These are so wonderful. Thank you for creating them!
@Ryannaut Says:
8:08 if only I could’ve understood that simple truth and applied it sooner! In Jesus name.
@edwardoyelade1177 Says:
8:28
But the righteousness of faith speaks in this way, “Do not say in your heart, ‘Who will ascend into heaven?’ ” (that is, to bring Christ down from above) or, “ ‘Who will descend into the abyss?’ ” (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead).
But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith which we preach): that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
Romans 10:6-9 NKJV
@talentheturtle Says:
Let's Pretend is blocked
@benjamintan9996 Says:
Please don’t stop making these explanatory videos. They are wonderful 🎉
@BobbyMiller64 Says:
Thanks for the great video! The additional notes in the comments help too.
@myJesusfilledshishilife95 Says:
Thus Jesus Christ the Kinsman Redeemer 🙃
@JoseAvila-nv3hb Says:
Christian message explained in a unique fresh way! Thank you!!
@christinawilliams3746 Says:
I love C.S. Lewis
@nchunter8918 Says:
Awesome work! Thanks for these videos
@Geronimo_Jehoshaphat Says:
Flat facts in 5D
@chessversarius2253 Says:
When these come out I try to watch them with fiends.
Once again, thank you so much for making them!
@ladyred9613 Says:
Amazing! Thank you CS Lewis Doodle for bringing this to life!
@swesleyc7 Says:
The BBC put this on? Should I be surprised? I feel that I am.
@heartrocketblast Says:
The best presentation of the gospel there ever was! Thank you for this. 👍
@Louis.R Says:
Praise God
@markletourneau4682 Says:
Dude, as a animator and artist. I praise god because of you. Thank you
@tomward5293 Says:
Its always a treat when a new cslewis doodle is released! Been following for years.
Have you considered making a book? I bet it would be beautiful.
@musiccraftsman2192 Says:
Wonderful work! I just wanted to praise God for all that he has done for me and us. Thank you!
@anotheroutlier1227 Says:
Even though you made comments here, do I still get a 'first'?
Regardless, a great effort on behalf of the artist - that tree looks like a good hour or two tall!
@mariuszgaaj2814 Says:
Amazing as always.
@gingrai00 Says:
Such good work regarding such a good work! I am confident that we will be quite surprised when we come to see what God has done for us in Christ. Lewis was such a sage, a blessing.
@denmarkball7728 Says:
Appreciate the animation at the end
@bradsipila7478 Says:
Thank you Cs Lewis Doodle! These works are great stuff!
@hunterfortruth6036 Says:
I wait for these more than breakfast.
@dr_dave512 Says:
I love the animations! 🤩🤩🤩 and CS Lewis!
@sennest Says:
🙏🙏 my internal clock told me a video was due soon!!🙏🙏 thank you so very much!! Your work and effort are beautiful! Blessings!!
@samueldjames Says:
You're the best channel.
@onerosegrowing936 Says:
Yeah!! Welcome back Doodles! Great work as always! I Really liked the reference to the tin solder and the paper ballerina at the end!
@t.d.c.channel Says:
Always happy to see another new one out. Appreciate the hard work and great style you've done with each video! :) ~The Data Cruncher
@Nomansland77 Says:
Nice to see another doodle vid from ya man, i hope you can one day get back all the other vids you had of C.S Lewis and the doodles that went with it, they were gems hidden among the internet.
@caprimercenary2522 Says:
I never click on videos faster than yours.
@EmmanuelLambertCanada Says:
Amazing has always they are amazing teaching tools
@tylerburns1364 Says:
Thank you for the continued effort to this wonderful channel!
Says:
Masterful as always.
Thanks from the heart, for keeping the good work up. Nowdays it is even more necessary. Thanks!
@jonathanz.9675 Says:
These are always so extraordinarily high quality. I wish they had these type of videos for theology majors
@jdasign Says:
Amazing production. Thanks so much for this.. C. S. Lewis was a brilliant thinker and writer.
@dertgild Says:
Very cool
@allanlindsay8369 Says:
Its always a good day when there is a new CSLewisDoodle.Thank you yet again!
@CSLewisDoodle Says:
(9:49) The music here was taken from “Toymaker and Son”, a drama, dance & mime which was the story of the creation of Toyland and its toys, its descent into Sorrowland, and its saving through the Toymaker’s Son. The production has a similar theme to this talk from C.S. Lewis with a tin soldier coming to life. Below is the link to the interpretive dance recalling the creation of Adam, where the Toymaker and Son create the first toy in Toyland - and who could not do with more 70's interpretive dance in their lives?
Video clip: https://youtu.be/z5T7qFlPH1k / Text Summary: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Jv4_N2Q6mSKaso5uwQ2XBTFXS9Tezpqg/view?usp=sharing
More notes in the video description above.
@CSLewisDoodle Says:
(6:42) This section below was spoken in the original broadcast but was removed from the book version of the broadcasts and then expanded & made into a new chapter (‘Two Notes’). I have not re-added the below paragraph to the soundtrack, but have put the new and improved chapters in the comments section below.
“...is ‘keeping him going’. *When I say that humanity is a single organism you must not imagine that I mean the individuals are unimportant. In politics, we have to neglect individuals and deal with people in bulk. And then the make up for that, in our private life we tend to think of ourselves and our friends as things quite separate from humanity in general. Both those points of view are really false. Individual people are immensely important, but are not separate. God intended them to work in together as the different organs in one body work in together; but also to be different as the different organs are, as your lungs are different from your liver. Being different has nothing to do with being separate. Twenty pennies are all the same and quite separate. A root, a branch & a leaf are quite different but may all belong to one tree. A mother, father, and child are much more closely bound together than three men sitting in the same ‘bus; but they may be much less alike. When God entered the human race He entered a thing of that sort – a thing like a tree or a family or an orchestra, an organism of different parts which all ought to make one thing. And what He formed inside it was again a thing of the same sort – the Christian brotherhood – the first patch of the new life beginning to spread.*
Consequently, when Christ becomes man...”
('The Listener', 16 March 1944).
@CSLewisDoodle Says:
C.S. Lewis: In order to avoid misunderstanding, I here add notes on two points arising out of the last chapter (Obstinate Toy Soldiers).
Note 1: One sensible critic wrote asking me why, if God wanted sons instead of "toy soldiers," He did not BEGET many sons at the outset instead of first MAKING toy soldiers and then bringing them to life by such a difficult and painful process. One part of the answer to this question is fairly easy: the other part is probably beyond all human knowledge.
The easy part is this. The process of being turned from a creature into a son would not have been difficult or painful if the human race had not turned away from God centuries ago. They were able to do this because He gave them free will: He gave them free will because a world of mere automata could never love and therefore never know infinite happiness.
The difficult part is this. All Christians are agreed that there is, in the full and original sense, only one "Son of God." If we insist on asking "But could there have been many?" we find ourselves in very deep water. Have the words "Could have been" any sense at all when applied to God? You can say that one particular finite thing "could have been" different from what it is, because it would have been different if something else had been different, and the something else would have been different if some third thing had been different, and so on.
(The letters on this [book] page would have been red if the printer had used red ink, and he would have used red ink if he had been instructed to, and so on.) But when you are talking about God—i.e. about the rock bottom, irreducible Fact on which all other facts depend— it is nonsensical to ask if It could have been otherwise. It is what It is, and there is an end of the matter. But quite apart from this, I find a difficulty about the very idea of the Father begetting many sons from all eternity. In order to be many they would have to be somehow different from one another. Two pennies have the same shape. How are they two? By occupying different places and containing different atoms. In other words, to think of them as different, we have had to bring in space and matter; in fact we have had to bring in "Nature" or the created universe. I can understand the distinction between the Father and the Son without bringing in space or matter, because the one begets and the other is begotten. The Father's relation to the Son is not the same as the Son's relation to the Father. But if there were several sons they would all be related to one another and to the Father in the same way. How would they differ from one another? One does not notice the difficulty at first, of course. One thinks one can form the idea of several "sons." But when I think closely, I find that the idea seemed possible only because I was vaguely imagining them as human forms standing about together in some kind of space. In other words, though I pretended to be thinking about something that exists before any universe was made, I was really smuggling in the picture of a universe and putting that something INSIDE it.
When I stop doing that and still try to think of the Father begetting many sons "before all worlds" I find I am not really thinking of anything. The idea fades away into mere words. (Was Nature—space and time and matter—created precisely in order to make manyness possible? Is there perhaps no other way of getting many eternal spirits except by first making many natural creatures, in a universe, and then spiritualising them? But of course all this is guesswork.)
Note 2: The idea that the whole human race is, in a sense, one thing —one huge organism, like a tree—must not be confused with the idea that individual differences do not matter or that real people, Tom and Nobby and Kate, are somehow less important than collective things like classes, races, and so forth. Indeed the two ideas are opposites. Things which are parts of a single organism may be very different from one another: things which are not, may be very alike. Six pennies are quite separate and very alike: my nose and my lungs are very different but they are only alive at all because they are parts of my body and share its common life.
Christianity thinks of human individuals not as mere members of a group or items in a list, but as organs in a body—different from one another and each contributing what no other could. When you find yourself wanting to turn your children, or pupils, or even your neighbours, into people exactly like yourself, remember that God probably never meant them to be that. You and they are different organs, intended to do different things.On the other hand, when you are tempted not to bother about someone else's troubles because they are "no business of yours," remember that though he is different from you he is part of the same organism as you. If you forget that he belongs to the same organism as yourself you will become an Individualist. If you forget that he is a different organ from you, if you want to suppress differences and make people all alike, you will become a Totalitarian. But a Christian must not be either a Totalitarian or an Individualist.
I feel a strong desire to tell you—and I expect you feel a strong desire to tell me—which of these two errors is the worse. That is the devil getting at us. He always sends errors into the world in pairs—pairs of opposites. And he always encourages us to spend a lot of time thinking which is the worse. You see why, of course? He relies on your extra dislike of the one error to draw you gradually into the opposite one. But do not let us be fooled. We have to keep our eyes on the goal and go straight through between both errors. We have no other concern than that with either of them" (Mere Christianity, Bk 4, Chapter 6 'Two Notes').
@CSLewisDoodle Says:
(3:26) “What happens in ordinary generation? What is a father's function in the act of begetting? A microscopic particle of matter from his body fertilizes the female: and with that microscopic particle passes, it may be, the colour of his hair and his great grandfather's hanging lip, and the human form in all its complexity of bones, liver, sinews, heart, and limbs, and pre-human form which the embryo will recapitulate in the womb. Behind every spermatozoon lies the whole history of the universe: locked within it is no small part of the world's future. That is God's normal way of making a man - a process that takes centuries, beginning with the creation of matter itself, and narrowing to one second and one particle at the moment of begetting. And once again men will mistake the sense impressions which this creative act throws off for the act itself or else refer it to some infinite being such as [the pagan fertilite god] Genius.
Once, therefore, God does it directly, instantaneously; without a spermatozoon, without the millenniums of organic history behind the spermatozoon. There was of course another reason. This time He was creating not simply a man, but the man who was to be Himself: the only true Man. The process which leads to the spermatozoon has carried down with it through the centuries much undesirable silt; the life which reaches us by that normal route is tainted. To avoid that taint, to give humanity a fresh start, He once short-circuited the process.
There is a vulgar anti-God paper which some anonymous donor sends me every week. In it recently I saw the taunt that we Christians believe in a God who committed adultery with the wife of a Jewish carpenter. The answer to that is that if you describe the action of God in fertilizing Mary as 'adultery' then, in that sense, God would have committed adultery with every woman who ever had a baby. For what He did once without a human father, He does always even when He uses a human father as His instrument. For the human father in ordinary generation is only a carrier, sometimes an unwilling carrier, always the last in a long line of carriers, of life that comes from the supreme life. Thus the filth that our poor, muddled, sincere, resentful enemies fling at the Holy One, either does not stick, or, sticking, turns into glory” (Miracles, essay version)
LATEST COMMENTS