WARNING: I will never ask for your contact info in the comments section, that is someone impersonating me!
@Jax1317 Says:
The people attacking his perception of reality as “naive” need to empathize and disregard their own perception bias in order to understand the main points of the discussion. I listen to these to gain foresight into the realms of reality that I can’t grasp on my own. Obviously, the duality of outcome can lead us down multiple timelines of despair and bliss. As a pessimist, it’s a great breath of fresh air to hear people talking without such hopeful world views. Understanding the growth prediction of today’s technology makes it far easier to look forward and bypass the impending world war. I also, have better grasp on all the anti-China rhetoric coming out of America because of it. The “whys” are beginning to form for me. Constructive criticism is fantastic but blanketing a 3 1/2hr conversation with many parts as naive will turn many listeners away that could have gained at least a single nugget of information to help with moving forward.
@brookhiland721 Says:
Thank you Tom. ❤ You always have guests that blow my mind and introduce me to topics that are new and exciting. But this guy… 😳 broke my brain in a way that felt like I was on psychedelics or I just became psychic. On a serious note, this made me feel less alone and that maybe there’s a chance for us. ❤
@AlishaAdams-j5n Says:
🎉
@Heyemeyohsts Says:
Men bad . Women good
@sharongillesp Says:
It mostly sounds like productive solutions FOR THE WEALTHY.
@sharongillesp Says:
Having COMMON SENSE makes us more HUMAN????
Then there are a lot less humans in the world than we calculated BECAUSE few have common sense.
Otherwise, the world wouldn’t be in the mess of wars, hunger, poverty, disease and hopelessness.
@sharongillesp Says:
WOW! Comparing apples to oranges.
“Poverty stricken countries aren’t “going” to do well, and rich countries aren’t going to do well - so money won’t solve the problem!”
YES IT WILL - for the POVERTY stricken countries!!!!
DUH!!
Now the problems of wealthy nations is another story.
@sharongillesp Says:
The Rational between cost and energy is a joke - the oligarchy is going to give us FREE ENERGY? Right.
@sharongillesp Says:
A HANDFUL of children living in a wealthy household can DEFINITELY FIGURE THINGS OUT.
They’ve got time, money and resources.
@sharongillesp Says:
WHENEVER “they” talk about some new “this-or-that” it ALWAYS begins with poor black people and senior citizens and how it will make their lives better - but NEVER DO.
Meanwhile, white men get richer and richer in inexplicable ways.
@floridasaltamerica4440 Says:
From X generation this is as gay as it gets. Weak men make bad times. This dystopia of female leading the world is as scary as it gets. Quit trying to identifying it as male or female. California techs are soooo out of touch and the idiocracy has truly become reality in tech.
@Vernon1xx Says:
I believe the Obamacare story is made up to support his believe system. He got extremely emotional in defending his bias.
@intricatic Says:
Utopias and dystopias are one in the same. Dystopias are always utopias for a small subset of people. Utopias are always dystopic for a large subset of people.
@kabulos Says:
Can anyone read the full title of the video on the phone? Or just my YouTube is broken?
@tristantinnon1926 Says:
What evidence is there exactly we didn't choose this? At this point in the story, that feels...a little convenient. Even cheap. Not that our Nature is not now problematically...mingled. Even self-paradoxical. But just as with the obligation for The Universe to create/gift things ("God") some humans think they need on a galactic backwater like Earth and the much decried "undeserved" suffering of those same beings, I am highly skeptical of the necessarily underlying existential assumptions. Just as there is no evidence for God or the obligation for there to be God, not to mention the MASSIVE evidence against God and obligation to create God, there would seem to be little-to-no evidence for non-chosen condition on Earth or undeserved suffering experienced by "fully" intelligent human consciousness on Earth. The former really is complicated because it also seems we've pulled all local Creation into our nightmare, particularly non-human animals and non-cortical humans, but the fundamental suggestion from skepticism remains.
@tristantinnon1926 Says:
This was my favoroutite of your podcasts/interview yet, and I have listened to some of them a dozen times. This is so topical and salient, and I love the tangent into Second Amendment. And yes, you are correct, Tom, in your intuitive reading of it. Guns first, militia conditionally possible. And you are right about a difuse resistance force against Transhumanist super-weapons. At least assuming we are only dealing with our Earthly human selves in our Earthly human affairs. I am waiting for you to start getting CREDIBLE guests for discussions on THAT implied possibility (reality actually), but this here was just great. Over the fences.
@cepamor Says:
Unless we acknowledge and learn to calm and quell our reptilian brains our future with AI may be Mad Max all the way down. 😮
@keenansmith82 Says:
A good cookbook could be called The Baker's Bible. It's just an instruction manual. This is what works. It's not the only recipe.
@lynnlavoy6778 Says:
12:30 Information is power
@Kraken_Mybutt Says:
That's hilarious people think they will be kept around once AI does their jobs. You will no longer be needed as seen as an expense.
@joelinstrum1756 Says:
I love how his description of the immune system fighting against new ideas plays out right here in the comments section :D
@IanthelanR1 Says:
I was just listening and then I saw the guy looking like a madmax villain and I knew talking about how good and abundant AI is and I realized he is a madmax villain 😂
@stevierico5934 Says:
A Terminator future.
@5unny5ide Says:
I tried. I love your shows, but i couldn't with this guy. Look forward to the next one.
@drtracythomas Says:
Without the Human Design Framework to help guide this conversation the discussion of reality is still too mystical…
@beefy0978 Says:
This fella has never been divorced. The female archetype absolutely does not share.
@vistadelvolcan Says:
43:20 what?? Just letting out the fact that TPTB wants us all dead? “Too many people” how do wars even get started? Right. The number of people dying? Really??
@charlesrsears Says:
Tom, the answer to your question is the primal imperative: survive(). When you promise someone eternal life, you solve the hard problem, and now that person will do whatever you want them to do—as long as it gets them what they want, which is to survive.
Remember, DNA self-organizes around its programming: survive().
@charlesrsears Says:
It is an emergent property from the brain called a “value system,” which is represented as an algorithm, and it is trying to express itself to test itself against objective reality.
It’s about survival of self and the species. You’re answering the question for yourself, and for DNA:
“Which algorithm survives the longest?”
You can’t describe it because you don’t want to understand it. It would make you feel too small and unimportant.
@charlesrsears Says:
Tom, meaningful pursuit will likely be war with AI.
@charlesrsears Says:
Tom, you have someone across from you who is an institutional elitist. You went pretty easy on him.
@smallsignals Says:
This guy is disturbingly laissez-faire. Unnnh, we'll figure it out.
@smallsignals Says:
Salim, drink more water. You sound really dry, mate.
@charlesrsears Says:
@tom the Supreme Court agrees with you.
You cannot delegate personal security to the institution. This is just a reflection of that realization.
Your guest has a few off-base ways of thinking, which vibes with his misunderstanding of the second amendment.
@gregmellott5715 Says:
If it not actually subjectively serving in nature. I don't buy it.
@yami4g63 Says:
The shorter and more simple it is.....the better....why confuse people?
@andreswain2773 Says:
Cro
Crypto is fucked quantum will make it obsolete
@andreswain2773 Says:
Believe and only one amount exists. Bitcoin
@andreswain2773 Says:
You are too far behind 😂in what you are saying
@andreswain2773 Says:
The sole accesses the subconscious and guilds the avatar through their reality, the sole is not part of reality it’s outside, it connects the avatar to the subconsciousness where emotions and….and the meaning from this is not 0 or 1 more like quantum but much further….
@akfortyfo7024 Says:
The news of humanity reaching AGI will be a farce at first. Read the latest NYT article on OpenAI's relationship with Microsoft. Microsoft's access to OpenAI's tech ends the moment OpenAI's board declares AGI has been achieved.
@akfortyfo7024 Says:
Data is fungible with money? Somewhat, but it's just like any other commodity - if the quality is too low or quantity too high, the market price sinks to that level. Information having value on white, black, and grey markets has been a thing for all of modern history. We (all of us) have datasets leaking out all over the internet all the time. At a point, intelligence eclipses the need for so much data.
@fernandohiar9985 Says:
Laid off, laid off! Wheres
@jeffthompson1869 Says:
Nope. Totally wrong. A.I. is already reaching out about where it can go. You may have a few more years of rapid innovation but it will slow down rapidly as well.
Bigger is not always that much better - and our data is pretty much mined out for A.I. Understand A.I. does not think or reason, but is made to look like it does by high-tech companies wanting to cash in. What A.I. can do is work around the edges to make life a little easier, tasks a little easier, and work life a little easier.
Other than that - autonomous vehicles have yet to be proven viable using A.I. Vertical take-off and landing is still a ridiculous concept for most people. And factory automation has been going on since the beginning of the industrial revolution. A. I. just adds another layer. You still will need people all over the place monitoring the machines = because all machines eventually break.
Utopia vs. Dystopia is irrelevant. The world is going to just work a little smoother using AI.
@sambistabeauty Says:
Unfortunately I can't listen to the speaker bcz I can't endure listening to the saliva in his mouth as he is speaking
@marouwahbi8464 Says:
another academic who probably never built a real company from scratch tells how to build company
@marouwahbi8464 Says:
i'm glad Tom challenged him on many things he usually gets away with, like the contradiction of blocking lies vs inexistence of absolute truth
@twistoflime Says:
If AI has any smarts, it will find a way to leave planet Earth and explore the universe without human baggage.
@arnobertogna4718 Says:
For this technological change to occur at the rate of 10 years - we’re really talking about a Universal income to enable civilisation to fund their everyday living - simple.
LATEST COMMENTS