Okay, I have been watching your videos and most of them have been pretty good. But this one I feel like at the fourteen minute mark you guys just got boarded, wrapped it up. You l
iterally went from millions to 5 men in the matter of one paragraph. We know dna solved the crime. You could have done a hell of a lot. Better explaining it
@DaisyPeach-q8v Says:
None of these people are trustworthy. Not the police and not the DNA companies. Never provide your DNA if you can help it. Police commit crimes every day and companies abuse personal information just as often. On top of that, there's the problem of custody chains for DNA samples from crime scenes. I wouldn't trust DNA from one year ago let alone 30. Not only would it have degraded, but it would have been through countless hands that could have swapped it intentionally or accidentally. Then of course, we have the countless cases where the DNA was processed incorrectly by lazy or incompetent forensic techs. Everything law enforcement comes up with is a farce. Bullet lead analysis; nonsense. Fingerprints; not unique. Blood spatter analysis; doesn't factor in variables such as gravity. Best we can work with is credible witness testimony, camera footage that is unlikely to be generated, and a large combination of logged data since any one source could be faked such as relying solely on what google says someone searched for.
@ausforce1 Says:
Wow, gross abuse of peoples personal DNA data. The ends absolutely do not justify this perverse state abuse of private citizens medical data. Shocking big brother dystopia thatbis America.
@BriMeme2 Says:
Wait this cop’s DNA wasn’t already in a database?
@Lykdraft Says:
The 1986 Ending of the killing. I think it's more probable that he stopped because his youngest daughter was born that year. Isn't that way more likely?
@disporting Says:
18 million records that we know of..
@byrdMANNJoey Says:
I don’t know why they’re talking about micro arrays in 2022?
We should be talking about next generation sequencing semiconductors and pyrosequencing
@normbograham3 Says:
This echos data stored by data brokers. Except, data brokers have grossly wrong data about people, but even when wrong, there is an explaination as to why it's wrong, and yet, there is no function of data brokering to correct bad data.
@williamtolbert5473 Says:
My concern is not what their goal is now. My concern is what the government does with that data 30 years from now. I have ZERO faith in the government to do what they promise.
@gameislife3081 Says:
HAHAAHAHAH Duck Duck Go!
@7rollythingsgames395 Says:
This video did not age well.
@benabdodz Says:
so Michelle McNamara basically did nothing? this stop me from watching that brainrot of a documentary called i'll be gone in the dark
@rayotar Says:
Even if I didn't know my second or third cousin. I still wouldn't want to snitch on one of my own. Regardless of what crime they committed. Would that make me a bad person?
@ВикторПетров-ч8с Says:
Only in cases of t-rism! Including talking bad about your goverment ofc
@W1ZY Says:
A great example of this is the Idaho 4 case, where the FBI illegally accessed DNA databases and destroyed all documentation, including computer data, of their "work-ups".
@W1ZY Says:
Always be careful when cops and biotech execs start opining on 4th Amendment protections.
@LillianaSandoval12 Says:
The irony of her using DuckDuckGo to not be tracked lol
@mitternachtsplausch9559 Says:
It's inevitable that sooner or later that the government has all our DNA. The problem is that people accept evil actors in power. The USA kills whole governments for no reason and no one objects. Only if someone comes after you personally, you start complaining. Somehow you all deserve a life observed by the government.
@mitternachtsplausch9559 Says:
I hope they do worse to him in prison than he did to those people.
@The_High_Fiver Says:
My biggest concern I have, equally with Insurance Companies using it to discriminate pricing, is that a criminal could break into one of these facilities, obtain DNA, and place it over their own DNA to try to confuse police and get anyone but themselves caught.
@elmotareal Says:
The best way to stop crime is prevention. Why do you have such violent societies?!!
@krugmeister7301 Says:
That was at the Same TIME when the Vampire of Sacramento started to Kill People..
@judynoble951 Says:
Misleading, you said Golden State Killer found with Dna, Ancestry! The serial killer hasn't been found?
@croranks Says:
Nice one
@Fazzer-Theory Says:
19:31 I say that stuff like insurance they don’t get access to that
@Fazzer-Theory Says:
16:49 this means there is more proof that almost everyone is related in some shape or form
@rajendrabishnoiartist Says:
Dub it in Hindi and upload it; your audience will grow.
@vangelosecondomarco7549 Says:
Minority Report DNA. Nulla di grandioso entra nella vita dei mortali senza essere accompagnato da una maledizione.
@SOSULLI Says:
Couldn't everyone and specifically the family members of the man that assaulted the church woman sue the company? They signed a contract and it was broken. You guys say; well if only she had died, we could help you. And she was near death. The man could evenly had thought, well I won't fully kill her, cause I'm not going to be found by DNA.
@AlM22 Says:
Love this!!! Incredible. I uploaded mine to GEDMatch years ago, if there's ever some distant relative of mine that turns out to be a heinous criminal, get their ass!
@ashutosmishra5660 Says:
Finally a mindhunter episode after a long period......
@sarahtenbensel2231 Says:
Privacy and safety. ICE/CBP forcing DNA samples from citizen observers, protesters who oppose the federal government- for what purpose? Its not a benefit for well being of all. Life insurance and when health insurance in US may go back to not covering "pre-existing" conditions that have not yet revealed themselves
@ybloc1428 Says:
24:53 it's hard because it isn't but also precisely is exactly what you think it is...
@drmirzanaveed Says:
When will they cause the people who do more serious crimes like gen o ci d
@AJ-jc7sl Says:
If only organizations really stick to their privacy and ethics terms, we would be willing to give up the data. But you can never trust large organizations as most of them are greedy. For example, in this very channel there's a video on asbestos and it's effects. Government still didn't do anything to stop the asbestos use and production. Do you really believe that kind of government and businesses ???? They didn't care about thousands of poor daily wage workers, who works very hard with honesty. They left those workers to die for some millions. I will never ever believe these businesses and it's funny when they say that they help victims families get the justice lol.
@dypolesolutions3970 Says:
That's why Putin moves around with a toilet 😂
@parenthecoltsenr Says:
I love this guy’s voice. Get him to narrate documentaries please
@Harriet1822 Says:
How long until trained AI paints a portrait of the killer at ages 15, 30, 45, and 60, based on DNA?
@valderhide1674 Says:
Private companies have surely found a way to monetize dna by now
@pinBin25 Says:
Interesting episode, but don't get why the guy needed to hold the camera while getting filmed...
@ChannelHopper-v5y Says:
24:42
@JaydnKearsarge Says:
You take your audience for absolute idiots with your introduction about ‘serious crimes.’ The video is titled ‘How They Caught The Golden State Killer,’ the killer part alone is a serious crime, probably even the most serious crime, that you have to explain further the videos contents is unnecessary, unless you think we are stupid?
@jimzucker Says:
i never met my father, I actually dont even know who he is. I just have and very old informations ut hew could be alive still. It sucks that in europe these databases aren't so popular
@getbendt2970 Says:
DNA profiling is just another tool that law enforcement can use according to what people decide is reasonable. Just like a fingerprint being left at a crime scene, like your image being captured on all of the cameras that surround us every day. I am not afraid of this technology being used by law-enforcement because the people elect our government. Yes I know there is fraud but in general, we get the government we elect. We the People, through our elective leaders can place limitations on DNA collecting and analyzing. It may take time but eventually we can get it right. Arguing that you have a right to privacy is irrelevant at this point. If you wanna walk around in an inflatable bubble that captures all the skin cells that you shed be my guest but that will not stop your DNA from eventually being captured by some future collection device. Imagine robots roaming around the streets and into and out of businesses collecting random DNA. AI will analyze it, categorize it and geographically tag it. There is no escaping this outcome.
@getbendt2970 Says:
All of you arguing about privacy need to realize the argument is over. Your DNA is out there. Everywhere you go you shed cells. So the debate is whether we want mass collections of random DNA by some type of entity that is able to capture it, collate it and make it available to whoever. AI is already sourcing those databases so we might as well accept it. We are not going to go backwards.
@getbendt2970 Says:
The genie is out of the bottle. Your DNA will eventually be captured because it is left everywhere you go. So privacy flew out the window decades ago. Even if you refuse a DNA test there will be systems that will collect and store DNA whether you like it or not. Then, once it is categorized or registered in a database that database will be used to geographically locate everyone. If a crime is committed that database will identify a city, a location or region where the perpetrator is located. It is then just a matter of mining databases on a smaller scale until they lock down a neighborhood or commercial location. There is no way to stop the progress of science finding a criminal.
@getbendt2970 Says:
We leave DNA everywhere we go. It’s yours, but once you abandon it wherever you are it becomes public. Sorry but your rights to your cells only exist while they are attached to you. Once you shed cells, sneeze or cough, you are basically abandoning those rights.
@Somesortadog Says:
18:35 his name is Doc Doc Edge?
@kuromi8384 Says:
nice try fed
@EhupUK Says:
I'm more concerned about the security of data held, whether police and law investigate properly. Why should a criminal be entitled to privacy, just don't commit a heinous crime, you have nothing to hide unless you're guilty.
LATEST COMMENTS