TV
What we learned from the 3-body problem
What we learned from the 3-body problem
Advertisement

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

LATEST COMMENTS

@veritasium Says:
Want to restore the planet’s ecosystems and see your impact in monthly videos? The first 150 people to join Planet Wild will get the first month for free at: https://planetwild.com/r/veritasium/join If you want to get to know them better first, check out their project stopping plastic waste before it reaches the ocean: https://planetwild.com/r/veritasium/m34
@richardlovato6301 Says:
But don't we use that equation for multipul gears on a single drive right but still the three it does come to three but in a touch potentials but in a grav and electric that can be subject to the individual potential to each first
@richardlovato6301 Says:
But that the two theory's of gravity and magnetic well to find planets that function in a total environment that we could not live on just due to the diamonds falling down the standard is based on earth that function in what is earth but a silicon or carbon environment who's to say what is the pryanerter of gravity and electoral force composition could change everything right
@richardlovato6301 Says:
So why did you say he solved the three body if he didnt he just came up with a new when they say new math that means someone fudge the numbers to fit there model and if they didn't have they been to space to see of it works wait it's just a speculation we know that past speculations have been sorroly wrong and then we find that the fudge the numbers for the grant but I'm just giving past major taught in school and to find out wrong till you can prove it it's just a theory
@pablomarquez9073 Says:
I wish I had this video 3 years ago when I started my mechanical engineering degree. The first ten minutes explain better Lagrange, vectors, scalars, potential, potential energy and even the curl than all my teachers in 8 hours a week each of them for months. University literally made me feel like I was there to pass exams and not to learn. But this channel just makes every single piece of information I had to study for passing an exam, into something understandable and even exciting to see and learn. Thank you for what you do and the amount of people you incentive to learn.
@lordstarklives Says:
This video has a lot of potential.
@FélixTurbina Says:
Mechanics 2 (in my university, in my days, named Dinamic Systems) had a really hard first half. Until Mr. Lagrange shows up. After that, second half was a walk in the park (well , not so easy, but easier). Thanks budy.
@karmendrasingh687 Says:
Difference between Casper Mebius & Derek Muller (pls tell if anybody else also feel ) : - Casper Mebius , as soon as he appears on screen , understanding becomes impossible ....while with Derek Muller on screen , it feels so smooth to understand . Inspite both are lecturing same physics (its not religious/spritual/philosophical narration )
@stevenlengyel6651 Says:
Why not the 1% that own everything be responsible on the cleanup?
@gracechamber613 Says:
The Aharonov effect Israel 😅
@zonked1200 Says:
WTF is the donut? Don't use a vague title if you aren't actually going to talk about it.
@samuelcosgrove663 Says:
Bring back that Wolverine beard!
@CrunchyIcy Says:
4:36 they think megumi
@SmartTech-l1w Says:
Could it be not the effect of being observed but impact automatically between two matters with another electronic appliance plugged in with frequency energy
@Naash Says:
a lot of bs in this video
@photoren Says:
Why was there no background provided regarding Tonomura? Seems he was very important in the overall process of this. If he didn't successfully complete his experiment, this video wouldn't exist. This is the silent movement (lack of a better term) being waged against Asians.
@91Portela Says:
Amazing
@I-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l Says:
Bros beard is annoying me, bro needs to get a barber to cut his beard, his sh1t is so wonky and uneven
@Youtube_Reporter-y2i Says:
THIS IS THE BEST CHANNEL I'VE EVER SEEN and i've been watching it since a long time
@johneichsteadt4432 Says:
One of the biggest issues in physics today is that physicists can't get Newton out of their head. They still think of gravity as a force. Even most of the people trying to reconcile QM with GR will never get anywhere because what they actually doing it trying to reconcile it with Newtonian gravity. You can tell them "Gravity isn't a force" and the response will be "I know, but....". Trying to calculate forces isn't going to get you anywhere on this problem. You'd be much better off applying the principles of fluid dynamics.
@frickyfrickyfreshenterpris4303 Says:
ICP said as much back in '09
@mortal_vessel Says:
I think we owe ICP an apology.
@ricklhirondelle889 Says:
Perhaps the potentials, are representations of higher dimensions, so even though there isn't any river, the river bed remains.
@Sophia-p7l6x Says:
The Potential was called the Dielectric Field by the old masters of Electricity not to be confused with a dielectric material. The Dielectric Field is non-cartesional.
@gumendap Says:
The attraction-reppel image at 7:58, somehow reminds me of quantum entanglement.
@harbingerman146 Says:
Hi ... How is it possible I found this video ... this is so strange as I am building a light setup for spectrometry to study light noise ... I planned on using separate e/m fields to mess with the light particles ... now not only that I can use the fields to cancel supposed non-local field effects and use a torus to generate the low value potentials ... I can use the fields to cancle the potentials (?) and control the phase changes of the particles? My project invloves light noise and this new theory is crazy exciting to add to my setup ... how strange is that?!
@kirank809 Says:
🙏Beautiful Brains 🧠 ❤️ Why dont they start teaching this to kids at school or primary level Brains r very curious at that age n they will easily learn n imagine.. Even if theynpst graduation all this knowledge imagination is very limited to few
@Rico-m4v Says:
And yet there hasn't been a unlimited clean source of power presented that actually works?
@HeartsAndClover Says:
I hate that mathematicians think mathematical notation makes sense to non-mathematicians. Honestly they need to remember they could literally just draw squiggles and it would have the same semantic meaning to most human beings. This goes doubly so for physicists.
@rogerjohnson2562 Says:
Why is it our current educational systems seem to produce mimics instead of minds like these older scientists?
@lllPlatinumlll Says:
Ya dopes, it isn't a potential it is an actual field. 😒
@mrpicky1868 Says:
well.... it is field/potential. problem with fields that you can measure them only when they "consume/interact" with certain system. potentials are applicable in more cases. but should also have same problem but in different way. PS i doubt electrons exist. how do you know it's not just focused field?
@mrpicky1868 Says:
can you dive deeper on that last experiment?
@galaxy-1969 Says:
Hey that’s the guy from Minecraft 👍
@Reuben-ld8hd Says:
2:03 looks like a Doctor's signature
@randomlikeu Says:
so its time to say good bye, will unfollow now. SAD to say how money is everything which matters
@DeepNerf Says:
The Insane Clown Posse were correct. Magnets are miracles.
@mojcakrivec295 Says:
NTO - Trauma is the song playing in the background at the beginning. Just in case anyone wanted to know.
@tygadope187 Says:
It’s not unsolveable they gonna go around each other in and erattic way
@dreamforger7166 Says:
I am too dumb to understand this video, but it was still interesting to listen to people far brighter than myself.
@JustinFahimian Says:
I'm curious who the target audience is for these videos, I'm not the brightest crayon in the box but I can usually understand concepts pretty well. These all seem to go into details that need a higher education to understand though.
@rickyredd3131 Says:
So the three body problem is unsolvable? You mean we don't know from one second to the next where the Earth or moon or sun are going to be? You mean the moon landing deniers were right all along? If we can't predict where ther moon will be how could we ever land on it? Pure luck??
@theultimatetruth3226 Says:
Electrons do not exist, that's particle physics, that was falsified 100 Years Ago by Nikola Tesla. Don't be stupid all your life...
@josiaphus Says:
We describe a lot. We don’t actually understand much of anything.
@philmattison7501 Says:
Too gay.
@matt2of366 Says:
Nice lamp sir
@GeneralThargor Says:
The science is never settled. Science is investigation.
@dansweda712 Says:
And this is why what we see at night can not be stars
@Sonic_K Says:
Camp 1: ok that's a bit weird Camp 2: what's the point of fields then?!
@ProjectFleek Says:
I feel like I'm in the high school math class I was held back from. Just totally above my pay grade, and may as well be speaking another language. Very cool though. I was tracking the first half or so before you lost me.

More Science Videos