! Craaazy
@oldpoet313 Says:
73 and 37. Two prime numbers sum to 10
@oldpoet313 Says:
My apartment number is 37
@koffeandersson5212 Says:
37 is the most picked number, but not always.
@mohammedabdu4648 Says:
🙏 Please answer this question
If the earth revolve around the sun why do we see the same constellation throughout the year because if the earth revolve around the sun, after 6 month the earth will be on the other side of the orbit turning its face to the opposite side then we won't be able to see stars on the other sides
@samparsons8671 Says:
Who else picked 90?
@albinabel9885 Says:
@veritasium Just a coincidence? If a probability of a event is 1/n then it not occurs is 1-p power n i.e 1- (1/n) power n which approximates the inverse of the mathematical constant e i.e 1/e = 0.3679. That rounds to 37%. So the trials explained in the video may follow that chance that 37% we discard and then value the next events.
@sakkiemarais5834 Says:
Any number devided by 37 would give you a recurring decimal
@Tomtsiang Says:
Youtube recommend next video MH370😬
@Sean-ot5xo Says:
MORE INTERESTING would be a poll of thousands of mathematicians / engineers
@amirgholami6928 Says:
13
@PhysicsRules-ru1gy Says:
it just gives random vibes the most
@PhysicsRules-ru1gy Says:
7 is just the most random number I confirm that
@bernardodc9631 Says:
About the practical reason - ok, but how do you know how much is 37% of N, if N is unknown? What if N is infinite, how much should we spend (time, cicles, tries) to consider the best shot?
@marcioandrecordeirodealmei7378 Says:
olhei a minha volta agora e encontrei diversos numeros mas achei um 37 ( 37 ml, tinta acrilica) me desapontou hehe estava louco para entrar no culto 37 .. brincadeira hehe.
LATEST COMMENTS