Use code veritasium at https://incogni.com/veritasium to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan.
@wavelineusa Says:
The way the images get blurrier and blurrier the deeper you zoom really sells the journey — such a brilliant buildup to the final reveal. You can feel decades of engineering in every single frame.
@KingBuki Says:
Und wer hat es erfunden? Die Deutschen wie alles ....
@angelica1981 Says:
Molecular structure is neat science seeing how the world is held together but it does make you wonder what keeps atoms and molecules together is perfect order
@clauuZedch Says:
Ver atomos es muy dificil, es como ver gas... es mas facil ver gotas...
@OznayLeaf Says:
17:34 they spent all of this time for a difference that 99% of normal people won't even notice
@lipton_manbrofficial Says:
11:50 verity is watching
@naitosan1984 Says:
Proof god is dead
@aaronwatkins8973 Says:
My mass (135lbs) x my velocity (0mph) = I dont exist...
@jammerskank2849 Says:
I always ask myself this because if there infinite maximum size than there can be infinite smallest smallest size because you could always half a measurement
@leethomas7659 Says:
Tech.
Squeezing out God day by day!
@Homa_avgeek Says:
6:52 our eyes
@Atlas-loves-gaming Says:
11:48 hey it’s me it’s verit- I’ll stop sorry
@LucasWilber-i2c Says:
I honestly thought that taking pictures of atoms that is unrelated to microscope related hurdles: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Which by the way in case any of you are not familiar or just need a quick review: in this context, the more certain you try to measure a particle's position its momentum becomes more uncertain and vice versa.
Though in this specific situation, I guess I was wrong though.
Though, Veritasium producers should have mentioned it. Uhh.... oops 😅
After all when you use a microscope (or even just simply seeing stuff) you alter a particle's position and momentum or perhaps collapse it's wave function in Copenhagen terms or the many-worlds interpretation(depending on how you look at the problem).
@RV4LyfeR Says:
Keep zooming and you will see a tiny world
@jeesusteippi Says:
With what i know, wouldnt the smallest thing there is be quarks?
@ChessScholarOfficial Says:
This is probably nothing, but if you pause at 20:00, you can see some interesting 3D patterns if you look at the atom dots like an autostereogram.
@xionedadib717 Says:
yooo thats a bird no its rowan from viva la dirts,,,oh nope a look alike
@TinyniT Says:
why does jeremy fragrance know so much about electron microscopes
@ashuvst3 Says:
I have a small doubt.
We have studied that atoms are mostly empty inside with just nucleus at the centre and electrons going around it.
In the image shown we see the complete atom as whole. So what is that shell of atom? Atoms doesn't have shells, it's just electrons moving around.
How are we able to see the complete shells in the image?
@Emdaateaxuje1 Says:
Hi! I'm from Turkey and I've been watching your videos for a long time. I really enjoy your content, especially the videos that have Turkish dubbing. I just wanted to say that it would be amazing if more of your videos were available in Turkish. There are a lot of people here who love science and your channel, and I think it would help many of us learn and enjoy your content even more. Thanks for all the
@letsgobrandon1013 Says:
There is a Documentary if you shrink far enough you go into the Quantum Realm.
@Thepianoboyy-Shafeer Says:
Mmm… wonder when we will see plank lengths under a microscope 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
@DeanChadwick-g7u Says:
Forget the fiction but imagine having the ability to shrink down to the Planck scale of size
@DeanChadwick-g7u Says:
Could the Planck length squared be a pixel of our reality we see
@Lordjon85 Says:
I don't get where it would end if you have something then you can always split it in half
@ovadiaschechter381 Says:
Understanding ❌
Trusting ✅
@xdkzGD Says:
11:46 :)
@Alfa-fi4of Says:
20:01 atom
@FDemeis Says:
Dude's pony tail is giving me anxiety
@Oolnozaegsec2 Says:
How do you post a freaking masterpiece of a video every week? Holy smokes have you been killing
@SamRandumguy Says:
That’s what makes me believe in god and that its all a simulation coz their’s a continuous limit to our knowledge.We might in a 100 years be able to zoom upto say 10^(10000000), but will never reach the end coz it doesn’t exist. This loop has the analogy with any video games you make. Coz no matter what, the character can’t come out of screen and touch you.
@SillyInquiries Says:
TLDW: No.
@spaceimagine-m5b Says:
im looking at atoms rn lol
@diggre Says:
Short answer, NO. The planck distance keeps us from zooming in indefenitly.
@FactAtlasiQ Says:
Interesting 🧐
@lieberman12 Says:
8:00 yujiro?
@Intheclouds-rj9pl Says:
Verity
@percival1137 Says:
I believe if you zoom in enough, you wind up looking at the top of your own head as you look at a screen or lens that is zooming in. Crazy, huh.
@SamSabrin Says:
No. Next question.
@N3wKiddo Says:
Dude I’m researching this over for about the 7th time it’s just such an awesome video, and correct me if I am wrong, but the song at 11:50 is the same one that the Verity mod uses. Anyone know the name? Edit: Ok who the frick liked this plz just tell me the song.
@lumanee Says:
I still cant fathom being able to see an atom. You know the thing we are made of. But can we see the neutrinos and other elements
@melvinsmiley8136 Says:
Wow. The first one who actually can see an Atom.
@navalsheth Says:
After 100 years of work we see dot patterns similar to my bedsheet.
Wake me up when u see moving roatating electrons
@joshuabowers9721 Says:
This video has 30 million views dude. I’ve seen it probably twice. Can you recommend something else?
@BattleUndy Says:
Im kinda really lazy I just want a yes or no answer ✌️
@AllKindBlenderStuff Says:
18:20 deep town music mentioned
@LibertyDankmeme Says:
12:28 wait -the allies were bombing universities ? i thought they were the good guys ....
LATEST COMMENTS