Download FREE Cheat Sheet “The 4-Point Case For Christianity” 👉📱https://cutt.ly/ZYMC4nl
@destiny6080 Says:
It is true that atheist don't have objective morality. Same thing with religious people, your morality could be subjective even if it is objective, all it takes is for God to alter your morality, he needs just to say, "I shall change what is right and what is wrong" Since he is the authority of right and wrong, he can change it. Thus you still belive in a subjective morality, even if it is objective.
@ISkeptic649 Says:
The music. lol
@Ozzyman200 Says:
Theists individually can be moral, but they have no way to explain through faith why any act is right or wrong. unless someone can manage it?
@SoroushSabzi Says:
Why it shouldnt include? You think if two love each other won’t try to love each other back because it would be immoral? Or not help each other improve? What part of that is immoral?
@JAA949 Says:
People define it. Society defines it. No need for a god.
@diogeneslamp8004 Says:
This guy is doing the same thing everyone else does in a secular society to promote their moral view to drive a moral consensus: he’s touting its best selling points, the chief one being the claim that it is justified by a higher power.
Like any other selling point, this claim needs to be verified. “This is the healthiest cereal on the market.” Really? Let’s see the data. “This moral system is sourced from God.” Really? Let’s see the evidence.
The funny thing is that he doesn’t even realize that what he’s doing answers the question, how does a secular moral system come into being?
@hammalammadingdong6244 Says:
Nope. And if you need to obey an imaginary authority to act decently, you aren't moral.
@vlmmnadet1304 Says:
Actually, atheists can’t be moral, not one bit. The morality is a gift from heaven, given by God completely. When we were born, we were born with tendencies. How they developed has to do in part with how we were raised. To say that atheists have morality., is an absurd statement. Remember atheist believe not in God. So have them try that, see how quickly their claims fall apart.
@voodoochild5440 Says:
We do 😂😂
@lenicois909 Says:
HUMANS HAS . Why are all these religious kids dont get it?
@tarp-grommet Says:
Wrong. What is right and wrong is decided by consensus. It starts when we all agree that the golden rule is a good idea. Jesus didn't have that idea. Ordinary people did. The roots of civil and criminal law go back to Mesopotamia (5 thousand years ago).
@gi169 Says:
Thank you CE.
@Judge_of_Anubis05 Says:
The random combinations of atoms does not accrue morality. Without acknowledging a higher power objective morality cannot be defined as a fact in an atheistic worldview it can only be defined as an opinion and therefore no true obligations to follow it. Though I have an obligation to follow God's way for me and many others its more than an obligation its and honor.
@nothing-om6fn Says:
Simple. If you win, then you're right.
@christophertaylor9100 Says:
Right, atheism cannot base morality on anything but personal whims. They cannot declare something wrong or right, just what they prefer and don't prefer.
We have seen what happens when atheism gains power and runs things by its moral code in the 20th century: USSR and Nazi Germany. Albania, Pol Pot's Cambodia. We have seen the results of their ideology put into practice.
@curiouscurious6558 Says:
what is it so important for this guy to convince people his way is right. he says he's not saying atheists can't be moral or good people, so leave it at that. he is WRONGLY SAYING WE ALL NEED SOME AUTHORITY TO TELL US WHATS RIGHT AND WRONG. bs A good person knows what is right and wrong in their heart. AGAIN he thinks if he yells people will believe it more. HE TURNS OFF MORE PEOPLE THAN HE ATTRACTS
@Johnsmith-hp6tw Says:
We don't want morals, of we had them we'd have to stop sinning. We don't want to stop sinning. So we remain atheists.
@Diablo3364 Says:
As an atheist I define a atrocity as something that majority of society has agreed as inexcusable and horrific. There is no such thing as objective morality. Morality will always change. We get the illusion of objective morality via a set of rules that through collective unconscious democracy society has overwhelmingly decided is harmful to people. I consider murder an atrocity because in my views there is no heaven, no hell, no reincarnation and as such i consider a person's life valuable because I don't believe in life after death. I believe everyone gets one shot at life and as such is irreplaceable. My sense of what a atrocity is comes from the idea of massive loss of human lives.
@Nóttarský Says:
I think some of my braincells just died…
@jagofjokester1127 Says:
I do whats best for me. Not for others.
@Demonoicgamer666 Says:
It’s easy to justify morals without god you it’s called empathy
@annabelleh8312 Says:
Amen sir.
@i.g.flying.channel Says:
So religion can justify anything because God. Wait.. they did it, the inquisition 😂
@RagnarB175 Says:
Plato, Aristotle, Stoicism, and many others provide an ethic without a god or religion. Early church leaders used Plato as a rational argument for Christianity, and some say that much of Christianity is actually Platonism. Plato's idea of heaven or the non-material world isn't crucial to his philosophy, but currently more Christian's idea of heaven corresponds with Plato and not Christianity unbeknownst to them.
@ashemgold Says:
What he IS saying is "If you are arguing with me at all, you must've been created with the ability to do so. Rocks don't argue much." Great point.
@dah_goofster Says:
The outcome itself is justification for whether an action is moral or immoral. You claim everybody is born moral and knows right from wrong, so then we can all individually justify each action moral or immoralz
@majav15mg Says:
Objective principles don’t need a standard. This idea that for something to be objective, some kind of “law giver” has to exist is the biggest nonsense ever.
How would you even determine that if this law giver has to exist, it has to be the insane bipolar sociopathic Christian God?
@lizzard13666 Says:
Amazing answer!
@Ozzyman200 Says:
Theists have no way to explain why any act is right or wrong based on their religion. They can be moral, but their system has no way to explain morality.
@andreasplosky8516 Says:
Apparently god knows what an atrocity is. He committed and commits them himself.
@samael6144 Says:
Dude answered his own question.
@MrDav020 Says:
Humans provide the answer and so our morality changes overtime even though the Bible stays the same. If the Bible was the ultimate source of morality, we would still have the same morals as 2000 years ago and not reinterpret the Bible to fit our evolving morals.
@meusana Says:
Simply false, we base moral judgement upon the concept of empathy, if you, as a christian lack empathy and can only reach moral decisions due to authority, then you're just projecting your lack of moral framework onto others.
You might be able to convince your sheep that they can't think for themselves, but that method only works on those whom already admire and swallow your words like undisputed truth. It's completely ineffectual on any other demographic.
Have a lovely day, whomever may read this, and remember you don't need god to be happy/good/successful.
@thisguy165 Says:
And there is no authority to define it
@sarbnitrof4663 Says:
Crazy idea, what if a group of people got together and determined collectively what was good and what was bad? This guy is wild.
@runyanproperties2302 Says:
"...Unless there is some authority that provides it...." Okay. But that authority doesn't have to be "God."
@lifewasgiventous1614 Says:
He's got a point
@atheistcomments Says:
You are resorting to an imaginary god character for your argument. You can't argue something into existence either. The fact Frank is still to this day trying to CONVINCE people this character is real show he knows it is not.
@Bella11264 Says:
.
@anubion42 Says:
We are that authority.
We as a society can determine what is and isn’t good.
That’s how we as a species survived before modern humans or religion was a concept.
@Napoleonvanderbilt Says:
Easy. What do most people consider to be wrong. That’s immoral. You don’t need religion to tell you rape is wrong.
@55Quirll Says:
We are that authority Frank not some make believe creature up in the sky. You may require such a creature to live you life morally but I don't and my life has been pretty good so far.
@ChrnRn-iu4ny Says:
NO western Atheists are real atheists ... They all follow the Judeo-Christian Morals codes that they're familiar with & known to be right ! If they're true Atheistic, they would be like in China, North Korea... who would demand to ban religion, restrict freedom of new thoughts ... control people's freedoms, rights & demand people to obey the government & gov alone ! Atheism can sound / look good ONLY under a Christian society ... nowhere else , which is why basically all world renowned Atheists are from western nations ... bcuz they appears to please people worldwide with what they say /offer.... basically all of the morals/ethics derived from the Bible !
@ingus5552 Says:
Atheists cannot be moral people. Why? Because morality has to be absolute. Atheist morality is pragmatic therefore I call this kind of thinking amoral. Only morality comes from Creator not from men.
@alainlescault5016 Says:
The Holy Bible is the foundation of truth. The only documentation in history that gives civilization it's truth. Through Jesus I pray 🙏 🤲 🕍. Amen
@andrewkilbride971 Says:
Our evolution gradually defines what is moral, while Frank desperately wants a self imposed dictatorship to tell him.
@Xavier-ww9zy Says:
Amen
@nikhildeore9449 Says:
Constitution is a good solid authority...
@dennislock3415 Says:
Without God there is no morality and the world hates God because he exists and they love chaos.
LATEST COMMENTS