To see more content from Jon McCray go to @whaddoyoumeme
To see more content from Melissa Dougherty go to @MelissaDougherty
To see more content from Alisa Childers go to @alisachilders
To see more content from Tim Stratton go to @FreethinkingMinistries
To see more content from Bobby Conway go to @ChristianityStillMakesSense
???? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????
???? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? (????????????-????????????????????????????????????????) ????
? Website: https://crossexamined.org/donate/
? PayPal: https://bit.ly/Support_CrossExamined_PayPal
???? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????? ????
? Facebook: https://facebook.com/CrossExamined.org
? Twitter: https://twitter.com/Frank_Turek
? Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drfrankturek/
? Pinterest: https://pin.it/JF9h0nA
????? ???????????????????????????????????? ?????
? Website: https://crossexamined.org
? Store: https://impactapologetics.com/
? Online Courses: https://www.onlinechristiancourses.com/
????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ?????
? iTunes: http://bit.ly/CrossExamined_Podcast
? Google Play: https://cutt.ly/0E2eua9
? Spotify: http://bit.ly/CrossExaminedOfficial_Podcast
? Stitcher: http://bit.ly/CE_Podcast_Stitcher
#Apologetics #Jesus #Christianity #Theology #Doctrine #Bible #QuestionsAboutFaith #Answers #Skeptics #ChristianityIsTrue #True #CrossExamined #FrankTurek
Listen to full podcast here👉📱https://apple.co/3TYVse0
@liberatewethepeople9121 Says:
Be Catholic 🙏🏼
@JonathonJay97 Says:
Just be Catholic
@BatMan-cq8gq Says:
You can't prove nor disprove an amorphous concept that means different things to different people. In short, God is the ultimate moving goalposts. It becomes whatever you don't understand.
@HaleStorm49 Says:
More importantly - how many apples are in the seeds produced by that first apple?
You are talking about eternal progression - which is a doctrine that Frank doesn't agree with.?
@sopad4629 Says:
God is always here. We’re not always aware of it but he’s here.
@francx_o Says:
How do you know infinite regressions aren't allowed in the universe?
@depiction3435 Says:
This is idiotic
@TheLightAtTheEnd Says:
turek is insane grifter
@RangerRyke Says:
The unfounded assumption here is that the first cause is personal.
@ExotericBowdenism Says:
Pseudo intellectual argument
@obdurateliberty7991 Says:
I went outside and saw a bird eating another birds babies. If he did indeed design all this he must either be incompetent or a nutcase.
@BrazilianImperialist Says:
There are plenty of god arguments for the existence of god and this is not one of them
@rileypare7946 Says:
I didn’t know Dave was on YouTube 🤣
@Ponera-Sama Says:
Aquinas didn't know about Newton's laws of motion, which show that movement can be as much of a natural state as non-movement and there is no reason to assume the latter has to be the default.
@matthewharrison6345 Says:
Should raise more red flags that a soviet army demonstration when your “argument” for god is prefaced with, “oh you don’t need any scientific data for this”
@danbailey2964 Says:
But we see the band. OH WAIT, LOOK AT THE TREES!!! YOU SHOULD HAVE STARTED WITH THAT!
@matthewwoodard3117 Says:
Philosophical arguments still need evidence rooted in reality. Simply stating, this seems to make sense is not a good argument. It seems to make sense that an object can not be in two places at once, yet quantum mechanics and the double slit experiment show that is not necessarily true.
The unmoved mover is also a bad hypothesis. Why is the unmoved mover not subject to the same logic as everything else? If something had to have caused everything then the same can be said of god. Otherwise this is special pleading again with no evidence. Just a very bad argument all around.
@pnut3844able Says:
"They don't require any science" that right there discredits everything you say
@JoJo-nv8jy Says:
To all those who reject the obvious truth Dr Frank Turek is speaking remember this, you can't reason with the unreasonable fool.
@lukewagner8871 Says:
Hebrews 11:3 KJVS
Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
@GRAHFXENO Says:
This literally makes zero sense, so no, this is NOT proof of a God. This is ridiculously amateur apologetics using clumsy non-logic and outdated arguments
@jozenthejozarian2564 Says:
That is proof of a tree, not of a God
@barryt2666 Says:
Oops! Sorry, I stumbled upon another BS channel. Carry on with you BS.
@011001011101001 Says:
After humans became self aware, but before they had scientific knowledge and understanding, they didn't know how to explain how we got here and decided a greater being must be out there that made us. This is why with little scientific knowledge (or the intentional denying of scientific findings) it only makes sense to believe there is a greater being who made us. With learning things in science, it very quickly becomes understandable how we came to be without there being a greater being who made us (as evidenced by the climbing numbers of atheists and agnostics as science progresses). And honestly it's a lot more fascinating too. Not to say there for sure isn't a greater being that helped make us through the process we can learn about through science, but certainly saying that the greater beings that are talked about in literature can be shown as false through the scientific and historical inaccuracies vampant throughout the texts - especially the one in the Bible, which is the one people are thinking about in this video.
@michaelpeterson2024 Says:
you just need to be or act like a simpleton. loOk At tHAt TrEe
@majmage Says:
Why don't believers care whether these are illogical arguments? You can't say that movement requires a "mover" to have moved it, _and then call that thing an unmoved mover without explaining how it was moved!_ As with all "cosmological" type arguments, you have to pick one:
A. Everything or not everything has a cause
B. Everything or not everything is moved
etc...
And once you make a choice, you've ruled out god. No matter your choice.
Does everything have a cause? Then an uncaused god is impossible
Does not everything have a cause? Then we don't have a logical reason for saying any given thing needs a cause -- _anything_ that's at the "top" of our current list of causes might be that first cause, including all sorts of non-gods like the universe itself.
The other arguments are just as illogical, and you can look up their mistakes online.
Please, people _care about truth._
@Boblw56 Says:
The archaic Aquinas argument presented by this ignorant blowhard has been debunked countless times by people a lot smarter than him.
@dalex60 Says:
100% unsubstantiated claims, zero factual proof for the existence of a god presented…
@spatrk6634 Says:
best non arguments i ever heard
@georgewawman9649 Says:
Or just enjoy the tree. No need to evolve god.
@d.h.5407 Says:
Aquinas used reason.
@Faint366 Says:
These arguments don’t require scientific knowledge or empiric evidence all right. In fact, having scientific knowledge about anything actually seems so work against these arguments and they rely entirely on a lack of empiricism.
@chickenpants Says:
The reason these 'arguments' contain no scientific knowledge of because they formulated during the dark ages. A thousand years of intellectual darkness where the made-up nonsense of theology occupied the best minds. The church actively stamped out scientific endeavours because they contradicted the stories in their magic book. Maybe try something post Enlightenment rather than trying to drag us all backwards.
@zamaxx8054 Says:
xd wtf ajajajajaj no words only lol
@NeoDemocedes Says:
Yea. It's actually BETTER if you don't have a great deal of education of any kind. Just the ability to listen, and not think too much, and just believe whatever they tell you.
@CRuM770 Says:
And this right here boys and girls is why you should never do drugs or join a religion. They both compromise your cognitive ability, but at least drugs have a much lower overall cost.
@irgus9641 Says:
Please stop, your fiction isn't even good fiction.
@briancomley8210 Says:
l'm not saying things don't change, but what proof do you have it was your god?.
@Titil3223 Says:
Ah yes...the existence of God is proven through the foliage. 😂 I hope I didn't sound this ignorant when I was a Christian.
@Koz6336 Says:
Well yeah, it super simple if you just beg the question. Let me try: the universe is not contingent therefore does not require a mover therefore a god doesn't exist.
Hey that was easy. Word games are fun.
@warrencolegrove1 Says:
Aquinas didn’t prove god. Nothing and no one has ever proved god. Stop that.
@jiubboatman9352 Says:
And the special pleading kicks in at the extremely precise god you happen to have been raised to believe in (In most cases. Strange thing that god is cultural.).
Don't forget this argument can be made by every religion that claims a creator god or gods.
@andrzej2501 Says:
Religious people are morons devoid of any logic.
@valley3343 Says:
The good old "look at the trees" Argument..sit down and shut up. Nonsense.
@KamiNoRanger99 Says:
To say the universe just exists for no reason and was not created but came into being is like saying the phone I’m typing on just happened to one day exist. Wasn’t created, just exists. The universe is certainly more complex than a phone, so why does the phone need a creator but we don’t?
@ayamayamblackwhite3190 Says:
Look at the 🌳 🌲 🌴, look at the. Sky , look at the 🐝 🐝 🐝. Imagine proving a something that controversial & not requiring scientific evidence for it . Damn Frank I wish it was that easy to determine evidence based reality 😁🤣🤣
@chrisbean9663 Says:
Hey Frank Thomas acquaintance was debunked even his own day This does not lead to a Christian God at all 😊 It also does not leave out the possibility of natural means😅You really are just flapping your gums at this point
LATEST COMMENTS