Get your exclusive NordVPN deal here https://NordVPN.com/veritasium and try it risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!
@frenchieguy-04 Says:
English is not the language I talk in , I don't understand physics and I understand it
@suthmo Says:
Does the light slow down when it hit's a window and then step on the gas on the other side 🤣
@BramWaals-r3h Says:
And what if we assume we move an electron and positron away from eachother, but in fact only bend the space around it so it looks like they are apart but still next to eachother.. same goes for all other parts moving apart..
@mine3minion123 Says:
darkness
@JustinRoberts-hc5xl Says:
Yes it’s called darkness
@ovoxochris88 Says:
Oh look, another scientist suddenly dies after challenging the status quo.
@kendurham5684 Says:
God travels at the speed of thought. Beat that.
@oreothelorreo Says:
John bell is my dads name
@eddiemudie952 Says:
0:09
bro they actually said "okay boomer" to ALBERT EINSTEIN
@DrSherlock_HG Says:
My subscriber count
@dengeleng7825 Says:
It may seem fantastic but I think everything we learn in the future helps us to create the past. We learn from our own creation. Its a circle. The egg was there before the henn and in the same time the henn was there first. 😂
@dpepa8480 Says:
6:12 you lost me when you started asking the woman for advice
@pedrorabitti2618 Says:
The most concise conclusion of Bell's theorem is that if local realism exists (in terms of the EPR paradox definition), then there is no statistical independence in the measurements. That's it. No need for many words, or the need for non-locality. That is the basis of superdeterminism, or as I like to call it, just plain old-fashioned determinism.
I find it interesting how such a prestigious channel overlooks one of the theorem's most important conclusions, leading people to believe that one must accept non-locality.
@lirmchip Says:
Imagination travels much faster that light
@IsraelSadovnik-v9d Says:
Faster than the speed of light
In the case of superposition, the entanglement distance does not matter. They occur instantaneously due to a speed faster than the constant c=1 … I know that moving at a speed faster than the constant speed of light is "extremely illogical"… It was once said, "The Titanic will never sink."
@soeyeaung2699 Says:
understanding is running away from me taster then speed of light.
@Jerome-f2v Says:
I need to get high for this
@aliozgurargunsah9251 Says:
I wonder what would Einstein think about the Many Worlds Interpretation of QM...
@limil0 Says:
I wonder ; should 2 particle always be local to entangled or is it possible to entangle them in the distance ?!
@Shathicartoon9 Says:
Will you be able to get a lift to the megaladon warning please if you can get a quote on it please please please please let us know if you need anything else to do it is a bit more important to us both if we have to go out and go for them and then we will have a look and then I will let him do push out the door to be honest and I 6.30am 6.30pm get the to do the megaladon and I can go back home with d if she is happy to come to you or not lol I don't want to go out with d or not like that I am not a person I want to do anything to get help her get say that she was so bad that I don't have any more than a week ago and she said it is a not of more yeah with I he you
@xcalamityog3743 Says:
Shadows and abstract patterns
@adammesheia Says:
Functions do not mathematically collapse , unless there is something making it collapse physically the functions never collapsed we simply view one result of it. “Measuring” is not magic it is simply another form of interaction or entanglement( edit I finished the video) yes that is how we end up with the many worlds interpretation but maybe the many worlds is not the right interpretation of the wave function never collapsing 🤷
@goedelite Says:
It is late (where I am!) and my first reaction to the collapse of the wave function as a violation of the limited speed of light as c or even of its finite magnitude is that the wave function is not something physical. It is a mathematical characteristic that describes the new state of the electron after passing through the double slit. P.A.M. Dirac describes a particle, but not as did Newton: a geometrical point in three dimensions and in in time. It not a Newtonian point but rather a QM-ical state. It is not described as a point in space-time but rather as a mathematical wave function or as a QM-ical state. As such it has characteristics that are far more complex than a point: namely those of a solution to the Schrodinger equation. As Richard Feynman put it, the character is more complicated than a point. One may not like it, but that is the way it is! Prof. Einstein did not like it; but I don't believe he could do anything about it. I shall have to read more to see if more recent physicists have been more successful !
@Lilith-x2l Says:
So yeah. Theory. The earth keeps spinning for a bit. Not fast, but it doesn't just fly off. It needs a moment to realize the sun isn't there anymore. And it would seem like a regular Tuesday! Until the earth realizes the sun isn't there.
@Qiangyu Says:
Could quantum mechanics perhaps move in the 4th dimension?
If something moves in 3 dimension, then for the world that exists in 2 dimensions, there’s only one moment to detect something along the 2 dimension field.
I’m just an idiot.
@John-v5h5o Says:
To me the problem with Many Worlds would seem to be conservation of mass. If we are continually branching off into infinite possible alternate worlds then aren't nearly infinite quantities of matter/energy being continually generated?
@FishlegStudio Says:
3:06 "After Einstein fixed gravity..." !!
@Ryan01111 Says:
Madam Wu 😂 😂 😂
@Carter-s4v3e Says:
Yeah my sperm💔💔
@nicolaskrinis7614 Says:
What are you talking about? He literally discovered QM and won a Nobel Prize on the photoelectric effect. The Many Worlds theory is almost dead, along with string theory. A wave in QM is not a function, the wave is mathematically explained as a wave function. Einstei did not come up with the Double Slit Experiment.
Do better next time, because these false facts were all spouted within the first 4 min of the video, when I stopped watching it.
@kennethvaughn8884 Says:
Why can’t you just look at the interference with a mems Wyco veco and not let it know you’re looking?
@niteconx Says:
There is no two-location fact until an interaction makes one.
@neghurts_sobad Says:
If light from sun takes 8 minutes to arrive earth, and I'm already in earth, then I'm prob more faster than it
@巴拉克·蒂达克·塞博克 Says:
I dont even know what he is talking about but sure and aint no way all these 14 million people pass calc 3
@ColeHarbison Says:
We were all mated before we were created so it is certainly the local connection that determines what the mate does. It's not something that happens after the fact faster than the speed of light
@CharmuletArbalate Says:
Anything organic going faster than the speed of light will break up atoms and go in different directions.
It's better to go into a worm hole.
You can go from one end of the galaxy to another in seconds while you feel like your standing still
@cliftonsullivan Says:
i’m confused -> around 30 minutes when the positron and electron are trying to pick answers to their questions to fool the researchers into thinking they obey quantum mechanics. i thought that the local explanation was that they each have opposite spin directions and that’s all the information they need. why are they choosing answers to questions instead of just agreeing “i spin in this direction you spin in that direction.” is that not enough information for them to pass the test?
@urban.gritty Says:
yes there is something faster than the speed of light : mom slipper 😀
@SimonCaleb-y1r Says:
Is there a word for me to use that just sits right at the middle between understanding and not understanding
@martellmarshall2152 Says:
The instant message analogy just explains space time
@حسينروني-ش2ث Says:
so amazing
@sinanvarsi Says:
For those who don't understand
This man decided to explain some sht in nerd language and he means to say "electrons are faster bc they're instant but they don't even have a speed at all so light us the fastest alongside gravity which they both share the exavt same sht of speed"
So basically
Electrons travel what we call information energy thourgh each other which makes the distance zero
But speed is found by distance in a speed
So instant is out of speed equations
Hope this helps before u spend 40 mins un nerd language
@andycartwright7972 Says:
You'd think a video about speed would be shorter.
@ssoouurraabbhh1 Says:
Choosing many world interpretations doesn't solve all the problems in unifying relativity and quantum mechanics. The biggest headache for quantum mechanics is the architecture of space. Assuming it's quantised kills the relativity, until you assume ER = EPR but even with ER = EPR, you still end up with the universe with an unlikely negative cosmological constant.
@AnOnymous-w1j5q Says:
There not only Copenhagen or Many Worlds, there is also superdeterminism.
@Scout025 Says:
Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone, that’s gotta be Crazy Stupid Love
@nothingtoseehere93 Says:
I had to rewind 28min so many times I still don’t get it
@spaxx2404 Says:
Ok, bear with me; I’m sitting in the back of a car, travelling at 60mph. I throw a tennis ball forward at a speed of say 2mph. The relative speed of the ball will be 62mph. Now, it’s been proven that space is expanding faster than the speed of light, so my argument is that if an object emitting light (sun, galaxy etc) is in that region of space then surely, the relative speed of the light is more than the “standard” speed of light!????
@shukrimesho Says:
I still don’t understand what is faster than speed
LATEST COMMENTS